I do think that they could maybe navigate around having to target some of those big name 4's that you mentioned. For example--if they went for a guy like Mo Speights (who is relatively cheap compared the guys that you mentioned)--but in turn used the money they saved to target a really legit PG and maybe a sharp shooter like Reddick or Korver..etc. While I certainly agree that the guys you mentioned would be awesome--I don't think they are the only options. I think the point is that replacing Nurk with a guy like Plumlee essentially duplicated the same roster problem that they have always had. I think you were absolutely spot on with your assessment there.Yeah, I agree with most of this. Plumlee would be a fine center for somebody, just not the Nuggets. They don't need a center, they need a power forward that can protect the rim and space the floor. The problem with that, is there is only a very small number of such players, and they are all expensive. Of guys that can actually be full time power forwards, you have Ibaka, Porzingas (probably much better at center), KAT (better at center), Durant (probably better at SF), Green, and Millsap. I would be happy to have the Nuggets give a three year max deal to either Millsap or a little less than three year max deal to Ibaka, but the other guys would never come here.
How many of those do you ever recall working out though? Other than chauncey billups I can't think of one.is there another sport where fans & teams give up on players faster than the NBA?
if you aren't a superstar inside 20 games, you're garbage
Sure, just for you.You mean IF they can get past Toronto of course.
62% from 3 in 9 February games so far. Silly.Not sure if it's been mentioned in this thread or not, but Korver looks like a nice pickup for the Cavs. I just looked it up and he is shooting like 52% from 3 since being with them. In 32 games with Atlanta, he only broke 20 points 1 time, but has done it 4 times with the Cavs in 20 games. Just seems like a really good fit for both the team and player and gives them a slightly better chance of hanging with the W's. Plus with Boston not making any major adds, they should have an easier road to the Finals than Golden State.
Kyle Lowry?How many of those do you ever recall working out though? Other than chauncey billups I can't think of one.
You can win with an interior offense you just can't if you have a player that the defense doesn't have to honor.This. Spacing is everything now. It's the reason the Celts are in the conversation with weak ball talent at almost every position, the terms under which largely uncoachable athletes are able to play some form of defense and the focus of everyone who wants to win basketball games. Used to be you couldnt win with a perimeter offense, now you cant win with an interior offense. Now, you dont got the mix, you aint in the mix. Dual bigs can work if they get the spacing down. Lesser talents probably shouldnt try, uncoachable supreme talents shouldn't try (which makes BoogieBrow unlikely to work). Like gap-oriented defenses in fb, the first guy to figure out hi-lo posting in modern spacing schemes is gonna win for several years while everyone else is going to go out & get dual bigs and fail, just like they're doing in the 3&D game now.
The problem they have going forward is Jokic will never been a plus defender and cannot play any position other than center because he is too slow. Offensively, he thrives with an empty lane and guys that can space the floor. When they play with Gallo or Chandler at the 4 they are an elite offense, only Golden State can match. With guys like Nurkic and Plumlee, they are still at terrible defense and maybe even worse, but it also kills the offense. Other than point guard, they don't need to improve on their lineups offensively, they need to improve defensively while not clogging the lane. To do that they need players that can control perimeter penetration, which IMO is a bigger problem than rim defense, and also find a power forward that can protect the rim. Ideally, Murray and Harris would be the starting back court next year, but they need guys that can shoot AND defend at the forward spots.I do think that they could maybe navigate around having to target some of those big name 4's that you mentioned. For example--if they went for a guy like Mo Speights (who is relatively cheap compared the guys that you mentioned)--but in turn used the money they saved to target a really legit PG and maybe a sharp shooter like Reddick or Korver..etc. While I certainly agree that the guys you mentioned would be awesome--I don't think they are the only options. I think the point is that replacing Nurk with a guy like Plumlee essentially duplicated the same roster problem that they have always had. I think you were absolutely spot on with your assessment there.
In a semi-related note, on NY radio last night one of the hosts made the point how the current 6-7-8 seeds (Pistons, Pacers, and Bulls) were all either sellers or tried to be sellers at the trade deadline. Three teams in the playoffs right now basically admitted they had no shot and were giving up. While it makes sense, it's just a weird little quirk of the NBA that doesn't really happen in other sports.is there another sport where fans & teams give up on players faster than the NBA?
if you aren't a superstar inside 20 games, you're garbage
you'd be far better equipped to answer that than meHow many of those do you ever recall working out though? Other than chauncey billups I can't think of one.
CJ McCollum. Giannis. I think there's actually quite a few examples of good players taking awhile to develop, though the superstars usually show flashes right away.Tony Parker.
just because this is how my mind works.. i think it would be interesting to analyze drafts going back, say, 30 years and figure out how all the top 15 picks fared.Kyle Lowry?
but mostly true I think.
 Dirk was pretty bad for most of his rookie year. I remember thinking he was going to be just a typical stiffCJ McCollum. Giannis. I think there's actually quite a few examples of good players taking awhile to develop, though the superstars usually show flashes right away.
This is exaggerated just a bit, off the top Steve Nash, Kawhi Leonard, Tyson Chandler, Ben Wallace, Isaiah Thomas of the Celtics, Jeff Teague.is there another sport where fans & teams give up on players faster than the NBA?
if you aren't a superstar inside 20 games, you're garbage
which is what i'm wondering. Nerlens Noel was picked #6 and iirc was expected to set the league on its ear with his defensive prowess. he's in his 3rd year, with the Sixers. they also selected Okafor and Embiid which made people say "we don't need Noel, he's not good anyways".This is exaggerated just a bit, off the top Steve Nash, Kawhi Leonard, Tyson Chandler, Ben Wallace, Isaiah Thomas of the Celtics, Jeff Teague.
not sure who you mean by Philadelphia, but the Noel deal seems to have been roundly dismissed by everyone.which is what i'm wondering. Nerlens Noel was picked #6 and iirc was expected to set the league on its ear with his defensive prowess. he's in his 3rd year, with the Sixers. they also selected Okafor and Embiid which made people say "we don't need Noel, he's not good anyways".
he's so poorly thought of in Philadelphia that they just sent him to Dallas for a sack of basketballs.. and that's with Okafor also considered a bust and Embiid, when he comes back from another injury, playing with one balsa leg.
is Noel so bad, after 2+ seasons with a horrible organization and nothing around him, that he can be given away?
maybe he is. i have no idea. but that seems to be how these young guys get treated now. if you're a big man not putting up 20 and 10 in your first season fans are looking around like "why is our GM so bad? why won't he cut this bum?"
there doesn't seem to be room for rotation type guys anymore. either you're a superstar or the team wants nothing to do with you... immediately.
Maybe you could create a slideshow about the top 21 draft busts and gems for us.just because this is how my mind works.. i think it would be interesting to analyze drafts going back, say, 30 years and figure out how all the top 15 picks fared.
hell, maybe just top 10 since the consensus seems to be if you're drafting outside the lottery you may as well not pick a player at all.
eta: starting with the '89 draft![]()
http://www.nba.com/history/draft/1989-draft/
it's a great day to be a sixers' fan!Simmons officially shelved for the remainder of the season. Huge bummer.
There's no shame in losing to the rising dynasty.
alright, alright, alrightHonestly, they should hire Hinkie back
Mario HezonjaHow many of those do you ever recall working out though? Other than chauncey billups I can't think of one.
i've yet to hear anyone say "Nerlens Noel is a star/useful player/shouldn't be traded"not sure who you mean by Philadelphia, but the Noel deal seems to have been roundly dismissed by everyone.
mixing the backing track on this right nowMaybe you could create a slideshow about the top 21 draft busts and gems for us.
too flambose
This is awesome - Rockets' shot chart from last night. Hard to get more efficient than that.Daywalker said:Rockets at +1600 to win title is starting to intrigue me.
Most people said it was a bad deal, what more do you want? The fact is Noel is a good and useful player, but he doesn't fit in for Philly. It is going to be difficult to pay your 3rd or 4th big roughly 15 to 20 million and compete.mr. furley said:i've yet to hear anyone say "Nerlens Noel is a star/useful player/shouldn't be traded"
Yea fans in Philly are not happy at all giving up on Noel. Especially for what we got. Then we're being sold he was traded for a first rounder. A crock of ####.mr. furley said:which is what i'm wondering. Nerlens Noel was picked #6 and iirc was expected to set the league on its ear with his defensive prowess. he's in his 3rd year, with the Sixers. they also selected Okafor and Embiid which made people say "we don't need Noel, he's not good anyways".
he's so poorly thought of in Philadelphia that they just sent him to Dallas for a sack of basketballs.. and that's with Okafor also considered a bust and Embiid, when he comes back from another injury, playing with one balsa leg.
is Noel so bad, after 2+ seasons with a horrible organization and nothing around him, that he can be given away?
maybe he is. i have no idea. but that seems to be how these young guys get treated now. if you're a big man not putting up 20 and 10 in your first season fans are looking around like "why is our GM so bad? why won't he cut this bum?"
there doesn't seem to be room for rotation type guys anymore. either you're a superstar or the team wants nothing to do with you... immediately.
would have been 1.01 if they didnt already know he was missing his rookie yr with a knee. he was exACTly what i wanted for the Celts last draft day and they could have had him for the 2 #1 picks they used on those international guys. ten cent head & tude, which made the bigmanlogjam ugly in Philly and made his subtraction an addition (and dont overlook Anderson just yet), but a transcendent defensive talent who at least knows how to get out of the way on offensemr. furley said:which is what i'm wondering. Nerlens Noel was picked #6 and iirc was expected to set the league on its ear with his defensive prowess. he's in his 3rd year, with the Sixers. they also selected Okafor and Embiid which made people say "we don't need Noel, he's not good anyways".
It wasn't that long ago that most coaches wouldn't play most rookies much.msudaisy26 said:This is exaggerated just a bit, off the top Steve Nash, Kawhi Leonard, Tyson Chandler, Ben Wallace, Isaiah Thomas of the Celtics, Jeff Teague.
Agreed. I think most of Philly wanted Noel.Long Ball Larry said:not sure who you mean by Philadelphia, but the Noel deal seems to have been roundly dismissed by everyone.
I think your last sentence is the key. Philly didn't want to pay Noel $20M a year. If he could play alongside Embiid it would be one thing, but they didn't have much success at that. They weren't going to pay him $20M a year to be a backup center.Most people said it was a bad deal, what more do you want? The fact is Noel is a good and useful player, but he doesn't fit in for Philly. It is going to be difficult to pay your 3rd or 4th big roughly 15 to 20 million and compete.
I think your last sentence is the key. Philly didn't want to pay Noel $20M a year. If he could play alongside Embiid it would be one thing, but they didn't have much success at that. They weren't going to pay him $20M a year to be a backup center.
  They played a total of 8 minutes together.  Kobe had a pretty rough rookie year and people were calling him a bust.Capella said:How many of those do you ever recall working out though? Other than chauncey billups I can't think of one.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/draft_finder.cgi?request=1&year_min=1989&year_max=2016&college_id=0&pick_overall_min=1&pick_overall_max=15&pos_is_g=Y&pos_is_gf=Y&pos_is_f=Y&pos_is_fg=Y&pos_is_fc=Y&pos_is_c=Y&pos_is_cf=Y&c1stat=g&c1comp=gt&c1val=0&order_by=ws_per_48mr. furley said:just because this is how my mind works.. i think it would be interesting to analyze drafts going back, say, 30 years and figure out how all the top 15 picks fared.
hell, maybe just top 10 since the consensus seems to be if you're drafting outside the lottery you may as well not pick a player at all.
eta: starting with the '89 draft![]()
http://www.nba.com/history/draft/1989-draft/
I, for one, am shocked Rose is looking for the biggest payday possible.Derrick Rose is not looking to get a buyout from the Knicks, as he still hopes to sign with New York long-term.
Rose was purportedly almost swapped for Ricky Rubio at the deadline, but the Knicks were asking for an extra piece and the Wolves declined. Rose now says he wants to re-sign with the Knicks this summer. "I hope so. They didn’t trade me,’’ Rose said. "That’s a good sign." From a fantasy perspective, Rose has exceeded modest expectations this season, due in large part because he has been able to stay healthy for the most of the year.
Source: New York Post
 he should play for whatever minimal amount an NBA team will pay him?I, for one, am shocked Rose is looking for the biggest payday possible.
Wally Sczerbiak is Spanish