As long as he's healthy, book it. He's what they've been missing on offenseHere is hoping he is a difference maker down the stretch
Every time he gets tackled it scares me hes not gonna get up. Dude is just a beast. Dalton loves himAs long as he's healthy, book it. He's what they've been missing on offense
Not sure either bro. Maybe I'll get lucky with Kelce.Fullly practiced, off injury report. Nothing saying he would be limited. Not sure why you wouldn't have started him this week. Especially if you drafted him and have been waiting all year like I have...
Don't be a dooshLol at the people who didn't start him. Sorry fellas
Man do i wish i started him
Yep, I started him but more due to need than belief that he'd do well. Might be my best waiver pickup in years.I get why people didn't start him. I was wary of him too. Full practice doesn't mean full role when you've missed so much time. Plus, this game profiled as a running game for the Bengals. Like I said before though, seeing Uzomah inactive sealed it for me. If they were ready for him to be one of the 2 active TEs, his role was going to be near full.
Well yeah, starting kelce isn't a bad call. Might not work out, but not a bad call at all.Not sure either bro. Maybe I'll get lucky with Kelce.
Except next week. Damn byes. One more week of starting Kelce and holding my nose.Lol at the people who didn't start him. Sorry fellas
You are right. I let my Eifert excitement get the best of me.Don't be a doosh
Green and Eiffert could be getting 10+ targets a week.Must start every week. He is going to get all the red zone targets he can handle. No one else on that team besides Green can do anything in or near the end zone.
I have both and sat Eifert until he got more involved. Holy Cow!!!BigBlue_RI said:Except next week. Damn byes. One more week of starting Kelce and holding my nose.
weird this wasn't the post I was quoting...
Same here ... may be starting them both on the occasional flex issue.I have both and sat Eifert until he got more involved. Holy Cow!!!
Thankfully Kelce got me the exact same points. I like Eifert the rest of the way and will trade Kelce.
I might be flexing Kelce, but I don't want to get too excited about Sunday. Games even a fraction like that have been too few with him.I have both and sat Eifert until he got more involved. Holy Cow!!!
Thankfully Kelce got me the exact same points. I like Eifert the rest of the way and will trade Kelce.
Don't forget no Gio either. Those dump offs to Gio have to go somewhere too. Think Eifert will see a nice increase of targets.So what's the consensus here. Is Green's injury a killer for Eifert as the defense will pay him more attention, or does he get force fed the ball now?
IMO RB targets will remain at a similar level, targets for Hill and Burkhead will go up. Green's absence will likely increase Eifert's targets, though.Don't forget no Gio either. Those dump offs to Gio have to go somewhere too. Think Eifert will see a nice increase of targets.
Torn on him as well. Balty's been a tough matchup on TE's. That and I'm a having a hard time seeing Cincy move the ball. So leaning towards sitting him as I have other options. But not confident in the decision b/c as you say could get a lot of targets.So what's the consensus here. Is Green's injury a killer for Eifert as the defense will pay him more attention, or does he get force fed the ball now?
Just grabbed Henry. Hopefully we have clarity by Saturday AM...Missed second straight day off practice. Now I'm concerned. Grabbed Clay off the waivers and looking at H. Henry as well.