Notorious T.R.E.
Showdown!™ Administrator
Does this statement presuppose that I have to leave the basement to post?No it's just stating facts. Besides I listed Lester regardless. Now go back down to the basementOoh, semantics!
Does this statement presuppose that I have to leave the basement to post?No it's just stating facts. Besides I listed Lester regardless. Now go back down to the basementOoh, semantics!
I thought the entire point of the internet was that you didn't have to move at all.Does this statement presuppose that I have to leave the basement to post?No it's just stating facts. Besides I listed Lester regardless. Now go back down to the basementOoh, semantics!
yeah but is his nickname Big Game?Clanton Kershaw has a postseason ERA of 5.12 and is 1-5.
Not worth Shield money
I'm shukedI thought the entire point of the internet was that you didn't have to move at all.Does this statement presuppose that I have to leave the basement to post?No it's just stating facts. Besides I listed Lester regardless. Now go back down to the basementOoh, semantics!
AAV is all that mattersYes as an average per he does. He's making 20 in 2015 though.Lester makes a hell a lot more than 20 mill a year
It's because your momma's so poor you only have internet upstairs. BOOM!Does this statement presuppose that I have to leave the basement to post?No it's just stating facts. Besides I listed Lester regardless. Now go back down to the basementOoh, semantics!
my hand usually movesI'm shukedI thought the entire point of the internet was that you didn't have to move at all.Does this statement presuppose that I have to leave the basement to post?No it's just stating facts. Besides I listed Lester regardless. Now go back down to the basementOoh, semantics!
Auto correct, but it has a nice ring to it. Gilda stays!Da Gilda seems fun
Yes it does. Your wifi is weak down there.Does this statement presuppose that I have to leave the basement to post?No it's just stating facts. Besides I listed Lester regardless. Now go back down to the basementOoh, semantics!
Speaking of weak, let's talk about your iBanterYes it does. Your wifi is weak down there.Does this statement presuppose that I have to leave the basement to post?No it's just stating facts. Besides I listed Lester regardless. Now go back down to the basementOoh, semantics!
I like the edit to get that extra jab in.Yes it does. Your wifi is weak down there.Does this statement presuppose that I have to leave the basement to post?No it's just stating facts. Besides I listed Lester regardless. Now go back down to the basementOoh, semantics!
And your phone privileges end at 3 pm on Thursdays.
Since you're so full of wit, what would you call it then?You used the phrase "iBanter". No words.
Lets move on. Thx
YOUR FACE HAS A NICE RING TO IT!Auto correct, but it has a nice ring to it. Gilda stays!Da Gilda seems fun
Nightengale reporting that Shields will likely get "perhaps a bit more than the 55M Ervin Santana got last year."Shields isn't signing for 3/54
I think you mean "irregardless."No it's just stating facts. Besides I listed Lester regardless. Now go back down to the basementOoh, semantics!
41 yrs old and mocking a username on a fantasy forum... Perhaps it's time to reconsider your life goals.Gilda, why so mad?
But Gilda's smack is scorchingObviously, the stove is no longer hot.
But Gilda's iSmack is scorching.But Gilda's smack is scorchingObviously, the stove is no longer hot.
2007 - Zito's SF deal was the highest ever at that point, he got 7/126 or ~ 18 perQuestion for Da Grillz: How long is this $20M amount only for aces? Forever? 5 years?
Also, did James Shields have sex with your mother and not call her back?
BARRY ZITO RECIEVED A CONTRACT FOR $18M/YEAR IN 2007. THAT WAS THE BIGGEST CONTRACT FOR A SP TO DATE.Huh?
Well his #'s were better then Shields at the time of that signing. But yea most people thought that contract was crazy also. The same reaction people would have today if James got 20+/yr. Zito was also 4 yrs young and had a ridiculous W/L ratio.But Zito was an ace and remains one to this day
Ace or no, Shields would still be the biggest pickup of the Padres' busy offseason. He would solidify the front of their rotation while reducing the need for one of their lottery ticket SPs (e.g. Morrow, Josh Johnson, Kelly) to pan out."Growing sense" Padres will get James Shields
I got a growing sense I was getting laid last night, but that didn't happen.
Zeet's ERA was lower than his FIP in every one of those years which was true of his career as a whole. Some guys are just like that.Barry Zito's 4 years before signing his contract
FIP 4.05, 4.50, 4.34, 4.89
James Shields 4 years before this contract
FIP 3.42, 3.47, 3.47, 3.59
What about Zito's first 500 IP, conveniently left those out I guess? But i agree, his years leading up to that deal were far from good and I thought the contract was horrendous at the time, so you're preaching to the choir.Barry Zito's 4 years before signing his contract
FIP 4.05, 4.50, 4.34, 4.89
James Shields 4 years before this contract
FIP 3.42, 3.47, 3.47, 3.59
Are you sure they do in 2015?Zeet's ERA was lower than his FIP in every one of those years which was true of his career as a whole. Some guys are just like that.Barry Zito's 4 years before signing his contract
FIP 4.05, 4.50, 4.34, 4.89
James Shields 4 years before this contract
FIP 3.42, 3.47, 3.47, 3.59
I'm also not sure the Giants' front office understood FIP in 2007.