What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** 2013 Oakland Raiders thread *** (2 Viewers)

I don't believe that this is a make or break year for anyone. I think 2014 is. I think Mark gave Reggie the green light to cut the fat all at once, and take their medicine. Next year, I think, is the year to see significant improvement, or Allen/McKenzie could be in trouble.
Contrary to Silver's article, I don't think Reggie is any kind of trouble this year. But Allen needs to show what he can do on Reggie's budget. I think Allen will survive the season as long as he doesn't lose the lockerroom. If Allen gets on the hot seat, expect him to take the bullet to buy Reggie another offseason to get the house in order.

Biggest concern is the QB situation which is currently clear as mud. If we don't get a franchise caliber QB soon (next year's draft?) I'm thinking it will only be a matter of time till they are both in trouble. This is a QB driven league, and if you don't have one, coaches job security is practically nil.

 
Oakland's QBs: A work in progress

By Bill Williamson | ESPN.com

ALAMEDA, Calif. -- Dennis Allen knows there is much intrigue about his quarterback situation.

Still, the Oakland Raiders’ head coach is not in a hurry to see it play out.

“We haven’t really even had a full practice,” Allen said. “We have three-plus months till the season starts. All the guys have a lot to work to do. But we have time. I don’t have to make any decisions until we have a game that’s a ways off ... Overall, I like where we are as a group and I really have no worries about the quarterback position.”

Still, it will be a topic throughout the summer. It has already been an oft-written about topic in the Bay Area.

Ever since the Raiders took Arkansas’ Tyler Wilson in the fourth round of the April draft, there has been chatter that presumed Oakland quarterback Matt Flynn is in danger of losing his job to a rookie named Wilson for the second straight year. Flynn, who turns 28 on June 20 but has started just two NFL games as a backup in Green Bay, was set to be the starter in Seattle last year. But he was beaten out by rookie Russell Wilson, who turned out to be a dynamic rookie.

Oakland pursued Flynn in a deal with Seattle earlier in the offseason when Carson Palmer balked at a contract reduction from $13 million to $10 million. Oakland general manager Reggie McKenzie was in Green Bay with Flynn and he liked his moxie and his football intelligence.

The Raiders wanted to keep Palmer, but when that broke down, Flynn was the best option for the team in the beginning of a rebuilding stage. Oakland was fine with the idea of moving forward with Flynn because it didn’t give a lot to Seattle for him and he is reasonably priced at $6.5 million.

Yet the tone of the situation changed when Tyler Wilson came into the picture and reports were that he was performing well early in OTA sessions. Allen and McKenzie have been playing it close to the vest, saying there will be competition and making comments that Flynn is the “presumed starter.”

I get the sense the team expects Flynn to win the job in part because Wilson and Terrelle Pryor are green and not ready.

Everything is up for discussion, though. If Flynn is awful in the preseason and Wilson or Pryor is fantastic, a Seattle-like situation could happen. But it is unexpected.

The most likely situation is Flynn will be the Day 1 starter in an offense that will be centered around the run and short, precise passes. If the OTA sessions are any indications, the 2013 Raiders will not offer heavy reminders of the Al Davis vertical passing days.

If Flynn falters and the team falls out of the race, I could see Wilson getting a chance to play late in the season. I do sense that Wilson is much further along in the Raiders’ eyes than Pryor. The Raiders love Pryor’s work ethic, but they haven’t seen much improvement from the player who showed some promise while starting the season finale at San Diego in December. Pryor is still battling with inconsistencies and his throws often flutter.

Allen said this about Pryor this week: “He’s not there yet.”

The selection of Wilson put as much pressure on Pryor as it did on Flynn. Pryor was a 2011 third-round supplemental pick of the late Al Davis. The fact that the new regime took Wilson so early in Pryor’s career means they are looking for better young quarterback.

While Wilson has been getting rave media reviews, Allen is cautious. He likes what he sees. But he knows Wilson is a rookie and he needs to get better, I think once Wilson improves on reading coverages and making faster in-play decisions, he will further gain the trust of the coaching staff. Those are typical, manageable steps for a rookie.

Wilson is known for having a strong arm and for being tough. He’s the type of player coaching staffs fall in love with if he can refine his overall game. I spoke to Wilson this week and it was quickly evident he belongs in an NFL uniform. He has the intangibles necessary to be a successful NFL quarterback.

“I feel like I’m in a great situation,” Wilson said. “I’m getting a lot of reps. that’s what’s important. I’m getting on the field. I’m part of it. It’s just about working every day to get better.”

That’s what Allen is hoping to see from his entire group. That includes fourth stringer Matt McGloin. He was signed this spring as an undrafted free agent out of Penn State. ESPN’s Chris Mortensen recently said on NFL32 that McGloin has impressed the coaching staff and he could move up the depth chart. McGloin hasn’t gotten much work in the OTAs that have been open to the media. Allen said he likes how McGloin has fit in. But, at this point, it appears a lot would have to go wrong in front of him for McGloin to get a chance to skyrocket up the depth chart.

For now, the focus is on Flynn. What the Raiders like most about Flynn is he has good natural leadership abilities and he has a chip on his shoulder. He knows he has to prove himself. Receivers Rod Streater and Denarius Moore, the two likely starting candidates, both praised Flynn’s ability to quickly get in sync with the group of receivers

“I just play the best I can and I want to lead this team,” Flynn said.

Added Allen: “Matt Flynn hasn’t showed me anything that I’m worried about. He’s doing fine.”

So while the Oakland quarterback situation will be often talked about leading up to the season opener, Flynn remains on target to start for now. But like most positions, in Oakland this year, it will have to be earned.
 
Hey, fellow Raider fans, don't fall into this bizarre trap that national writers are setting here.

The last few days has seen a bizarre trend in stories that frankly, seem to push the boundaries of normal offseason journalism in order to fit this dysfunctional label on the Raiders.

First and foremost, we have no idea. None of us. The Raiders have quietly gone about their business since Mark took over. They may or may not be completely inept and dysfunctional, and McKenzie and Allen may both be on their way out the door, but there are no outward signs of this, and any hints that there are are tend to be of the ProFootballTalk "Oh, but what did he reaaalllllyyy mean by that??" school of reporting.

Silver's article was, frankly, pointless and contrary. Check this out:

This is the headline:

Raiders owner Mark Davis puts GM, rest of staff on notice with firing of PR headSoooooo, yeah, has anyone read that headline about any other team, in any sport? Ever? Firing a freaking PR is big red flag, huh? That's the smoking gun??

Aww geez, they fired Wally, the guy that set up interviews.

Has anyone ever heard about another NFL team firing a PR guy? It must have happened, right? They can't all die from old age on the job, in the middle of the night, can they???

We'll come back to that. Later, Silver lays this Shark Pool logic on ya:

"• The Raiders' pronounced and prolonged struggles since their Super Bowl XXXVII defeat to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in January of 2003 were largely the result of Al Davis' outdated sensibilities and shortsighted spending habits seeking instant gratification. By extension, he was also responsible for the team's salary-cap issues.

• The only way out of this financial Black Hole was to tear down the existing roster and employ a deliberate rebuilding approach embraced by McKenzie during his time with the Packers, emphasizing the draft and eschewing splashy free-agent signings."

That was followed by:

For one thing, whining about the salary cap is unbecoming and, in this case, a bit disingenuous. Yes, McKenzie inherited somewhat of a mess, but plenty of other men in his position encounter similar challenges and find creative ways to address such issues while remaining competitive.

Check out those last two words: remaining competitive.

Hey ####stick, we were bad when we only had 15 mill in dead cap space. Now we have 50, and we should remain competitive? Hey, do you mean remain really untalented? There are probably a dozen players on this team that are stop gap guys, who are lucky to have jobs. That was the best we could do. It ain't pretty. That's the truth.

Silver comes off as piling on a bit, and looking for anything to use as a flash point. (I have to ask again: The F###ing PR guy?? :shock: ) He goes so far to provide a link to him giving Mark the name "Tommy Boy". Helpful. Is this guy 14 years old, or what?

ProFootballTalk jumps on to this blazing hot sexy scoop of a juicy story:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/06/09/davis-says-gilbert-firing-not-a-shot-at-mckenzie/

Davis says Gilbert firing not a shot at McKenziePosted by Mike Florio on June 9, 2013, 12:10 AM EDT
APRaiders owner Mark Davis has broken his silence. When it comes to his decision to fire P.R. director Zak Gilbert, however, it’s not clear what Davis is saying.

In a 2.5-hour interview with Monte Poole of the Bay Area News Group, Davis apparentlydidn’t explain precisely why he fired Gilbert. If Davis did, the reason didn’t make its way into the final article.

While the dismissal of the franchise’s mouthpiece has no relevance to wins and losses, the concern raised by many in the wake of the move was that, because G.M. Reggie McKenzie hand-picked Gilbert, the decision to fire Gilbert represents a shot across the bow at McKenzie. Not so, Davis says.

“Reggie understands why I made the decision I made,” Davis said. “Look, I understand what Reggie is trying to do. Reggie’s fine. He’s the one guy that I’ve hired. I’ve got to give him room to do his job.”

Still, to the extent the Sports Illustrated article that reportedly prompted Davis to exile Gilbert for several weeks before firing him arose from the common organizational narrative that McKenzie is merely cleaning up the mess that others (i.e., Al Davis and Mark Davis) made, the man who benefits most from the inevitably objectionable message pushed by Gilbert (i.e., McKenzie) would seem to be on less sturdy ground than believed.

Making the situation even more confusing is a concession from Mark Davis that Gilbert did his job well.

“I’ll agree with that,” Davis said. “I believe he did.”

The simplest and most obvious of questions either wasn’t asked or, for whatever reason, was omitted from the article. It’s pretty simple. Did you fire Gilbert because of the Sports Illustrated article? If so, what’s the connection between the content or tone of the article and any act or omission by Gilbert that made him worthy of being fired?

The failure to ask or answer that question does nothing to eradicate the impression that Davis will act irrationally or arbitrarily when it comes to employment decisions, firing people for things they didn’t do or outcomes for which they aren’t responsible. Even if McKenzie knows what really happened with Gilbert, others who work for the team need to know, too.

Otherwise, current employees will tiptoe on eggshells, and prospective employees with options will take jobs elsewhere.
Check out the bolded. Can anyone tell me what the #### any of that gibberish means? Talk about twisting yourself into a pretzel to imagine some drama.

We haven't any player rumblings, nothing from the beat writers, no former players saying it was a mess.

Nope. A PR guy got let go,

Mark Davis has hired one guy, that's it. He has let that guy do everything, and has actively gone to the press to refute a rumor, regarding his GM. where's the problem?

 
So, all I get from the post above is that it's better if Raiders fans come off appearing paranoid and delusional than it is to have the franchise looking dysfunctional.

Quite an effort first thing on a Sunday morning. :thumbup:

 
Rotoworld:

Terrelle Pryor was unimpressive on the first day of Raiders mandatory minicamp on Tuesday.

Pryor's struggles were noted by three different beat writers, with Vittorio Tafur bluntly stating he "continues to not show much improvement." Pryor was similarly unimpressive in OTAs. The fact that the 6-foot-6, 233-pound quarterback can't even light up a padless practice bodes poorly for his showdown with rookie Tyler Wilson for No. 2 duties.

Related: Tyler Wilson

Source: Vittorio Tafur on Twitter
 
So, all I get from the post above is that it's better if Raiders fans come off appearing paranoid and delusional than it is to have the franchise looking dysfunctional.Quite an effort first thing on a Sunday morning. :thumbup:
Facts.

You can't tell me without checking Google who the PR Director of your favorite team is.

If he or she was fired tonight, you could care less. Primarily because you would never even realize it happened.

If he or she was fired tonight, there might be a brief note buried somewhere on ESPN.com (not SportsCenter); but only if it was a particularly slow news night.

If you or anyone else is going to extrapolate that firing a PR director, this is not a coach or GM, is the mark of a dysfunctional franchise then please correlate that with evidence that a long standing leader in a PR position is indicative of NFL dominance. I am sure you have loads of free time to coordinate that effort.

 
Rotoworld:

Raiders KR/WR Josh Cribbs (meniscus surgery) will be sidelined until training camp.
There had been some confusion over when Cribbs would be ready to resume football activities after Jets GM John Idzik said his knee "wasn't quite there yet." Cribbs initially refuted the claim, but Coach Dennis Allen cleared it up today, stating his kick returner won't practice until training camp. Cribbs will be the Raiders' primary return man once the season starts.

Source: Vic Tafur on Twitter
 
I like the sound of this. Can't wait to see them in action.

ALAMEDA -- The Raiders are out to lower the boom in 2013, and new defensive tackles Pat Sims and Vance Walker plan on doing something about it.It was former Raiders defensive tackle Tommy Kelly who described the team's run defense as "stop, stop, boom'' because of its penchant for being stout for two downs before being gashed for a long run.It reached the height of absurdity last Nov. 4 as Tampa Bay rookie Doug Martin had four second-half touchdowns runs of 1, 45, 67 and 70 yards in a 42-34 win at O.co Coliseum. Martin had 251 yards rushing on 25 carries, one of five backs to break 100 yards on an Oakland defense that ranked 18th against the run (118.6) and 20th in yards per carry(4.3).It was actually a moderate improvement under coach Dennis Allen in that it was Oakland's best finish in run defense since a No. 3 ranking in 2002.Enter Sims and Walker, less well-known and much less expensive than the departed Kelly, Richard Seymour and Desmond Bryant, but players who will be crucial to stopping the run should they be able to successfully drop anchor in the middle of the Raiders defense.Sims, 6-foot-2 and 310 pounds, plays closer to the nose in a 4-3 defense and specializes in occupying double-teams.When the Raiders' recent history in terms of being deficient against the run is recited to Sims, he replied, "Then I'm your man. ... I don't know what the problem has been, but I really don't seeit being a problem this year.''Walker, 6-2, 305, excels at beating one-on-one blocks, a perfect complement to Sims. Both signed one-year contracts, with Sims coming from Cincinnati and Walker from Atlanta for $1.5 million and $2 million, respectively.Both were known as strong run defenders and were brought in specifically for that skill."They play the run square, they come off and attack blocks like they're supposed to,'' Allen said. "They've been gap-sound and fundamental in that regard.''The gap integrity of which Allen speaks has been one of Oakland's big issues against the run over the past decade. A solid run defense is like fitting a puzzle, and all too often the Raiders had one or more pieces out of place, with players either trying to do too much or simply doing not enough to get where they were supposed to be."The biggest thing is to listen to your coach and do what your system asks you to do, and you'll make plays,'' Walker said. "Pat and I, we're very disciplined. We're knocking guys back, and we may not make the tackle, but we know a linebacker will be right there for us.''The Raiders won't truly hit anyone or shed a real block until training camp begins July 25. At which time Sims believes the Raiders will establish run defense as a strength rather than a weakness."When we put on pads, its going to be even better, because we're coming off the ball, we're fitting up and we're plugging those holes,'' Sims said.
 
anybody with any updates as to who has been running with the 'ones' in camp? Ausberry making an impression at all? Some FBG staff seem to think fairly high of him but it doesn't really sound too much like he is going to make much of an impact or at least Im not hearing any buzz

thoughts?

 
Glad to hear Janikowski wants to play for the Raiders another 7 or 8 years. Hope he eventually gets his Super Bowl ring. Someday...at least 8 years is a nice window to shoot for.

Regarding Pryor, it's too early to throw the towel in on him. He's got a nice deep ball. Crazy fast wheels. Just needs to learn how to master the intermediate game that is the bread and butter of Olson's WCO. I know, easier said than done.

Early reports from mini-camp are that none of the 4 QB's are pulling away from the pack. Not encouraging news, but it's early June. It still looks like Flynn's job to lose, and would require an incredible faceplant or injury for him to lose it. Pryor is the wildcard, maybe a lottery ticket. Definitely as a physical specimen has the most upside of the QB's on roster. Let's see what we have before throwing that ticket in the trash. This is a QB driven league. Franchise QB's take teams to Super Bowls. Pryor may end up being QB3 when the season starts, but the guys ahead of him will only be capable game managers at best. Pryor has the upside that teases and gives us some hope that we have a Russell Wilson or RG3 type QB buried in the depth chart waiting to emerge. Going into his 3rd year, it's time to unleash him on the league or cut him loose. With this roster, we have absolutly nothing to lose.

 
anybody with any updates as to who has been running with the 'ones' in camp? Ausberry making an impression at all? Some FBG staff seem to think fairly high of him but it doesn't really sound too much like he is going to make much of an impact or at least Im not hearing any buzz

thoughts?
I do not think much of Ausberry at all. Do not think Raiders do either, they drafted two TEs.

 
Raiderfan32904 said:
Glad to hear Janikowski wants to play for the Raiders another 7 or 8 years. Hope he eventually gets his Super Bowl ring. Someday...at least 8 years is a nice window to shoot for.

Regarding Pryor, it's too early to throw the towel in on him. He's got a nice deep ball. Crazy fast wheels. Just needs to learn how to master the intermediate game that is the bread and butter of Olson's WCO. I know, easier said than done.

Early reports from mini-camp are that none of the 4 QB's are pulling away from the pack. Not encouraging news, but it's early June. It still looks like Flynn's job to lose, and would require an incredible faceplant or injury for him to lose it. Pryor is the wildcard, maybe a lottery ticket. Definitely as a physical specimen has the most upside of the QB's on roster. Let's see what we have before throwing that ticket in the trash. This is a QB driven league. Franchise QB's take teams to Super Bowls. Pryor may end up being QB3 when the season starts, but the guys ahead of him will only be capable game managers at best. Pryor has the upside that teases and gives us some hope that we have a Russell Wilson or RG3 type QB buried in the depth chart waiting to emerge. Going into his 3rd year, it's time to unleash him on the league or cut him loose. With this roster, we have absolutly nothing to lose.
i completely disagree on both points. janikowski is too expensive, thanks for the memories. when his contract is up, he won't be back, unless he lowers his price of 4mil/year. .

and don't get me started on the possibility that pryor is cam newton/rg3/kap just languishing on the bench.

 
Rotoworld:

Raiders RT Khalif Barnes received the majority of minicamp reps with the first-team offense.
Barnes started nine games in 2012, but struggled to play above replacement level. With second-round Menelik Watson likely to open the season as the starting right tackle, the San Francisco Chronicle expects Barnes to move to guard.


Source: Steve Corkran on Twitter
Raiders RG Mike Brisiel has been getting most of the first-team reps in OTAs.
Brisiel signed a five-year deal last year, but he was a big-time bust in his first season with the Silver and Black. At just 300 pounds, he's also an extremely poor fit for the Raiders' new power-blocking scheme. Beat writer Steve Corkran opines that the left guard spot is the only one up for competition on Oakland's offensive line. We wouldn't be surprised if Lucas Nix upstaged Brisiel at some point.


Source: Steve Corkran on Twitter
Charles Woodson has been running as the first-team free safety during Raiders minicamp.
As expected, Woodson has stepped in ahead of Usama Young immediately despite just signing on three weeks ago. The 36-year-old will line up next to strong safety Tyvon Branch.

Related: Usama Young

Source: Contra Costa Times
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I posted this in the player thread, but it is worth adding here as well:

Coach Dennis Allen said he's "counting on" Denarius Moore to be "our No. 1 receiver."
On paper, Moore looks primed for a big year as he enters his third NFL season. A special catcher of deep balls locked into an every-down role on a team that figures to be trailing a ton is a solid formula for statistics. However, Carson Palmer's inconsistency held Moore to a 51/741/7 line last year and the quarterback play figures to be even worse this year. Matt Flynn isn't a downfield passer, taking away Moore's strength. Consider him a WR3/4.


Source: Contra Costa Times
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Today happens to be the birthday of both Pryor and Flynn - wonder if Wilson bought them new clipboards?

 
Finding the Fits: Sio Moore attack from the Silver and Black

By Rob Rang | The Sports Xchange/CBSSports.com
June 21, 2013 9:49 am ET

This article is one of a series called Finding the Fits in which NFLDraftScout.com will review some of the more intriguing picks made during the 2013 NFL Draft. The goal of the series is to identify one relatively unheralded player per team who appears to be a good schematic fit and, therefore, more likely to be a surprise contributor early in his pro career.

Oakland Raiders' best fit: OLB Sio Moore, Connecticut, Third Round, No. 66 overall

The only fearsome thing on the Oakland Raiders' defense last year was the decal on their helmet. The club finished 28th in the NFL in points allowed per game (27.7) and surrendered that in nearly 100 fewer plays than it took the Tennessee Titans to allow a league-worst 29.4. The Raiders ranked behind only the Jacksonville Jaguars in sacks with 25, and no team finished with fewer forced fumbles (three) a season ago.

Rather than replace the coaching staff for the eighth time since 2002 (think about that for a minute), head coach Dennis Allen and general manager Reggie McKenzie overhauled their linebacking corps, signing veterans Nick Roach (Chicago Bears), Kaluka Maiava (Cleveland Browns) and Kevin Burnett (Miami Dolphins) to compete with solid second-year defender Miles Burris.

Roach is viewed as the only lock to start. As the middle linebacker in Oakland's 4-3 defense, he'll almost certainly lead the team in tackles.

Rookie Sio Moore, however, could prove to be the big play specialist that the Raiders have been searching for at linebacker for years.

Moore led UConn with 15.5 tackles for loss in 2012, which gave him an eye-popping 43 for his career. His sack numbers increased each of his three seasons as a starter (1.5-6.5-7.5), and he developed into a savvy defender in coverage as a senior (11 pass breakups) as well, showcasing the versatility necessary in today's NFL.

Some scouts believed the Huskies' aggressive defense inflated his statistics, but Moore's recognition and burst through gaps made him a terror at the East-West Shrine Game and as a late addition at the Senior Bowl (where he was coached by the Raiders). Moore followed up his impressive all-star game exploits with a terrific all-around performance at the Combine, where the 6-foot-1, 245-pound linebacker clocked in at 4.62 seconds in the 40-yard dash, lifted the bar 29 times and posted a 38-inch vertical jump.

The third-round pick wasted little time turning heads in Oakland.

"I like Sio," Allen told reporters following mini-camp June 11-13. "Sio's a rookie; he makes some rookie mistakes. But he's a big, powerful man. And he's got a little bit of pass-rush ability to him. So, I like some of the flexibility that he gives us.

"What you look at is you look at football intelligence, and he's got some football intelligence and some football savvy about him. We got a big volume of stuff that we're throwing at him, and sometimes it can overload him. He's a guy that continues to go out there and work every day. His work ethic and his understanding of the game of football is what's going to allow him to be a good player for us."

Finally, Optimism in Oakland (other thoughts on the Raiders' 2013 draft class)

While Moore could prove the flashiest of the Raiders' 10 selections, the entire class could one day be viewed as the haul that led to Oakland's revival.

Cornerback D.J. Hayden's miraculous recovery from a life-threatening injury (torn inferior vena cava) dominated his build-up to the draft, but scouts traveling through Houston before he was injured were consistently pegging him as a first-round prospect. He threw a scare into the club by missing some of the OTAs with surgery to remove scar tissue in his abdomen but is expected to be ready to go by training camp. Hayden impressed onlookers before the procedure with his fluidity and ball skills ...

Small hands and a tough senior campaign pushed quarterback Tyler Wilson to the fourth round, but he has the talent and toughness necessary to start in the NFL. Allen named veteran Matt Flynn as his starter, and there is no question that the former backup in Seattle and Green Bay puts Oakland in a better position to win now. But Wilson is the more gifted passer. Unless the Raiders surprise as playoff contenders, expect to see the former Arkansas star get his opportunity to start a few games late in the year ...

Tony Sparano's failed attempts with the wildcat in Miami and New York earned him plenty of derision from the media and fans, but he's among the most respected offensive line coaches in the league. With Sparano's tutoring, second-round offensive tackle Menelik Watson could develop into a Pro Bowler ...

The Raiders might have provided a glimpse as to their plans in new offensive coordinator Greg Olson's offense with the selection of a pair of tight ends in the sixth round. Colorado's Nick Kasa (6-6, 269) and Tennessee's Mychal Rivera (6-3, 242) join a club that was already led in receptions a season ago by veteran tight end Brandon Myers. Flynn does not possess a big arm but does have good accuracy in the short and intermediate levels. With division opponents Denver, Kansas City and San Diego all relying in large part on 3-4 principles, attacking down the seams with tight ends would seem like a logical strategy and could lead to a surprising contribution from the late-round prospects.

-- The Raiders' 2013 draft class:

1st Round -- No. 12 overall -- CB D.J. Hayden, Houston

2nd Round -- No. 42 overall -- OT Menelik Watson, Florida State

3rd Round -- No. 66 overall -- OLB Sio Moore, Connecticut

4th Round -- No. 112 overall -- QB Tyler Wilson, Arkansas

6th Round -- No. 172 overall -- TE Nick Kasa, Colorado

6th Round -- No. 181 overall -- RB Latavius Murray, Central Florida

6th Round -- No. 184 overall -- TE Mychal Rivera, Tennessee

6th Round -- No. 205 overall -- DT Stacy McGee, Oklahoma

7th Round -- No. 209 overall -- WR Brice Butler, San Diego State

7th Round -- No. 233 overall -- DE David Bass, Missouri Western

-- Key Undrafted Free Agents Signed:

DB Adrian Bushell, Louisville

OT John Wetzel, Boston College

WR Conner Vernon, Duke

Read more about all of the Raiders' picks here.

Read all of the Finding the Fits series here.
 
Raiders' long wait for receiving success

By Bill Williamson | ESPN.com

One of the bigger issues for the Oakland Raiders in their decadelong malaise has been the inability to develop a dynamic group of receivers.

Oakland, which has not had a winning record since the 2002 season when it went to the Super Bowl, bypassed future superstars Larry Fitzgerald (2004) and Calvin Johnson (2007) high in the draft in favor of busts Robert Gallery and JaMarcus Russell. The Raiders made a blockbuster trade for Randy Moss. He essentially took a two-year vacation when he was in Oakland before re-energizing his career after he was dealt to New England.

Particularly in the past five years, Oakland has drafted a slew of young receivers in hopes of striking it rich. Promising players such as Chaz Schilens, Darrius Heyward-Bey and Louis Murphy have all come and gone without making a major impact.

Although the receivers in Oakland’s current stable are young and, for the most part, unproven, there is hope for a franchise that is perpetually waiting for receivers to reach their potential. The Raiders enter the 2013 season hopeful the wait is nearing its end.

“It’s as green as grass,” Oakland coach Dennis Allen recently said of his group. “But there is all kinds of talent here.”

I asked Allen whether he could see himself waking up one morning in the near future and proclaiming that his group of receivers has finally arrived.

“Absolutely,” Allen said. “It’s coming. We just need the guys to step up.”

Oakland has done a nice job of drafting promising receivers late in the draft or adding them as undrafted free agents. All of the receivers projected to make the Raiders’ 53-man roster have potential to be impact players. But they also have to show they can be consistent threats.

The focal points of Oakland’s receiving group are third-year player Denarius Moore and second-year player Rod Streater. They are expected to be the starters, and they embody this group of receivers. Moore was a fifth-round pick in 2011, and Streater was an undrafted free agent last year. Although both were training camp stars and have shown glimpses of their potential, neither has proved he is an impact player.

A lot of that has to do with their youth. Moore was a bit inconsistent last year, and he had some hands problems. Streater was incredibly fluid for an undrafted rookie, but, as to be expected, he didn’t always show up. Moore ended up with 51 catches for 741 yards and seven touchdown catches. Streater had 39 catches for 584 yards and three TDs. Oakland is hoping both players will make significant strides in 2013.

“I think we have a chance to be a good group,” Streater said. “There are a lot of good athletes in this group. We all are trying to get better together.”

ESPN analyst Matt Williamson likes the potential of Moore and Streater as a long-term starting tandem.

“I am really high on Moore, but he needs to stay healthy and be more consistent as a route runner,” Williamson said. “[Can he be] a true No. 1? That might be a bit of a stretch, since I rarely throw that term around, but he’s right on that cusp in terms of talent. Streater is a good complement to Moore, as he is bigger and more physical. He’s a possession guy to Moore’s explosiveness.”

Although the Raiders’ receiving success starts with Moore and Streater, the group has more to offer. Jacoby Ford has shown he can be a dynamic No. 3 receiver with explosive big-play ability. But he has had trouble staying healthy. He missed nearly the past season and a half with foot problems.

Juron Criner, a fifth-round pick last year, impressed on a daily basis last summer with one phenomenal catch after another. Yet he was pretty quiet in the regular season. Oakland added two more prospects this year with seventh-round pick Brice Butler and undrafted rookie Conner Vernon. Vernon is a prototype slot receiver who looked good in the offseason camps.

All of these players will have the time to develop together and show they belong on their own merits. New quarterback Matt Flynn thinks positive results are possible this season.

“We have some weapons on this offense that I think we can really take advantage of this season,” Flynn said.
 
Rotoworld:

After breaking down Matt Flynn's NFL game tape, ESPN's Ron Jaworski came away discouraged by his arm strength and believes the Raiders will have to "manipulate" Flynn with "pass concepts and playcalling."
Flynn is No. 32 in Jaws' 2013 Quarterback Countdown. "The more throws I watched, the more his arm strength limitations were evident," Jaworski said. "... In fact, I was concerned that his few deep balls lost energy at the back end. They had a tendency to die." Jaws suggested Flynn "needs" an effective play-action passing game to be successful, which isn't dissimilar from Matt Cassel. We don't believe Flynn will last more than eight starts in Oakland.
 
I agree that Flynns lack of arm strength is concerning but that doesn't mean he's an awful qb. He's still better than the bottom barrel Qbs out there ala Sanchez, Ponder, Locker.

Hopefully Wilson or Pryor beats him out in the long term.

 
To be fair, there isn't a whole lot of NFL game tape for Jaws to break down a Matt Flynn. And Rotoworld is always spinning their analysis to the extreme, like they always do. Nobody is saying Flynn belongs with the elites, and probably he's the 4th best QB in the division even as of today. Like Jaws said, he's not going to challenge anyone with his deep ball. But in the WCO, accuracy and timing on intermediate throws are the offense's bread and butter. If he plays to his strength in Olson's offense, he can manage the offense to move the chains and get the ball to the playmakers and let them do the work. Let's see some preseason football action before we call Flynn's Raider career a disaster that will only last 8 games. We aren't playing for a super bowl this year, but it doesn't mean it's a sure fire disaster either. Let's see them play some actual football before we bury the starting QB.

:popcorn:

 
I am hopeful that someone from our current group of QBs will emerge asa solid starting option.

Jaws observations feel more like a filler on a slow news day. Food for thought:

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/11033728

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1212100-why-accuracy-not-arm-strength-is-most-important-for-todays-nfl-quarterbacks

Everytime I hear the phrase poor arm strength I think of how that criticism followed Joe Montatna around his entire career: http://miamimigraine.blogspot.com/2008/03/not-greatest-quarterback-of-all-time_30.html

No, I am not implying Flynn is the next Montana, rather that arm strength isn't at the top of the list for good qb play.

 
Matt Barkley the Raiders' choice over Tyler Wilson?By Chris Wesseling

Around the League Writer

The Oakland Raiders' quarterback play was so wretched at June's mandatory minicamp that it led Gregg Rosenthal to describe their offseason as a "sliding scale of awfulness."

Could the Raiders have produced a more optimistic offseason storyline if they had lucked into the quarterback they originally were targeting in the draft? According to Les Pasquarelli of the National Football Post, the Raiders had planned to "jump on" Matt Barkley with their fourth-round pick only to watch the Philadelphia Eagles snare the USC quarterback earlier in the round. Tyler Wilson then joined the Raiders as their "fallback option."

Wilson made a strong impression early in offseason training activities, leading one beat writer to declare that the former Arkansas star was "not an ordinary rookie."

The consensus in May was that Matt Flynn could experience deja vu, losing the starting job to a mid-round rookie for a second consecutive summer. That talk has died down, however, with Wilson's play tailing off in June and coach Dennis Allen anointing Flynn the starter "until the competition dictates otherwise."

Meanwhile, Barkley currently is viewed as the odd man out in the competition with Michael Vick and Nick Foles for the Eagles' starting job. Had he slid 14 more spots in the fourth round, he might have been riding high as the clubhouse leader in Oakland.

Follow Chris Wesseling on Twitter @ChrisWesseling.
 
I will believe it when I see it. If you caught the Standford game last season Barkley was staring down Standford's THREE man rush. That more than anything else hints at Barkley's NFL future IMO.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I liked Barkley before the draft and I like him better after the draft. He's in a better landing spot in Philly with regards to coaches and talent level at the skill positions than in Oakland. I was hoping we'd have been able to have Barkely fall to us in the 4th round. I love the 3rd round pick of Sio Moore, so I'll trust that Reggie's fallback of Tyler Wilson eventually pans out. Kelly and Shurmur should be able to work with Barkley to speed up his decision making and get the most out of him. I wouldn't be surprised to see him win the starting job in Philly.

 
Making the Leap: No. 32 Raiders coach Dennis Allen

By Marc Sessler

Around the League Writer

Around The League will profile the top 40 players (or, in this case, coaches) we see Making the Leap in 2013.

No. 32. Dennis AllenWhy he's on the listWhen Around the League's gang of scribes huddled to come up with our 40 candidates for "Making the Leap", our choice for the Oakland Raiders took an unusual turn.

I suggested coach Dennis Allen instead of one of his players, but at least one of my co-writers wasn't buying it.

"If they win six games, I'll eat my softball pants," Chris Wesseling declared.

That sealed it, and my ambivalence toward the Raiders has given way to grand visions of Wess at a quaint tabletop, his freshly laundered sporting garments spread before him and accompanied by fork, knife and maybe a healthy dabble of Grey Poupon.

Trouser cuisine aside, Allen's here for a reason: Despite strong backing from general manager Reggie McKenzie, Allen's leadership is under the microscope on a Raiders team that will struggle to improve upon last year's 4-12 mark. It's unrealistic to expect better results from this year's paper-thin roster, but good coaching will go a long way toward fostering buy-in from Allen's young players.

If he isn't up to the task, Allen's second season in Oakland could morph into one of the NFL's biggest train wrecks.

ObstaclesIt's easy to pick on the Raiders, but McKenzie walked into a ghastly scenario when he took the job 18 months ago. Short on draft picks and mired in salary-cap hell, the well-respected GM has worked tirelessly to revive this struggling, behind-the-times organization from the inside out. It's a painful process that still continues.

The challenges are everywhere. There's no clear-cut franchise passer, and the team's best player on offense, arguably Darren McFadden, is a sometimes-dangerous runner who can't stay healthy. On defense, McKenzie used his first-ever first-rounder on D.J. Hayden. The Raiders are thrilled with the cornerback's potential, but few teams in the AFC have more issues in the front seven.

Allen's pedigree is defensive wizardry, but the Raiders might have the AFC's worst unit in 2013. Until more talent arrives, Allen will struggle to put his stamp on this group the way he did with the Denver Broncos' D in 2011. The win-loss record could be ugly, so it's important Allen wins the public-perception battle, making his vision clear for everyone from owner Mark Davis down to the 8-year-old Raiders fan wondering when Sundays will be fun again.

2013 ExpectationsOur very own Elliot Harrison put Allen on his list of hot-seat coaches heading into the season. His argument -- that Allen's presumed loose leash doesn't mean much if Oakland crumbles -- is sound. I tend to believe Allen can save his job if he emerges as the primary voice of this organization. Sink or swim, he can't be a wallflower in Year 2.

If Allen sometimes lies awake at night, wishing he never left Denver, who could blame him? This might be the NFL's toughest head coaching job of all in 2013, but it's also an opportunity for Allen to prove that Oakland -- missing many parts -- has a leader to hold onto.

For now, Wess's softball pants are safe.

Follow Marc Sessler on Twitter @MarcSesslerNFL.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree that Flynns lack of arm strength is concerning but that doesn't mean he's an awful qb. He's still better than the bottom barrel Qbs out there ala Sanchez, Ponder, Locker.

Hopefully Wilson or Pryor beats him out in the long term.
I would take all three of those QBs over Flynn. I will say i am excited to watch Flynn this season, just to see if what I actually think of the guy is confirmed.

 
What is your axe to grind with Flynn? Are you waiting to declare a 'victory' in the trade? that you fleeced us of a future couple of late round picks? oh the burn !!!!

 
What is your axe to grind with Flynn? Are you waiting to declare a 'victory' in the trade? that you fleeced us of a future couple of late round picks? oh the burn !!!!
My problem isn't with Flynn, its more with the annoying Seahawk fans who instantly fell in love with him like he was Hasselbeck 2.0. I know there are not many Seahawk fans on this forum so its hard for outsiders to know how bad it really was.

As for "trade victory", I don't mind the trade for either side, its about what I thought someone would give for him. When a player is traded for picks it really depends on what the other team does with the picks. With that said, I have full confidence in the hawks ability to draft in the late rounds...Sherman and Chancellor are both 5th round picks.

 
What is your axe to grind with Flynn? Are you waiting to declare a 'victory' in the trade? that you fleeced us of a future couple of late round picks? oh the burn !!!!
My problem isn't with Flynn, its more with the annoying Seahawk fans who instantly fell in love with him like he was Hasselbeck 2.0. I know there are not many Seahawk fans on this forum so its hard for outsiders to know how bad it really was.

As for "trade victory", I don't mind the trade for either side, its about what I thought someone would give for him. When a player is traded for picks it really depends on what the other team does with the picks. With that said, I have full confidence in the hawks ability to draft in the late rounds...Sherman and Chancellor are both 5th round picks.
Haven't there been links to your posts touting Flynn as a top-10 QB after the Hawks acquired him? So your problem is...you?

 
What is your axe to grind with Flynn? Are you waiting to declare a 'victory' in the trade? that you fleeced us of a future couple of late round picks? oh the burn !!!!
My problem isn't with Flynn, its more with the annoying Seahawk fans who instantly fell in love with him like he was Hasselbeck 2.0. I know there are not many Seahawk fans on this forum so its hard for outsiders to know how bad it really was.

As for "trade victory", I don't mind the trade for either side, its about what I thought someone would give for him. When a player is traded for picks it really depends on what the other team does with the picks. With that said, I have full confidence in the hawks ability to draft in the late rounds...Sherman and Chancellor are both 5th round picks.
Haven't there been links to your posts touting Flynn as a top-10 QB after the Hawks acquired him? So your problem is...you?
:goodposting:

 
What is your axe to grind with Flynn? Are you waiting to declare a 'victory' in the trade? that you fleeced us of a future couple of late round picks? oh the burn !!!!
My problem isn't with Flynn, its more with the annoying Seahawk fans who instantly fell in love with him like he was Hasselbeck 2.0. I know there are not many Seahawk fans on this forum so its hard for outsiders to know how bad it really was.

As for "trade victory", I don't mind the trade for either side, its about what I thought someone would give for him. When a player is traded for picks it really depends on what the other team does with the picks. With that said, I have full confidence in the hawks ability to draft in the late rounds...Sherman and Chancellor are both 5th round picks.
Haven't there been links to your posts touting Flynn as a top-10 QB after the Hawks acquired him? So your problem is...you?
If there was I certainly don't remember it. Link it and maybe I can get a good chuckle out of it. I was probably :fishy:

I know there is a thread dated April 30th, 2012 professing my love for Russell WIlson: http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=640432

I belive in monogamy. April 30th is certainly before either threw a pass for the Seahawks. Feel free to read it, plenty of what I think of Flynn in there. I think he is a great backup.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Haven't there been links to your posts touting Flynn as a top-10 QB after the Hawks acquired him? So your problem is...you?
If there was I certainly don't remember it.
Maybe because you deleted the post.

Weak. :yawn:

As a Seahawk fan I would be happy with a bag of Doritos for Flynn. Flynn is horrible, he has a weak arm, can't make all the throws....and in his last 9 years of playing football he only has 16 starts. That isn't what you want.....there is a reason he isn't starting ANYWHERE. The best you can hope for is he sucks it up and you get a high draft pick out of it.
That's why you thought he was dynasty QB 8 last year, huh?http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=637235

'ImTheScientist said:
matt flynn
:own3d: :lmao:
 
32 in 32: Raiders stare into the void

By Marc Sessler

Around the League Writer

"NFL Total Access" has launched its "32 in 32" series, breaking down the biggest subplots of every NFL team as the 2013 season approaches. Around The League will follow along and offer our own take. Up next: The Oakland Raiders.

1. Thirty-three-year-old Carson Palmer is out; the untested Matt Flynn is in. Flynn has thrown just 141 passes in five NFL seasons. He was a free-agent hot ticket coming out of Green Bay last offseason, but he barely saw the field for the Seattle Seahawks after losing out to the ascendant Russell Wilson. Now Flynn finds himself the presumed starter in Oakland over rookie Tyler Wilson, ongoing project Terrelle Pryor and longshot Matt McGloin. The foursome struggled early in minicamp, prompting beat writer Steve Corkran to describe their field work as the "worst in memory" in his 19 years covering the NFL.

Subsequent practices reportedly were more hopeful, but Flynn remains a question mark. The arm strength is lacking, with ESPN's Ron Jaworski noting that Flynn's long strikes "lost energy at the back end." It wouldn't be a surprise to see Wilson take the field this season, possibly sooner than later. The quarterback position remains queasy, and Raiders fans might ultimately learn to appreciate what Palmer achieved on a bad team over the past two seasons.

2. The drafting of first-rounder D.J. Hayden filled a gaping hole at cornerback, but Oakland's front seven is a disaster. Especially at linebacker, where stopgaps Nick Roach, Kaluka Maiava, and Kevin Burnett headline the league's least-impressive group on paper. An immediate contribution from third-rounder Sio Moore would help. The defensive line is equally depressing. Richard Seymour and Desmond Bryant are out the door, replaced by Vance Walker, Pat Sims and Jason Hunter. Lamarr Houston might be the best of the bunch, but there's no anchoring presence here.

3. Back to the offense, where Oakland's receiving corps lacks star power. Denarius Moore is mildly intriguing, but Juron Criner and Rod Streater fill out one of the NFL's weaker pass-catching groups. Jacoby Ford and free-agent addition Josh Cribbs add some veteran spice, but Cribbs, especially, isn't the player he once was. One positive development is the arrival of new coordinator Greg Olson, who immediately ditched last year's zone blocking scheme for a "downhill" run-heavy attack that should keep Darren McFadden happy (if Darren McFadden can stay healthy, something he hasn't done in any of his five NFL seasons). The offensive line is no bonus: ProFootballFocus ranked the Raiders front five in the bottom third of the league as a pass-blocking unit. As run-blockers, only two teams graded lower.

Add all this up, and a quarterback carousel of sadness -- similar to what we saw from the Arizona Cardinals last season -- looms as a possibility.

4. Let's end on a hopeful note. Yes, the Raiders have issues -- and it might get uglier before the dark clouds clear -- but general manager Reggie McKenzie is a major plus. He's accepted one of the roughest assignments in pro football. For all of the innovative wonder we saw from Al Davis over the decades, he left this team an antiquated mess, and McKenzie's reconstruction project touches every level of the franchise. No matter the record this season, McKenzie would be wise to stick with Dennis Allen and stay the course. There's plenty of pressure on Allen to improve on last year's troubling 4-12 campaign, but let's get real. Three of fewer wins is a possibility.

Our takeaway: I've made no friends in Oakland today, but don't ignore the subtext: There's reason for long-term optimism. With McKenzie at the controls, and if owner Mark Davis can stay patient, the Raiders have a chance, in time, to break out of their mega-funk and make the fan base proud once again.

Follow Marc Sessler on Twitter @MarcSesslerNFL.
 
Haven't there been links to your posts touting Flynn as a top-10 QB after the Hawks acquired him? So your problem is...you?
If there was I certainly don't remember it.
Maybe because you deleted the post.

Weak. :yawn:

As a Seahawk fan I would be happy with a bag of Doritos for Flynn. Flynn is horrible, he has a weak arm, can't make all the throws....and in his last 9 years of playing football he only has 16 starts. That isn't what you want.....there is a reason he isn't starting ANYWHERE. The best you can hope for is he sucks it up and you get a high draft pick out of it.
That's why you thought he was dynasty QB 8 last year, huh?http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=637235

'ImTheScientist said:
matt flynn
:own3d: :lmao:
DYNASTY QB 8. Man, I am starting to get a little pumped that we may have DYNASTY QB 8 on our team.

DId he really delete the post? That's just embarrassing.

 
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/franchise-qb-next-great-defensive-end-next-draft-172712467.html

If you've spent any time looking at the 2014 NFL draft (and why not, there's still three weeks of dead time until training camp), there's a potentially fascinating storyline brewing.

If a team that needs a quarterback gets the first pick of the draft (and that's usually the case), and there is a franchise quarterback available, do you take what looks like a sure thing in defensive end Jadeveon Clowney, or the quarterback?

Next year's NFL draft class has a chance to be really, really deep and good. The most likely player to rise to the top of the quarterback class is the aforementioned Bridgewater, a terrific pocket passer for Louisville. But, it wouldn't be a huge shock if the top quarterback ends up being Clemson's Tajh Boyd, Texas A&M's Johnny Manziel or someone else.

The thing is, if you've paid the slightest attention to college football you know that Clowney isn't simply a very good defensive prospect. If he plays like he did as a sophomore, he will probably be the highest rated defensive draft prospect in at least 15 years (I think he'll get more buzz thanNdamukong Suh). He ran a 4.5 in the 40-yard dash at 272 pounds this spring, faster than Montee Balland Giovani Bernard clocked at the combine. He also has a tremendous feel for the game. Nobody ever knows for sure if a draft pick will pan out, but it's hard to find someone who doesn't believe Clowney will be a NFL star. He could be a once-in-a-generation defensive player.

But, there's the quarterback issue.

Having a truly elite quarterback changes your entire franchise's outlook. You can win without an elite quarterback, but it's tough. There's a great moment in the Jimmy Johnson "A Football Life," episode where he is talking to Bill Belichick about how it used to be the most important thing to have a good quarterback.

"Now, the only thing that matters is if you get a great quarterback," Johnson said.

That should be the motto of the modern-day NFL.

You do not want to be the team to pass up the next Reggie White. You also don't want to be the team that passed on a quarterback when your top guy is someone like Blaine Gabbert. A trade could draw a huge return, but a good way to get fired is to be the guy who passed on Clowney and an elite quarterback in the draft. In a way it's a no-lose scenario for whoever gets the first pick, but it's also going to be a stressful few months for some front office.

So what's the right move? Franchise quarterback or Clowney? By next May, that could be the question everyone is debating.

 
Report: Oakland Raiders eyeing 50,000-seat stadium

By Kevin Patra NFL.com

Published: July 16, 2013 at 06:20 a.m

The Oakland Raiders want to build a new 50,000-seat stadium at the site of their current home, the Oakland Tribune reported Monday.

The capacity, which would be the smallest in the NFL, was determined after a team-commissioned study determined the demand in the area.

"Both sides are conducting studies to determine the demand and financial viability of the project." Mike Taylor, the team's director of public affairs, said in a statement about the study's findings.

According to David Stone, a consultant working with Oakland and Alameda County (Calif.) officials on stadium construction, the new stadium would cost approximately $800 million. The Raiders have proposed contributing about $300 million, Stone said, with the remaining amount to be funded by the NFL ($200 million) and public financing (about $300 million).

The Raiders' lease on O.co Coliseum expires after the 2013 NFL season. Raiders owner Mark Davis said in June he wanted the team to stay in Oakland, but he doesn't want to sign another short-term lease at the Coliseum without plans in place for a new stadium.

Follow Kevin Patra on Twitter @kpatra.
 
Report: Oakland Raiders eyeing 50,000-seat stadium

By Kevin Patra NFL.com

Published: July 16, 2013 at 06:20 a.m

The Oakland Raiders want to build a new 50,000-seat stadium at the site of their current home, the Oakland Tribune reported Monday.

The capacity, which would be the smallest in the NFL, was determined after a team-commissioned study determined the demand in the area.

"Both sides are conducting studies to determine the demand and financial viability of the project." Mike Taylor, the team's director of public affairs, said in a statement about the study's findings.

According to David Stone, a consultant working with Oakland and Alameda County (Calif.) officials on stadium construction, the new stadium would cost approximately $800 million. The Raiders have proposed contributing about $300 million, Stone said, with the remaining amount to be funded by the NFL ($200 million) and public financing (about $300 million).

The Raiders' lease on O.co Coliseum expires after the 2013 NFL season. Raiders owner Mark Davis said in June he wanted the team to stay in Oakland, but he doesn't want to sign another short-term lease at the Coliseum without plans in place for a new stadium.

Follow Kevin Patra on Twitter @kpatra.
this sounds like a best case scenario to me. A SMALLER, NEW stadium that keeps the Raiders in Oakland, gets us a new, state-of-the-art facility, and a capacity that matches the demand and affordability of a city like Oakland. Sign me up.

 
Rotoworld:

CSN Bay Area believes David Ausberry will get the first crack at the Raiders' tight end job.
Ausberry and Richard Gordon are the longest-tenured tight ends on the roster, so they'll get the first looks based on experience. But rookies Nick Kasa and Mychal Rivera will both be given fair shots to win the gig. The four players have combined for ten career receptions in the NFL.

Related: Nick Kasa, Mychal Rivera, Richard Gordon

Source: CSN Bay Area
 
On the stadium:

Hard to believe Oakland has no available (affordable) land anywhere for a stadium. Is this the same problem as in L.A., no one wants to fund it? If they had the guts the city/county would put one by the water and blow the 9ers shiney new stadium away.

As for Flynn:

- Hey wait and see. I understand why some are doubtful but he was a heck of a winner and was plenty game at LSU. He is still in the league, he has learned a lot, sitting behind Wilson and Rodgers sure doesn't mean a QB is lousy or anything, and between McCarthy and Carroll they both liked something they saw. You just need a guy who can get you there ("there" being .500 with a shot at better) for a couple years and can bring some stability to the situation. Give him a chance, I remember him having a pretty decent preseason last year even though he was hampered by a couple things like missing a game with the elbow problem and Terrell Owens blowing catches and a wide open TD catch and things like that, meanwhile Wilson was coming in in the 2nd half role, etc.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would love to see the Raiders build a stadium on Candlestick Point, and still call themselves the Oakland Raiders.

 
On the stadium:

Hard to believe Oakland has no available (affordable) land anywhere for a stadium. Is this the same problem as in L.A., no one wants to fund it? If they had the guts the city/county would put one by the water and blow the 9ers shiney new stadium away.

As for Flynn:

- Hey wait and see. I understand why some are doubtful but he was a heck of a winner and was plenty game at LSU. He is still in the league, he has learned a lot, sitting behind Wilson and Rodgers sure doesn't mean a QB is lousy or anything, and between McCarthy and Carroll they both liked something they saw. You just need a guy who can get you there ("there" being .500 with a shot at better) for a couple years and can bring some stability to the situation. Give him a chance, I remember him having a pretty decent preseason last year even though he was hampered by a couple things like missing a game with the elbow problem and Terrell Owens blowing catches and a wide open TD catch and things like that, meanwhile Wilson was coming in in the 2nd half role, etc.
Lots of available land but Oakland has many, many problems that far outweigh accommodating the Raiders.

Little to no chance the city votes for public dollars to support the Raiders.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top