Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I see you haven't submitted a list. Neither have I. It is way too early to put one together. That said, I think you are mistaken in what you seem to be implying.Almost every list I've taken the time to read with care is simply a rejiggering of last years RBs. Many of the lists don't have a single new name on them. That will be wrong, despite the fact that this year's RB crop - which was universally acclaimed as weak before the draft - is weaker still based on who went where. Still and all, there will be a few surprises in the top 5 for 2003 and many of the names proposed for the top won't be there. Who will it be? Still too early to tell. But don't be surprised if a J. Lewis (or Portis or Bennett) goes down with injury and a M Smith (or Griffiths/Sapp or O Smith) jumps in and thrives. Something like this happening is far more probable than having zero new entrants in the top 10, let alone the top 30.
I think the point is that this is just an initial listing for those who took the time. The market demands an early "cheatsheet", as evidenced by posts on this forum asking about them. So of course the FBGs want to provide what their customers want. And of course the initial list is just going to be a copy of last year's top 30, with a few minor changes up and down. Whether or not a rookie gets into a starting gig through an injury or a sleeper back comes from out of nowhere, that won't change the order in which they are drafted this season.Now that I've finally broken down and posted something in this topic besides my list, as for this guy....
Are you really serious? If you don't like the lists, provide one of your own. If you're planning to pick Holmes at #1 right now, hip problem and all, go right ahead...but if that hip doesn't pull a recovery, I think you'll be lucky to finish at 2-11.
