Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
BWHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAA. #### anyone that called him out on that. That's exactly what you do in those situations. Is there an argument to be made that the guy that "called him out" is guilty of collusion? It's probably a weak argument... he did get together with the other owner to make a trade only to acquire an asset because he still thought he'd get what he wanted.
Good to know you don't play for money.
Same syndicate, round 5 if you're interested to see a similar league:
We're almost done but it's limping along in mid round 5. I'm the Broncos and I feel good about it.
Ours just finished up yesterday, those last couple of rounds can really drag as people lose some interest. I think you got good value at all of your picks. I'm not a huge Paul Perkins fan, but I think he's worth the shot at 2.06. Someone took Dwayne Washington (DET) at 3.03 ahead of DeAndre Washington who went a few picks later in my league. Given their ADPs, I wonder if that guy mistook one for the other.
Duarte as the top TE selected ?.
Ya are you new or what.........lol
I don't know WTF that was about.
I'm a Dixon buyer at 1.07, and for me it was more a reflection of my dislike for the WRs available around there than an endorsement of Dixon (though I do think he's a quality prospect to earn a starting job as a well-rounded back).
According to this I don't see him being drafted. Mitchell is still going pretty high but dropped a couple spots since last I checked.
After a quick glance, I don't see any non-rookies. Maybe these drafts just disallow non-rookies? Most of my drafts have vets mixed in but are deep enough that only a couple guys are worth taking.
Went 3.14 in one of mine (42 overall, so almost exactly 4.5 in a 12-teamer):thriftyrocker said:
Like the player, but rough landing spot. Hard to see another KC receiver having real value over the next 3-4 years with Maclin and Kelce locked up long-term and Reid's long history of spreading the ball around (and throwing to the RBs a bunch). Don't hate him as a 4th round target, but prefer some of the other Day 3 receivers in round 3 based upon opportunity.
Not the pick I would have made. But in a non-PPR with points for return yards, I can see why the pick was made. Drake will return kicks and should rack up some decent offensive yardage as well.Drake at 5.
Sssshhh...this is one of my favorite 4th round sleepers. No clear #2 in KC so a job is there for the taking. Tack on that he was a 4th round NFL draft selection despite a reputation of being a headcase in college, and that to me screams that KC had a 1st/2nd round grade on him and was willing to take the headcase risk in the 4th. Also like that they added Tyreek Hill the next round, which to me means they know that #2 WR is unsettled and are trying to address.
Dan Hindery said:
The problem is so many of those other guys play for Cleveland, which offers both low upside and lots of competition. If you're looking for a clear path to starting, the other candidates are CLE, TEN, and LA, none of which are big pluses. I would like Robinson a lot more if his upside was more apparent. I would love to get behind a high upside guy whose production was limited by off the field stuff but really he's just a guy. The main plus is Reid definitely overdrafted him, so you have to wonder what Andy was thinking.Dan Hindery said:
Someone used to compile that data but I'm glad he doesn't do that anymore. My reason is that everyone saw it and a great many people, when they had no freakin' clue of who to take, would just go off that list. You were never able to hope for a player who might slide to actually do so.
You can find all the drafts by seaching zealot on MFL like this. From a look at this there are still several drafts that haven't started yet.
