Hilts
Footballguy
Is that his entire career, or just his career stats with Stafford?Calvin Johnson career targets:
1st quarter - 287
2nd quarter - 364
3rd quarter - 276
4th quarter - 378
Is that his entire career, or just his career stats with Stafford?Calvin Johnson career targets:
1st quarter - 287
2nd quarter - 364
3rd quarter - 276
4th quarter - 378
Entire career. 7 seasons with Stafford, 2 without. Not going to research every year individually because I doubt it moves the needle.Is that his entire career, or just his career stats with Stafford?
Fair enough. I am debating MVS with AJ Green hurt. It's an end of bench spot so l'm also looking at Dez & Malcolm Brown. Probably going to go with MVS.Can we stop the Stafford stuff and focus on MVS in here?
It would. Near the end it was brutal owning him. You had to own him and watch the games to see it. Sure when he first came in and threw to Calvin, it was a lot early in games. As an owner, I watched every game.Entire career. 7 seasons with Stafford, 2 without. Not going to research every year individually because I doubt it moves the needle.
I agree here. I'm actually benching him in one dynasty league in favor of J Moore as I think this game could see some higher volumes for backups.Temper expectations as Miami could be blown out. It could be 27-6. Against the Jets last week, Miami had a total of 7 first downs.
in cases like this I go with the better QB. Cooper may get more volume but MVS may do more with what hes given. My opinion is their volume will be similar. GB passes more than Dallas.Where would you rank MVS for the rest of the year (including this week’s tough matchup)?
Without getting too “my team”, I have the option to trade for either MVS or Amari Cooper and, while very high on MVS, am torn between who I’d rank higher.
They both seem seem to be in that “Low WR2/WR3” with high WR2 upside.
I like both a decent amount. Can't say which one I like more but I'd trade for one of them. If I had to pick one maybe Cooper b/c I think Garrett is going to force balls to him to try and the owner look good. But like MVS quite a bit as well.Where would you rank MVS for the rest of the year (including this week’s tough matchup)?
Without getting too “my team”, I have the option to trade for either MVS or Amari Cooper and, while very high on MVS, am torn between who I’d rank higher.
They both seem seem to be in that “Low WR2/WR3” with high WR2 upside.
true, with the offense dysfunction I'm not sure they pull anyone too early. put him back in for me. at the very least I'm playing my best guyI like him today...GB blowing anyone out seems unlikely.
They may but I don’t see them pulling MVS or anyone too early. And I think Rodgets is wanting to make a statement.
Im leaning him over Ridley and Michel in my flex.
It will be me my struggle the rest of the year having Michel Ridley and MVS . Most days Michel will get the nod. Coming off an injury with a bye next week his usage scares me.true, with the offense dysfunction I'm not sure they pull anyone too early. put him back in for me. at the very least I'm playing my best guy
Even if they did, it would only be the 4th Q. PITT was destroying Carolina and they played thru 3 Qs.true, with the offense dysfunction I'm not sure they pull anyone too early. put him back in for me. at the very least I'm playing my best guy
Never sit ur studsCBS dude just indicated Cobb is going to be out.
Tempted to start MVS over Jeffery, but can't do it.
That was last week.Never sit ur studs
Well that's stupid this guy is tyreek hill fast ..he's best at going deep ..well hurry up Cobb and come backStrangely, it appears that if Cobb is out it may work against MVS. See ESPN analysis (and take with a grain of salt). I'd think they find a way to get MVS on the perimeter. Rotoworld's Silva also points this out:
ESPN
If Randall Cobb (hamstring) returns, downgrade him vs. Seattle slot corner Justin Coleman and upgrade Marquez Valdes-Scantling opposite Adams against Flowers and Griffin. If Cobb is out again, MVS will work inside against Coleman and should be downgraded, whereas Equanimeous St. Brown will be a sleeper opposite Adams. Seattle has allowed the fewest fantasy points to the slot over the past eight weeks.
ROTO/SILVA
With Cobb (hamstring) sidelined again, Valdes-Scantling will primarily play slot receiver after running 62% of his routes inside in last week’s win. St. Brown was Green Bay’s other perimeter wideout but ran only 19 routes behind Adams’ 32 and MVS’ 31. Valdes-Scantling warrants upside WR3 treatment averaging 6.8 targets for 72.2 yards with two TDs over his last five games. MVS offers more big-play potential outside, and a higher volume floor in the slot. He had six grabs against the Dolphins, but all came close to the line of scrimmage. …
Sorry but Jeffrey is a wr2 I would never sit him vs a rook come on now unless the guy plays against RamseyThat was last week.
And "stud" Jeffery was outscored by MVS.
Worst advice ever to never sit your studs. There are few "studs." Matchups rule the day.
Agree, and didn't. And wont.Sorry but Jeffrey is a wr2 I would never sit him vs a rook come on now unless the guy plays against Ramsey
Have the same exact decision and going with MVS.In as I can;t gamble on AJ Green playing. So in over J Brown due to potential QB challenges and I am already starting Collins of Balt
He caught one for 8How do you not catch 1 pass with Aaron Rodgers as your QB!
I should have listenedStrangely, it appears that if Cobb is out it may work against MVS. See ESPN analysis (and take with a grain of salt). I'd think they find a way to get MVS on the perimeter. Rotoworld's Silva also points this out:
ESPN
If Randall Cobb (hamstring) returns, downgrade him vs. Seattle slot corner Justin Coleman and upgrade Marquez Valdes-Scantling opposite Adams against Flowers and Griffin. If Cobb is out again, MVS will work inside against Coleman and should be downgraded, whereas Equanimeous St. Brown will be a sleeper opposite Adams. Seattle has allowed the fewest fantasy points to the slot over the past eight weeks.
ROTO/SILVA
With Cobb (hamstring) sidelined again, Valdes-Scantling will primarily play slot receiver after running 62% of his routes inside in last week’s win. St. Brown was Green Bay’s other perimeter wideout but ran only 19 routes behind Adams’ 32 and MVS’ 31. Valdes-Scantling warrants upside WR3 treatment averaging 6.8 targets for 72.2 yards with two TDs over his last five games. MVS offers more big-play potential outside, and a higher volume floor in the slot. He had six grabs against the Dolphins, but all came close to the line of scrimmage. …
Marquez Valdes-Scantling caught 1-of-3 targets for eight yards in the Packers' Week 11 loss to the Seahawks.
That's going to leave a mark. It was the first time in seven games MVS failed to post at least 38 yards. Aaron Rodgers was laser focused on Davante Adams. Aaron Jones was also gobbling up touches. The entire Packers offense went off the rails in the second half, limiting opportunity for everyone. MVS will look to bounce back as a WR4 for Week 12 against the Vikings.