NorvilleBarnes said:
There's been a lot of good discussion about males (who identify as female) competing against women. This topic is very similar but with a big difference imho. A biological male competing against women in sports may get an advantage. But it seems to me that in a beauty pageant, the biological male doesn't have a competitive advantage, and possibly may be at a disadvantage.
Thoughts?
Direct Headline: GLAAD 2020 POST-ELECTION POLL: 81% OF LGBTQ VOTERS VOTED FOR PRESIDENT-ELECT BIDEN; 93% OF REGISTERED LGBTQ VOTERS TURNED OUT TO VOTE AND 25% WERE FIRST-TIME VOTERS
November 20, 2020
https://www.glaad.org/releases/glaad-2020-post-election-poll-81-lgbtq-voters-voted-president-elect-biden-93-registered
Direct Headline: ‘Proud trans woman of colour’ will vie to compete in Miss USA after stunning pageant victory
Vic Parsons March 19, 2021
https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/03/19/kataluna-enriquez-miss-nevada-trans-pageant-usa-silver-state/
PHOTO:
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/53/ea/e6/53eae632364fa0b57ed46b1de2566e86.jpg
******
In terms of politics, this is a tightrope situation. Obama/Biden/Harris are going to lose some women voters out of all this. If Nikki Haley gets the 2024 RNC ticket, Team Red will sweep in lots of moderate women and lots of suburban women. That Harris is on record sleeping with a married man (Willie Brown) to get ahead politically and he's even acknowledged this, look bad. If we delve into Q Score/E Score dynamics, lots of black women will not see Kamala Harris as black. Also she married a white man ( so did Haley) and is raising children not her own (Haley has her own biological children) Some will think this won't make a difference with some cross section of female voters but that's just not true. Inside the black community is some internal strife against those who marry outside of their own group. That Harris kept young black men in prison by suppressing evidence ( no one denies nor is able to make this narrative go away, the left leaning MSM simply refuse to cover it) plus Biden's situation with the Crime Bill and busing and getting caught lying about marching doesn't help.
The DNC can't afford to lose major sections of the woman vote, and then again lose sections of possibly the black vote and the wildcard of parents as a whole. ( Liberal or conservative, some people are just going to spin hard on the idea of biological males playing girl sports)
The next question is if GLAAD's numbers are cooked or not. The reality of the situation is Biden/Harris/Obama need to hold onto those first time LGBT voters and can only do so if these four years operate with some kind of traction for that community. No one has their vote for free.
In terms of Kataluna Enriquez, there has to be a lot of internal and external pressure. If she/he doesn't win, then the showrunners face the risk of being called bigots. And then get the standard operating procedure of demonetization, loss of careers and essentially zero tolerance. If Enriquez does keep winning, there is going to be some silent ( how large is the big question) resentment from some women who will feel marginalized for a possible agenda built only for a specific media optic.
The biological male has a massive advantage in these situations. Vote for him or risk losing your job/career. I mean The Bachelor's Harrison got clipped for saying let's try to be understanding of a young person and the reality of making mistakes and let's try to forgive. It's easy to stay stick to your guns, but what about your mortgage? Feeding your kids? Keeping your career?
I have nothing against Enriquez and I acknowledge many LGBT out there have suffered. But allowing Enriquez to compete with women operates very closely to basic social political extortion. This relentless open threat of punishing everyone who is non LGBT does not change hearts and minds. If you act like a threat, people will always see you as a threat.
Zero tolerance structures that ride the line of public purity tests is one of the least tolerant mechanisms in the entire free world.
But because I dare to invoke the idea of seeing this as political strategy and a raw punitive methodology, it's very likely I'll be labeled a bigot, then bracketed and then eventually, one day, lined up against a wall and used as a bullet sponge.
This is the new culturally acceptable extortion by means of demonetization and identity politics as a soft cover for pure social terrorism. The people who suffered, fought and died for our freedom, for our right to vote, for our speech without fear of censorship, did not bleed out so that future generations could be held hostage by hardened unforgiving radicals. I have no quarrel with Enriquez, but the weight of all this, the silent threat of punishment for dissent against the singular narrative deemed pure enough, is not the kind of world many of us want our children to inherit.
This issue is many things, but one thing it's not is actual equality.