Go.
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
San Francisco at Los Angeles (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Maurile Tremblay
- Start date
PlasmaDogPlasma
Footballguy
Go Niners! Northern Ohio is rooting for you.
Thimblerig
Footballguy
PlasmaDogPlasma
Footballguy
Apparently the Niners would go first based on the way people are talking. I guess the breaker is SoS
Bob Magaw
Footballguy
Yeah, bizarre, especially being such a barnburner between two "juggernaut" teams that had lost nine their past 10 and thirteen straight, respectively?Sounds like a Niner home game.
surprised so many of those die hardLos Angeles
yeah still think Rams win. Who has the tiebreaker plasma?
2016 NFL Home Attendance
http://www.espn.com/nfl/attendance
LA #2 (die hard
San Francisco fans averaging more than 13,000 per game less at #13)* Congrats on the 49ers second win of the season (both against LA), one more than the Browns! :golf clap:
Last edited by a moderator:
Bob Magaw
Footballguy
Great post, 5Rings :X
Really disproved the fact that:
1) It was a lousy match up/heinous opponent (SF 0-13 since opening day going into Saturday) from which intelligible sweeping generalizations can't be drawn.
2) It is incoherent to criticize LA attendance their first year back when it would be hard for them to have been better than #2 IN GENERAL (not to mention the Coliseum is probably the oldest/worst venue in the league, and Levi's is one of the newest and most state of the art, fair weather fan base glass house resident).
3) Or that they suffered in comparison with the #13 team in home attendance (averaging over 13,000 per game less ) SPECIFICALLY. This point (or any of the above, for that matter) isn't hard, criticizing another team's attendance would make more sense and be vastly more defensible if, oh I don't know, your team actually sported appreciably better instead of significantly worse attendance figures this season.
* Wishing you only the best with the York/Baalke axis.
Really disproved the fact that:
1) It was a lousy match up/heinous opponent (SF 0-13 since opening day going into Saturday) from which intelligible sweeping generalizations can't be drawn.
2) It is incoherent to criticize LA attendance their first year back when it would be hard for them to have been better than #2 IN GENERAL (not to mention the Coliseum is probably the oldest/worst venue in the league, and Levi's is one of the newest and most state of the art, fair weather fan base glass house resident).
3) Or that they suffered in comparison with the #13 team in home attendance (averaging over
13,000 per game less ) SPECIFICALLY. This point (or any of the above, for that matter) isn't hard, criticizing another team's attendance would make more sense and be vastly more defensible if, oh I don't know, your team actually sported appreciably better instead of significantly worse attendance figures this season. * Wishing you only the best with the York/Baalke axis.
Last edited by a moderator:
Similar threads
