knowledge dropper
Footballguy
Wow. This really is a sensitive bunch.
This would be a good point if Trump didn't care about the African American vote.Wow. This really is a sensitive bunch.
Personal preference to not have people say "called it" after someone gets killed.Wow. This really is a sensitive bunch.
Trump and Cruz have a baby...Nope. He's just a creepy, out of touch old dude.
Better then being in any bunch that would support this idiot.Wow. This really is a sensitive bunch.
Donald cares he is only getting 1% of black voters.Don cares and buffoons think its a joke
FYFPFYPDon cares only for himself and he is a joke
Sensitive bunch? No, the question is: Why aren't Trumpallos more sensitive? You can still be anti-Hillary, anti-PC, and still think what he said is gross. You know that, right? You can support a candidate, and still say, ''well, that was a dumb thing to say.''Wow. This really is a sensitive bunch.
You have to say this for the man: He keeps topping himself.Dragging Wade's family's tragedy into politics like that is pretty shameful. Or shameless.
How narcissistic and flat out uncaring a person do you have to be? Damn.
He's polling better than any republican has done since RR in the black communityDonald cares he is only getting 1% of black voters.
Check out his Twitter work after the Orlando shooter in case you missed that gem.Dragging Wade's family's tragedy into politics like that is pretty shameful. Or shameless.
How narcissistic and flat out uncaring a person do you have to be? Damn.
BingoSensitive bunch? No, the question is: Why aren't Trumpallos more sensitive? You can still be anti-Hillary, anti-PC, and still think what he said is gross. You know that, right? You can support a candidate, and still say, ''well, that was a dumb thing to say.''
Imagine if someone killed your cousin, while she was with her child, and a reporter stuck a mic in your face when you left your house, and asked you what you thought about Donald Trump's thoughts on your cousin's death. Really, imagine what is going on in your head. Someone killed your cousin. On the streets that you got out of, and some rich guy who has never been to the South Side, knows nothing about where you came from says, ''SEE? JUST LIKE I WAS SAYING!!!''
Someone cracks a dumb wife joke in here, and suddenly the anti-PC crowd is talking about boundaries. A presidential candidate sends out a tone deaf, offensive tweet with far greater damage than any one message board post, and suddenly you guys are pargaons of free speech again.
Zero consistency. Zero credibility.
I'd like to see that info but it's not really the point.He's polling better than any republican has done since RR in the black community
Believe me I know , I'm telling you he's polling better . It's true , I know he is.I'd like to see that info but it's not really the point.
You have a little flair for the dramatic , wouldn't you say? I try to call things as I see them.Sensitive bunch? No, the question is: Why aren't Trumpallos more sensitive? You can still be anti-Hillary, anti-PC, and still think what he said is gross. You know that, right? You can support a candidate, and still say, ''well, that was a dumb thing to say.''
Imagine if someone killed your cousin, while she was with her child, and a reporter stuck a mic in your face when you left your house, and asked you what you thought about Donald Trump's thoughts on your cousin's death. Really, imagine what is going on in your head. Someone killed your cousin. On the streets that you got out of, and some rich guy who has never been to the South Side, knows nothing about where you came from says, ''SEE? JUST LIKE I WAS SAYING!!!''
Someone cracks a dumb wife joke in here, and suddenly the anti-PC crowd is talking about boundaries. A presidential candidate sends out a tone deaf, offensive tweet with far greater damage than any one message board post, and suddenly you guys are pargaons of free speech again.
Zero consistency. Zero credibility.
Romney won 6% if the African American vote, trump is polling at 1%...Explain your quote to meHe's polling better than any republican has done since RR in the black community
He's pulling around 12% , not 1%.Romney won 6% if the African American vote, trump is polling at 1%...Explain your quote to me
That's not actually true unless you only look at a single outlier poll. His average is 8%. GWB got 11% in 2004 and 9% in 2000. Dole got 12%. GHWB got 10% and 11%. So basically he's doing worse than any Republican not facing Obama.He's polling better than any republican has done since RR in the black community
That's not correct . No. Let's keep things real here. Hillary is leading in polls , no need to embellish anything. Come on now let's act justlyThat's not actually true unless you only look at a single outlier poll. His average is 8%. GWB got 11% in 2004 and 9% in 2000. Dole got 12%. GHWB got 10% and 11%. So basically he's doing worse than any Republican not facing Obama.
Who knows which polls you are reading. Regardless those numbers suck so I think we have discovered Donald's sudden interest in the black community.He's pulling around 12% , not 1%.
No idea what point is being made in this post.You have a little flair for the dramatic , wouldn't you say? I try to call things as I see them.
And you usually see them wrong - see Mitt Romney 2012.HellToupee said:You have a little flair for the dramatic , wouldn't you say? I try to call things as I see them.
You see things like an imbecile. HTHHellToupee said:You have a little flair for the dramatic , wouldn't you say? I try to call things as I see them.
Trump is a horrible person who doesn't deserve a single vote as such.HellToupee said:Let's keep things real here.
Have you even been to an African American neighborhood to count yard signs HT?And you usually see them wrong - see Mitt Romney 2012.
Speaking of which, it would be a fun experiment to put a Trump sign in a black neighborhood and film the reaction.Have you even been to an African American neighborhood to count yard signs HT?
I'll take that as a compliment .MOP is top notch in my bookmassraider said:What are you, channeling MOP?
For people who aren't obviously , here are some real unembellished poll numbers: Trump averaging 2% of black votersHellToupee said:That's not correct . No. Let's keep things real here. Hillary is leading in polls , no need to embellish anything. Come on now let's act justlyPlasmaDogPlasma said:That's not actually true unless you only look at a single outlier poll. His average is 8%. GWB got 11% in 2004 and 9% in 2000. Dole got 12%. GHWB got 10% and 11%. So basically he's doing worse than any Republican not facing Obama.
In one poll I saw a few weeks ago he was getting 0% - no kidding.The General said:Donald cares he is only getting 1% of black voters.
What if you were a 1 issue voter and that issue was the TPP?Trump is a horrible person who doesn't deserve a single vote as such.
Real.
Better question how often has he been to an AA neighborhood in the last decade? This is the same guy that has a vacation home and mentioned some pages back that when he goes there he has to shop at Walmart and that is the only time he associates with the "rabble".Have you even been to an African American neighborhood to count yard signs HT?
Wouldn't change Donald or those who even consider voting for him. You can be willfully ignorant of horrible he is -- its expected from certain types.What if you were a 1 issue voter and that issue was the TPP?
Assuming you're in the "GLOBALISM IS EVIL!" camp then I'd say you lack a fundamental understanding of economics.What if you were a 1 issue voter and that issue was the TPP?
Not going with the slanted 538 & WaPo types that cook the booksFor people who aren't obviously , here are some real unembellished poll numbers: Trump averaging 2% of black voters
So where is your proof?HellToupee said:That's not correct . No. Let's keep things real here. Hillary is leading in polls , no need to embellish anything. Come on now let's act justly
Fox News: 1%Not going with the slanted 538 & WaPo types that cook the booksFor people who aren't obviously , here are some real unembellished poll numbers: Trump averaging 2% of black voters
The standard argument as been:
In 2012 you said the same thing about Nate Silver and 538, that they cooked the books, their aggregate polls were off and that Romney would win. You said that while Nate had gotten it right in 2008, that was a fluke, he was a just a one hit wonder. You even predicted on the morning of the election that Romney would still win, noting that polls done in the last 48 hours before elections were completely unreliable.Not going with the slanted 538 & WaPo types that cook the books