OrtonToOlsen
Footballguy
Bottom line:
Is there anyone who disagrees with this...
Dynamite drop-inI don`t disagree at all...
Bottom line:
Is there anyone who disagrees with this...
Dynamite drop-inI don`t disagree at all...
Dynamite drop-in-monty
1. He didn’t try anythingI don't care that Trump tried and failed. I don't think he has any idea what he's doing most days.
There is a good chance and hopefully Joe Biden will be our next POTUS. What do you think he should do with NK?1. He didn’t try anything
2. Agree
I think he tried something. In simplest terms, I see Kim as a troubled kid. Everybody labels him as weird and nobody does anything to help him. Eventually he snaps and shoots up the school. Perhaps if someone would have taken the time to get to know him, maybe sit next to him at lunch (stand in NK and take a photograph). Maybe the weird kid doesn't look so weird and appears to be just like you and me. Maybe that kid stops acting out to get attention.1. He didn’t try anything
2. Agree
Still haven't heard an answer to this question. What makes our testing (or anyone else's) less dangerous.?Where did the U.S. test their missiles and atomic weapons?
As you've said, there is nothing he was going to be able to do to make things better. Manage it so things don't get worse was the best possible outcome and relatively easy to achieve by just keeping his mouth shut and letting the grown ups handle the relationship. This way there is no narrative like "The US seems to enjoy the company of dictators who murder their own citizens", yet here we are. "Better to keep your mouth shut and leave everyone wondering than opening it and removing all doubt" seems to be particularly applicable here.I've never taken this seriously. What can he do? A big, fat nothing. See: Madeliene tripping the light fantastic with Jong-Il one fine night. He could also, however, shut the good heck up about it on Twitter and publicly, which he has refrained from even attempting.
In reality, we were always ####ed as long as China gave them nuclear secrets, an element of N. Korea going nuclear which I had the pleasure of being unwittingly briefed upon once.
The only way to NOT come away with the idea that Trump likes being in his company is to suggest that his actions are staged and his words are all lies. The latter is rather simple to justify, the actions are the problem.I don't see how you can look at diplomatic relations and make the leap from establishing contact to enjoying the company of or longing for the same authority over the citizenry.
It takes some sort of mental gymnastics to pull that off, and I don't think the world sees it that way. If they do, they're stupid.
The "look into his heart" argument.I don't see how you can look at diplomatic relations and make the leap from establishing contact to enjoying the company of or longing for the same authority over the citizenry.
It takes some sort of mental gymnastics to pull that off, and I don't think the world sees it that way. If they do, they're stupid.
Bush looked into Putin's eyes, saw a window to the soul, and deemed it good.The "look into his heart" argument.
And that's not "mental gymnastics"?
We do it removed from populous areas if I understand correctly. And we have a reliable program.Still haven't heard an answer to this question. What makes our testing (or anyone else's) less dangerous.?
He didn't. He elevated a tin pot dictator to the world stage, "fell in love", praised the dictator for how well he had cowed his people and press, etc.Bush looked into Putin's eyes, saw a window to the soul, and deemed it good.
I mean, these guys pump each other's tires all the time. It's diplomacy, something that Trump is awful at, so let's encourage him when he gets it right.
Because assuaging a nuclear power in the press is part of the #### of the job that you do as a world leader. I don't believe a word Trump says. I doubt he means anything that comes out of his mouth about Jong Un.He didn't. He elevated a tin pot dictator to the world stage, "fell in love", praised the dictator for how well he had cowed his people and ptess, etc.
That's not getting it right.
And why justify Trump's idiocy by pointing out that Bush dis stupid things too?
I just wrote downthread that I haven't believed a word out of Trump's mouth since he promised to use Mexico to pay for the wall.The only way to NOT come away with the idea that Trump likes being in his company is to suggest that his actions are staged and his words are all lies. The latter is rather simple to justify, the actions are the problem.
And I never, ever said he "got it right."
:SHUKED:It's diplomacy, something that Trump is awful at, so let's encourage him when he gets it right.
I was talking about pumping Un's tires instead of threatening to wipe him off of the map with an arsenal of nuclear weaponry, much like he said he could do in Afghanistan if he needed to. He at least figured out that a nuclear power requires a differing diplomacy. Good for him.:SHUKED:
Right....which is why I wrote the bold. The actions are the problem and lead directly to being something more than simply "establishing contact"I just wrote downthread that I haven't believed a word out of Trump's mouth since he promised to use Mexico to pay for the wall.The only way to NOT come away with the idea that Trump likes being in his company is to suggest that his actions are staged and his words are all lies. The latter is rather simple to justify, the actions are the problem.
My jaw hit the ####### floor when I heard that a serious politician would ever even beggar belief by saying that out loud.
I won't be voting Bucky in 2020.I think there's really only two options with NK.
All out war where there's 100's of thousands of lives lost, or wait for some coup within. Giving him a gigantic propaganda victory doesn't help with option 2 IMO.
He says things like “we fell in love” about Kim Jong Un. And how much they are friends. He certainly says they enjoy each other’s company.I don't see how you can look at diplomatic relations and make the leap from establishing contact to enjoying the company of or longing for the same authority over the citizenry.
It takes some sort of mental gymnastics to pull that off, and I don't think the world sees it that way. If they do, they're stupid.
Trump is called a pathological liar a 50 times a day (and that's just on this board). He said Mexico was going to pay for the wall. He said there was no collusion with Russia. He said he didn't sexually assault those women.He says things like “we fell in love” about Kim Jong Un. And how much they are friends. He certainly says they enjoy each other’s company.
Of the four things you mention, he falling in love with KJU is by far the most believable...Trump is called a pathological liar a 50 times a day (and that's just on this board). He said Mexico was going to pay for the wall. He said there was no collusion with Russia. He said he didn't sexually assault those women.
But, this. This is what you want to believe he's telling the truth about? He and Kim fell in love?
He started out with fire and fury, and rocketman, remember.I was talking about pumping Un's tires instead of threatening to wipe him off of the map with an arsenal of nuclear weaponry, much like he said he could do in Afghanistan if he needed to. He at least figured out that a nuclear power requires a differing diplomacy. Good for him.
And again... conversation was about how the world views trump and his actions..... not how the anti trump people in this country view him and his actionsHe says things like “we fell in love” about Kim Jong Un. And how much they are friends. He certainly says they enjoy each other’s company.
No, I think he’s sucking up to Kim. Which has a similar response from me.KCitons said:Trump is called a pathological liar a 50 times a day (and that's just on this board). He said Mexico was going to pay for the wall. He said there was no collusion with Russia. He said he didn't sexually assault those women.
But, this. This is what you want to believe he's telling the truth about? He and Kim fell in love?
See, I think you are taking this a step too far. There is no credible evidence that Trump had Epstein killed.THAT is why it's dangerous to give oxygen to the dictator who kills his own people. Seeing is believing.
Nice to see UK, France and Germany speaking truth to the situation
I'm old enough to remember when the US would have been on that list
Just a gentle reminder that the UN supported the US in the war in Korea.Three important U.S. allies on Tuesday condemned the “repeated provocative launches” of ballistic missiles by North Korea, saying they violate U.N. Security Council resolutions banning any such activity.
The United Kingdom, France and Germany issued a joint statement after a closed council briefing by U.N. political chief Rosemary DiCarlo that they requested because of serious concerns at the series of missile launches in recent weeks by North Korea.
Actually more correct is that we supported the UN.Just a gentle reminder that the UN supported the US in the war in Korea.
A Defense Intelligence Agency estimate this summer estimated that North Korea has produced enough fuel for roughly a dozen new nuclear weapons since the historic talks between Trump and Kim in Singapore.
@SangerNYT
@WilliamJBroad
So... North Korea used the time when Trump believed he was negotiating to build nuclear launch submarines.North Korea has announced it now has submarine launches ballistic missile capability.
Trump supporters avoid this thread anyway.Where is the "they stopped testing missiles thanks to Trump" crowd these days?
Would this have been different under any other President?So... North Korea used the time when Trump believed he was negotiating to build nuclear launch submarines.
Cool. Cool cool cool.
Cool.
Well, but, really who could have seen that coming?
Depends where they're getting their tech help to move this fast. If it's from China in part as a result of tariffs and China's work to alleviate any stress from them or from Russia as a result of relaxed scrutiny on their relationship with North Korea, maybe. Lots of other possibilities.Would this have been different under any other President?
Probably not but then no other president would have declared that he saved us from nuclear war and tried to sell us that NK's dictator was a great guy.Would this have been different under any other President?
Totally embarrassing behaviorProbably not but then no other president would have declared that he saved us from nuclear war and tried to sell us that NK's dictator was a great guy.
"Well, at least they tried"North Korea says working-level nuclear talks with the US have been called off, on the same day they restarted.
US and North Korean officials met in Sweden on Saturday, in the hope of breaking their stalemate.
"The negotiations have not fulfilled our expectation and finally broke off," North Korea's top nuclear envoy Kim Myong Gil.
The meeting came just days after North Korea tested a new missile, in a significant step up from earlier tests.
It was set to be the first formal working-level discussion since US President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un met briefly at the inter-Korean border zone in June.
North Korea crisis in 300 words
Neither of the leaders was present in Sweden, instead initial discussions were being handled by North Korea's Kim Myong Gil and US Special Representative for North Korea Stephen Biegun.
What was expected?
Many observers saw the fresh talks as an opening move to another Trump-Kim summit.
The two have held two summits so far. The first one in Singapore in 2018 resulted in a vague denuclearisation agreement which led to little concrete results.
North Korea's missile and nuclear programme
The second summit in Vietnam in February 2019 ended early without any agreement.
It’s dumb, and Russia. We’re transactional and invite leverage while completely shrugging off outside support.The main problem with our approach to North Korea is that we are basically helpless to get them to do anything without China on our side, and the North Koreans know it. And why should China do anything for us, when we are waging economic war against them?