Touchdown There
Footballguy
Better, just not 4th round better. Can't see the value on that team with those qbs. High risk.
A poor QB? Perfect! Because Patterson is a poor route runner. Screens and 5-10 yards passes...lots of them.Better, just not 4th round better. Can't see the value on that team with those qbs. High risk.
Poor route runner?? He was raw entering the league last year, but should make big strides this year in the department. All that said, he's definitely being drafted a few rounds too early for my likingA poor QB? Perfect! Because Patterson is a poor route runner. Screens and 5-10 yards passes...lots of them.Better, just not 4th round better. Can't see the value on that team with those qbs. High risk.
Doesn't sound like anything but you never know...foot injury.Master Tesfatsion @MasterStrib 14m
Cordarrelle Patterson didn't talk the media. He's day-to-day though. Did not take conditioning test. #Vikings
Stinks. A foot injury could derail this thing real quick...Doesn't sound like anything but you never know...foot injury.Master Tesfatsion @MasterStrib 14m
Cordarrelle Patterson didn't talk the media. He's day-to-day though. Did not take conditioning test. #Vikings
Yuck, do not like the sound of this. Screeeech.Stinks. A foot injury could derail this thing real quick...Doesn't sound like anything but you never know...foot injury.Master Tesfatsion @MasterStrib 14m
Cordarrelle Patterson didn't talk the media. He's day-to-day though. Did not take conditioning test. #Vikings
Each player doesn't have to have a hard-line expected output to be ranked in a certain spot.I like Patterson but I have to admit I don't understand league configurations where a guy like him would be taken in the 4th round. Where do those who think he is a 4th round pick rank him among WRs? Top 10? Teens? Low, mid or high 20s?
Thanks but that has little to do with my question. I take it from your response that Patterson is generally ranked in the early 20s and I stand by my original statement that I don't understand leagues where WR #20 is taken in the 4th round.Each player doesn't have to have a hard-line expected output to be ranked in a certain spot.I like Patterson but I have to admit I don't understand league configurations where a guy like him would be taken in the 4th round. Where do those who think he is a 4th round pick rank him among WRs? Top 10? Teens? Low, mid or high 20s?
It's not necessarily that people think Patterson WILL be a top 5 or top 10 wide receiver, it's that they think he CAN be a top 5 or top 10 wide receiver. Or, more specifically, that his chances of finishing in that range are high enough over his similarly ranked peers that it makes up for his equal or lower floor.
If people were expecting Patterson to be a top 5 WR, he'd be drafted a lot higher than the ~WR20 he's at right now. This is why I dislike projections. It breeds this kind of one dimensional thinking in fantasy owners. Rankings are essentially an unwritten balance of odds. Maybe someone believes that Roddy White has a 75% chance of finishing as a top 25 WR but only a 1% chance of finishing top 5 and a 3% chance of finishing top 10. Meanwhile, maybe they think Patterson has only a 65% chance of finishing top 25 (lower than White) but he has a 10% chance of finishing top 5 and a 20% chance of finishing top 10. That could lead them to value that player much higher than a guy like White even if his chances of finishing top 25 are lower in their minds.
It's exactly those kind of guys, the mid-round guys that blow up into true fantasy studs, that are the real difference makers in fantasy football. Patterson's climb up the ADP rankings involved mostly him leap-frogging guys that either don't have, or have a significantly lower chance of reaching that kind of upside. Meanwhile, his involvement in other aspects of the game besides receiving makes him unique in that it has the additional advantage of also raising his floor above what it typically would be for a boom or bust type wide receiver.
The first 4 rounds consists of 48 players. You figure 3 QBs (Peyton, Rodgers, Brees) and 2 TEs (Graham/Gronk) in that span, which leaves 43 spots for RBs and WRs. Some leagues may have an extra QB or two and maybe a 3rd TE go in there but either way you're talking about 40 RBs/WRs in the first 4 rounds of most leagues.Thanks but that has little to do with my question. I take it from your response that Patterson is generally ranked in the early 20s and I stand by my original statement that I don't understand leagues where WR #20 is taken in the 4th round.Each player doesn't have to have a hard-line expected output to be ranked in a certain spot.I like Patterson but I have to admit I don't understand league configurations where a guy like him would be taken in the 4th round. Where do those who think he is a 4th round pick rank him among WRs? Top 10? Teens? Low, mid or high 20s?
It's not necessarily that people think Patterson WILL be a top 5 or top 10 wide receiver, it's that they think he CAN be a top 5 or top 10 wide receiver. Or, more specifically, that his chances of finishing in that range are high enough over his similarly ranked peers that it makes up for his equal or lower floor.
If people were expecting Patterson to be a top 5 WR, he'd be drafted a lot higher than the ~WR20 he's at right now. This is why I dislike projections. It breeds this kind of one dimensional thinking in fantasy owners. Rankings are essentially an unwritten balance of odds. Maybe someone believes that Roddy White has a 75% chance of finishing as a top 25 WR but only a 1% chance of finishing top 5 and a 3% chance of finishing top 10. Meanwhile, maybe they think Patterson has only a 65% chance of finishing top 25 (lower than White) but he has a 10% chance of finishing top 5 and a 20% chance of finishing top 10. That could lead them to value that player much higher than a guy like White even if his chances of finishing top 25 are lower in their minds.
It's exactly those kind of guys, the mid-round guys that blow up into true fantasy studs, that are the real difference makers in fantasy football. Patterson's climb up the ADP rankings involved mostly him leap-frogging guys that either don't have, or have a significantly lower chance of reaching that kind of upside. Meanwhile, his involvement in other aspects of the game besides receiving makes him unique in that it has the additional advantage of also raising his floor above what it typically would be for a boom or bust type wide receiver.
The first 4 rounds consists of 48 players. You figure 3 QBs (Peyton, Rodgers, Brees) and 2 TEs (Graham/Gronk) in that span, which leaves 43 spots for RBs and WRs. Some leagues may have an extra QB or two and maybe a 3rd TE go in there but either way you're talking about 40 RBs/WRs in the first 4 rounds of most leagues.Thanks but that has little to do with my question. I take it from your response that Patterson is generally ranked in the early 20s and I stand by my original statement that I don't understand leagues where WR #20 is taken in the 4th round.Each player doesn't have to have a hard-line expected output to be ranked in a certain spot.I like Patterson but I have to admit I don't understand league configurations where a guy like him would be taken in the 4th round. Where do those who think he is a 4th round pick rank him among WRs? Top 10? Teens? Low, mid or high 20s?
It's not necessarily that people think Patterson WILL be a top 5 or top 10 wide receiver, it's that they think he CAN be a top 5 or top 10 wide receiver. Or, more specifically, that his chances of finishing in that range are high enough over his similarly ranked peers that it makes up for his equal or lower floor.
If people were expecting Patterson to be a top 5 WR, he'd be drafted a lot higher than the ~WR20 he's at right now. This is why I dislike projections. It breeds this kind of one dimensional thinking in fantasy owners. Rankings are essentially an unwritten balance of odds. Maybe someone believes that Roddy White has a 75% chance of finishing as a top 25 WR but only a 1% chance of finishing top 5 and a 3% chance of finishing top 10. Meanwhile, maybe they think Patterson has only a 65% chance of finishing top 25 (lower than White) but he has a 10% chance of finishing top 5 and a 20% chance of finishing top 10. That could lead them to value that player much higher than a guy like White even if his chances of finishing top 25 are lower in their minds.
It's exactly those kind of guys, the mid-round guys that blow up into true fantasy studs, that are the real difference makers in fantasy football. Patterson's climb up the ADP rankings involved mostly him leap-frogging guys that either don't have, or have a significantly lower chance of reaching that kind of upside. Meanwhile, his involvement in other aspects of the game besides receiving makes him unique in that it has the additional advantage of also raising his floor above what it typically would be for a boom or bust type wide receiver.
I get that. I figured it applied to leagues that marginalize QBs and I don't understand those leagues.The first 4 rounds consists of 48 players. You figure 3 QBs (Peyton, Rodgers, Brees) and 2 TEs (Graham/Gronk) in that span, which leaves 43 spots for RBs and WRs. Some leagues may have an extra QB or two and maybe a 3rd TE go in there but either way you're talking about 40 RBs/WRs in the first 4 rounds of most leagues.Thanks but that has little to do with my question. I take it from your response that Patterson is generally ranked in the early 20s and I stand by my original statement that I don't understand leagues where WR #20 is taken in the 4th round.Each player doesn't have to have a hard-line expected output to be ranked in a certain spot.I like Patterson but I have to admit I don't understand league configurations where a guy like him would be taken in the 4th round. Where do those who think he is a 4th round pick rank him among WRs? Top 10? Teens? Low, mid or high 20s?
It's not necessarily that people think Patterson WILL be a top 5 or top 10 wide receiver, it's that they think he CAN be a top 5 or top 10 wide receiver. Or, more specifically, that his chances of finishing in that range are high enough over his similarly ranked peers that it makes up for his equal or lower floor.
If people were expecting Patterson to be a top 5 WR, he'd be drafted a lot higher than the ~WR20 he's at right now. This is why I dislike projections. It breeds this kind of one dimensional thinking in fantasy owners. Rankings are essentially an unwritten balance of odds. Maybe someone believes that Roddy White has a 75% chance of finishing as a top 25 WR but only a 1% chance of finishing top 5 and a 3% chance of finishing top 10. Meanwhile, maybe they think Patterson has only a 65% chance of finishing top 25 (lower than White) but he has a 10% chance of finishing top 5 and a 20% chance of finishing top 10. That could lead them to value that player much higher than a guy like White even if his chances of finishing top 25 are lower in their minds.
It's exactly those kind of guys, the mid-round guys that blow up into true fantasy studs, that are the real difference makers in fantasy football. Patterson's climb up the ADP rankings involved mostly him leap-frogging guys that either don't have, or have a significantly lower chance of reaching that kind of upside. Meanwhile, his involvement in other aspects of the game besides receiving makes him unique in that it has the additional advantage of also raising his floor above what it typically would be for a boom or bust type wide receiver.
ETA: Fantasypros ADP has 5 QBs and 4 TEs in the first four rounds and still has WR20 at the end of the 4th round.
if they take qb with the first 12 picks in your league I guess you'd find it bizarre, but the rest of us might find your league bizarre.I get that. I figured it applied to leagues that marginalize QBs and I don't understand those leagues.The first 4 rounds consists of 48 players. You figure 3 QBs (Peyton, Rodgers, Brees) and 2 TEs (Graham/Gronk) in that span, which leaves 43 spots for RBs and WRs. Some leagues may have an extra QB or two and maybe a 3rd TE go in there but either way you're talking about 40 RBs/WRs in the first 4 rounds of most leagues.Thanks but that has little to do with my question. I take it from your response that Patterson is generally ranked in the early 20s and I stand by my original statement that I don't understand leagues where WR #20 is taken in the 4th round.Each player doesn't have to have a hard-line expected output to be ranked in a certain spot.I like Patterson but I have to admit I don't understand league configurations where a guy like him would be taken in the 4th round. Where do those who think he is a 4th round pick rank him among WRs? Top 10? Teens? Low, mid or high 20s?
It's not necessarily that people think Patterson WILL be a top 5 or top 10 wide receiver, it's that they think he CAN be a top 5 or top 10 wide receiver. Or, more specifically, that his chances of finishing in that range are high enough over his similarly ranked peers that it makes up for his equal or lower floor.
If people were expecting Patterson to be a top 5 WR, he'd be drafted a lot higher than the ~WR20 he's at right now. This is why I dislike projections. It breeds this kind of one dimensional thinking in fantasy owners. Rankings are essentially an unwritten balance of odds. Maybe someone believes that Roddy White has a 75% chance of finishing as a top 25 WR but only a 1% chance of finishing top 5 and a 3% chance of finishing top 10. Meanwhile, maybe they think Patterson has only a 65% chance of finishing top 25 (lower than White) but he has a 10% chance of finishing top 5 and a 20% chance of finishing top 10. That could lead them to value that player much higher than a guy like White even if his chances of finishing top 25 are lower in their minds.
It's exactly those kind of guys, the mid-round guys that blow up into true fantasy studs, that are the real difference makers in fantasy football. Patterson's climb up the ADP rankings involved mostly him leap-frogging guys that either don't have, or have a significantly lower chance of reaching that kind of upside. Meanwhile, his involvement in other aspects of the game besides receiving makes him unique in that it has the additional advantage of also raising his floor above what it typically would be for a boom or bust type wide receiver.
ETA: Fantasypros ADP has 5 QBs and 4 TEs in the first four rounds and still has WR20 at the end of the 4th round.
If you put every NFL player back in the draft right now how many QBs do you think would be drafted before the 20th WR? I am guessing it would be a lot more than five.
I understand that people don't want to play in super flex leagues (or start 2 QB leagues) because it doesn't realistically reflect the NFL, but having only 4-5 QBs drafted before Cordarrelle Patterson is every bit as unrealistic. Being able to grab a Joe Flacco, Eli Manning, Sam Bradford or Andy Dalton off of your waiver wire in week 8 is even more unrealistic.
QB is the most important player on the football field but the majority of fantasy leagues value Cordarrelle freaking Patterson over Cam Newton, Matt Ryan and Matthew Stafford. That is simply bizarre.
Neither here nor there, just bizarre.
Well that doesn't happen (more like 4-5 QBs and by round 4, 12 teams, typically 16 QBs are off the board and only 11 WRs or so) but I understand the point you are trying to make.if they take qb with the first 12 picks in your league I guess you'd find it bizarre, but the rest of us might find your league bizarre.I get that. I figured it applied to leagues that marginalize QBs and I don't understand those leagues.The first 4 rounds consists of 48 players. You figure 3 QBs (Peyton, Rodgers, Brees) and 2 TEs (Graham/Gronk) in that span, which leaves 43 spots for RBs and WRs. Some leagues may have an extra QB or two and maybe a 3rd TE go in there but either way you're talking about 40 RBs/WRs in the first 4 rounds of most leagues.Thanks but that has little to do with my question. I take it from your response that Patterson is generally ranked in the early 20s and I stand by my original statement that I don't understand leagues where WR #20 is taken in the 4th round.Each player doesn't have to have a hard-line expected output to be ranked in a certain spot.I like Patterson but I have to admit I don't understand league configurations where a guy like him would be taken in the 4th round. Where do those who think he is a 4th round pick rank him among WRs? Top 10? Teens? Low, mid or high 20s?
It's not necessarily that people think Patterson WILL be a top 5 or top 10 wide receiver, it's that they think he CAN be a top 5 or top 10 wide receiver. Or, more specifically, that his chances of finishing in that range are high enough over his similarly ranked peers that it makes up for his equal or lower floor.
If people were expecting Patterson to be a top 5 WR, he'd be drafted a lot higher than the ~WR20 he's at right now. This is why I dislike projections. It breeds this kind of one dimensional thinking in fantasy owners. Rankings are essentially an unwritten balance of odds. Maybe someone believes that Roddy White has a 75% chance of finishing as a top 25 WR but only a 1% chance of finishing top 5 and a 3% chance of finishing top 10. Meanwhile, maybe they think Patterson has only a 65% chance of finishing top 25 (lower than White) but he has a 10% chance of finishing top 5 and a 20% chance of finishing top 10. That could lead them to value that player much higher than a guy like White even if his chances of finishing top 25 are lower in their minds.
It's exactly those kind of guys, the mid-round guys that blow up into true fantasy studs, that are the real difference makers in fantasy football. Patterson's climb up the ADP rankings involved mostly him leap-frogging guys that either don't have, or have a significantly lower chance of reaching that kind of upside. Meanwhile, his involvement in other aspects of the game besides receiving makes him unique in that it has the additional advantage of also raising his floor above what it typically would be for a boom or bust type wide receiver.
ETA: Fantasypros ADP has 5 QBs and 4 TEs in the first four rounds and still has WR20 at the end of the 4th round.
If you put every NFL player back in the draft right now how many QBs do you think would be drafted before the 20th WR? I am guessing it would be a lot more than five.
I understand that people don't want to play in super flex leagues (or start 2 QB leagues) because it doesn't realistically reflect the NFL, but having only 4-5 QBs drafted before Cordarrelle Patterson is every bit as unrealistic. Being able to grab a Joe Flacco, Eli Manning, Sam Bradford or Andy Dalton off of your waiver wire in week 8 is even more unrealistic.
QB is the most important player on the football field but the majority of fantasy leagues value Cordarrelle freaking Patterson over Cam Newton, Matt Ryan and Matthew Stafford. That is simply bizarre.
Neither here nor there, just bizarre.
Greg is prone to hyperbole but still, as an CP owner, I'll take it.
This keeps sounding more and more like Marshall and Jeffery last year. I agree with the title too. I feel like there is no ceiling with Patterson. He's Percy Harvin mixed with an ideally sized #1 WR. His future and his legacy is all in his hands. If he becomes a student of the game and truly dedicates himself to being the best football player he can be, then he can be something great."I'm excited," Jennings added this week, via ESPN.com. "I told him this, and maybe it was a little premature, but I told him, 'At some point, I'm going to tell my kids I played with Cordarrelle Patterson.'"
Why, was he terrible?No one watched the Raiders game, huh? Good.
Saw this in the comments of the video... "The Cordarrelle Strategy:The Cordarrelle Patterson strategy:
http://espn.go.com/blog/minnesota-vikings/post/_/id/8223/the-cordarrelle-patterson-strategy
Targeted early and often, ran good routes, made good catches.Why, was he terrible?No one watched the Raiders game, huh? Good.
ThisTargeted early and often, ran good routes, made good catches.Why, was he terrible?No one watched the Raiders game, huh? Good.
I'm guessing massraider is saying "good" as in it didn't bump his value too high for him to get him.
Yeah, didn't mean to sound as mysterious as that.ThisTargeted early and often, ran good routes, made good catches.Why, was he terrible?No one watched the Raiders game, huh? Good.
I'm guessing massraider is saying "good" as in it didn't bump his value too high for him to get him.
I think the Raiders game was perfect for those of us that really want him but are skeptical of his ADP. He ran good routes and made contested "normal route" catches. These are the type of plays that people are worried about him being able to make. They aren't worried about his playmaking ability so it's good that he didn't make any crazy plays. If he makes crazy plays in the preseason then his ADP will rise. Him looking good running normal routes and catching 3-4 passes game will not raise his ADP, but for those of us who really want him, him doing that is justifying his ADP.Over the last three updates to FBGs ADP (July 30, Aug 5 & Aug 11) Patterson has gone from WR20 to WR19 to WR22 so I guess not too many people did watch the Raiders game.
LOLPhew! Cassel overthrew Patterson on a deep ball. 0 catches so far! Let's keep up the poor work and let's watch his ADP slide!
You won't be so happy when you manage to draft him and Cassel/other overthrows him in the regular season, too.Phew! Cassel overthrew Patterson on a deep ball. 0 catches so far! Let's keep up the poor work and let's watch his ADP slide!
Baby steps. I'm worrying about getting him on my roster first. Then I'll worry about that.You won't be so happy when you manage to draft him and Cassel/other overthrows him in the regular season, too.Phew! Cassel overthrew Patterson on a deep ball. 0 catches so far! Let's keep up the poor work and let's watch his ADP slide!
Going 2-9 will do that. Lets see how they use him in the first half on Saturday.Despite 21 pages here it seems eerily quiet on this guy.
he's my wr4 so i will be ok if that happens. got depth.You won't be so happy when you manage to draft him and Cassel/other overthrows him in the regular season, too.Phew! Cassel overthrew Patterson on a deep ball. 0 catches so far! Let's keep up the poor work and let's watch his ADP slide!
I like it a lot, especially if you can get Dunbar to back up Murray to feel secure at that RB slot.I'm in a 14-team keeper league and have an opportunity to trade AJ Green and Keenan Allen, I would get DeMarco Murray, Patterson and Michael Floyd. I post this here as the basis of me wanting to make this trade involves my man-crush on CP and my not being interested in Allen. The only way to make this trade happen is to involve AJ Green, but I wonder if Patterson is going to live up to the hype that 'the machine' is generating for him or if he is over-hyped and I am overlooking Allen as a viable fantasy option going forward. CP looks to me to be a bigger, stronger and sturdier version of Harvin, and Harvin is still getting some hype thrown on him depsite his struggles in his career thus far. Thoughts?
I really like all three of the guys you'd get. I'd take that deal.
Thanks for the quick replies. I made the offer just now and it will be accepted later today. I have been wrestling with this trade for a couple weeks now; between the new offensive philosophy in Cincy and the fact Andy Dalton is going to be the starting QB for AJ for the next few years (at least) I feel like now is the time to move him and get somone with the upside of CP, especially since Allen's value last year was so TD related in some games. CP doesn't need an elite QB to make him elite while I think Allen needs good QB play + system to up his value. Like I said, the reason I posted this here was the whole idea of the trade was born out of my belief that CP is a top-level athlete that is fun to have on your team while Allen is just a guy.I like it a lot, especially if you can get Dunbar to back up Murray to feel secure at that RB slot.I'm in a 14-team keeper league and have an opportunity to trade AJ Green and Keenan Allen, I would get DeMarco Murray, Patterson and Michael Floyd. I post this here as the basis of me wanting to make this trade involves my man-crush on CP and my not being interested in Allen. The only way to make this trade happen is to involve AJ Green, but I wonder if Patterson is going to live up to the hype that 'the machine' is generating for him or if he is over-hyped and I am overlooking Allen as a viable fantasy option going forward. CP looks to me to be a bigger, stronger and sturdier version of Harvin, and Harvin is still getting some hype thrown on him depsite his struggles in his career thus far. Thoughts?