Were there obvious things the landlord could have done to prevent the burglary?
Bars on the window they broke to get in would have been a good start. An alarm system would have been nice as well. I'm not an idiot and neither is she; she knew it wasn't in the best neighborhood. I'm trying to get some good insight here, so I'll keep it civil, but the protection these people have built into leases makes me sick. That's why we're going to fight it.
Well the good news is that typically a landlord is obligated to make reasonable efforts to re-let the property, so even if they won't willingly let her break it, she should only be on the hook for the time it goes empty plus the cost to re-let.
You seem pretty angry about it, but just as an objective observation, you should know that landlords aren't obligated to protect tenants from the criminal acts of others, unless there's *a lot* of evidence that they were inviting a problem, or weren't doing obvious things, like keeping common areas lit.