Stay classy guy. You may not agree with me and I certainly don't agree with you but that's pretty uncalled for.You're kind of a moron. Prime years as a RB does not mean prime recovery years. Prime recovery years will put you back to being 100% during your prime years as a RB.Bojang0301 said:Man you guys are babies. I mentioned McGahee as a plus in Gurleys favor. And 26-28 is a RB's prime. SMH. You guys want to ignore an ACL injury and think he'll have some magical impact next year so be it. If you're drafting him at 1.01 to 1.03 that's what you'll expect and you'll be sitting on him for at least half a season. Teams haven't even got to see him run, workout, hell I'm not even sure if they've got to examine his knee
Edit to add: 1 month of rehab is a long time in football terms. That's 4 to 5 games in season. So tell me how my statement is false again.
Memory spasm , thanks for the catch.Pretty amazing for him to be 7 in UGA history and also find time to get top 10 at Auburn as well.... I kid.I think Brooks pointed out he is in Auburn's top 10 ever for hurdles (60 m.?), which I didn't know. Good point about being a returner, indication of COD and movement skills for a player close to 225 lbs. While he may not be RG3, borderline Olympic-caliber fast in the hurdles, still very fast.Amazingly there are still people out there who will try and tell you Gurley isn't fast. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000481389/article/five-rb-prospects-with-best-gamebreaking-speed
Yes, this kid is fast. Very fast.
SI's Peter King sees Georgia RB Todd Gurley coming off the board by the 25th pick.
Gurley will be five months removed from ACL surgery on draft day. Per King, the "book" on Gurley is he'll be good in 2015 and tremendous in 2016. The Cardinals, in search of a power complement to Andre Ellington, should be very interested at pick 24. The Cowboys need to replace DeMarco Murray and hold the 27th pick. Gurley's upcoming medical re-check in Indy will impact his stock.
Mar 30 - 8:15 AM
Source: SI.com
Todd Gurley - RB - Bulldogs
In the eyes of ESPN's Mel Kiper, Georgia RB Todd Gurley and the Dallas Cowboys are a match made in heaven.
"Dallas is going to have one of the best run-blocking lines in the NFL next season, if not the best," Kiper wrote. "The Cowboys don't need a dancer, they need a player who will get downhill fast and turn a crease into a big run because he's so hard to get to the ground when he hits the second level. Gurley can do that. Dallas added Darren McFadden, but they won't be done at this position." Though it's an ideal match, the analyst believes there's a better chance than not of it not coming to fruition. "Dallas has shown good restraint recently, such as in last year's draft and in not overpaying for DeMarco Murray, so it certainly wouldn't be knocked by me for passing on a RB in Round 1 (I certainly would)," Kiper wrote. "But Gurley is worth a close look if they think he's a missing link."
Source: ESPN Insider
Mar 30 - 10:46 PM
no way he's there at 27Rotoworld:
Todd Gurley - RB - Bulldogs
In the eyes of ESPN's Mel Kiper, Georgia RB Todd Gurley and the Dallas Cowboys are a match made in heaven.
"Dallas is going to have one of the best run-blocking lines in the NFL next season, if not the best," Kiper wrote. "The Cowboys don't need a dancer, they need a player who will get downhill fast and turn a crease into a big run because he's so hard to get to the ground when he hits the second level. Gurley can do that. Dallas added Darren McFadden, but they won't be done at this position." Though it's an ideal match, the analyst believes there's a better chance than not of it not coming to fruition. "Dallas has shown good restraint recently, such as in last year's draft and in not overpaying for DeMarco Murray, so it certainly wouldn't be knocked by me for passing on a RB in Round 1 (I certainly would)," Kiper wrote. "But Gurley is worth a close look if they think he's a missing link."
Source: ESPN Insider
Mar 30 - 10:46 PM
that seems debateable. and IMO is one of the biggest tests of how GMs see the position.no way he's there at 27Rotoworld:
Todd Gurley - RB - Bulldogs
In the eyes of ESPN's Mel Kiper, Georgia RB Todd Gurley and the Dallas Cowboys are a match made in heaven.
"Dallas is going to have one of the best run-blocking lines in the NFL next season, if not the best," Kiper wrote. "The Cowboys don't need a dancer, they need a player who will get downhill fast and turn a crease into a big run because he's so hard to get to the ground when he hits the second level. Gurley can do that. Dallas added Darren McFadden, but they won't be done at this position." Though it's an ideal match, the analyst believes there's a better chance than not of it not coming to fruition. "Dallas has shown good restraint recently, such as in last year's draft and in not overpaying for DeMarco Murray, so it certainly wouldn't be knocked by me for passing on a RB in Round 1 (I certainly would)," Kiper wrote. "But Gurley is worth a close look if they think he's a missing link."
Source: ESPN Insider
Mar 30 - 10:46 PM
Todd Gurley - RB - Player
Georgia RB Todd Gurley (ACL) has resumed running.
Gurley suffered a clean tear of his ACL in November. "I've been starting to run and do like backpedaling and stuff like that. It’s been going pretty good, it’s going smoothly," he said. Given Gurley's special talent and the recent success of many ACL patients (Adrian Peterson, Jamaal Charles, Jeremy Maclin), it would be a major surprise if he's not a first-round pick. The Cardinals, in search of a physical complement to Andre Ellington, make sense at No. 24 overall.
Source: Sirius XM NFL Radio
Apr 2 - 8:25 AM
Is this correct? If so that is terrific.4.34What's his post ACL 40 time?
It is debatable. granted the top talent is better this year, but for the past 2 years in the draft it is starting to show a trend. i can totally see 1 rb going in the first this year.that seems debateable. and IMO is one of the biggest tests of how GMs see the position.no way he's there at 27Rotoworld:
Todd Gurley - RB - Bulldogs
In the eyes of ESPN's Mel Kiper, Georgia RB Todd Gurley and the Dallas Cowboys are a match made in heaven.
"Dallas is going to have one of the best run-blocking lines in the NFL next season, if not the best," Kiper wrote. "The Cowboys don't need a dancer, they need a player who will get downhill fast and turn a crease into a big run because he's so hard to get to the ground when he hits the second level. Gurley can do that. Dallas added Darren McFadden, but they won't be done at this position." Though it's an ideal match, the analyst believes there's a better chance than not of it not coming to fruition. "Dallas has shown good restraint recently, such as in last year's draft and in not overpaying for DeMarco Murray, so it certainly wouldn't be knocked by me for passing on a RB in Round 1 (I certainly would)," Kiper wrote. "But Gurley is worth a close look if they think he's a missing link."
Source: ESPN Insider
Mar 30 - 10:46 PM
He's guessingIs this correct? If so that is terrific.4.34What's his post ACL 40 time?
Actually was being sarcastic in response to CSTU's (fill in adjective of choice) question.He's guessingIs this correct? If so that is terrific.4.34What's his post ACL 40 time?
Actually was being sarcastic in response to CSTU's (fill in adjective of choice) question.He's guessingIs this correct? If so that is terrific.4.34What's his post ACL 40 time?
Todd Gurley - RB - Player
A "respected evaluator" tells NFL.com's Ian Rapoport that Georgia's Todd Gurley is the best running-back prospect since Adrian Peterson.
It's not the first Peterson comparison for a back who is widely considered this year's top runner. With each passing day, concern about Gurley's torn ACL seems to fade. He's shaping up as a strong bet to come off the board on Day 1.
Source: Ian Rapoport on Twitter
Apr 2 - 6:42 PM
Not if Gurley is a better prospect than Trent. Both statements would then be correct.ian said the same thing about trent. so shouldn't gurley be the best prospect since trent?
And Reggie Bush was also the best thing since sliced bread after Peterson. Trent too.ian said the same thing about trent. so shouldn't gurley be the best prospect since trent?
Bush was drafted the year before Peterson.And Reggie Bush was also the best thing since sliced bread after Peterson. Trent too.Eventually, they'll be right on one of these guys.ian said the same thing about trent. so shouldn't gurley be the best prospect since trent?
So they said Reggie would be the best thing since ADP, did they?And Reggie Bush was also the best thing since sliced bread after Peterson. Trent too.ian said the same thing about trent. so shouldn't gurley be the best prospect since trent?
Eventually, they'll be right on one of these guys.
Ian is reporting what an evaluator told him, not what he himself said.beef said:ian said the same thing about trent. so shouldn't gurley be the best prospect since trent?
Once again, Bush could never be the "next AP". He was drafted a year earlier.To be fair Gurley looks more like AD then Bush ever could. Trent looked legitimate but proved to have no vision and once his confidence was gone so was his speed.
Yes, sorry. Bush was the greatest thing since LT.Once again, Bush could never be the "next AP". He was drafted a year earlier.To be fair Gurley looks more like AD then Bush ever could. Trent looked legitimate but proved to have no vision and once his confidence was gone so was his speed.
You realize being a great prospect is not the same as being a great player, right? And using hindsight to crap on nearly unanimous evaluations at the time is dumb? Great prospects at every position bust.Yes, sorry. Bush was the greatest thing since LT.Once again, Bush could never be the "next AP". He was drafted a year earlier.To be fair Gurley looks more like AD then Bush ever could. Trent looked legitimate but proved to have no vision and once his confidence was gone so was his speed.
The only thing that drops him from 1.01 IMO is a poor medical in a few weeks and thus a drop in the draft that isn't expected. Like going in the second round, behind several other fantasy options.What would drop Gurley from the 1.01 spot?
Is there landing spots that would drop him? If so, where?
Is there a landing spot for another player that could drop him? If so, who and where?
I realize there's lots of possibilities but let's say just slight variances from the current projections.
That's what I've been asking myself lately. I have the 1.01 in a large league where I'm okay at RB but weaker at receiver without much depth. I don't draft for need but I'm really liking cooper. This becomes a bit easier if cooper lands in new York but right now they're really close imo.What would drop Gurley from the 1.01 spot?
Is there landing spots that would drop him? If so, where?
Is there a landing spot for another player that could drop him? If so, who and where?
I realize there's lots of possibilities but let's say just slight variances from the current projections.
Depending on the league he could really drop. In a 32 team dynasty I would have a hard time taking him in the top 5What would drop Gurley from the 1.01 spot?
Is there landing spots that would drop him? If so, where?
Is there a landing spot for another player that could drop him? If so, who and where?
I realize there's lots of possibilities but let's say just slight variances from the current projections.
If he went to NE I would have trouble taking him 1st.What would drop Gurley from the 1.01 spot?
Is there landing spots that would drop him? If so, where?
Is there a landing spot for another player that could drop him? If so, who and where?
I realize there's lots of possibilities but let's say just slight variances from the current projections.
looks like 25-30 range from that chart... Rookie drafts I would say 1.1-1.2Where is this guy, and Gordon for that matter, going in start up dynasty drafts?
Teams that I would perceive to drop Gurley's value: Seattle, NE, Philly, Pittsburgh, Washington, Buffalo, New Orleans, Green BayWhat would drop Gurley from the 1.01 spot?
Is there landing spots that would drop him? If so, where?
Is there a landing spot for another player that could drop him? If so, who and where?
I realize there's lots of possibilities but let's say just slight variances from the current projections.
How's that?Depending on the league he could really drop. In a 32 team dynasty I would have a hard time taking him in the top 5What would drop Gurley from the 1.01 spot?
Is there landing spots that would drop him? If so, where?
Is there a landing spot for another player that could drop him? If so, who and where?
I realize there's lots of possibilities but let's say just slight variances from the current projections.
I do not value RBs that highly in 32 team leagues (mostly what I play now). Position is far too volatile and his injury would scare me off. Far less risk taking White, Cooper, Parker IMO and with only 32 starting QBs JM and MM come into play due to QB scarcity.How's that?Depending on the league he could really drop. In a 32 team dynasty I would have a hard time taking him in the top 5What would drop Gurley from the 1.01 spot?
Is there landing spots that would drop him? If so, where?
Is there a landing spot for another player that could drop him? If so, who and where?
I realize there's lots of possibilities but let's say just slight variances from the current projections.
Todd Gurley - RB - Player
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution's D. Orlando Ledbetter has the Falcons selecting Georgia RB Todd Gurley at No. 8 overall in his latest mock draft.
This was probably done in an effort to appease local readers, but it's notable nonetheless. Prior to tearing his ACL, Gurley was considered a top-10 pick. Recent reports have Gurley's knee improving quickly, and his stock has steadily been back on the rise as the clear-cut No. 1 back in this class. The Falcons badly need a foundation running back like him. Gurley should be a first-round lock.
Related: Falcons
Source: Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Apr 3 - 8:42 AM
Some people will prefer a WR 1st, but outside of that, if Gordon goes to Dallas I imagine there would be a fair amount of people that grab him 1st, especially if Gurley ends ups in a not great situation (for instance if he drops to the early 2nd and goes to the Titans, Jags, Jets, or Raiders).What would drop Gurley from the 1.01 spot?
Is there landing spots that would drop him? If so, where?
Is there a landing spot for another player that could drop him? If so, who and where?
I realize there's lots of possibilities but let's say just slight variances from the current projections.
Understand the logic, but I'll gladly take a top half rb1 (imo he's easily top 16) over qb prospects I don't really like. No way does he fall out of the top 3 in 99% of leagues.I do not value RBs that highly in 32 team leagues (mostly what I play now). Position is far too volatile and his injury would scare me off. Far less risk taking White, Cooper, Parker IMO and with only 32 starting QBs JM and MM come into play due to QB scarcity.How's that?Depending on the league he could really drop. In a 32 team dynasty I would have a hard time taking him in the top 5What would drop Gurley from the 1.01 spot?
Is there landing spots that would drop him? If so, where?
Is there a landing spot for another player that could drop him? If so, who and where?
I realize there's lots of possibilities but let's say just slight variances from the current projections.
You think Parker is less risky than Gurley? Wow...Parker is one of the biggest boom bust players in the 1st round. Give me the transcendent talent at RB, no matter the format.I do not value RBs that highly in 32 team leagues (mostly what I play now). Position is far too volatile and his injury would scare me off. Far less risk taking White, Cooper, Parker IMO and with only 32 starting QBs JM and MM come into play due to QB scarcity.How's that?Depending on the league he could really drop. In a 32 team dynasty I would have a hard time taking him in the top 5What would drop Gurley from the 1.01 spot?
Is there landing spots that would drop him? If so, where?
Is there a landing spot for another player that could drop him? If so, who and where?
I realize there's lots of possibilities but let's say just slight variances from the current projections.
Todd Gurley - RB - Bulldogs
Yahoo Sports' Rand Getlin reports that "a number of teams" believe Georgia RB Todd Gurley "will be selected before Wisconsin's Melvin Gordon "if his knee checks out."
This month the Georgia prospect plans to return to Indianapolis for a medical recheck with NFL team doctors. The 6-foot-1, 236-pound Gurley should hear his name called in the first round of the draft, but those NFL Scouting Combine medicals will be extremely important for Gurley's first round draft stock. Getlin added in another tweet, that "some teams believe Gordon is likely to have a more significant immediate impact," but "they believe Gurley may be better in the long-term."
Source: Rand Getlin on Twitter
Apr 3 - 3:09 PM
ThisSome people will prefer a WR 1st, but outside of that, if Gordon goes to Dallas I imagine there would be a fair amount of people that grab him 1st, especially if Gurley ends ups in a not great situation (for instance if he drops to the early 2nd and goes to the Titans, Jags, Jets, or Raiders).What would drop Gurley from the 1.01 spot?
Is there landing spots that would drop him? If so, where?
Is there a landing spot for another player that could drop him? If so, who and where?
I realize there's lots of possibilities but let's say just slight variances from the current projections.
Wow he's really putting his reputation on the line with that one!!!Rotoworld:
Todd Gurley - RB - Bulldogs
Yahoo Sports' Rand Getlin reports that "a number of teams" believe Georgia RB Todd Gurley "will be selected before Wisconsin's Melvin Gordon "if his knee checks out."
This month the Georgia prospect plans to return to Indianapolis for a medical recheck with NFL team doctors. The 6-foot-1, 236-pound Gurley should hear his name called in the first round of the draft, but those NFL Scouting Combine medicals will be extremely important for Gurley's first round draft stock. Getlin added in another tweet, that "some teams believe Gordon is likely to have a more significant immediate impact," but "they believe Gurley may be better in the long-term."
Source: Rand Getlin on Twitter
Apr 3 - 3:09 PM
Todd Gurley - RB - Player
The South Florida Sun-Sentinel's Omar Kelly is "told" Georgia RB Todd Gurley could begin the season on the PUP list.
The best running back prospect since Adrian Peterson, Gurley's November ACL tear is the only reason he is not a first-round lock. He will only be nine months removed from the injury when the NFL season begins, and though his recovery is reportedly going well, it is not out of the question Gurley begins his career on the PUP list. It is something to keep in mind in re-draft formats, but Gurley is still a candidate for the first overall pick in Dynasty drafts.
Source: Omar Kelly on Twitter
Apr 4 - 9:39 AM
Gurley easy. What's wrong with the San Diego landing spot? Lot's of people seem to be pessimistic about that one I don't get it. Sure their o-line isn't great, but it's not terrible either (or is it?)Just for fun, who do you pick if...
White goes to Chicago
Cooper to Atlanta
Gurley to San Diego
Gordon to Dallas
Parker to Indy