Dentist
***Official FBG Dentist***
sure, but it's timely which is of value compared to a lot of his pieces which could be done any month or any yearMeh. this one just seemed like low hanging fruit to me. Didn't require any original research.
sure, but it's timely which is of value compared to a lot of his pieces which could be done any month or any yearMeh. this one just seemed like low hanging fruit to me. Didn't require any original research.
#soybeanwindGreat show on the NCAA. Didn't review anything we haven't said here in the anti-NCAA stuff but good to see it getting more play. Ed O'Bannon was hysterical.
And Dabo Swinney has got to be furious right now.
I don't like when he talks sports because I know that I know more on the topic than he does and that takes away from the show for me.Dentist said:sure, but it's timely which is of value compared to a lot of his pieces which could be done any month or any yearTLEF316 said:Meh. this one just seemed like low hanging fruit to me. Didn't require any original research.
His World Cup rant was about the best thing ever.I don't like when he talks sports because I know that I know more on the topic than he does and that takes away from the show for me.Dentist said:sure, but it's timely which is of value compared to a lot of his pieces which could be done any month or any yearTLEF316 said:Meh. this one just seemed like low hanging fruit to me. Didn't require any original research.
Agreed.His World Cup rant was about the best thing ever.I don't like when he talks sports because I know that I know more on the topic than he does and that takes away from the show for me.Dentist said:sure, but it's timely which is of value compared to a lot of his pieces which could be done any month or any yearTLEF316 said:Meh. this one just seemed like low hanging fruit to me. Didn't require any original research.
It was covered on Real Sports well before he did it. Just like the NCAA story.His World Cup rant was about the best thing ever.I don't like when he talks sports because I know that I know more on the topic than he does and that takes away from the show for me.Dentist said:sure, but it's timely which is of value compared to a lot of his pieces which could be done any month or any yearTLEF316 said:Meh. this one just seemed like low hanging fruit to me. Didn't require any original research.
and see sports guy isn't his target audience... someone out there watching knows more about infrastructure, or any of the topics he covers.I don't like when he talks sports because I know that I know more on the topic than he does and that takes away from the show for me.Dentist said:sure, but it's timely which is of value compared to a lot of his pieces which could be done any month or any yearTLEF316 said:Meh. this one just seemed like low hanging fruit to me. Didn't require any original research.
I agree but I am not only sports guy, I like him but I just don't get much out of his sports segments plus he was fumbling through it too. Not trying to bring down others that do enjoy his sports stuff, I just enjoy his other stuff more.and see sports guy isn't his target audience... someone out there watching knows more about infrastructure, or any of the topics he covers.I don't like when he talks sports because I know that I know more on the topic than he does and that takes away from the show for me.Dentist said:sure, but it's timely which is of value compared to a lot of his pieces which could be done any month or any yearTLEF316 said:Meh. this one just seemed like low hanging fruit to me. Didn't require any original research.
So NCAA and FIFA weren't new or exciting to me, nor were lotteries.... but several of his topics have been things I never thought of, like Drones or the Translators... but people who watch real news more often probably knew about those topics already also.
I already knew all that and more. It was still awesome.It was covered on Real Sports well before he did it. Just like the NCAA story.His World Cup rant was about the best thing ever.I don't like when he talks sports because I know that I know more on the topic than he does and that takes away from the show for me.Dentist said:sure, but it's timely which is of value compared to a lot of his pieces which could be done any month or any yearTLEF316 said:Meh. this one just seemed like low hanging fruit to me. Didn't require any original research.
I get it, you got a man crush, he is pretty good.I already knew all that and more. It was still awesome.It was covered on Real Sports well before he did it. Just like the NCAA story.His World Cup rant was about the best thing ever.I don't like when he talks sports because I know that I know more on the topic than he does and that takes away from the show for me.Dentist said:sure, but it's timely which is of value compared to a lot of his pieces which could be done any month or any yearTLEF316 said:Meh. this one just seemed like low hanging fruit to me. Didn't require any original research.
There's only so much you can do in 30 minutes. I like this format better than the Daily Show or Colbert Report. I like that he spends more time and gets into more detail on a topic than the 5 minute segments they did on those shows. It's like a 60 Minutes segment, but funny. I don't think they should change much, if at all.i kind of want him to broaden his show's format a bit. it's great that he has a weekly topic but it's entirely too familiar for me already. i'd like him to be a little less rigid in his thinking.
he's under the constraints of 30 minutes a week. i could see him expanding to a full hour and open things up as a result. his format now is barely connected to current events and the news cycle. he can still have that in-depth topic or item but he's free to comment/observe elsewhere.There's only so much you can do in 30 minutes. I like this format better than the Daily Show or Colbert Report. I like that he spends more time and gets into more detail on a topic than the 5 minute segments they did on those shows. It's like a 60 Minutes segment, but funny. I don't think they should change much, if at all.i kind of want him to broaden his show's format a bit. it's great that he has a weekly topic but it's entirely too familiar for me already. i'd like him to be a little less rigid in his thinking.
You guys do understand that at the heart of it, this show and the daily show are both comedy news shows and not 60 minutes with cursing and hipper stories.he's under the constraints of 30 minutes a week. i could see him expanding to a full hour and open things up as a result. his format now is barely connected to current events and the news cycle. he can still have that in-depth topic or item but he's free to comment/observe elsewhere.There's only so much you can do in 30 minutes. I like this format better than the Daily Show or Colbert Report. I like that he spends more time and gets into more detail on a topic than the 5 minute segments they did on those shows. It's like a 60 Minutes segment, but funny. I don't think they should change much, if at all.i kind of want him to broaden his show's format a bit. it's great that he has a weekly topic but it's entirely too familiar for me already. i'd like him to be a little less rigid in his thinking.
Sometimes, more is not better. I think he's got a format that works for him.he's under the constraints of 30 minutes a week. i could see him expanding to a full hour and open things up as a result. his format now is barely connected to current events and the news cycle. he can still have that in-depth topic or item but he's free to comment/observe elsewhere.There's only so much you can do in 30 minutes. I like this format better than the Daily Show or Colbert Report. I like that he spends more time and gets into more detail on a topic than the 5 minute segments they did on those shows. It's like a 60 Minutes segment, but funny. I don't think they should change much, if at all.i kind of want him to broaden his show's format a bit. it's great that he has a weekly topic but it's entirely too familiar for me already. i'd like him to be a little less rigid in his thinking.
But there are a ton of f-bombs, which adds to the comedy.You guys do understand that at the heart of it, this show and the daily show are both comedy news shows and not 60 minutes with cursing and hipper stories.he's under the constraints of 30 minutes a week. i could see him expanding to a full hour and open things up as a result. his format now is barely connected to current events and the news cycle. he can still have that in-depth topic or item but he's free to comment/observe elsewhere.There's only so much you can do in 30 minutes. I like this format better than the Daily Show or Colbert Report. I like that he spends more time and gets into more detail on a topic than the 5 minute segments they did on those shows. It's like a 60 Minutes segment, but funny. I don't think they should change much, if at all.i kind of want him to broaden his show's format a bit. it's great that he has a weekly topic but it's entirely too familiar for me already. i'd like him to be a little less rigid in his thinking.
you do understand, that 60 minutes is TDS or john Olver without the humor, right?You guys do understand that at the heart of it, this show and the daily show are both comedy news shows and not 60 minutes with cursing and hipper stories.he's under the constraints of 30 minutes a week. i could see him expanding to a full hour and open things up as a result. his format now is barely connected to current events and the news cycle. he can still have that in-depth topic or item but he's free to comment/observe elsewhere.There's only so much you can do in 30 minutes. I like this format better than the Daily Show or Colbert Report. I like that he spends more time and gets into more detail on a topic than the 5 minute segments they did on those shows. It's like a 60 Minutes segment, but funny. I don't think they should change much, if at all.i kind of want him to broaden his show's format a bit. it's great that he has a weekly topic but it's entirely too familiar for me already. i'd like him to be a little less rigid in his thinking.
especially since Andy Rooney passed away.you do understand, that 60 minutes is TDS or john Olver without the humor, right?You guys do understand that at the heart of it, this show and the daily show are both comedy news shows and not 60 minutes with cursing and hipper stories.he's under the constraints of 30 minutes a week. i could see him expanding to a full hour and open things up as a result. his format now is barely connected to current events and the news cycle. he can still have that in-depth topic or item but he's free to comment/observe elsewhere.There's only so much you can do in 30 minutes. I like this format better than the Daily Show or Colbert Report. I like that he spends more time and gets into more detail on a topic than the 5 minute segments they did on those shows. It's like a 60 Minutes segment, but funny. I don't think they should change much, if at all.i kind of want him to broaden his show's format a bit. it's great that he has a weekly topic but it's entirely too familiar for me already. i'd like him to be a little less rigid in his thinking.
yeah- Rooney brought the funny. hard.especially since Andy Rooney passed away.you do understand, that 60 minutes is TDS or john Olver without the humor, right?You guys do understand that at the heart of it, this show and the daily show are both comedy news shows and not 60 minutes with cursing and hipper stories.he's under the constraints of 30 minutes a week. i could see him expanding to a full hour and open things up as a result. his format now is barely connected to current events and the news cycle. he can still have that in-depth topic or item but he's free to comment/observe elsewhere.There's only so much you can do in 30 minutes. I like this format better than the Daily Show or Colbert Report. I like that he spends more time and gets into more detail on a topic than the 5 minute segments they did on those shows. It's like a 60 Minutes segment, but funny. I don't think they should change much, if at all.i kind of want him to broaden his show's format a bit. it's great that he has a weekly topic but it's entirely too familiar for me already. i'd like him to be a little less rigid in his thinking.
He certainly did.yeah- Rooney brought the funny. hard.especially since Andy Rooney passed away.you do understand, that 60 minutes is TDS or john Olver without the humor, right?You guys do understand that at the heart of it, this show and the daily show are both comedy news shows and not 60 minutes with cursing and hipper stories.he's under the constraints of 30 minutes a week. i could see him expanding to a full hour and open things up as a result. his format now is barely connected to current events and the news cycle. he can still have that in-depth topic or item but he's free to comment/observe elsewhere.There's only so much you can do in 30 minutes. I like this format better than the Daily Show or Colbert Report. I like that he spends more time and gets into more detail on a topic than the 5 minute segments they did on those shows. It's like a 60 Minutes segment, but funny. I don't think they should change much, if at all.i kind of want him to broaden his show's format a bit. it's great that he has a weekly topic but it's entirely too familiar for me already. i'd like him to be a little less rigid in his thinking.
He certainly did.yeah- Rooney brought the funny. hard.especially since Andy Rooney passed away.you do understand, that 60 minutes is TDS or john Olver without the humor, right?You guys do understand that at the heart of it, this show and the daily show are both comedy news shows and not 60 minutes with cursing and hipper stories.he's under the constraints of 30 minutes a week. i could see him expanding to a full hour and open things up as a result. his format now is barely connected to current events and the news cycle. he can still have that in-depth topic or item but he's free to comment/observe elsewhere.There's only so much you can do in 30 minutes. I like this format better than the Daily Show or Colbert Report. I like that he spends more time and gets into more detail on a topic than the 5 minute segments they did on those shows. It's like a 60 Minutes segment, but funny. I don't think they should change much, if at all.i kind of want him to broaden his show's format a bit. it's great that he has a weekly topic but it's entirely too familiar for me already. i'd like him to be a little less rigid in his thinking.
For those that may have missed the Snowden interviewSnowden episode was brilliant. Except that my DVR killed it about 2 minutes after they started the **** pic stuff so I missed the end. Will have to try to catch it again.
He couldn't keep eye contact. Although, I'm guessing he has learned to live looking over his shoulder every 3 seconds and will for the rest of his life. But he didn't come away confident at all. Which is probably to be expected. I actually thought Jon did a great job in the interview. Like better quality than "serious journalists."He was pretty tough on Snowden, I thought. I actually didn't come away too impressed with Snowden for some reason I can't really put my finger on.
Agreed about he eye contact and the quality of the interview.He couldn't keep eye contact. Although, I'm guessing he has learned to live looking over his shoulder every 3 seconds and will for the rest of his life. But he didn't come away confident at all. Which is probably to be expected. I actually thought Jon did a great job in the interview. Like better quality than "serious journalists."He was pretty tough on Snowden, I thought. I actually didn't come away too impressed with Snowden for some reason I can't really put my finger on.
I think the way Oliver tossed in some things Snowden didn't expect did shake him up a bit and I totally agree about how Snowden has to live his life now being paranoid every few seconds.He couldn't keep eye contact. Although, I'm guessing he has learned to live looking over his shoulder every 3 seconds and will for the rest of his life. But he didn't come away confident at all. Which is probably to be expected. I actually thought Jon did a great job in the interview. Like better quality than "serious journalists."He was pretty tough on Snowden, I thought. I actually didn't come away too impressed with Snowden for some reason I can't really put my finger on.
Nice.For those that may have missed the Snowden interviewSnowden episode was brilliant. Except that my DVR killed it about 2 minutes after they started the **** pic stuff so I missed the end. Will have to try to catch it again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEVlyP4_11M
The way he showed Snowden how very few cares or knows who Snowden is was brilliant in that we got to see his reaction and then turning it around showing people get upset about the #### pics and want it stopped and then have Snowden explain that this is going on.Nice.For those that may have missed the Snowden interviewSnowden episode was brilliant. Except that my DVR killed it about 2 minutes after they started the **** pic stuff so I missed the end. Will have to try to catch it again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEVlyP4_11M
Yeah, this episode was brilliant in every way. And I love that he managed to take this story and turn into something so stupid yet so interesting to the general public. He's right. The technical stuff and the big words the legal speak and everything else is just making people ignore it all but when you break it down like this it's easy enough to understand that everyone should get it. Remarkable.
My exact reaction. He asked him some tough, intelligent questions to his face.He couldn't keep eye contact. Although, I'm guessing he has learned to live looking over his shoulder every 3 seconds and will for the rest of his life. But he didn't come away confident at all. Which is probably to be expected. I actually thought Jon did a great job in the interview. Like better quality than "serious journalists."He was pretty tough on Snowden, I thought. I actually didn't come away too impressed with Snowden for some reason I can't really put my finger on.
Snowden didn't do a very good job of presenting his talking points. He's not a very strong pointman for international espionage.\He was pretty tough on Snowden, I thought. I actually didn't come away too impressed with Snowden for some reason I can't really put my finger on.
I agree.I thought it was poorly done and poorly executed. You got Snowden and you do that? Worst piece Oliver has put out. That piece didn't do anything to advance the discussion, in fact it hurt it. IMO.
Ridiculous.I thought it was poorly done and poorly executed. You got Snowden and you do that? Worst piece Oliver has put out. That piece didn't do anything to advance the discussion, in fact it hurt it. IMO.