titusbramble
Footballguy
I personally don't think any of these RBs, with the possible exception of Brooks, has any long term value. Sure, some will have short term value most likely, but no way in hell I waste a #1 pick on them.
In the current era of RBBC everywhere, scarcity of second contracts of any note outside of überstuds, and the continued evolution of game planning leading to an even greater pass:rush ratio (not helped by going on decades of awful rule changes), are we getting into a situation where a RB with long term value is going to be very much the exception, and if we're able to pick someone up in a draft who has a couple of seasons of high RB2 numbers and then flares out to a flex play until he's done at 26, do we actually start considering that a good result? How many RBs still on their first contract are we actually confident about having starter value in, say, 2026?