What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2021-22 NBA Thread: Bill Simmons furiously recording 2.5 hour long pod about how Boston is still better than Golden State (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Shams:

Sources: The Philadelphia 76ers are expected to pursue Brooklyn's James Harden ahead of NBA trade deadline Thursday – and the Nets are now open to discussing a deal.
holy ####

EDT:  To everyone but Djax, what do you think Philly would have to realistically add to Ben to get him?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
holy ####

EDT:  To everyone but Djax, what do you think Philly would have to realistically add to Ben to get him?


There's an $11M salary difference to make up.  Danny Green's expiring contract fits the easiest but I think that's a no go from the Nets' perspective.  Seth Curry is another option but he seems a bit redundant with Patty Mills. After those two, it's tougher to make the numbers work because it would involve three players from the Sixers' side.

I still think it makes more sense for Brooklyn to keep Harden and do a sign and trade during the offseason.

 
Simmons’ vaccination status may be an issue in NY.

Also, there will be calls for a tampering investigation against Philly.

 
Shams:

Sources: The Philadelphia 76ers are expected to pursue Brooklyn's James Harden ahead of NBA trade deadline Thursday – and the Nets are now open to discussing a deal.


I don't get this trade for either side. Harden is on a fast decline and now that the NBA took away his foul call advantage shot flopping his FT per game and PPG have gone down further. Plus he's getting up there in age and would be a negative to the Sixers defense

For a Nets stand point why would KD want to play with Ben Simmons or any player want to play with this guy. Any GM who trades for this guy is putting a big red sign telling their employer PLEASE FIRE ME FOR BEING AN IDIOT!!!!! Team cancer, can't shoot, weak mentally, uncoachable, big contract, soft, lack of aggressiveness, and we didn't even get to how bad his agent is. 

Trades like this never work in the long run for either side. Also if this trade does go through I fully expect a full investigation into both clubs for possible tampering. 

 
Simmons’ vaccination status may be an issue in NY.

Also, there will be calls for a tampering investigation against Philly.


I heard teams might want the Nets investigated for it as well. From what I read there's people around the league upset with both parties involved. 

 
I'm interested to see what the Cavs do with Rubio. That's a $17m expiring on an injured player and Cleveland isn't exactly a hot FA destination so this would be a good chance to get a nice piece to go with what they already have going. 

The Wolves have also have a couple expiring vets in Pat Bev ($14m) and Taurean Prince ($13m) they could do something with. Beverley has essentially been a one man cultural shift so I can see them holding (and trying to resign) him, but I hope they do something with Prince (and Okogie and Layman who are both in their final year at $4m each).  Those three get you into Myles Turner salary range, but I wonder what the rest of the cost would be. 
This is probably a dumb question, but if traded can Rubio be brought back next year? I recall a rule change preventing that a few years ago, but maybe I'm making stuff up. This year's important, but I'm much more interested in maximizing next year's team than this one. I want Rubio back.

 
slow. the next wave in NBA wheelin'-dealin' will be shopping players up for 2nd contracts, but GMs are hidebound and you-go-first and it will take em a while to determine what actually is value there. i'd love to see Cle get a real 2-guard (Beal, McCollum) and think the Mavs gotsta to do sumn, but i dont see much happening.
I don't know how McCollum is possible (would love to be wrong...within reason), but what's this about Beal?

 
This is probably a dumb question, but if traded can Rubio be brought back next year? I recall a rule change preventing that a few years ago, but maybe I'm making stuff up. This year's important, but I'm much more interested in maximizing next year's team than this one. I want Rubio back.


Yes, it’s only within the same season when it’s not allowed.

 
Simmons’ vaccination status may be an issue in NY.

Also, there will be calls for a tampering investigation against Philly.
There was reporting this week that he got vaccinated. Regarding the second part, if the Nets make the trade, it would be difficult to turn around and claim tampering.

 
Dinwiddie and Beal definitely do not see eye to eye.  I'm not so sure the Wiz should move Dinwiddie.  He started the year strong, and he's in year 1 back from an ACL.  I think the downslide has coincided with Beal and Dinwiddie not getting along.  Problem is, if you trade for Simmons, Dinwiddie isn't very useful. 

I'm not even so sure they shouldn't play Avdija at PG anyway.  He's essentially a poor mans Simmons already.  Good passer, rebounder, defender, nice vision, and neither of them can shoot or finish at the rim.  When Avdija has the ball in hand things happen, when he doesn't he stands in a corner and becomes a statue.  I don't think Unseld realizes what he has in Deni (nor Rui or Bryant for that matter).  No Deni is not a future all-star.  But he's a solid starter and needs the ball in hand much more.  Getting rid of Beal would go a long way to improve the likes of Deni, Rui, KCP, and even Bertans if they get stuck with him.  The ball just gets stuck on Beals hands too much.

Honestly they'd be better trying to get Sabonis.  But that means shipping Beal to a bad team.  Not sure they'd do that to him.
I'm not going to lie and say I've watched a single minute of the Wizards this year but there are zero metrics that point to Avdija being even a capable secondary ball handler. He averages like 3 assists per 100 possessions (that's like center level assists), 0.2 isolations per game (that's 10 or 11 isolation plays all season), 0.6 pick and rolls per game, and 2.9 drives per game. 

 
This is probably a dumb question, but if traded can Rubio be brought back next year? I recall a rule change preventing that a few years ago, but maybe I'm making stuff up. This year's important, but I'm much more interested in maximizing next year's team than this one. I want Rubio back.
Yep

 
I don't know how McCollum is possible (would love to be wrong...within reason), but what's this about Beal?
I think of the Cavs and Wolves as similar in that they weren't playoff teams last season but things are clicking this year (although the Cavs are significantly ahead of the Wolves) and they're young teams. I wouldn't want to break up the Wolves unless it was for a significant return, other than a few obvious trade candidates. I'd think Cleveland would be thinking the same - with Rubio and obvious trade candidate. 

 
I think of the Cavs and Wolves as similar in that they weren't playoff teams last season but things are clicking this year (although the Cavs are significantly ahead of the Wolves) and they're young teams. I wouldn't want to break up the Wolves unless it was for a significant return, other than a few obvious trade candidates. I'd think Cleveland would be thinking the same - with Rubio and obvious trade candidate. 
Right, this year's about getting playoff experience with the goal next year may be something more. No matter what happens this spring/summer the cavs aren't winning a ship. The playoffs are different. Experience is important though. I have no issue making a move to better this year's team, just as long as it doesn't impact next year. 

 
AYOOOOOOOOO

Named to Rising Stars game (duh). As impressive as any rookie that's stepped onto an NBA floor this season. Guy literally has changed roles on the fly. Invaluable filling in in 2 different roles for Lavine and Ball. He's not going to win ROY (unless Ball/Caruso are gone duration of season) but he's in the conversation for me.

Edit: Oh yeah he sealed the game tonight

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is probably a dumb question, but if traded can Rubio be brought back next year? I recall a rule change preventing that a few years ago, but maybe I'm making stuff up. This year's important, but I'm much more interested in maximizing next year's team than this one. I want Rubio back.


Rubio signed as a street free agent with the Suns in 2019.  That means he will have earned his full Bird Rights with the Cavs this offseason.

There are three roads here with Cleveland.

The Cavs can trade him now in some kind of deal where he is salary ballast and hope to resign him in the offseason.

The Cavs can renounce his rights ( flushing his Bird Rights and resetting his Bird clock) and resign him

The Cavs can resign him without renouncing him thus keeping his full Bird Rights.

The benefit of full Bird Rights is you can over the salary cap to resign the player. This is how the Warriors have kept that core together for so long and part of the reason why they were able to carve out enough cap space to sign Kevin Durant as a free agent.

The first scenario, the other team will hold his full Bird Rights. This would create a limitation on the Cavs is they are in a salary crunch and want to have Rubio on their roster. They need to have enough open cap space to sign him if it's any contract above the Veteran's Minimum ( the DVE)

The 2nd scenario seems kind of nonsensical on it's face and it only works for a situation like Frank Ntilikina and the Knicks. The French Prince was a pretty mediocre player and the Knicks weren't going to sign him to a long term extension after his rookie deal and they weren't going to pay him his qualifying offer for his 5th year in the league (something nutty like 9 million)  Renouncing him would flush his full Bird Rights ( which he earned after his third full season in the league) but allow the Knicks to not be locked into a qualifying offer sheet situation. They could then just sign him as a street free agent for the veteran's minimum. The market would be so bare for The French Prince where that might have been his only option to stay in the league ( He ended up in Dallas)

The status of your Bird Rights is a huge deal for these players. Julius Randle was allowed to walk from the Lakers. His Bird Rights clock reset. That means the Pelicans got him as a street free agent. But he left the Pelicans after one year because they weren't going to resign him to a long term deal, thus his Bird Rights clock reset again.  When he signed a long term deal with the Knicks, he did so after his 2nd year with them, so he could only sign under Early Bird Rights conditions and not full Bird Rights conditions. The difference is an extra year and lots of money. Had Randle signed with the Knicks instead of the Pelicans, he would have been in his third season and reearned his full Bird Rights timed with his best season ever.

It's better to be traded to a new team than to sign there as a street free agent. Kevin Durant was traded to the Nets from the Warriors because those full Bird Rights were very valuable in terms of cap management for Brooklyn. It's how the Warriors got DLo and how DLo turned into Wiggins and Kuminga. GSW got those two useful and valuable players for essentially the value of Durant's full Bird Rights.

So if the Cavs trade Rubio this week, his new team holds his full Bird Rights. In order for Cleveland to resign him, they can go to a sign and trade with that team ( unlikely) or they can hope that team renounces the rights to Rubio.

Why does a team renounce a player? It removes the "cap hold" that player represents on the salary cap. Frank Ntilikina represented a cap hold of something like 9 million last offseason on the Knicks roster and total cap sheet. That means the Knicks can't spend that money until they make a decision him. Resign him or cut him loose to the open market. The purpose of this is to prevent "cash rich" teams like the Knicks to sign a crap load of expensive free agents, then fill their cap space, then sign all their own free agents with Bird Rights to go over the cap because they can afford the luxury and repeater tax.

The "cap hold" is a mechanism to prevent a team like the Knicks from outspending it's financial leverage to an advantage that a team like the Kings or the Hawks don't have.

There are three general rules with inseason trading. You can't trade guys you've signed to consecutive one year deals. The Knicks couldn't trade Elfrid Payton without his consent last year. The OKC Thunder couldn't trade Nerlens Noel when they signed him to another one year deal before he signed with the Knicks. You can't trade a free agent you signed that offseason before the trade deadline. The Knicks could trade Kevin Knox anytime they wanted this year, but they can't trade Evan Fournier until just recently at the mark of this years deadline. You can't trade as "lending"  You can't trade with a team and then later exchange those two same players again for each other in the same year. If Team A needs a 3rd string center and Team B needs a third string PG, you can't trade those guys, to fill some roster holes, then trade them again for each other to get back to your original roster. IIRC, there is a full league calendar year turnaround time stamp required to move the same players for each other later.

 
Huh? What did the Net do, allegedly? 


I might have this wrong but it was inferred by Hayes that both teams talked to the players and or their agents illegal. It was on his latest podcast where he goes into more detail on it. Short version is multiple people around the league feel both teams are pulling some funny business here and want the league to make sure if this trade goes through it wasn't tampering. 

 
Luka's full-season stats would look even more impressive if he didn't spend the first two months getting his conditioning in order. 

I saw a couple games around Christmas where he was chunky, winded and lethargic. Teams were trapping him and he lacked the energy to get around or through them, and they screened him relentlessly.

Tonight, on the ESPN broadcast he looks fifteen pounds lighter, is zipping around with such quickness and change of pace that he has the Philadelphia defense in total disarray. He is getting up the floor so fast they can't set-up for him.

His last 10 games he's produced a cool 29/9/9.

 
I might have this wrong but it was inferred by Hayes that both teams talked to the players and or their agents illegal. It was on his latest podcast where he goes into more detail on it. Short version is multiple people around the league feel both teams are pulling some funny business here and want the league to make sure if this trade goes through it wasn't tampering. 
How is it tampering asking if a player will be happy or resign with a new team if traded?

 
How is it tampering asking if a player will be happy or resign with a new team if traded?
This is what Haynes said:

Michael Rubin – for those who don’t know, the Sixers’ co-owner – very, very, very good friends with James Harden. And I’ve talken to a rival owner, talking to rival front-office executives who believe that there can be something, some talks going on now between both sides. And this is what I was told: Some front-office executives are prepared to – when the time comes, if a deal does look like it’s about to transpire where there could be some potential sign-and-trade in the offseason – they’re prepared to get the league involved on a potential collusion case, dating back to what they believe could be going on right now, as to why we’re probably hearing a lot of Philadelphia-James Harden talk. So, that’s something to keep an eye on. If it does get to the point where it looks like James Harden will be headed to Philly, I was told there will be complaints issued to the league on trying to investigate, to see if there were any collusion, any talks of recruitment going on right now, which is illegal and against the CBA

 
Wolves after Marcus Smaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaart apparently. Either Taurean Prince or Malik Beasley work moneywise.  Prince is $13m expiring and Beasley is $14.5 with this year and next still on the books. I don't know the Celtics tax situation, but the money also works if it's Prince and Josh Okogie ($4m expiring) who is like a Walmart store brand version of Smart with potential to get better. It would be pretty badass to close out a game with a Smart/Pat Bev backcourt. 

 
Wolves after Marcus Smaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaart apparently. Either Taurean Prince or Malik Beasley work moneywise.  Prince is $13m expiring and Beasley is $14.5 with this year and next still on the books. I don't know the Celtics tax situation, but the money also works if it's Prince and Josh Okogie ($4m expiring) who is like a Walmart store brand version of Smart with potential to get better. It would be pretty badass to close out a game with a Smart/Pat Bev backcourt. 
They are $2.77 million over so they have significant incentive to cut salary.

 
They are $2.77 million over so they have significant incentive to cut salary.
So the Wolves give Beasley and a 2nd round pick to Boston, Boston sends Smart to Minn and Schroeder to OKC, and the Wolves throw a 2nd to OKC to take on Schroeder for the rest of the year. Celtics save almost $6M and get under the tax. 

 
Wolves after Marcus Smaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaart apparently. Either Taurean Prince or Malik Beasley work moneywise.  Prince is $13m expiring and Beasley is $14.5 with this year and next still on the books. I don't know the Celtics tax situation, but the money also works if it's Prince and Josh Okogie ($4m expiring) who is like a Walmart store brand version of Smart with potential to get better. It would be pretty badass to close out a game with a Smart/Pat Bev backcourt. 
as i said upthread, there was a rumored team meeting a wk ago Monday, but reports came out later that it was Smaaaat saying goodbye to his team, certain he was gone by the deadline. of course the Green have won by 20 every game since, so......

ETA: but Celts preppie owners are cheap and cashflow poor.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So the Wolves give Beasley and a 2nd round pick to Boston, Boston sends Smart to Minn and Schroeder to OKC, and the Wolves throw a 2nd to OKC to take on Schroeder for the rest of the year. Celtics save almost $6M and get under the tax. 
You gotta throw a first round pick or a real player if they want Smart. Beasley is trash. 

 
Smart is highly regarded among much of the Boston faithful.  There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth among the fanbase if he is traded for anything short of a massive haul. 

Not sure if Tatum actually listens to Smart, but he's the only guy on the team with a chance at getting in his ear effectively.  Also don't know of many players that can complement two guys who need the ball a lot to be successful as well as him.  His defense and playmaking are exactly what the Celtics need.

Basically, I think trading Smart is a mistake if the return isn't very high.

 
How is it tampering asking if a player will be happy or resign with a new team if traded?


@Juxtatarot explained it a little better but the short version is that the 76ers are possible talking to Harden personally while hes under contract with the Nets which is against CBA guidelines as well as teams talking about players not on their team and being interested in said player publicly. Basically the team can't talk to the player they are trading for until the trade is complete. They can send feelers to an agent I believe on how likely they might resign if it's an expiring contract but they can't discuss numbers yrs and incentives and other things. Most of this is done through loopholes of players talking to players which Lebron has been doing for yrs and how LBJ, Bosh and Wade all got together in MIA. 

However given the delicateness of the trade and the fact one of the Sixers owners is friends with Harden there's reason to believe tamper/collusion maybe involved. Rubin can be friends with Harden but by no means can they talk about Harden coming to play for his team or Harden talking to him about it. General basketball talk is on the table still. Just can't go into trying to get said player to join you. 

 
So the Lakers have to be looking to trade Westbrook for literally anything that can make it in the court right now, right? He has been just run of the mill bad with either Davis or lebron hurt, but he's been like the worst player in the NBA with both of them on the court. 

How about a Westbrook + THT + lightly protected '27 first for Eric Gordon and John wall? Seems like a strong win-win if John wall can actually play still.

 
So the Lakers have to be looking to trade Westbrook for literally anything that can make it in the court right now, right? He has been just run of the mill bad with either Davis or lebron hurt, but he's been like the worst player in the NBA with both of them on the court. 

How about a Westbrook + THT + lightly protected '27 first for Eric Gordon and John wall? Seems like a strong win-win if John wall can actually play still.
I don't do that if I'm Houston. Can the Lakers even do that deal with salaries?

I don't think they'll find a taker for Westbrook this season. I think if Nunn were healthy that Westbrook would be coming off the bench. They hit big on Monk and Nunn's another that can score off the ball. I'm not a big fan of TNT and think he'd be DNP-CD right now if Nunn were healthy.

 
I don't do that if I'm Houston. Can the Lakers even do that deal with salaries?

I don't think they'll find a taker for Westbrook this season. I think if Nunn were healthy that Westbrook would be coming off the bench. They hit big on Monk and Nunn's another that can score off the ball. I'm not a big fan of TNT and think he'd be DNP-CD right now if Nunn were healthy.
It works in a trade machine although the Lakers would be adding $8.8 million in salary this year when they already have a $43 million luxury tax bill.  It’s not my money but I question whether this trade moves the needle enough to merit that. Next season would have a huge tax bill too.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So the Lakers have to be looking to trade Westbrook for literally anything that can make it in the court right now, right? He has been just run of the mill bad with either Davis or lebron hurt, but he's been like the worst player in the NBA with both of them on the court. 

How about a Westbrook + THT + lightly protected '27 first for Eric Gordon and John wall? Seems like a strong win-win if John wall can actually play still.


GM LeFlop knows how to pick em. Any GM who trades for Russ right now should be fired. 

 
The more desirable of westbrook/wall will be the one more likely to accept buyout next year. 

It's something that sparked Derrick Roses career (coming off bench). At this point it's the obvious move....and you got to try something different. To me, Rose is one of the mid-career all time turnaround stories. Out of the league by 30 with overseas looking like his only basketball future

It's the reality of many former individual stars ...they can't transition to a complimentary role late in career. Why I'm so impressed with guys that are able to do it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cavs not messing around!
JMO but they've got the ammo to make another major move (Sexton/Love/Lauri (if able to deal)/Okoro). Maybe even LeVert himself.

I love LeVert as a 6th man type....just not sold on him as a 1st unit complimentary player....or "the guy" as a starter on a good team.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
JMO but they've got the ammo to make another major move (Sexton/Love/Lauri (if able to deal)/Okoro)

I love LeVert as a 6th man type....just not sold on him as a 1st unit complimentary player....or "the guy" as a starter on a good team.
I'm nervous about this if I'm a Cavs fan. 

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top