What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2015 NBA Thread: I felt a great disturbance in the trolls, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. (4 Viewers)

I would like the LeBrons to make it a series and I kinda think they will.  Don't have a horse in this race, just want teh fun.
Same. But had you told me in October that Channing Frye was going to play in the Finals this year, I would have agreed with you.

Go Frye!

 
Yeah I don't get this either.  They looked deep earlier in the season but Livingston seems to have fallen off a cliff, which leaves them without any real depth in the backcourt. And Bogut's not gonna give them much against the Cavs either IMO.  He's a good post defender but the Cavs don't really go to the block except to LeBron, who I assume will not be manned by Bogut.

Kyrie's defense, on the other hand ... that's a real problem. Maybe he suddenly pulls it together, IIRC there was talk that he was defending much better last year in the playoffs before his injury.  But I'll believe it when I see it.

Warriors in 5 for me. Cavs could spring the upset, but I think the Cleve lost its best shot at a title when OKC went out. I loved that matchup for them.
Yep, I get the Kyrie defense angle (while ignoring the other end of the court) and potential coaching mismatch, but still waiting for something interesting on the depth superiority in this series.  

When comparing the Finals last year to now, the Cavs essentially add Kyrie, Love, and Frye to their rotation...moving their depth and other pieces back to the roles they excel in or should be in.  Delly won't have to be hospitalized after Game 3.  Frye fits much better against GS than Mozgov (who won't see the floor now) and has been draining 3's.  Shump can concentrate on defense instead of also trying to moonlight as the 3rd offensive option (and JR as the 2nd option, that was cute).  Jefferson was also added and has found a fountain of youth the last couple months and in these playoffs.  He matches up well with the GS length, moving James Jones to the motivational role he should be in.  And they got rid of Andy, who just might be one of Kerr's heady adjustments.  Facts are, the Cavs are more prepared for anything GS will, or maybe have to (like last year), throw at them this year.

I'm also hearing talk about how the Cavs need to slow it down (like they attempted in the Christmas game) and grind out wins.  Forget that.  GS misses a 3, run and get open looks.  Play the way you play best.  Like all playoffs against those Eastern Conf teams that should be in the D-League.  Make adjustments like slowing the pace when something isn't working.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kyrie on defense is going to be a problem for Cleveland for sure.  They'll likely try to hide him on Iggy and Barnes, but GS will find a way to get him matched up on Curry and Thompson.

However, I still don't see how GS stops Cleveland's offense.  LeBron and Kyrie are every bit as good at breaking down defenses as KD/WB are and the biggest difference is that Cleveland doesn't have a Roberson you can leave open and help off of.  

I think it'll be a high scoring series and I think the only reason I favor GS is because of the home court.

 
The greatest heel turn of all time would be Andy nut kicking Dray so hard in the middle of Game 7 that he'd have to exit, Cavs win, and then he's shown celebrating in downtown SF with the Cavs.

 
Are there odds on a team winning the series in a specific number of games? I've heard percentages of likelihood bandied about (GS in five was the most likely iirc) but no odds that I can see. If you can find odds I'd go anywhere from 0-$1000 depending on what they are.

But if this is one of those dumb posts about wagering 1:1 on something that has <.5 chance of happening and how I'm not willing to put my money were my mouth is because I have >1 brain cells then save your breath.

As an aside, I'm about +10 units simply betting the favorites in these Playoffs. The team that has failed me the most is, unironically, the Cavs.

Let's not forget Cleveland has lost five straight to Golden State already.

I like GSW to win tommorow 110-89

So I like GS -5.5, u209.5 for game 1 and -210 for the series. Name your price. And if you have odds on a sweep let me know.
Golden State sweep is about +800 on average, as far as I can tell.

 
Are there odds on a team winning the series in a specific number of games? I've heard percentages of likelihood bandied about (GS in five was the most likely iirc) but no odds that I can see. If you can find odds I'd go anywhere from 0-$1000 depending on what they are.
Clev 4-0 +3000

Clev 4-1 +1200

Clev 4-2 +485

Clev 4-3 +670

GS 4-0 +900

GS 4-1 +325

GS 4-2 +500

GS 4-3 +310

 
It's cute that you have these little fantasy scenarios where Cleveland wins. Believe me, I understand. I'm a Bernie supporter.
Just admit you would applaud Andy if he did that.  You know you would!

Honestly...GS is rightfully favored, extra home game, will probably win the title again, but of course I'm going to think my team would win.  Why wouldn't I?  I think the series will be closer than some are predicting.  

In true Cleveland sports team form, they go from potentially playing OKC (who I think the Cavs would have beat in 5 or 6), to getting the champs riding high after being down 3-1 in their series.  Trust me, I was silently right with you GS homers knowing the outcome of the OKC series.  That's how it's worked for a long time.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah I don't get this either.  They looked deep earlier in the season but Livingston seems to have fallen off a cliff, which leaves them without any real depth in the backcourt. And Bogut's not gonna give them much against the Cavs either IMO.  He's a good post defender but the Cavs don't really go to the block except to LeBron, who I assume will not be manned by Bogut.

Kyrie's defense, on the other hand ... that's a real problem. Maybe he suddenly pulls it together, IIRC there was talk that he was defending much better last year in the playoffs before his injury.  But I'll believe it when I see it.

Warriors in 5 for me. Cavs could spring the upset, but I think the Cleve lost its best shot at a title when OKC went out. I loved that matchup for them.
Totally agree. 

As for the defense, the Cavs only real chance is that they put Kyrie on Curry and hope he plays decent enough defense to force GS to need to run PnR (as opposed to Westbrook...I mean Kyrie just falling asleep and giving him open looks from 3).  I'd assume GS would then run the PnR with Love's man.  While Love is bad defensively, he is at least OK when he knows how he needs to play the PnR (ie trap in this case to force the ball out of Curry's hands).  That will create a mismatch down the line, but at that point you have to hope LeBron's good enough to cover up whatever's coming at him.  The Cavs will have to let Iggy, Barnes, and Green shoot from 3, but frankly that's not horrendous from their perspective....

because...the Cavs are an even more efficient offensive team and they present unique matchup problems for GS on the other end.  Barnes can't handle LeBron, so that falls to Iggy or Green (once Iggy gets in foul trouble).  The entire Cavs team has been lethal from the corner this postseason, so once one of those defenders collapses to help on LeBron, they are going to get an open look from 3, and they've been shooting them better than GS this postseason.  As long as they continue to make their fair share of those open 3s, this will be a close series. 

 
Totally agree. 

As for the defense, the Cavs only real chance is that they put Kyrie on Curry and hope he plays decent enough defense to force GS to need to run PnR (as opposed to Westbrook...I mean Kyrie just falling asleep and giving him open looks from 3).  I'd assume GS would then run the PnR with Love's man.  While Love is bad defensively, he is at least OK when he knows how he needs to play the PnR (ie trap in this case to force the ball out of Curry's hands).  That will create a mismatch down the line, but at that point you have to hope LeBron's good enough to cover up whatever's coming at him.  The Cavs will have to let Iggy, Barnes, and Green shoot from 3, but frankly that's not horrendous from their perspective....

because...the Cavs are an even more efficient offensive team and they present unique matchup problems for GS on the other end.  Barnes can't handle LeBron, so that falls to Iggy or Green (once Iggy gets in foul trouble).  The entire Cavs team has been lethal from the corner this postseason, so once one of those defenders collapses to help on LeBron, they are going to get an open look from 3, and they've been shooting them better than GS this postseason.  As long as they continue to make their fair share of those open 3s, this will be a close series. 
:goodposting:

 
The greatest heel turn of all time would be Andy nut kicking Dray so hard in the middle of Game 7 that he'd have to exit, Cavs win, and then he's shown celebrating in downtown SF with the Cavs.
Varejao gets a ring regardless of the outcome. Since he played for Cleveland. If he heel turns, I guarantee you that you will hear David Stern's music shortly after.

Bah Gawd!

 
As near as I can tell he gets a call every time, even when he initiates contact with a stationary defender by ramming his, Lebron's, forearm and elbow, into the throat of the defender.  Presuming though, like you do, that the whistle didn't blow for this chiseled, supersonic Cavalier freight train I would presume the whistle was clogged from the hair unable to remain on his head due to the airspeed friction of this charging locomotive.  I would, therefor, clean out the clog or go to my standby whistle.  
I definitely think on the superstar call spectrum, LeBron is very much on the low end. He gets hammered. 

 
I definitely think on the superstar call spectrum, LeBron is very much on the low end. He gets hammered. 
Disagree, but I admit my own bias.  I think he gets away with a lot on defense that "the others" get called on routinely (and he overreacts to almost every foul called against him).

 
Yep, I get the Kyrie defense angle (while ignoring the other end of the court) and potential coaching mismatch, but still waiting for something interesting on the depth superiority in this series.  

When comparing the Finals last year to now, the Cavs essentially add Kyrie, Love, and Frye to their rotation...moving their depth and other pieces back to the roles they excel in or should be in.  Delly won't have to be hospitalized after Game 3.  Frye fits much better against GS than Mozgov (who won't see the floor now) and has been draining 3's.  Shump can concentrate on defense instead of also trying to moonlight as the 3rd offensive option (and JR as the 2nd option, that was cute).  Jefferson was also added and has found a fountain of youth the last couple months and in these playoffs.  He matches up well with the GS length, moving James Jones to the motivational role he should be in.  And they got rid of Andy, who just might be one of Kerr's heady adjustments.  Facts are, the Cavs are more prepared for anything GS will, or maybe have to (like last year), throw at them this year.

I'm also hearing talk about how the Cavs need to slow it down (like they attempted in the Christmas game) and grind out wins.  Forget that.  GS misses a 3, run and get open looks.  Play the way you play best.  Like all playoffs against those Eastern Conf teams that should be in the D-League.  Make adjustments like slowing the pace when something isn't working.
When OKC ran, it definitely gave the Warriors a lot of problems. I would think CLE could take some of the things that worked for OKC forward. 

 
Disagree, but I admit my own bias.  I think he gets away with a lot on defense that "the others" get called on routinely (and he overreacts to almost every foul called against him).
I've compiled my exhaustive list of NBA players who don't overreact to calls against them. Check it out:

 
He's a bit like Shaq was in that regard. His style of play results in a lot of contact. Tough for the refs to call everything, so there will be times where it seems he's getting too many calls, or not enough.
Agreed.  Almost posted the same thing, but lazy.  These guys are such monsters that they either draw contact or you watch them dunk all day.  Tough job for the officials.

 
He's a bit like Shaq was in that regard. His style of play results in a lot of contact. Tough for the refs to call everything, so there will be times where it seems he's getting too many calls, or not enough.
And like Shaq, LeBron can power through so much contact there's a lot of fouls that go uncalled because the contact doesn't impede his movement or seem to put him at a disadvantage.  Shaq had hundreds, possibly thousands, of three-point play opportunities denied because he could dunk through fouls without having his position altered.    

 
And like Shaq, LeBron can power through so much contact there's a lot of fouls that go uncalled because the contact doesn't impede his movement or seem to put him at a disadvantage.  Shaq had hundreds, possibly thousands, of three-point play opportunities denied because he could dunk through fouls without having his position altered.    
Yeah, as much of a freak as LeBron is, Shaq was an even bigger one. So many time's he'd finish with three guys grabbing his forearms, no call. So many other times he'd blast guys out of the lane with a shoulder to the chest just doing one of his natural post moves and not get a charging call. I wonder what kinds of conversations the ref crews had before games they worked in which he was playing. James is the same way, just on a slightly smaller scale.

 
I've compiled my exhaustive list of NBA players who don't overreact to calls against them. Check it out:
While almost every NBA player is a 9 or 10 on the Offdee scale of complaining about calls (so admittedly it is a bit silly to compare), LeBron is certainly in the 9.9 range.

 
unless you're new to the NBA and haven't figured this out yet... wide latitude is given to the absolute superstar players in the league. always has been. nobody is paying to watch Lebron foul out in the 3rd quarter. 

players, officials, coaches all know this.  since they know this they are going to manipulate, argue, bicker, finagle, whatever as much as they can to massage the guidelines. and they're going to be allowed to get away with it. 

superstars can explode in an insane temper tantrum and refs let it be.  the 4th guy off the bench can give a blank stare in the general direction of the 3rd official who wasn't involved in the call and get run. 

that's just how it has always worked

it's not different in any sport. if you are in the top handful of your sporting profession you get to do whatever the hell you want to do. it's not just an NBA phenomenon.

 
bananafish said:
Are there odds on a team winning the series in a specific number of games? I've heard percentages of likelihood bandied about (GS in five was the most likely iirc) but no odds that I can see. If you can find odds I'd go anywhere from 0-$1000 depending on what they are.

But if this is one of those dumb posts about wagering 1:1 on something that has <.5 chance of happening and how I'm not willing to put my money were my mouth is because I have >1 brain cells then save your breath.

As an aside, I'm about +10 units simply betting the favorites in these Playoffs. The team that has failed me the most is, unironically, the Cavs.

Let's not forget Cleveland has lost five straight to Golden State already.

I like GSW to win tommorow 110-89

So I like GS -5.5, u209.5 for game 1 and -210 for the series. Name your price. And if you have odds on a sweep let me know.
As expected.

And LOL regular season games. Ask Toronto how that .667 record this season worked out. (Sorry Cliff I would have been hoping Raps win it all of they beat the Cavs).

I wanted to see how much of that sweep talk was really yeah I'll put my money where my mouth is or just what it is pure having fun and being pumped for the Finals.

I was born and raised in Cleveland I am hoping against hope for the win, but like a true native expecting some heart breaking loss or the Cavs get smashed.

Under 209.5 for Thursday? Interesting, Lue has said he wants to run with GSW.

I'd expect the over to hit, unless multiple players shoot the ball badly.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Britney Spears said:
When OKC ran, it definitely gave the Warriors a lot of problems. I would think CLE could take some of the things that worked for OKC forward. 
Russell Westbrook running is not like any other player in the league running though.

 
bananafish said:
Livingston disappeared during the Thunder series for sure, though he did have a crucial 5 points in about 45 seconds in that pivotal 3rd quarter of game 7. I'd attribute his relative silence more to OKC's defense than anything else, a defense that Cleveland lacks. He was absolutely huge during Curry's absence.
Yep, it's all relative.  The Thunder beat a great Spurs team and took a great Golden State team to 7.  Writing off a player because he struggled against a vastly improved defense is silly.

 
Cleveland had a lot of trouble against Lowry and  Derozan on the road and it cost them 60 + points and 2 games, if they have the same trouble against these guards it will cost them 80+ points and the series.

 
bananafish said:
And there you go, thanks.

This seems reasonable. I'll go $300. Your call, Mr. Idiot. We'll use League Safe or some other escrow service.

Where did you find these tj? I must suck at the internet more than I thought.
Back in the day I would bet point lines and over/unders.  Help an old man get clear.  For every hundred you bet you return $900 if G.S. sweeps so your payout here is $2700 on your $300 wager, is that right?

I don't know how folks seem to weigh these probabilities.  Points always seemed so natural to me, over/unders as well.  Predicting one team has an 80% chance of an outright win, or a 11% probability, in this case, of accomplishing something.  It seems less natural to me.  Of Course if you are placing this particular bet you obviously feel they have greater than a 12% chance of accomplishing a sweep, is that right?

Do you look at historic numbers, this years playoffs, regular season matchups, which to me seem only somewhat indicative of playoff ball?  Do you prefer these lines to point lines, and if so can you articulate why?  Just curious.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
tjnc09 said:
Clev 4-0 +3000

Clev 4-1 +1200

Clev 4-2 +485

Clev 4-3 +670

GS 4-0 +900

GS 4-1 +325

GS 4-2 +500

GS 4-3 +310
See these numbers interest me too.  Counterintuitive movement sometimes, but not so if you think road closeouts are unlikely in some scenarios.  This is interesting, but I am not sure I can get a handle on this sort of thinking.  Fascinating.

 
Britney Spears said:
I definitely think on the superstar call spectrum, LeBron is very much on the low end. He gets hammered. 
I would never say he does not get hammered.  Jut that he initiates as often as he does, and he does always get the call.  Now Durant, he gets away with lots of reaching and grabbing on defense, and he gets every benefit on the offensive end.  Certainly if folks came at him as hard as they do Lebron many of those would be called flagrant. Given that, if you say Lebron does not get the flagrant calls he should I would agree.  He does take some hard fouls.  Of course when he initiates, and then gets hard fouled in that same play I can see the refs balancing, though they probably should not.

Hard game to ref in full speed.  I get to see everything in slow motion on high def from the comfort of my recliner and a bit of an elevated view.  They are right down there with giants screening them half the time.  Not a job I would want.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As expected.

And LOL regular season games. Ask Toronto how that .667 record this season worked out. (Sorry Cliff I would have been hoping Raps win it all of they beat the Cavs).

I wanted to see how much of that sweep talk was really yeah I'll put my money where my mouth is or just what it is pure having fun and being pumped for the Finals.

I was born and raised in Cleveland I am hoping against hope for the win, but like a true native expecting some heart breaking loss or the Cavs get smashed.

Under 209.5 for Thursday? Interesting, Lue has said he wants to run with GSW.

I'd expect the over to hit, unless multiple players shoot the ball badly.
I do admire the way Clevelanders have supported their teams in spite of returns.  If they get a Championship I will be happy for them, the fans.  They seem like good folks.

 
Bananafish,

Have you ever gone the other way on these long odds things.  Have you risked say $900 for a return of $100?  Seems that would be a difficult emotional choice, one much more likely to be made by institutions, not persons.  Almost undoubtedly it is the smart play to be going long to short, but it seems emotionally nearly impossible for the small time player just looking for some juice on a game or series.

 
See these numbers interest me too.  Counterintuitive movement sometimes, but not so if you think road closeouts are unlikely in some scenarios.  This is interesting, but I am not sure I can get a handle on this sort of thinking.  Fascinating.
Each team has a win probability set by the books for each individual game.  For example, GS is 70.25% to win game 1 and Cleveland is 29.75% to win game 1.  GS should be about 47% to win game 3 or 4.  You can calculate these win probabilities with a simple formula that excludes the vig.  The probability GS wins at home <> wins on the road.  All you are doing is calculating the different ways the above outcomes can happen.

So, the probability GS sweeps is just P(wins game 1 at home) x P(wins game 2 at home) x P(wins game 3 away) x P(wins game 4 away)

GS wins 4-1 is:

P(WWWLW)+P(WWLWW)+P(WLWWW)+P(LWWWW)

etc

ETA: plus vig on each option

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Each team has a win probability set by the books for each individual game.  For example, GS is 70.25% to win game 1 and Cleveland is 29.75% to win game 1.  GS should be about 47% to win game 3 or 4.  You can calculate these win probabilities with a simple formula that excludes the vig.  The probability GS wins at home <> wins on the road.  All you are doing is calculating the different ways the above outcomes can happen.

So, the probability GS sweeps is just P(wins game 1 at home) x P(wins game 2 at home) x P(wins game 3 away) x P(wins game 4 away)

GS wins 4-1 is:

P(WWWLW)+P(WWLWW)+P(WLWWW)+P(LWWWW)

etc

ETA: plus vig on each option
I get the math of it.  The win probabilities projectors have gotten close over the years but how does a human set their win probabilities?  Big swings in math if your numbers are even say 5% different than the projectors times say four games.  How does one start thinking in percentages instead of point differentials, just watchin and practicing?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top