Good Posting Judge
Footballguy
Yeah, I don't get this at all. Hope they see something that I don't.
There's been some speculation that the signing was about lineup diversity. But $10m/yr seems like a lot to spend just because the rest of the lineup hits fly balls.What the ####?Billy Butler to Oakland 3/30
You can never have too few ground balls, especially with a big slow dude.There's been some speculation that the signing was about lineup diversity. But $10m/yr seems like a lot to spend just because the rest of the lineup hits fly balls.What the ####?Billy Butler to Oakland 3/30
To be fair, Butler has only led in the league in Double Plays Grounded Into twice.You can never have too few ground balls, especially with a big slow dude.There's been some speculation that the signing was about lineup diversity. But $10m/yr seems like a lot to spend just because the rest of the lineup hits fly balls.What the ####?Billy Butler to Oakland 3/30
Moncada still has to be cleared by the US Office of Foreign Assets.When can teams negotiate with the 2 Cuban FA's?
Fangraphs Writer [SIZE=1.1em]says:[/SIZE]Interesting Fangraphs piece about the Butler deal
My second favorite EnoWhat Sarris' article (whom I really like) ignores is that for a payroll-constrained team like Oakland, you need more bang from your FA dollar to be competitive. Just having a guy be "worth 30 million" by league-wide standards probably isn't going to be good enough.
Which is pretty dumb. How many WS wins do these geniuses have? How about a "lousy" GM like RAJ? Maybe it's time these 'moneyball' types get their noses out of the stat sheets and watch real baseball. Butler can have all these fancy stats behind him, but he's never lead his team to the postseason. They made it this year in spite of Butler. Dude is a fat slob who lacks the grit and intensity needed to carry his teams to victory.One does arch an eyebrow when Beane (or, say, somebody like Friedman) does this as opposed to someone like Sabean or Amaro. That doesn't mean it's necessarily good, but it's probably worth trying to delve into to see what Beane's trying to do.
I think baseball guys have a natural prejudice against oddballs like Venditte. Sidearmers and knuckleballers have faced similar challenges in getting promoted. There seems to be a tendency for people to say "I know he succeeded at N level but wait until the hitters in (N+1) get a shot at him".How did Venditte never get a shot with the Yankees? He's 29, but he's been a pretty solid contributor to the Yanks' minor league system throughout the years.
If Martin can almost get 90M, what makes you think Sandoval wont?I cannot believe Pablo Sandoval is gonna get 90 million from someone.
ExactlyIf Martin can almost get 90M, what makes you think Sandoval wont?I cannot believe Pablo Sandoval is gonna get 90 million from someone.
Ruben Amaro has zero WS wins as a GM and the team has gotten worse every single year since he became GM.Hilts said:Which is pretty dumb. How many WS wins do these geniuses have? How about a "lousy" GM like RAJ? Maybe it's time these 'moneyball' types get their noses out of the stat sheets and watch real baseball. Butler can have all these fancy stats behind him, but he's never lead his team to the postseason. They made it this year in spite of Butler. Dude is a fat slob who lacks the grit and intensity needed to carry his teams to victory."Good said:One does arch an eyebrow when Beane (or, say, somebody like Friedman) does this as opposed to someone like Sabean or Amaro. That doesn't mean it's necessarily good, but it's probably worth trying to delve into to see what Beane's trying to do.
Just because someone overpaid for Martin doesn't mean they should overpay for Sandoval. Someone will though.Doctor Detroit said:ExactlyWrigley said:If Martin can almost get 90M, what makes you think Sandoval wont?Annyong said:I cannot believe Pablo Sandoval is gonna get 90 million from someone.
likewise with Martin and the obvious outlier, last year.He's been in steady decline for four straight years?
I mean obviously someone's going to see past that and pay him because playoffs, but yikes.
has there been a good contract yet? Those who haven't signed anyone so far are ahead of the others.Remember when we thought the Cuddyer signing was a bad one?
Maybe we're just grossly underestimating the market here. With more focus on promoting younger cost-controlled talent, especially in bullpens, and very early extensions, teams have more money to spend in the free agent market. The $5 million per win model is long gone.has there been a good contract yet? Those who haven't signed anyone so far are ahead of the others.Remember when we thought the Cuddyer signing was a bad one?
And Pablo Sandoval will be the next piss poor domino. At least he is probably going to the AL so when his fat ### keels over at third he can play DH.has there been a good contract yet? Those who haven't signed anyone so far are ahead of the others.Remember when we thought the Cuddyer signing was a bad one?
Tell that to the Giants and Cardinals.Maybe we're just grossly underestimating the market here. With more focus on promoting younger cost-controlled talent, especially in bullpens, and very early extensions, teams have more money to spend in the free agent market. The $5 million per win model is long gone.has there been a good contract yet? Those who haven't signed anyone so far are ahead of the others.Remember when we thought the Cuddyer signing was a bad one?
I'd be shocked if its not matched. Boras knows what he's doing. In January, someone will sign Scherzer to an 7 year/$175mm contract.Was listening to the MLB Network and they seem to think that the 6-144 for the Tigers offered last year Max Sherzer might not be matched in this off season unless the Yankees are involved. Seems a little odd that Lester had had a number of teams interested yet Max has only been mentioned by the Yankees. I know it is still early but am wondering if Boros thinking Max is a 200 million player is scaring off some teams.
im just saying, draft pick aside, id much rather have cuddyer at 2/20 than butler or martin at their contracts.has there been a good contract yet? Those who haven't signed anyone so far are ahead of the others.Remember when we thought the Cuddyer signing was a bad one?
nah its just early. Hell get more than thatWas listening to the MLB Network and they seem to think that the 6-144 for the Tigers offered last year Max Sherzer might not be matched in this off season unless the Yankees are involved. Seems a little odd that Lester had had a number of teams interested yet Max has only been mentioned by the Yankees. I know it is still early but am wondering if Boros thinking Max is a 200 million player is scaring off some teams.
Not sure what you mean.Tell that to the Giants and Cardinals.Maybe we're just grossly underestimating the market here. With more focus on promoting younger cost-controlled talent, especially in bullpens, and very early extensions, teams have more money to spend in the free agent market. The $5 million per win model is long gone.has there been a good contract yet? Those who haven't signed anyone so far are ahead of the others.Remember when we thought the Cuddyer signing was a bad one?
I get that, but I'd rather not have any of them.im just saying, draft pick aside, id much rather have cuddyer at 2/20 than butler or martin at their contracts.has there been a good contract yet? Those who haven't signed anyone so far are ahead of the others.Remember when we thought the Cuddyer signing was a bad one?
At some point we all have to realize the money in baseball is ridiculous, and none of it's ours.I get that, but I'd rather not have any of them.im just saying, draft pick aside, id much rather have cuddyer at 2/20 than butler or martin at their contracts.has there been a good contract yet? Those who haven't signed anyone so far are ahead of the others.Remember when we thought the Cuddyer signing was a bad one?
Of course it is. But every team has a limit of how much they're going to spend, and thus one doesn't want their team to spend poorly.At some point we all have to realize the money in baseball is ridiculous, and none of it's ours.I get that, but I'd rather not have any of them.im just saying, draft pick aside, id much rather have cuddyer at 2/20 than butler or martin at their contracts.has there been a good contract yet? Those who haven't signed anyone so far are ahead of the others.Remember when we thought the Cuddyer signing was a bad one?
it is, but that doesn't mean those funds should be spent badly.At some point we all have to realize the money in baseball is ridiculous, and none of it's ours.I get that, but I'd rather not have any of them.im just saying, draft pick aside, id much rather have cuddyer at 2/20 than butler or martin at their contracts.has there been a good contract yet? Those who haven't signed anyone so far are ahead of the others.Remember when we thought the Cuddyer signing was a bad one?
None of the deals so far this off-season will cripple a team's finances (except for maybe the Stanton deal if it runs to its full duration). Cuddyer and Butler could easily earn their keep and the lengths are pretty short. Even if Martin or Panda tank in the final years of their deals, the teams can take the writedown. The biggest risk falls on small payroll teams who invest in long-term deals because they can't absorb it when things go south.it is, but that doesn't mean those funds should be spent badly.At some point we all have to realize the money in baseball is ridiculous, and none of it's ours.I get that, but I'd rather not have any of them.im just saying, draft pick aside, id much rather have cuddyer at 2/20 than butler or martin at their contracts.has there been a good contract yet? Those who haven't signed anyone so far are ahead of the others.Remember when we thought the Cuddyer signing was a bad one?