What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2011 offseason dynasty trades (2 Viewers)

Those Gates trades above are silly. If that's all you can get for him, keep him.

Better to have his points on the roster and fully depreciate him than it is to give him away for spare parts.

 
Those Gates trades above are silly. If that's all you can get for him, keep him. Better to have his points on the roster and fully depreciate him than it is to give him away for spare parts.
The first trade for Ben Tate is nuts, but I don't think moving up into the top 5 via Gates is trading him away for spare parts. That league was non-PPR, no TE required, so Gates is really a borderline WR2 with a growing injury history. Second trade isn't bad.
 
Those Gates trades above are silly. If that's all you can get for him, keep him.

Better to have his points on the roster and fully depreciate him than it is to give him away for spare parts.
The first trade for Ben Tate is nuts, but I don't think moving up into the top 5 via Gates is trading him away for spare parts. That league was non-PPR, no TE required, so Gates is really a borderline WR2 with a growing injury history. Second trade isn't bad.
I'm not sure I agree with this part.
 
Those Gates trades above are silly. If that's all you can get for him, keep him. Better to have his points on the roster and fully depreciate him than it is to give him away for spare parts.
Agreed.Some people are so obsessed with trading off "expiring assets" that they fail to see the value they forgoe (1-3 years of production) that would likely help their team much more than just settling for minimal value. You see it in this thread with Michael Turner, Stephen Jackson, Reggie Wayne and now Gates going for peanuts.
 
Those Gates trades above are silly. If that's all you can get for him, keep him. Better to have his points on the roster and fully depreciate him than it is to give him away for spare parts.
The first trade for Ben Tate is nuts, but I don't think moving up into the top 5 via Gates is trading him away for spare parts. That league was non-PPR, no TE required, so Gates is really a borderline WR2 with a growing injury history. Second trade isn't bad.
Under those parameters (non ppr, no TE) the trade makes more sense - but I'm not so sure the 1.5 pick necessarily nets a better player than the 2.1 in this draft (where there are about 4-10 fungible RBs imo), although obviously it's a more valuable asset if it's flipped.
 
Just went down in a 16 team, IDP, NON-PPR league, start 1-2 RB's:

Team A GaveL

2011 1.09

2011 1.14

2012 1st

2012 1st

Team B gave:

Ray Rice, RB BAL

A few late/insignificant draft picks (in the 40's or later)

 
Team A gave: addai, welker, smith (car), 1.12, 3.6, 2012 pick 1st

Team B gave: moreno, grant, mike thomas, 1.9, 2012 1st

Both 1sts should be mid to late depending on injuries and luck of course

 
Just went down in a 16 team, IDP, NON-PPR league, start 1-2 RB's:

Team A GaveL

2011 1.09

2011 1.14

2012 1st

2012 1st

Team B gave:

Ray Rice, RB BAL

A few late/insignificant draft picks (in the 40's or later)
That's a pretty horrible trade. Why did RRice go so cheap? Is that owner rebuilding and has absolutely nothing else but Rice?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kenny BrittforMichael Crabtree, 2.10
A nice buy low on Britt.
Huh? I think the guy getting Britt got raped.
Ive got Britt ranked just outside the top 10, and Crabtree around WR25. The 2.10 is not near enough to make up that difference...imo of course.ETA, I have Britt at WR11 and Crabtree at WR22. Same thing applies about the 2.10.
Pretty even swap in my eyes. I have them both in a nebulous WR14~20 range.
 
"Thumbs Up" to both owners. Trade helps both of them based upon present roster configurations, and whatever projections are in place for the coming season(s) - but not more than one or two for many factors/considerations. A single year is difficult to predict, but using a two year total can prove to be more accurate than specifics for each year independently. Then the individual players' projections can be massaged more accurately using real data.

GL to two great dynasty 'ballers.

 
Kenny BrittforMichael Crabtree, 2.10
A nice buy low on Britt.
Huh? I think the guy getting Britt got raped.
Ive got Britt ranked just outside the top 10, and Crabtree around WR25. The 2.10 is not near enough to make up that difference...imo of course.ETA, I have Britt at WR11 and Crabtree at WR22. Same thing applies about the 2.10.
I wouldn't trade Crabtree for Britt straight up.....but that's me.
 
Kenny BrittforMichael Crabtree, 2.10
A nice buy low on Britt.
Huh? I think the guy getting Britt got raped.
Ive got Britt ranked just outside the top 10, and Crabtree around WR25. The 2.10 is not near enough to make up that difference...imo of course.ETA, I have Britt at WR11 and Crabtree at WR22. Same thing applies about the 2.10.
I wouldn't trade Crabtree for Britt straight up.....but that's me.
Fair enough. You must be worried about the off field issues more than me. Do you think Crabtree looked better than Britt last season? I watched both play quite a bit last season, and the difference was pretty clear. Some of the blame for Crabtree has to do with his supporting cast, but Morgan and Davis both looked better than him last year. I know Crabtree is young, and has room to improve, but Britt is a year younger, and also has alot of room for improvement..and its not like he had Peyton Manning or Tom Brady throwing to him either.
 
12 team PPR

Team A gave up:

Greene, Shonn NYJ RB

Morris, Maurice DET RB

Finley, Jermichael GBP TE

Team B gave up:

Jennings, Rashad JAC RB

Jones-Drew, Maurice JAC RB

Winslow, Kellen TBB TE

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Team A gives AFoster/BTate/Colston/CelekTeam B gives RMendenhall/Mike Thomas/V.Davis
Foster/Tate>>MendenhallColston/Celek<Thomas/DavisWinner: Team A, 150-140...or 3% advantage...according to my trade calc.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
12 team PPRTeam A gave up:Greene, Shonn NYJ RBMorris, Maurice DET RBFinley, Jermichael GBP TETeam B gave up:Jennings, Rashad JAC RBJones-Drew, Maurice JAC RBWinslow, Kellen TBB TE
Ouch, Team A wins(surprise, doesnt it always) 130-103(or 13%)...of course thats using my non-pprs rankings. Not sure it matters much in this trade though unless scoring is heavily weighted torwards TE's.
 
Team A gives AFoster/BTate/Colston/CelekTeam B gives RMendenhall/Mike Thomas/V.Davis
Foster/Tate>>MendenhallColston/Celek<Thomas/DavisWinner: Team A, 150-140...or 3% advantage...according to my trade calc.
Should also post that this is a 12 team PPR league with flexible starting requirements.(hyperactive 3)I saw it .....Foster/Tate>Mendenhall. I give Foster the edge based on last seasons production but i feel Mendenhall is a better player.Mike Thomas>>B.Celek. Love Mike Thomas in PPR especially with MSW packing his bags. Celek was unstartable last yearVernon Davis>Colston. TEs that score like top 20 WRs are a lot more valuable imo than WRs that score like Colston. I like Colston for his year to year consistancy but the knee scopes every offseason, the potential breakout of Graham as a PPR hog and red zone target, and just the way Brees spreads the ball around made me feel the time was now to move Colston
 
Team A gives AFoster/BTate/Colston/CelekTeam B gives RMendenhall/Mike Thomas/V.Davis
Foster/Tate>>MendenhallColston/Celek<Thomas/DavisWinner: Team A, 150-140...or 3% advantage...according to my trade calc.
Should also post that this is a 12 team PPR league with flexible starting requirements.(hyperactive 3)I saw it .....Foster/Tate>Mendenhall. I give Foster the edge based on last seasons production but i feel Mendenhall is a better player.Mike Thomas>>B.Celek. Love Mike Thomas in PPR especially with MSW packing his bags. Celek was unstartable last yearVernon Davis>Colston. TEs that score like top 20 WRs are a lot more valuable imo than WRs that score like Colston. I like Colston for his year to year consistancy but the knee scopes every offseason, the potential breakout of Graham as a PPR hog and red zone target, and just the way Brees spreads the ball around made me feel the time was now to move Colston
Obviously Foster/Mendenhall is the big part of this trade. Im not a big fan of either player from a talent standpoint, but considering the Foster side essentially has the Texans run game locked down for the near future, i give a big edge to Foster there...especially since this is a PPR, which makes Mendenhall even less valuable and the Texans RB's more so. I really feel like the Steelers are going to bring in a speed back, and if they do, Mendenhall is going to fall a few more spots down my rankings as his value hinges alot on his usage.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kenny BrittforMichael Crabtree, 2.10
A nice buy low on Britt.
Huh? I think the guy getting Britt got raped.
Ive got Britt ranked just outside the top 10, and Crabtree around WR25. The 2.10 is not near enough to make up that difference...imo of course.ETA, I have Britt at WR11 and Crabtree at WR22. Same thing applies about the 2.10.
I wouldn't trade Crabtree for Britt straight up.....but that's me.
Fair enough. You must be worried about the off field issues more than me. Do you think Crabtree looked better than Britt last season? I watched both play quite a bit last season, and the difference was pretty clear. Some of the blame for Crabtree has to do with his supporting cast, but Morgan and Davis both looked better than him last year. I know Crabtree is young, and has room to improve, but Britt is a year younger, and also has alot of room for improvement..and its not like he had Peyton Manning or Tom Brady throwing to him either.
Legal issues don't have as much as you might think. I just like Crabtree more. I saw both of them play numerous times. Nothing Britt has done shows him to be superior. Harbaugh being in SF gets me even more excited.
 
<BR>

<BR>

<BR>

<BR>

<BR>

<BR>

<BR>Kenny Britt<BR>for<BR>Michael Crabtree, 2.10<BR>
<BR><BR>A nice buy low on Britt.<BR>
<BR>Huh? I think the guy getting Britt got raped.<BR>
<BR><BR><BR>Ive got Britt ranked just outside the top 10, and Crabtree around WR25. The 2.10 is not near enough to make up that difference...imo of course.<BR><BR>ETA, I have Britt at WR11 and Crabtree at WR22. Same thing applies about the 2.10.<BR>
<BR>I wouldn't trade Crabtree for Britt straight up.....but that's me.<BR>
<BR><BR><BR>Fair enough. You must be worried about the off field issues more than me. Do you think Crabtree looked better than Britt last season? I watched both play quite a bit last season, and the difference was pretty clear. Some of the blame for Crabtree has to do with his supporting cast, but Morgan and Davis both looked better than him last year. I know Crabtree is young, and has room to improve, but Britt is a year younger, and also has alot of room for improvement..and its not like he had Peyton Manning or Tom Brady throwing to him either.<BR>
<BR>Legal issues don't have as much as you might think. I just like Crabtree more. I saw both of them play numerous times. Nothing Britt has done shows him to be superior. Harbaugh being in SF gets me even more excited.<BR>
I guess this is where we differ. Obviously its too early to get a really good idea of how their futures will play out, but based on what i have seen from them, in the NFL anyway, Britt has definitely been the better player. He just seemed uncoverable one on one, and even against double coverage at times, he is a big target who is as good in traffic/short yardage situations as he is at stretching the field. While i like what i saw from Crabtree after he has the ball, he just has a hard time beating coverage, and had a harder time making plays in it. ETA, Even though stats dont really matter, they seem to agree with me. Last season Britt caught 57.5% of his passes for 18.5 ypc. Crabtree caught 54.5 % of his passes for 13.5 ypc. Not to mention Britt had more yards and TD's despite Crabtree playing 5 more games. *

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12 team PPR

A gave up:

Jackson, Steven STL RB

B gave up:

Greene, Shonn NYJ RB

Ford, Jacoby OAK WR

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12 team PPRA gave up:Jackson, Steven STL RBB gave up:Greene, Shonn NYJ RBFord, Jacoby OAK WR
I have S-Jax in several leagues, and no one wants to touch him. Nice value here.
Gonna have to disagree here. Sure, his value is down and it's probably too late to get good value but this isn't good value, IMO. There's only 2 yrs age difference as Greene will be turning 26 this year. In 1-2 more yrs, Greene's value will be trending downward as well. The thing is, you know what you get in SJax and that is a top FF producer. Greene has yet to show anything and took a backseat to a 31 yo LT. There's no guarantee that will ever change this year. While I like Ford a lot, he's not enough to go from a top FF producer to a big question mark that hasn't shown much in 2 yrs and is much older than others in his class. I'd stomach it a little more if SJax were older, but he's still only 27 and is still one of the few bellcows in the league.
 
man I thought Greene was like 23! Taking his age into account, I agree with your post.
Kudos to Eastwood here, I rarely see anyone change their minds in some of these longer than should be player discussions and I applaud you coming back to post that!Way to be excellent!
 
Team A receives: Grant/Torain

Team B receives: Manningham/Keiland Williams
Manningham is the only guy with any real value.
I couldn't disagree more. Points are points, and both of those RBs will score in 2010. Sometimes I think guys forget the purpose is to win games, not collect names.

Agree, but i think you have it backwards. Grant is the "name" player in this trade.

I can see teams winning championships with Manningham in their starting lineup next year, especially if Steve Smith leaves. He just turned 25 and finished as WR 18 last season, while only being the #3 WR in NY. He finished the year with 3 straight 100 yard games and 4 TD's. On the other hand, i cant see many teams winning a championship with Grant and/or Torain in their starting lineup and i dont think either is a good bet to be starting, or even in the league a couple years from now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Team A receives: Grant/Torain

Team B receives: Manningham/Keiland Williams
Manningham is the only guy with any real value.
I couldn't disagree more. Points are points, and both of those RBs will score in 2011. Sometimes I think guys forget the purpose is to win games, not collect names.
Damn! I guess that means I have been holding Craphonso Thorpe on my roster all these years for nothing.
 
12 team PPR

A gave up:

Fitzpatrick, Ryan BUF QB

Hillis, Peyton CLE RB

McKnight, Joe NYJ RB

Clayton, Mark STL WR

Crabtree, Michael SFO WR

Williams, Mike TBB WR

Year 2011 Draft Pick 1.03

B gave up:

Freeman, Josh TBB QB

Bush, Michael OAK RB

Mendenhall, Rashard PIT RB

Colston, Marques NOS WR

Wayne, Reggie IND WR

Keller, Dustin NYJ TE

Year 2011 Draft Pick 2.10

Year 2011 Draft Pick 3.08

 
12 team PPR A gave up: Fitzpatrick, Ryan BUF QB Hillis, Peyton CLE RB McKnight, Joe NYJ RB Clayton, Mark STL WR Crabtree, Michael SFO WR Williams, Mike TBB WR Year 2011 Draft Pick 1.03 B gave up: Freeman, Josh TBB QB Bush, Michael OAK RB Mendenhall, Rashard PIT RB Colston, Marques NOS WR Wayne, Reggie IND WR Keller, Dustin NYJ TE Year 2011 Draft Pick 2.10 Year 2011 Draft Pick 3.08
After a quick glance i like team B here. This should be a fun one to run through my calc. ETA Closer than i thought, but team B wins 266-250(3%)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
12 team PPRA gave up:Fitzpatrick, Ryan BUF QBHillis, Peyton CLE RBMcKnight, Joe NYJ RBClayton, Mark STL WRCrabtree, Michael SFO WRWilliams, Mike TBB WRYear 2011 Draft Pick 1.03B gave up:Freeman, Josh TBB QBBush, Michael OAK RBMendenhall, Rashard PIT RBColston, Marques NOS WRWayne, Reggie IND WRKeller, Dustin NYJ TEYear 2011 Draft Pick 2.10Year 2011 Draft Pick 3.08
Out of interest, team A have any other solid RBs?I would prefer A here by a small margin.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
12 team PPR A gave up: Fitzpatrick, Ryan BUF QB Hillis, Peyton CLE RB McKnight, Joe NYJ RB Clayton, Mark STL WR Crabtree, Michael SFO WR Williams, Mike TBB WR Year 2011 Draft Pick 1.03 B gave up: Freeman, Josh TBB QB Bush, Michael OAK RB Mendenhall, Rashard PIT RB Colston, Marques NOS WR Wayne, Reggie IND WR Keller, Dustin NYJ TE Year 2011 Draft Pick 2.10 Year 2011 Draft Pick 3.08
After a quick glance i like team B here. This should be a fun one to run through my calc. ETA Closer than i thought, but team B wins 266-250(3%)
It's ppr and I think your ratings are non ppr...ppr makes it an even bigger advantage for team b
 
12 team PPR A gave up: Fitzpatrick, Ryan BUF QB Hillis, Peyton CLE RB McKnight, Joe NYJ RB Clayton, Mark STL WR Crabtree, Michael SFO WR Williams, Mike TBB WR Year 2011 Draft Pick 1.03 B gave up: Freeman, Josh TBB QB Bush, Michael OAK RB Mendenhall, Rashard PIT RB Colston, Marques NOS WR Wayne, Reggie IND WR Keller, Dustin NYJ TE Year 2011 Draft Pick 2.10 Year 2011 Draft Pick 3.08
After a quick glance i like team B here. This should be a fun one to run through my calc. ETA Closer than i thought, but team B wins 266-250(3%)
It's ppr and I think your ratings are non ppr...ppr makes it an even bigger advantage for team b
You might be right. I looked over the players and figured PPR wasnt going to make a big difference based on the players involved.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top