What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

TRUMP TO INFINITY AND BEYOND HQ - The Great and Positive Place (12 Viewers)

Because the President took the a full on authoritarian stance today and I recall you saying that then and it occurred to me it was very much about just that very thing.
It is not at all the same thing. I was talking about the awful blue state governors in that post trying to infringe and take away their citizens liberties constantly. Never let a good crisis go to waste Rahm used to say!

And that’s not an authoritarian stance by Trump. If twitter wants to put “fact checks” on posts they should absolutely be treated like a publisher. I’m surprised Twitter screwed up so bad here honestly. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
And that’s not an authoritarian stance by Trump. If twitter wants to put “fact checks” on posts they should absolutely be treated like a publisher. I’m surprised Twitter screwed up so bad here honestly. 
It’s seizing control of free speech content and the platform it takes place on. That’s either far left -socialist/communist - or extreme right - nationalist Etc - authoritarianism. Publication/publisher has nothing to do with it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
When would debates typically start? He’s going to get slaughtered. 
After the conventions and Labor Day. Probably in October sometime.

And Biden did quite well in the last debate against Bernie, but no one who claims he is deteriorating mentally has been able to explain that.

 
After the conventions and Labor Day. Probably in October sometime.

And Biden did quite well in the last debate against Bernie, but no one who claims he is deteriorating mentally has been able to explain that.
Yet every day we all see on tv Trump going further and further off the rails.

 
Biden can’t get out of his basement much less win an election and accomplish a single thing. Can’t believe the Demmies rolled out an out of touch ancient white dude that can’t keep his hands to himself.  :lmao:
Unfortunately Republicans are rolling out someone who fits your description of Biden as well.

We should all be embarrassed and demand better options for leadership in this country.

 
Biden can’t get out of his basement much less win an election and accomplish a single thing. Can’t believe the Demmies rolled out an out of touch ancient white dude that can’t keep his hands to himself.  :lmao:
I like the new Democrat Biden strategy, when they roll him out once every 3 months make sure to put on his silence of the lambs mask so he can’t sniff anybody or say anything stupid.

 
It’s seizing control of free speech content and the platform it takes place on. That’s either far left -socialist/communist - or extreme right - nationalist Etc - authoritarianism. Publication/publisher has nothing to do with it.
They are acting as a publisher when they put a fact check on. How do you think Twitter avoids getting the crap sued out of them every 2 seconds? They aren’t a publisher and don’t editorialize. Well now they are which opens them up to a whole new world. Dumb move by a Twitter. 

 
And one guy is going to be prepared. The other will probably get the questions beforehand. 
If Trump were prepared he would get through a Q/A without freaking out on someone or saying something nuts like bleach injection needs to be looked into. It is what it is.

Biden is no debate beast either so it’s going to be a mess most likely.

But this idea that Trump is so great in this format is kind of ridiculous.

 
They are acting as a publisher when they put a fact check on. How do you think Twitter avoids getting the crap sued out of them every 2 seconds? They aren’t a publisher and don’t editorialize. Well now they are which opens them up to a whole new world. Dumb move by a Twitter. 
So, do you think book publishers can be regulated, censored or shut down by the president? How about newspaper publishers? Pamphlet publishers?

 
So, do you think book publishers can be regulated, censored or shut down by the president? How about newspaper publishers? Pamphlet publishers?
I think Twitter is in a world of crap for caving to the Democrats here. Why not put a fact check on Biden or Schiff when they lie about Russia? 

 
They are acting as a publisher when they put a fact check on. How do you think Twitter avoids getting the crap sued out of them every 2 seconds? They aren’t a publisher and don’t editorialize. Well now they are which opens them up to a whole new world. Dumb move by a Twitter. 
Fact checking is checking facts, not editorializing. Editing or censoring content would be exercising editorial prerogative. They haven't changed anything Trump actually said. 

 
Guys look who’s back and feeling good about the economy. The Biden handlers must be freaking out. 
 

https://theweek.com/speedreads/916724/paul-krugman-says-hes-feeling-more-positive-than-expected-about-economy
 I'd imagine there'd be a certain amount of consumer confidence (particularly in the service and entertainment industry) that would need to happen now for there to be a (relatively) quick recovery.  Unfortunately, there's always the spectre of flair ups and a Fall problem that could slow that down.

 
I think Twitter is in a world of crap for caving to the Democrats here. Why not put a fact check on Biden or Schiff when they lie about Russia? 
Ok I was asking you about a question of principle which is easy for any conservative - no, it's not legal for a president to censor or shut down publishers in our American, democratic system. I don't think I have to remind you of Tom Paine, and yes I suppose if Paine allowed people to use his press (which he did) he'd be well fit and entitled - as was his right - to edit their work before he did so.

Your point is a different one though, and really I kind of agree, though I am not sure why you bring up fellow Americans. What about falsehoods by China and various other handles from various adversaries around the world? I do think it's a lot of work, bound to lead to inconsistencies and generally fraught with peril. But it is their right to do what they will with their property and their free press.

 
Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

37m

If the FISA Bill is passed tonight on the House floor, I will quickly VETO it. Our Country has just suffered through the greatest political crime in its history. The massive abuse of FISA was a big part of it!

 
Bucsfan5493 said:
Unfortunately Republicans are rolling out someone who fits your description of Biden as well.

We should all be embarrassed and demand better options for leadership in this country.
It would be nice but what decent person wants the job....all options suck. We pulled an arrogant billionaire off a reality TV show and he’s running circles around our recent typical politicians and he has the ability of a 5th grader to communicate. 
 

Not perfect but I’ll take it over what we had every time. 

 
Just so you know, if you get rid of FISA that would be a return to warantless searches, like we had during Nixon and before.
FISA needs to be reformed. We haven't even gotten to the bottom of the Russiagate scandal.  I think we need to complete that and we need to close all the loopholes. This current FISA bill doesnt do that.

 
Barr wants it reformed and I hope Trump listens. It serves a purpose, but is too easily abused. 
You do know Barr founded the spying program that DOJ and the NSA ultimately got busted for by IG Michael Horowitz?

Whatever comes of Mr. Barr’s review and the conspiracy theories that ensue, he would be wise to reflect on his own history with government surveillance that stretched the limits of the law. Just last month, Mr. Horowitz’s office concluded that the Justice Department and the Drug Enforcement Administration “failed to conduct a comprehensive legal analysis” when the two agencies undertook a secret surveillance program in the 1990s that swept up records of Americans’ phone calls — the kind of bulk collection that the National Security Agency later engaged in after 9/11.

The D.E.A. program dates back to 1992, when Mr. Barr first led the Justice Department under President George H.W. Bush. Relying on so-called administrative subpoenas, the D.E.A. would go on fishing expeditions, vacuuming up metadata from billions of phone calls to more than 100 countries, according to a 2015 USA Today investigation.

The inspector general’s office found it “troubling” that the government’s collection entailed a “uniquely expansive” reading of the law; under the program, officials would issue subpoenas for records without first determining that they were “relevant or material” to a specific investigation, as the law requires. The inspector general also suggested that the D.E.A. abused its authority because the records were then shared with other federal agencies that had nothing to do with drug enforcement.

One thing the inspector general report makes clear: Mr. Barr was in charge as this program came into being and “provided approval” for its deployment without appropriate legal review. In the future, if Mr. Barr wants to move forward with a similar bulk-collection program, “the Department should conduct a rigorous, objective legal analysis, memorialized in writing, in advance of initiating such a program,” the report said.
Barr doesn't want to reform anything. He wants less oversight, not more.

Here's Horowitz's report:

According to DEA and FBI memoranda and other contemporaneous records, senior Department officials sanctioned the development of [REDACTED] in the early 1990s. The DEA's historical records reflect that in January 1992 Attorney General William Barr provided approval for the [REDACTED] program, including [REDACTED], after receiving a program briefing, which the Deputy Attorney General also attended.
Barr hates the FISC.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top