He’s a Trumper- supports the ban on Muslims. Not a chance in hell.U.S. House of Representative...Scott Taylor.....
I don't think he supports a ban on Muslims...He is definitely strong on National Security/Immigration.. (due to his military background and his actual real life experience in that region of the world). I don't know what defines a Trumper....Maybe you can clarify that...ThanksHe’s a Trumper- supports the ban on Muslims. Not a chance in hell.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Taylor_(politician)I don't think he supports a ban on Muslims...He is definitely strong on National Security/Immigration.. (due to his military background and his actual real life experience in that region of the world). I don't know what defines a Trumper....Maybe you can clarify that...Thanks
Worked out great last time there were polls. They were spot on. ?NEW POLL: Biden leads Trump by 7 points in hypothetical 2020 matchup
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/399820-biden-tops-trump-by-7-points-in-hypothetical-2020-matchup-poll
Nate Silver has pointed out repeatedly that most were in the margin of error, Mr. Alias.Worked out great last time there were polls. They were spot on. ?
Ask Hillary about how accurate the polls areNEW POLL: Biden leads Trump by 7 points in hypothetical 2020 matchup
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/399820-biden-tops-trump-by-7-points-in-hypothetical-2020-matchup-poll
Trump did not prepare an acceptance speech, so he and his campaign thought they were accurate too.Ask Hillary about how accurate the polls are
Polls taken before a major presidential election are generally pretty accurate (as was the case in 2016). Polls taken two years beforehand when the nominees aren't even set yet are meaningless and only measure name recognition.Nate Silver has pointed out repeatedly that most were in the margin of error, Mr. Alias.
The most striking thing about election night was the truly dumbfounded and terrified look on trumps face coming out on stage to give his acceptance speech. You know he was already halfway through talks with a new media outlet or whatever scam he concoted to profit from his run. He had no idea he would even be in the realm of winning.Trump did not prepare an acceptance speech, so he and his campaign thought they were accurate too.
Very well spoken and I agree with almost all of that. I don’t know his policy position but I would agree it would be nice to have him represent the Republicans.I fully admit I don't know much about this guy, but I would love to see him enter the race.
Ben Sasse on Kavanaugh hearings
Sasse v O'Rourke 2020
I am quite confident that the public's attitude about Donald Trump in November of 2020 will have no relationship to their opinion of him at this current time.NEW POLL: Biden leads Trump by 7 points in hypothetical 2020 matchup
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/399820-biden-tops-trump-by-7-points-in-hypothetical-2020-matchup-poll
If it has a cumulative effect on public perception, then yes it could. His approval ratings have been gradually eroding and there may be a point of no return that is reached among independents or anyone but his hard core base that he can't come back from.I am quite confident that the public's attitude about Donald Trump in November of 2020 will have no relationship to their opinion of him at this current time.
I think we're looking at a blue wave this November. After that, the two key questions become, how will Trump work with a Democratic majority? And how will a Democratic majority work with Trump?If it has a cumulative effect on public perception, then yes it could. His approval ratings have been gradually eroding and there may be a point of no return that is reached among independents or anyone but his hard core base that he can't come back from.
He can barely work with republicans, there will be very little legislation.I think we're looking at a blue wave this November. After that, the two key questions become, how will Trump work with a Democratic majority? And how will a Democratic majority work with Trump?
Daily ExpressVerified account @Daily_Express 2h2 hours ago
Hillary Clinton 'WILL return for 2020 presidential election' - shock
https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1044151/Hillary-Clinton-2020-presidential-election-Donald-Trump-clinton-latest
I hear pundits talking about Biden, but I don't hear it among the democrats I talk about this stuff with.Seems a lot of interest in Biden, but he may be too old. I doubt Warren will run. Harris and Booker look interesting but I am not sure how a minority candidate would play given the mood of the electorate.
In the meantime I still like this California Female.I hear pundits talking about Biden, but I don't hear it among the democrats I talk about this stuff with.
I think after looking at the 2018 mid-terms a Midwest Female would be a great bold to fill if a qualified, intelligent and articulate candidate comes forward.
So he can try to save his ###.Nate Silver has pointed out repeatedly that most were in the margin of error, Mr. Alias.
Silver was one of the few pundits/pollsters who was telling everyone right before the 2016 election to put on the breaks for a Hillary victory celebration, as he thought a Trump victory was still in play due to the margin of error. He has never been one to hedge his bets to save his patootie.So he can try to save his ###.
No because generally people are idiots when it comes to statistics and mathematics and don't understand probabilities and polls. I think his problem is that he is trying to market statistics to the mathematically illiterate.So he can try to save his ###.Nate Silver has pointed out repeatedly that most were in the margin of error, Mr. Alias.
No...because its factual. The people who continue to complain about polls are the ones that continue to show their lack of understanding of statistical analysis. Also interesting they are usually the people that tout Rasmussen polling on favorability of Trump.So he can try to save his ###.
Man you guys will try to spin anything.No...because its factual. The people who continue to complain about polls are the ones that continue to show their lack of understanding of statistical analysis. Also interesting they are usually the people that tout Rasmussen polling on favorability of Trump.
If your only go to polling reference is the proven outlier Rasmussen that can only be characterized as spin.Man you guys will try to spin anything.
I have never tooted for Rasmussen polls.If your only go to polling reference is the proven outlier Rasmussen that can only be characterized as spin.
If you want to vote for a honorable, upstanding conservative, Evan McMullen is your guy.https://www.wokv.com/news/national/schwarzenegger-kasich-urge-gop-move-center-trump-era/eixqwcfflF3RfrWDE2VNuJ/
Two of the nation's prominent Republicans on Wednesday envisioned a future for the GOP far removed from President Donald Trump's Twitter blasts, where inclusiveness, a kinder tone and a willingness to work with Democrats on immigration and climate change shape the agenda.
"Arnold Schwarzenegger, the former California governor, and Ohio Gov. John Kasich, another moderate Republican and 2016 Trump rival, talked of the need for both parties to move away from political extremes to address issues ranging from disparity in education to those left behind in a jobs-rich economy."
I know no one else is interested in this guy running in 2020 but I now feel i have someone I can endorse. I wish I had supported him in 2016 instead of Rubio. Most of you will see Kasich as a joke but I don't care.
Makes sense. Even if Trump were to drop out, Ryan still doesn't stand a chance, his political career will never recover from his spineless House leadership role.That website has The Rock with the same percentage as Paul Ryan.
Which one do you think should be favored? I’d give The Rock a small edge, but I think they’re pretty close.Bucky86 said:
That website has The Rock with the same percentage as Paul Ryan.
Does Kim Kardashian leapfrog The Rock if she runs?Which one do you think should be favored? I’d give The Rock a small edge, but I think they’re pretty close.
I am very glad to still see Tulsi Gabbard on that list.squistion said:Nate Silver @NateSilver538 30m30 minutes ago
Most likely winners of the 2020 election, according to prediction markets:
1. Donald Trump
2. Kamala Harris
3. BETO
https://electionbettingodds.com/
I think the Patriots are too high.I am very glad to still see Tulsi Gabbard on that list.
Folks, if JohnnyU and I actually agree on something I humbly suggest you also consider it.I think the Dems would be wise to run Amy Klobuchar for President. She has moderate Democratic appeal, , is very smart, and likable. I live in MN and most of the people here love her. She has a much better chance of beating Trump than the too far left leaning candidates such as Harris, Sanders, Booker and Warren.
they'd all beat him, assuming he even runs. but i agree, she's my favorite right now.I think the Dems would be wise to run Amy Klobuchar for President. She has moderate Democratic appeal, , is very smart, and likable. I live in MN and most of the people here love her. She has a much better chance of beating Trump than the too far left leaning candidates such as Harris, Sanders, Booker and Warren. While we're at it, she's a better choice than Beto also.
ETA: As a Republican and if I had to be satisfied with a Democrat President, it would be Amy Klobuchar.
She seems intelligent and a very nice person, but as I mentioned in another thread, she is pretty much lacking in charisma. I find her rather colorless (so to speak). If she would be the nominee I have trouble seeing Democrats getting that fired up over her, outside of the fact that she is not Trump. I don't think she would generate the enthusiasm a candidate like Beto would (or perhaps Harris).I think the Dems would be wise to run Amy Klobuchar for President. She has moderate Democratic appeal, , is very smart, and likable. I live in MN and most of the people here love her. She has a much better chance of beating Trump than the too far left leaning candidates such as Harris, Sanders, Booker and Warren. While we're at it, she's a better choice than Beto also.
ETA: As a Republican and if I had to be satisfied with a Democrat President, it would be Amy Klobuchar.
I am sure Tim will love her.I think the Dems would be wise to run Amy Klobuchar for President. She has moderate Democratic appeal, , is very smart, and likable. I live in MN and most of the people here love her. She has a much better chance of beating Trump than the too far left leaning candidates such as Harris, Sanders, Booker and Warren. While we're at it, she's a better choice than Beto also.
ETA: As a Republican and if I had to be satisfied with a Democrat President, it would be Amy Klobuchar.