What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

20 Question IQ Test (1 Viewer)

As a kid, I would score around 170 on IQ tests.

In college, my score was in the 130s

pretty sure my score now would be close to 110-120

this one was 160.
Not a lot of real IQ tests are accurate above 160.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would be very interested if anyone cares to explain the last 6 answers. I may be stupid, but I'm inquisitive with an unquenchable thirst for knowledge.

 
I would be very interested if anyone cares to explain the last 6 answers. I may be stupid, but I'm inquisitive with an unquenchable thirst for knowledge.
15: -5. Dunno why.

16: Visualize them all as square post-its. #1 is on the top, and every other one is partially obscured by the ones above it. 8 has to be on the bottom.

17: "5,10,19,32,49,70... What is next?" The difference between the numbers increases by 4 each time. +5 between 5 and 10. +9 between 10 and 19. +13 between 19 and 32. +17 between 32 & 49. +21 between 49 & 70, so the next is +25 and the result is 95.

18: 17. Dunno why.

19: "H" fits both left/right and top/bottom symmetry for the rows.

20: Read them left to right, and one line segment moves between each graphic. Although A, C, D, and E all seem to work by the rules of the middle row, A is the most correct because it's also a rotation of the first image in the row (same as in rows 1 & 2 where the 1st & 3rd symbols are rotations).
 
aren't there a couple of you jagoffs who belong to Mensa or TNS? Did you use this IQ test?

 
This isnt an IQ test. This is a math and logic test. The only similiarity is pattern recognition. A real IQ test measures spatial reasoning and consists of a lot of puzzles involving colors and shapes. I was given many of them as a child.

The classic misconception is that knowledge=intelligence. It doesnt. IQ tests dont measure what you know, they measure your ability to learn.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This isnt an IQ test. This is a math and logic test. The only similiarity is pattern recognition. A real IQ test measures spatial reasoning and consists of a lot of puzzles involving colors and shapes. I was given many of them as a child.

The classic misconception is that knowledge=intelligence. It doesnt. IQ tests dont measure what you know, they measure your ability to learn.
There is a lot more to an IQ test than spatial reasoning and some of it is language based on things learned.

 
This isnt an IQ test. This is a math and logic test. The only similiarity is pattern recognition. A real IQ test measures spatial reasoning and consists of a lot of puzzles involving colors and shapes. I was given many of them as a child.

The classic misconception is that knowledge=intelligence. It doesnt. IQ tests dont measure what you know, they measure your ability to learn.
There is a lot more to an IQ test than spatial reasoning and some of it is language based on things learned.
Perhaps some basic stuff but it doesnt measure academics

 
This isnt an IQ test. This is a math and logic test. The only similiarity is pattern recognition. A real IQ test measures spatial reasoning and consists of a lot of puzzles involving colors and shapes. I was given many of them as a child.

The classic misconception is that knowledge=intelligence. It doesnt. IQ tests dont measure what you know, they measure your ability to learn.
There is a lot more to an IQ test than spatial reasoning and some of it is language based on things learned.
Perhaps some basic stuff but it doesnt measure academics
It is not an academic achievement test, but there are plenty of topics that are learned such as word meanings, mental math or famous people.

 
I'm surprised with the higher scores, no one figured out your "IQ" is just how many questions you got right. 170=17 correct. I got 19 right therefore my "IQ" was 190 (of course it is not nearly that high irl). But still an interesting test to take. make a lot people feel smarter so maybe it'll motivate them to work harder on things. Then again it could cause the opposite effect too.

Was still a fun test to take and those last few were pretty good.

I know the one I got wrong was the number box so if someone does figure out the pattern, I'd love to see it. Thought I had figured out the pattern a few times but then I was able to disprove it, which put me right back to the drawing board.

 
#14 C and D are mutually exclusive so one is a lie, that means A is true since A is true C is a lie.

#15. Add the 2 digits in the bottom row and subtract that from the top row to get middle row.

#16. 2/8 3/4 4/5 5/2 6/3 7/6 so it's 8

#17. The difference increases by 4. 5 9 13 17 21 25.

18. Add all the digits across to get the number below 8+8+6+3=25

#19. Symmetry as already explained in other post.

#20. Turn bottom line 90 degrees then the top line 90 degrees.

I would be very interested if anyone cares to explain the last 6 answers. I may be stupid, but I'm inquisitive with an unquenchable thirst for knowledge.
 
140 and I've always really sucked at math. I answered I don't know on at least 5 questions. The one I went over the longest was the one where someone cheated and someone was a liar. None of the choices offered could be correct, the way I read it.
Same thought here about that question:

Four (A, B, C and D) suspect were interrogated:

  • A: C won't cheat unless B cheated.
  • B: Maybe one of A or C cheated.
  • C: B didn't cheat, it's me cheated.
  • D: B cheated.
Only one person can be the liar, which one is correct:1 C lied, B cheated

2 B lied, B cheated

3 A lied, C cheated

4 D lied, C cheated
If it's #1, C lied, B cheated, then B's statement is also a lie, so it's not that.

If it's #2, B lied & cheated, then C also lied.

If it's #3, A lied, C cheated, then D also lied.

If it's #4, D lied, C cheated, then A also lied... unless there are multiple cheaters? I guess that's what we're supposed to assume?
B's statement is not a lie.
Agreed. I was thinking at the time that this wasn't a particularly great question. It seems to hinge on whether somebody notices the "Maybe" in there. And of course the fact that C is ungrammatical.
My beef is that with all the other grammatical errors, in this question and in many others, it's easy to infer that the usage of "maybe" here could mean "one of" or "either". Since the language is so imprecise elsewhere, there's no way to have faith in one word here.

Also, it is explicitly stated there is one liar. It is not explicitly stated there is one cheater. If one allows for multiple cheaters, other answers are possible.

 
Why does this dock you for the "I don't know" answers. Knowing what you don't know is a sign of intelligence.

 
still not seeing the symmetry on 19...
if you fold the letters on the top row in half vertically through the middle of the letter they mirrow each side. If you fold the bottom letters horizontally through the middle they mirror top with bottom. H does left to right and top to bottom.

 
spoiler1041 said:
18. Add all the digits across to get the number below 8+8+6+3=25

I would be very interested if anyone cares to explain the last 6 answers. I may be stupid, but I'm inquisitive with an unquenchable thirst for knowledge.
Very nice! I thought I had looked at it every which way but obviously missed at least one. Great job!

 
This isnt an IQ test. This is a math and logic test. The only similiarity is pattern recognition. A real IQ test measures spatial reasoning and consists of a lot of puzzles involving colors and shapes. I was given many of them as a child.

The classic misconception is that knowledge=intelligence. It doesnt. IQ tests dont measure what you know, they measure your ability to learn.
There is a lot more to an IQ test than spatial reasoning and some of it is language based on things learned.
one thing that IQ tests like this DO test is one's ability to take tests....

 
I'm surprised with the higher scores, no one figured out your "IQ" is just how many questions you got right. 170=17 correct. I got 19 right therefore my "IQ" was 190 (of course it is not nearly that high irl). But still an interesting test to take. make a lot people feel smarter so maybe it'll motivate them to work harder on things. Then again it could cause the opposite effect too.

Was still a fun test to take and those last few were pretty good.

I know the one I got wrong was the number box so if someone does figure out the pattern, I'd love to see it. Thought I had figured out the pattern a few times but then I was able to disprove it, which put me right back to the drawing board.
You should read post 19 and put away your smugness.

 
I'm surprised with the higher scores, no one figured out your "IQ" is just how many questions you got right.
No. This is a valid and reliable test of intelligence, which confirms that the FFA is home to a statistically improbable number of super-geniuses. If only we used our powers for good instead of shtick, the world would be a better place, just not as funny.

 
I'm surprised with the higher scores, no one figured out your "IQ" is just how many questions you got right.
No. This is a valid and reliable test of intelligence, which confirms that the FFA is home to a statistically improbable number of super-geniuses. If only we used our powers for good instead of shtick, the world would be a better place, just not as funny.
I think making the world a funnier place would make it a better place.

 
I'm surprised with the higher scores, no one figured out your "IQ" is just how many questions you got right.
No. This is a valid and reliable test of intelligence, which confirms that the FFA is home to a statistically improbable number of super-geniuses. If only we used our powers for good instead of shtick, the world would be a better place, just not as funny.
People who think they know everything are especially annoying to those of us who do...

 
140 and I've always really sucked at math. I answered I don't know on at least 5 questions. The one I went over the longest was the one where someone cheated and someone was a liar. None of the choices offered could be correct, the way I read it.
Same thought here about that question:

Four (A, B, C and D) suspect were interrogated:
  • A: C won't cheat unless B cheated.
  • B: Maybe one of A or C cheated.
  • C: B didn't cheat, it's me cheated.
  • D: B cheated.
Only one person can be the liar, which one is correct:
1 C lied, B cheated

2 B lied, B cheated

3 A lied, C cheated

4 D lied, C cheated
If it's #1, C lied, B cheated, then B's statement is also a lie, so it's not that.

If it's #2, B lied & cheated, then C also lied.

If it's #3, A lied, C cheated, then D also lied.

If it's #4, D lied, C cheated, then A also lied... unless there are multiple cheaters? I guess that's what we're supposed to assume?
My head is spining from this question. I just can't follow what's going on here.

 
140 and I've always really sucked at math. I answered I don't know on at least 5 questions. The one I went over the longest was the one where someone cheated and someone was a liar. None of the choices offered could be correct, the way I read it.
Same thought here about that question:

Four (A, B, C and D) suspect were interrogated:

  • A: C won't cheat unless B cheated.
  • B: Maybe one of A or C cheated.
  • C: B didn't cheat, it's me cheated.
  • D: B cheated.
Only one person can be the liar, which one is correct:1 C lied, B cheated

2 B lied, B cheated

3 A lied, C cheated

4 D lied, C cheated
If it's #1, C lied, B cheated, then B's statement is also a lie, so it's not that.

If it's #2, B lied & cheated, then C also lied.

If it's #3, A lied, C cheated, then D also lied.

If it's #4, D lied, C cheated, then A also lied... unless there are multiple cheaters? I guess that's what we're supposed to assume?
My head is spining from this question. I just can't follow what's going on here.
"maybe" can't be true or a lie so it is useless information. They are testing your ability to extract the meaningful infornation.To explain it in detail:

1. There is one liar.

2. C says B didn't do it but D says B did it so one of them is the liar.

3a. Since C or D is the liar A is telling the truth.

3b. C won't cheat unless B does. NOW FACT since A is tellung the truth.

4. C says "C cheated without B cheating", 3b proves this is a lie.

5. C lied.......... thus B cheated.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
140 and I've always really sucked at math. I answered I don't know on at least 5 questions. The one I went over the longest was the one where someone cheated and someone was a liar. None of the choices offered could be correct, the way I read it.
Same thought here about that question:

Four (A, B, C and D) suspect were interrogated:

  • A: C won't cheat unless B cheated.
  • B: Maybe one of A or C cheated.
  • C: B didn't cheat, it's me cheated.
  • D: B cheated.
Only one person can be the liar, which one is correct:1 C lied, B cheated

2 B lied, B cheated

3 A lied, C cheated

4 D lied, C cheated
If it's #1, C lied, B cheated, then B's statement is also a lie, so it's not that.

If it's #2, B lied & cheated, then C also lied.

If it's #3, A lied, C cheated, then D also lied.

If it's #4, D lied, C cheated, then A also lied... unless there are multiple cheaters? I guess that's what we're supposed to assume?
My head is spining from this question. I just can't follow what's going on here.
"maybe" can't be true or a lie so it is useless information. They are testing your ability to extract the meaningful infornation.
Post #77 above. There are at least three grammatical errors in this question alone. Hinging the whole thing on an interpretation of "maybe" is pointless. Also, it's only stated there is one liar, but never stated there is only one cheater. Therefore more than one answer is possible and should be acceptable.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
140 and I've always really sucked at math. I answered I don't know on at least 5 questions. The one I went over the longest was the one where someone cheated and someone was a liar. None of the choices offered could be correct, the way I read it.
Same thought here about that question:

Four (A, B, C and D) suspect were interrogated:

  • A: C won't cheat unless B cheated.
  • B: Maybe one of A or C cheated.
  • C: B didn't cheat, it's me cheated.
  • D: B cheated.
Only one person can be the liar, which one is correct:1 C lied, B cheated

2 B lied, B cheated

3 A lied, C cheated

4 D lied, C cheated
If it's #1, C lied, B cheated, then B's statement is also a lie, so it's not that.

If it's #2, B lied & cheated, then C also lied.

If it's #3, A lied, C cheated, then D also lied.

If it's #4, D lied, C cheated, then A also lied... unless there are multiple cheaters? I guess that's what we're supposed to assume?
My head is spining from this question. I just can't follow what's going on here.
"maybe" can't be true or a lie so it is useless information. They are testing your ability to extract the meaningful infornation.
Post #77 above. There are at least three grammatical errors in this question alone. Hinging the whole thing on an interpretation of "maybe" is pointless. Also, it's only stated there is one liar, but never stated there is only one cheater. Therefore more than one answer is possible and should be acceptable.
My post proves C lied without using B so the interpretation of maybe is irrelevant. As for post 77, inductive reasoning does not guarantee a correct answer. You must use deductive reasoning to come to a true answer. In other words, don't start with the answers, start with the question/facts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm surprised with the higher scores, no one ffigured out your "IQ" is just how many questions you got right.
No. This is a valid and reliable test of intelligence, which confirms that the FFA is home to a statistically improbable number of super-geniuses. If only we used our powers for good instead of shtick, the world would be a better place, just not as funny.
I think it's an EQ test based on ability to reconcile that even though you scored well - it's bull####.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top