Wrong. I'm surprised anyone could say that with a straight face. You need to watch something other than CNN and MSNBC.Dems aren't moving left. The Repubs have moved so far right that any movement from the Dems is over exaggerated. The Repub party is nearing The Handmaid's Tale level of crazy.
From ~1976 to 2012 they moved right because that's where the votes were. When the votes are somewhere else, they'll go there.IC FBGCav said:I think it is an interesting question. What is the Democrat establishment obsession with always moving to right policies?
Don't be this way.Radical Larry said:Remember when you were a somewhat interesting and valued poster on this board?
Who dis?Radical Larry said:Remember when you were a somewhat interesting and valued poster on this board?
You're right. The GOP hasn't moved to the right, they have moved to Crazytown.JohnnyU said:Wrong. I'm surprised anyone could say that with a straight face. You need to watch something other than CNN and MSNBC.
I am not prepared to discourage careening leftiness because i've been waiting for it to re-emerge for almost half a century. I am almost certain we're going to crash and crash big in this generation and am pretty sure that decades of tyranny will follow - because power & militias are on the same side and AOC can't smile into that without getting her face ripped off - but i would like America to get a little practice at fairness before the fall.Even a way out there lefty like me knows you can't grab for too much all at once. Though I share wikkid's concerns about the Democratic establishment and its desire to obtain and maintain power uber alles, public sentiment continues to drive us inexorably leftward. Yeah, I'm impatient, too, but I'll only really start to worry if new young voters start advocating for a return of social conservatism. As it is, they understand the benefits of progressivism and will soon be the nation's most important electoral voice for change.
Can somebody please tell me why this isn't a suspendable offense? Seriously. It's a direct personal attack, and in no conceivable way addresses the thread content or moves conversation in a productive manner. Further, especially as one of the first responses to the OP, it significantly influences the direction and tone of the thread.Radical Larry said:Remember when you were a somewhat interesting and valued poster on this board?
Totally agree.The majority of the population isn't far left. If the democratic parts becomes out of touch with the majority of the population, they become irrelevant. Why would they want that?
For the millionth time, you have to report something for it to be seen. We see about 1% of the board.Can somebody please tell me why this isn't a suspendable offense? Seriously. It's a direct personal attack, and in no conceivable way addresses the thread content or moves conversation in a productive manner. Further, especially as one of the first responses to the OP, it significantly influences the direction and tone of the thread.
@Joe Bryant @FBG Moderator
Hillary beat Bernie in 68% of the States and got more than 3 million votes than Sander got. superdelegates were irrelevant.power. the Dem power base is labor & teachers and both bureaucracies are anachronisms as presently constituted. the only power they have left is the machinery - the Superdelegates by which they defeated the Bern, the ability to apportion dough and get folks elected. they know if they let people who actually care abide, they're over.
That poster behind thatalias is part of the protected class around hereCan somebody please tell me why this isn't a suspendable offense? Seriously. It's a direct personal attack, and in no conceivable way addresses the thread content or moves conversation in a productive manner. Further, especially as one of the first responses to the OP, it significantly influences the direction and tone of the thread.
@Joe Bryant @FBG Moderator
Seems a bit uncalled forRadical Larry said:Remember when you were a somewhat interesting and valued poster on this board?
You mean like HRC, that center left? Center left is a proven loser. Obama lost over 1000 seats nationwide under his watch. That center left?Totally agree.
If the dems stay a bit left of center they can`t possibly lose as they will get the moderates and independent voters to go their way. The hard liners on the left will always vote dem. Pelosi already knows this and that is why she is trying to get a handle on things before the election season gets in full swing.
Only way they can blow this is going too far left and losing the middle vote that can be swayed.
You mean that HRC that won the popular vote? Center left has a hell of a lot better chance of winning the presidency than far left does.You mean like HRC, that center left? Center left is a proven loser.
Disagree,I think HRC was the proven loser. Probably only candidate Trump would have beaten.You mean like HRC, that center left? Center left is a proven loser. Obama lost over 1000 seats nationwide under his watch. That center left?
She lost to Trump. I rest my case with only this evidence.You mean that HRC that won the popular vote? Center left has a hell of a lot better chance of winning the presidency than far left does.
Many of the policies espoused by the alleged far-left enjoy majority support bipartisan majority support. How do you become irrelevant pushing policies that enjoy majority support from both sides of the aisle?The majority of the population isn't far left. If the democratic parts becomes out of touch with the majority of the population, they become irrelevant. Why would they want that?
Ask Republicans. Support for certain gun control measures enjoys incredible public support, yet they believe if they vote in support of it they'll become irrelevant.Many of the policies espoused by the alleged far-left enjoy majority support bipartisan majority support. How do you become irrelevant pushing policies that enjoy majority support from both sides of the aisle?
Except their voters want it. 70% of NRA members want it. They are just afraid of the NRA not the voters. So when someone from the commie left runs on it will the left become irrelevant or will they make inroads? And if you never try what changes?Ask Republicans. Support for certain gun control measures enjoys incredible public support, yet they believe if they vote in support of it they'll become irrelevant.
Far left will get blown out in 2020 if that’s what they run against Trump. A centrist candidate is the only chance they have.She lost to Trump. I rest my case with only this evidence.
Surety in the face of absolutely no evidence in support and plenty against.Far left will get blown out in 2020 if that’s what they run against Trump. A centrist candidate is the only chance they have.
It's been hashed to death. Surely you know most Americans aren't in favor of far left policies.Surety in the face of absolutely no evidence in support and plenty against.
Surely you know that 70% of Americans including 85% of Democrats and 52% of Republicans support Medicare for All as just one example. To get to 70% you need a lot of independents as well. Is that one of those far left policies you were talking about?It's been hashed to death. Surely you know most Americans aren't in favor of far left policies.
Hey GB, how the heck are ya?Many of the policies espoused by the alleged far-left enjoy majority support bipartisan majority support. How do you become irrelevant pushing policies that enjoy majority support from both sides of the aisle?
Other areas are more of mixed-bag when you look across the country. Voting rights have obviously taken a hit, so it's more of mixed bag by State. My state (Colorado) has made huge gains in voting right. We've cleaned up our gerrymandered districts and taken it away from being a political process, have an all mail-in paper ballot system that makes it super easy to vote, etc. Conservative states obviously not so much, but at the National Level Dems are embracing much more liberal reforms like a National Election Day holiday and obviously talking more about the issues with the Electoral College.Generally speaking, the U.S. population and Democratic establishment are moving left pretty quickly. 10 years and change ago Candidate Barack Obama didn't feel like he could openly support Gay Marriage and right now there is an openly gay candidate running for the Democratic nomination and no one seems to think it's big deal. Virtually no one was talking about single payer health care, aside from maybe hypothetically supporting in a one-day scenario. Today most of the Democratic candidates are embracing Medicare for All, albeit with a lot up for interpretation exactly what that means. Marijuana legalization wasn't on anyone's radar and now it's expanding rapidly.
Yep - it’s just hard for some to be patient. I’m probably one of those but you are right, things are slowing moving left and socially will continue.Generally speaking, the U.S. population and Democratic establishment are moving left pretty quickly. 10 years and change ago Candidate Barack Obama didn't feel like he could openly support Gay Marriage and right now there is an openly gay candidate running for the Democratic nomination and no one seems to think it's big deal. Virtually no one was talking about single payer health care, aside from maybe hypothetically supporting in a one-day scenario. Today most of the Democratic candidates are embracing Medicare for All, albeit with a lot up for interpretation exactly what that means. Marijuana legalization wasn't on anyone's radar and now it's expanding rapidly.
Good. How you doing? Always on the lookout for a new video.Hey GB, how the heck are ya?
Censorship is anti americanCan somebody please tell me why this isn't a suspendable offense? Seriously. It's a direct personal attack, and in no conceivable way addresses the thread content or moves conversation in a productive manner. Further, especially as one of the first responses to the OP, it significantly influences the direction and tone of the thread.
@Joe Bryant @FBG Moderator
AgreeThe economy is strong, the world is at peace, and the Mueller report was a nothing burger. It’s going to be tough to beat Trump in 2020, they need a centrists candidate and some energy. Maybe a Biden / O’Rourke ticket.
The centrists were pushing the report, not the progressives. The economy is about to take a huge hit and the world is not at peace. HTH.The economy is strong, the world is at peace, and the Mueller report was a nothing burger. It’s going to be tough to beat Trump in 2020, they need a centrists candidate and some energy. Maybe a Biden / O’Rourke ticket.
Polls are worthless. I keep saying this. Those numbers are almost entirely meaningless without knowing what questions were asked and who was asked.Surely you know that 70% of Americans including 85% of Democrats and 52% of Republicans support Medicare for All as just one example. To get to 70% you need a lot of independents as well. Is that one of those far left policies you were talking about?
patheticRadical Larry said:Remember when you were a somewhat interesting and valued poster on this board?
Part of it is the way mods respond to reporting. When one of the mob does something, there is at most one report and it must be no big deal. When someone posts against the mob, there are eight reports instantly so the mods quickly react.That poster behind thatalias is part of the protected class around here
hth
Wow we're in total snowflake mode if you think that is bannable. And I like Cav know him IRL. I guarantee he didn't bat an eye over it. Thicker skin people look into it.Can somebody please tell me why this isn't a suspendable offense? Seriously. It's a direct personal attack, and in no conceivable way addresses the thread content or moves conversation in a productive manner. Further, especially as one of the first responses to the OP, it significantly influences the direction and tone of the thread.
@Joe Bryant @FBG Moderator