Not a lot of real IQ tests are accurate above 160.As a kid, I would score around 170 on IQ tests.
In college, my score was in the 130s
pretty sure my score now would be close to 110-120
this one was 160.
You just saved me a few hours of agony. Thanks. Never would have gotten that one.Thanks. Yep, completely whiffed that one.It's "H". Top row has left/right symmetry, bottom row has top/bottom symmetry, and "H" fits both.
Well we know who the cheating question was about now.your score could not be calculated because you answered every question correctly and in a short time period. This leads us to believe you cheated.
This is a very funny post.(HULK) said:http://www.mbti123.com/iq/en/
I'm not sure how valid it is as I scored a 170, which is a bit higher than my usual. Anyways, takes like 10 minutes if you're looking for a quick time waster.
Hope he wasn't wearing white pants.And yet you forgot your period.Hey I got 200 you guys
As a kid, I'd argue with you.Not a lot of real IQ tests are accurate above 160.As a kid, I would score around 170 on IQ tests.
In college, my score was in the 130s
pretty sure my score now would be close to 110-120
this one was 160.
lol. wasn't ridiculously high and flawwed til i matched you?(HULK) said:170 is a ridiculously high score. Probably a flawwed test then.
I would be very interested if anyone cares to explain the last 6 answers. I may be stupid, but I'm inquisitive with an unquenchable thirst for knowledge.
challenge acceptedThis is an IQ test like eating mac and cheese right from the oven is a test of courage.
There is a lot more to an IQ test than spatial reasoning and some of it is language based on things learned.This isnt an IQ test. This is a math and logic test. The only similiarity is pattern recognition. A real IQ test measures spatial reasoning and consists of a lot of puzzles involving colors and shapes. I was given many of them as a child.
The classic misconception is that knowledge=intelligence. It doesnt. IQ tests dont measure what you know, they measure your ability to learn.
Perhaps some basic stuff but it doesnt measure academicsThere is a lot more to an IQ test than spatial reasoning and some of it is language based on things learned.This isnt an IQ test. This is a math and logic test. The only similiarity is pattern recognition. A real IQ test measures spatial reasoning and consists of a lot of puzzles involving colors and shapes. I was given many of them as a child.
The classic misconception is that knowledge=intelligence. It doesnt. IQ tests dont measure what you know, they measure your ability to learn.
It is not an academic achievement test, but there are plenty of topics that are learned such as word meanings, mental math or famous people.Perhaps some basic stuff but it doesnt measure academicsThere is a lot more to an IQ test than spatial reasoning and some of it is language based on things learned.This isnt an IQ test. This is a math and logic test. The only similiarity is pattern recognition. A real IQ test measures spatial reasoning and consists of a lot of puzzles involving colors and shapes. I was given many of them as a child.
The classic misconception is that knowledge=intelligence. It doesnt. IQ tests dont measure what you know, they measure your ability to learn.
I would be very interested if anyone cares to explain the last 6 answers. I may be stupid, but I'm inquisitive with an unquenchable thirst for knowledge.
My beef is that with all the other grammatical errors, in this question and in many others, it's easy to infer that the usage of "maybe" here could mean "one of" or "either". Since the language is so imprecise elsewhere, there's no way to have faith in one word here.Agreed. I was thinking at the time that this wasn't a particularly great question. It seems to hinge on whether somebody notices the "Maybe" in there. And of course the fact that C is ungrammatical.B's statement is not a lie.Same thought here about that question:140 and I've always really sucked at math. I answered I don't know on at least 5 questions. The one I went over the longest was the one where someone cheated and someone was a liar. None of the choices offered could be correct, the way I read it.
If it's #1, C lied, B cheated, then B's statement is also a lie, so it's not that.Four (A, B, C and D) suspect were interrogated:
Only one person can be the liar, which one is correct:1 C lied, B cheated
- A: C won't cheat unless B cheated.
- B: Maybe one of A or C cheated.
- C: B didn't cheat, it's me cheated.
- D: B cheated.
2 B lied, B cheated
3 A lied, C cheated
4 D lied, C cheated
If it's #2, B lied & cheated, then C also lied.
If it's #3, A lied, C cheated, then D also lied.
If it's #4, D lied, C cheated, then A also lied... unless there are multiple cheaters? I guess that's what we're supposed to assume?
if you fold the letters on the top row in half vertically through the middle of the letter they mirrow each side. If you fold the bottom letters horizontally through the middle they mirror top with bottom. H does left to right and top to bottom.still not seeing the symmetry on 19...
I don't know probably is "answer is not obtainable" but it is never used.Why does this dock you for the "I don't know" answers. Knowing what you don't know is a sign of intelligence.
Very nice! I thought I had looked at it every which way but obviously missed at least one. Great job!spoiler1041 said:18. Add all the digits across to get the number below 8+8+6+3=25
I would be very interested if anyone cares to explain the last 6 answers. I may be stupid, but I'm inquisitive with an unquenchable thirst for knowledge.
one thing that IQ tests like this DO test is one's ability to take tests....There is a lot more to an IQ test than spatial reasoning and some of it is language based on things learned.This isnt an IQ test. This is a math and logic test. The only similiarity is pattern recognition. A real IQ test measures spatial reasoning and consists of a lot of puzzles involving colors and shapes. I was given many of them as a child.
The classic misconception is that knowledge=intelligence. It doesnt. IQ tests dont measure what you know, they measure your ability to learn.
You should read post 19 and put away your smugness.I'm surprised with the higher scores, no one figured out your "IQ" is just how many questions you got right. 170=17 correct. I got 19 right therefore my "IQ" was 190 (of course it is not nearly that high irl). But still an interesting test to take. make a lot people feel smarter so maybe it'll motivate them to work harder on things. Then again it could cause the opposite effect too.
Was still a fun test to take and those last few were pretty good.
I know the one I got wrong was the number box so if someone does figure out the pattern, I'd love to see it. Thought I had figured out the pattern a few times but then I was able to disprove it, which put me right back to the drawing board.
No. This is a valid and reliable test of intelligence, which confirms that the FFA is home to a statistically improbable number of super-geniuses. If only we used our powers for good instead of shtick, the world would be a better place, just not as funny.I'm surprised with the higher scores, no one figured out your "IQ" is just how many questions you got right.
I think making the world a funnier place would make it a better place.No. This is a valid and reliable test of intelligence, which confirms that the FFA is home to a statistically improbable number of super-geniuses. If only we used our powers for good instead of shtick, the world would be a better place, just not as funny.I'm surprised with the higher scores, no one figured out your "IQ" is just how many questions you got right.
People who think they know everything are especially annoying to those of us who do...No. This is a valid and reliable test of intelligence, which confirms that the FFA is home to a statistically improbable number of super-geniuses. If only we used our powers for good instead of shtick, the world would be a better place, just not as funny.I'm surprised with the higher scores, no one figured out your "IQ" is just how many questions you got right.
My head is spining from this question. I just can't follow what's going on here.Same thought here about that question:140 and I've always really sucked at math. I answered I don't know on at least 5 questions. The one I went over the longest was the one where someone cheated and someone was a liar. None of the choices offered could be correct, the way I read it.
If it's #1, C lied, B cheated, then B's statement is also a lie, so it's not that.Four (A, B, C and D) suspect were interrogated:Only one person can be the liar, which one is correct:
- A: C won't cheat unless B cheated.
- B: Maybe one of A or C cheated.
- C: B didn't cheat, it's me cheated.
- D: B cheated.
1 C lied, B cheated
2 B lied, B cheated
3 A lied, C cheated
4 D lied, C cheated
If it's #2, B lied & cheated, then C also lied.
If it's #3, A lied, C cheated, then D also lied.
If it's #4, D lied, C cheated, then A also lied... unless there are multiple cheaters? I guess that's what we're supposed to assume?
"maybe" can't be true or a lie so it is useless information. They are testing your ability to extract the meaningful infornation.To explain it in detail:My head is spining from this question. I just can't follow what's going on here.Same thought here about that question:140 and I've always really sucked at math. I answered I don't know on at least 5 questions. The one I went over the longest was the one where someone cheated and someone was a liar. None of the choices offered could be correct, the way I read it.
If it's #1, C lied, B cheated, then B's statement is also a lie, so it's not that.Four (A, B, C and D) suspect were interrogated:
Only one person can be the liar, which one is correct:1 C lied, B cheated
- A: C won't cheat unless B cheated.
- B: Maybe one of A or C cheated.
- C: B didn't cheat, it's me cheated.
- D: B cheated.
2 B lied, B cheated
3 A lied, C cheated
4 D lied, C cheated
If it's #2, B lied & cheated, then C also lied.
If it's #3, A lied, C cheated, then D also lied.
If it's #4, D lied, C cheated, then A also lied... unless there are multiple cheaters? I guess that's what we're supposed to assume?
Post #77 above. There are at least three grammatical errors in this question alone. Hinging the whole thing on an interpretation of "maybe" is pointless. Also, it's only stated there is one liar, but never stated there is only one cheater. Therefore more than one answer is possible and should be acceptable."maybe" can't be true or a lie so it is useless information. They are testing your ability to extract the meaningful infornation.My head is spining from this question. I just can't follow what's going on here.Same thought here about that question:140 and I've always really sucked at math. I answered I don't know on at least 5 questions. The one I went over the longest was the one where someone cheated and someone was a liar. None of the choices offered could be correct, the way I read it.
If it's #1, C lied, B cheated, then B's statement is also a lie, so it's not that.Four (A, B, C and D) suspect were interrogated:
Only one person can be the liar, which one is correct:1 C lied, B cheated
- A: C won't cheat unless B cheated.
- B: Maybe one of A or C cheated.
- C: B didn't cheat, it's me cheated.
- D: B cheated.
2 B lied, B cheated
3 A lied, C cheated
4 D lied, C cheated
If it's #2, B lied & cheated, then C also lied.
If it's #3, A lied, C cheated, then D also lied.
If it's #4, D lied, C cheated, then A also lied... unless there are multiple cheaters? I guess that's what we're supposed to assume?
My post proves C lied without using B so the interpretation of maybe is irrelevant. As for post 77, inductive reasoning does not guarantee a correct answer. You must use deductive reasoning to come to a true answer. In other words, don't start with the answers, start with the question/facts.Post #77 above. There are at least three grammatical errors in this question alone. Hinging the whole thing on an interpretation of "maybe" is pointless. Also, it's only stated there is one liar, but never stated there is only one cheater. Therefore more than one answer is possible and should be acceptable."maybe" can't be true or a lie so it is useless information. They are testing your ability to extract the meaningful infornation.My head is spining from this question. I just can't follow what's going on here.Same thought here about that question:140 and I've always really sucked at math. I answered I don't know on at least 5 questions. The one I went over the longest was the one where someone cheated and someone was a liar. None of the choices offered could be correct, the way I read it.
If it's #1, C lied, B cheated, then B's statement is also a lie, so it's not that.Four (A, B, C and D) suspect were interrogated:
Only one person can be the liar, which one is correct:1 C lied, B cheated
- A: C won't cheat unless B cheated.
- B: Maybe one of A or C cheated.
- C: B didn't cheat, it's me cheated.
- D: B cheated.
2 B lied, B cheated
3 A lied, C cheated
4 D lied, C cheated
If it's #2, B lied & cheated, then C also lied.
If it's #3, A lied, C cheated, then D also lied.
If it's #4, D lied, C cheated, then A also lied... unless there are multiple cheaters? I guess that's what we're supposed to assume?
I think it's an EQ test based on ability to reconcile that even though you scored well - it's bull####.No. This is a valid and reliable test of intelligence, which confirms that the FFA is home to a statistically improbable number of super-geniuses. If only we used our powers for good instead of shtick, the world would be a better place, just not as funny.I'm surprised with the higher scores, no one ffigured out your "IQ" is just how many questions you got right.