This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Acquaintances, the leagues going into its 4th year and he's never made a trade as terrible as this. I'm actually inclined to think it was sent in error.
This trade would be beyond stupid even if Weeden dies in a plane crash before he accepted it.
Via the Campbell family tree.
Dez Bryant side for me, easily. Stevie doesn't close the Harvin < Bryant gap IMO
Prefer Harvin side, since I like him more than Bryant and am not a Sanders fan at all.
Give me Dez. I don't care about Sanders either, but Stevie is nothing special and only going to lose value as Woods develops.
And I am sure the powers that be will take that suggestion as seriously as they have in the past.
Oh hell, there has been a new day in this forum on an annual basis for this subject. This has been a perennial topic for about as long as I can remember. And the outcome is always the same, nothing changes. Joe and friends are convinced that the dynasty subject matter overlaps with the redraft content and the two can not be split. The attitude is If it ain't broke, don't fix it and they don't consider it broken. I don't agree with that, but I don't run this place.
I would call that a pretty nice deal for you. One year hit for a better part of a decade return.
I like it. I have Givens pretty far ahead of Harper based on the facts that we have seen him play and play well. Harper might not even make the final roster.
That'd be a pretty huge shock, actually.
I'm the Harper side in that trade. I think it was an overpay, but I had him in 6/7 leagues and wanted to finish the collection.
Now that is what I call an EXCELLENT owner to give up a player for a 2014 2nd and not shop him to anyone else.
I almost jokingly asked the OP if the other trader was EBF when I first saw this.Not surprised you went out of your way to acquire him in every league and one of the reasons your teams seem to have a Holiday Inn quality to them (if you have seen one you have seen them all). Seemingly about a 50% overlap of players from any one team to another (of the rosters I am aware of) which is unusual in that most owners usually have no more than 3-4 of the same players from one league to another and you usually have about 10-12+. This is an All your eggs in one basket strategy which is great if you figure right on these players, not so much if you figure wrong or they get injured/suspended.That said, honestly not a bad a deal IMO because the Givens' owners in most of my leagues have been trying to unload him, which suggests they are not that optimistic about his future and that his ADP is overvalued. Also I have no problem with anyone overpaying occasionally for a player they really like, particularly a rookie, as this may be the only opportunity one has to acquire them.EBF said:
Hall of fame talent but I'm not sure how many seasons you'll get out of him at this point.
A lot of unknowns but give me all the potential for Crabtree.
Interesting deal. Big fan of both Trent and DT. Nearly a wash between those two, though scarcity would favor the RB in a lot of formats.
I'd take the bolded. Seastrunk is worth enough more than Dyer, in my opinion, to bridge the gap between the other parts.
Personally I don't like this for Team A at all, but I don't rank Murray very high and have Britt as a big bounce-back candidate in a contract year. If he moves to a team that has a QB in the 2014 offseason that one will hurt I think.
