Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Given the definition of troll/trolling the post I reported fit. This post of yours probably meets the definition as well, but I'm not doing the reporting thing anymore so -
.
I'll bet you $100 that Joe is the one that decided to let this sarcastic phrase go because he's tired of the report bat phone going off and if you were to look back Clayton and Aaron have suspended people for saying that and much less.
This isn't being excellent. Inane? Put me on ignore. Don't ever want to offend you as it doesn't take much.
Have a nice season as well.
wow, you must have reported until your fingers bledGiven the definition of troll/trolling the post I reported fit. This post of yours probably meets the definition as well, but I'm not doing the reporting thing anymore so -
You know what's sad, and somewhat illustrative of the multiple failures all around in this episode - I took you off ignore (I've found your posts to be mostly inane to the point they're a waste of time/space, so it's a boon to me not to have to scroll past them all the time) to read these last two posts of yours just to see if you'd changed any and improved the quality of your posts. Guess not. Have a nice season.
Man, well over half the posts here don't contribute positively to the conversation. That's the tone of the forum that Joe has created though and someone above pointed out it's not going to change. People don't talk politics (here or other places) to get an understanding of the other side. They do it to lash out, vent, shame the other side, and generally just to argue.
No, it doesn't. As many have said there are two lib mods that aren't fair in their handlings of posters. I think Joe is mostly fair or he really tries to be anyway.
Sadly, I think you're mostly right. I hang on because there are good posts and posters still grinding out enough quality discussion to keep it informative and worthwhile - using the ignore function really helps in this regard.
Just curious, you said you report up to 10 posts a week. Does that mean you are reporting posts from both sides of the argument?
In my limited time in the PSF it seems basically to be trolling each other. I thought that was part of this forums schtick. If people were rep[orting all trolling it would overwhelm all systems.Given the definition of troll/trolling the post I reported fit. This post of yours probably meets the definition as well, but I'm not doing the reporting thing anymore so -
You know what's sad, and somewhat illustrative of the multiple failures all around in this episode - I took you off ignore (I've found your posts to be mostly inane to the point they're a waste of time/space, so it's a boon to me not to have to scroll past them all the time) to read these last two posts of yours just to see if you'd changed any and improved the quality of your posts. Guess not. Have a nice season.
Yeah. For example I've reported Tanner/McJose/whatever at least a couple of times when he's gotten too nasty to people - I think once in response to one of your posts in fact.
So you have a double standard? Ok for you but you are offended at "You guys have him this time!"
I probably should have made this assumption from the outset as well. Live and learn.
People have such short memories. Last election Clayton got caught deleting any and every post he didn't agree with in his Bernie for president thread.
I got two weeks from Clayton for "arguing". Based on that you should have a life time ban.
We need to understand the level of hate that is out there for Trump supporters.
I don't even bother responding to him anymore. He is so predictable and I don't think he is all there.
Altering what someone said and then quoting someone when it's not what they actually wrote is lame and not something we allow. If you see that, report it.
Got a link for this?
When somebody says AOC is a socialist you ask for a link. Those aren't statements based on data points. Opinion, or at least to a large extent, is almost always implied in such statements. 
I disagree with nearly everything you wrote here...but enough of it...have a nice day.Got a link for this?
I am not actually being serious, just making a point at how dumb your link requests are and I think are genuinely just trolling.
You ask people for links in bad faith, not just fact finding missions. It isn't like somebody posts the US population is 750 million and you ask for a link. If somebody says democrats are in favor of open borders, you ask for a link. You aren't asking for a link supporting why they think that. You are asking for a link to all democrats saying "I want open borders". When you of course don't get the link saying "I want open borders" you act like you just proved the person wrong. When somebody says the ACA is a redistribution of wealth, you ask for a link,
Somebody posts quoted text from an article and you ask for a link and criticize them when all you need to do is copy the first line of the article and search it and voila!
Somebody says more violent rhetoric comes from the left, you ask for a link. This is stupid. What are you expecting? The organization of Official Violent Rhetoric to have a spreadsheet documenting all statements of rhetoric with an empirical rating scale?
People make obvious hyperbolic statements and you ask for a link(which is of course why I specified that I wasn't being serious when I said half your posts were asking for links because as we both know, that is the kind of "can I have a link" you would pull.)
Also just so you don't ask for a link, I made up the whole "office of violent rhetoric" thing.
You get mad when people sarcastically ask you for links and say "that was my opinion" even though you technically made a definitive statement. (Something you did in this thread just a few posts ago). Just like above bolded. I know you cant provide empirical data proving that such a theory has been destroyed since you don't have access to what is reported and not reported to the mods. I understand that your opinion was implied in such a statement and that asking for a link is just a stupid troll job.
These types of responses are my favorite. If you've had enough of it, why respond at all? Answer: because you want to have the last word without explanation.
It might be, and I say this seriously, if someone doesn't respond to a question they get hounded for ignoring that question. I know it has happened to you in the past, so maybe a response like that is better than no response.
![[scooter]](/data/avatars/m/22/22287.jpg?1659477690){kind=avatar}
