ScottNorwood
Footballcutie
Didn't the Panthers' defense have a pretty major regression this year?
Not sure thats his fault....they started two rookie cbs from the start........Didn't the Panthers' defense have a pretty major regression this year?
So you'd rather he was already a Head Coach somewhere else and not be available?What's a red flag for me, is if he's been interviewing for HC positions for a few years now, why hasn't he landed one?
No, I just wonder why he isn't. Usually it doesn't take several years to go from hot OC/DC to first time HC.So you'd rather he was already a Head Coach somewhere else and not be available?
I thought this at first too, but consider that he's only 42 and been a coordinator for 6 years. So when he was interviewing he was 40/41 with only 4/5 years coordinating experience. It seems like he wasn't hired because teams thought he wasn't ready yet, despite how effective he's been.What's a red flag for me, is if he's been interviewing for HC positions for a few years now, why hasn't he landed one?
Last year the Browns probably would've hired him if Carolina didn't go so far in the playoffs. He wasn't available until after the Super Bowl and they hired Hugh instead. I can't remember all the other places he's interviewed, but from what I do remember almost all of those teams hired guys who already had head coaching experience. I guess they valued that more. Either way, I like this hire a lot if it happens, especially if McCoy comes along and Houston's secondary coach as DC.No, I just wonder why he isn't. Usually it doesn't take several years to go from hot OC/DC to first time HC.
That's a good point.BlueDredSo said:Last year the Browns probably would've hired him if Carolina didn't go so far in the playoffs. He wasn't available until after the Super Bowl and they hired Hugh instead.
Big red flag here IMOBlueDredSo said:Last year the Browns probably would've hired him
Why not put an X next to Spiller? He had one good 3/4ths of a season under Gaily and was the world's worst cocktease the rest of his career.With all due respect to Todd Collins, Alex Van Pelt, Doug Flutie, Rob Johnson, *Drew Bledsoe, JP Losman, Kelly Holcomb, Trent Edwards, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Brian Brohm, EJ Manuel, Thad Lewis, Jeff Tuel, Kyle Orton, Matt Cassell and Tyrod Taylor,...(and I seem to have thought Shane Matthews was a starter in there someplace), Since JK retired, none of these guys are franchise QB's capable of being a consistent playoff caliber team.
You have to have a franchise QB - very few teams (Ravens, Bucs, Redskins) have ever made it to the Super Bowl without one. And none that I know have been perennial playoff teams without one.
*Bledsoe wasn't a franchise QB by the time he got here.
Sadly the two times they made trades giving up 1st round draft picks for lousy QB's (Bledsoe and Johnson) they didn't pan out. So, work on your scouting Dept and either get yourself a franchise QB or be willing to give up a couple of years of #1' picks for a first pick when that can't miss kid comes around again.
Oh...you don't want to give up a couple of 1st round picks? Why not? Look at the past #1 picks in the last two decades and tell me how many of them you think were worthy of 1st round selections.
Since 2000
Erik Flowers X
Nate Clements
MIke WIlliams X
Willis McGahee X missed entire first year.
Lee Evans
J.P. Losman X
Donte Whitner X (questionable)
John McCargo X
Marshawn Lynch
Leodis McKelvin
Aaron Maybin X
Eri Wood
C.J. Spiller
Marcell Dareus
Stephone Gilmore
EJ Manuel X
Sammy Watkins X (i'm saying a miss since they gave up too much for him).
That's 9 misses with 7 absolute disasters in 17 years. WTF
I'd be curious what a list like this looks like for teams like the Patriots, Steelers,Giants, Packers and other perennial playoff quality teams.
I don't disagree with either of your points. The only guys I "X'd" had little to no impact.Why not put an X next to Spiller? He had one good 3/4ths of a season under Gaily and was the world's worst cocktease the rest of his career.
One day I hope people reveal what happened to him in New Orleans. They paid him crazy money to basically sit on the bench. What was it with that guy?
You can put an X next to McKelvin too. He was drafted to be a #1 CB and he was an average #2CB at his best who could return kicks.
The team hasn't even announced it yet? I was starting to wonder why I haven't seen him speak at a press conference yet.Well, I'm sure that announcing the hire on Friday the 13th is a great omen. I mean, I'm not superstitious, but I'm not sure that spitting in the eye of Fate is a great idea either for a franchise this pathetic.
Well, they announced it, but the introduction or whatever is for tomorrow.The team hasn't even announced it yet? I was starting to wonder why I haven't seen him speak at a press conference yet.
Completely disagree. They're morons for giving that contract in the first place, but playing a guy who was already so injured that he required surgery, in a meaningless game where the only thing that could happen is they get a worse draft pick and/or they're on the hook for $30 mil for an injured player, would have been asinine. This wasn't a case where he got a bonus for hitting certain game/production milestones, that I would agree is bush league.Going back to the Bills not playing Tyrod in the finale, I think the Economist of all places, does a pretty good job of saying what I have been thinking. I would quibble with some of what they say, but there points on game theory and appeal to future FAs is right on target I think. The odds of Taylor suffering a long-term injury in that game and the harm from that were much much less than the damage benching him did to the franchise.
And I still think that Taylor will likely be a much better QB than anyone else they have over the next 5-7 years.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/gametheory/2017/01/contracts-american-football?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/
Totally agree. Players around the league will take notice.The odds of Taylor suffering a longterm injury in that game and the harm from that were much much less than the damage benching him did to the franchise.
While it's certainly possible, I really hope this doesn't prove to be correct.And I still think that Taylor will likely be a much better QB than anyone else they have over the next 5-7 years.
5-7 YEARS!?!? Well...this team is on a mission to finish at or around .500 every year, which is usually not a good formula for drafting a top QB. Ugghhhh...Going back to the Bills not playing Tyrod in the finale, I think the Economist of all places, does a pretty good job of saying what I have been thinking. I would quibble with some of what they say, but there points on game theory and appeal to future FAs is right on target I think. The odds of Taylor suffering a longterm injury in that game and the harm from that were much much less than the damage benching him did to the franchise.
And I still think that Taylor will likely be a much better QB than anyone else they have over the next 5-7 years.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/gametheory/2017/01/contracts-american-football?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/
I'm not a particularly big fan of Donte Whitner, I think he was overrated in his prime, but I'm not sure how you can say he wasn't a viable first round pick. 3x Pro Bowler who has started 152 NFL games - almost 10 full seasons. You could make the argument that he was a reach at where they picked him - as was the talk from pundits at the time - but look at some of the players drafted around him and he looks pretty solid to me. Reggie Bush, Vince Young, Michael Huff, Matt Leinart, etc. I think with a top 10 pick you hope he's more of an "impact player" than Whitner has been throughout his career, but I don't really think it was a miss by the Bills, in retrospect. Maybin and Mike Williams deserve multiple XXXXXXXs.Since 2000
Erik Flowers X
Nate Clements
MIke WIlliams X
Willis McGahee X missed entire first year.
Lee Evans
J.P. Losman X
Donte Whitner X (questionable)
John McCargo X
Marshawn Lynch
Leodis McKelvin
Aaron Maybin X
Eri Wood
C.J. Spiller
Marcell Dareus
Stephone Gilmore
EJ Manuel X
Sammy Watkins X (i'm saying a miss since they gave up too much for him).
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.GroveDiesel said:Geez, this interview with the Pegulas is a total trainwreck. Unbelievably bristly and so much bs about having to be secretive, etc. They really seem to have no clue why people think that the organization is a joke. Terry can be insulted all he wants, when you are clearly doing things in a way that other teams aren't and your results are awful, you can't pretend that everyone else is çrazy.
http://buffalonews.com/2017/01/12/terry-pegula-accusations-bills-dysfunctional-consider-insult/?utm_campaign=puma&utm_medium=social&utm_source=Twitter#link_time=1484308178
Eric Flowers was their worst 1st round pick. That guy did nothing. Maybin is a close second, but at least he stuck around the league a few years and had a small resurgence as a pass rushing specialist with the Jets. Mike Williams hung around awhile too as a guard for a few teams.Steve Tasker said:I'm not a particularly big fan of Donte Whitner, I think he was overrated in his prime, but I'm not sure how you can say he wasn't a viable first round pick. 3x Pro Bowler who has started 152 NFL games - almost 10 full seasons. You could make the argument that he was a reach at where they picked him - as was the talk from pundits at the time - but look at some of the players drafted around him and he looks pretty solid to me. Reggie Bush, Vince Young, Michael Huff, Matt Leinart, etc. I think with a top 10 pick you hope he's more of an "impact player" than Whitner has been throughout his career, but I don't really think it was a miss by the Bills, in retrospect. Maybin and Mike Williams deserve multiple XXXXXXXs.
Read that article (most of it anyway) and came to the same conclusion. Get the feeling that author's knowledge of football is pretty limited.humpback said:Completely disagree. They're morons for giving that contract in the first place, but playing a guy who was already so injured that he required surgery, in a meaningless game where the only thing that could happen is they get a worse draft pick and/or they're on the hook for $30 mil for an injured player, would have been asinine. This wasn't a case where he got a bonus for hitting certain game/production milestones, that I would agree is bush league.
While the odds aren't great for an injury, they're higher than you're admitting- he is small, takes tons of hits both as a QB and a runner, and already needed surgery. In recent weeks Tannehill, Carr, and Mariota all suffered significant injuries, and none of them were already planning on having surgery. I see virtually zero upside in playing him and plenty of downside.
The franchise is already one of the biggest laughing stocks in the NFL- this "decision" doesn't even register on reasons why free agents aren't knocking down the door to come play in Buffalo.
As a fairly objective observer-I'm not a Bills fan but I live right outside Buffalo and work in Buffalo-I kind of agree with this. I think the Bills would be ill advised to not try and retain Taylor if they can. I think he's a play-maker with identifiable limitations and he throws a nice deep ball. He's a QB who can be worked with and IMO is capable of being a playoff caliber QB.GroveDiesel said:Going back to the Bills not playing Tyrod in the finale, I think the Economist of all places, does a pretty good job of saying what I have been thinking. I would quibble with some of what they say, but there points on game theory and appeal to future FAs is right on target I think. The odds of Taylor suffering a longterm injury in that game and the harm from that were much much less than the damage benching him did to the franchise.
And I still think that Taylor will likely be a much better QB than anyone else they have over the next 5-7 years.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/gametheory/2017/01/contracts-american-football?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/
He said you "can" build a good offense around him, not that it is "easy" to. I agree that it's possible, but because he's so limited in what he can do, I feel like defenses can adjust fairly easily as well- that might be one of the reasons why his numbers regressed this season.One NFL writer/evaluator says that the Bills turning down Taylor's option would be "insane" and that it is easy to build and offense around Taylor.
http://www.newyorkupstate.com/buffalo-bills/index.ssf/2017/01/buffalo_bills_not_picking_up_tyrod_taylors_option_seems_like_insanity.html
He changed his tune on that, supposedly now fully embraces the move to L.A.I wonder if Rivers can be had on the cheap. Word is he has refused to play if the Chargers moved to LA. I could see that getting ugly and a trade being forced, or they outright cutting him.
ETA: I wouldn't be adverse to sending LA a 4th rounder for a 35 year old Rivers. If we get two solid years out of him while we groom a successor, it'd totally be worth it.
Apparently Childress is not an option. Not sure if Andy Reid blocked the move but they're interviewing Olsen who was fired from Jax. There isn't a lot of options after DEN stole the TOP TWO guys in McCoy and Musgrave. Not sure how they managed to do that. But NYJ have been needing to hire an OC and didn't have to hire a HC first and they still haven't found anybody. It's really slim pickings going on. JAX needs one as well. SF obviously will when they hire Shanahan. I think some of the optimists are hoping that GB loses so the Bills can interview Alex Van Pelt. The disgruntled "fans" will blame Buffalo and make comments like "Bills being Bills" but it was known all along there wasn't much available after McCoy or Musgrave. If we end up with some turd like Olsen, have to hope it's only for 1 season until someone better is available next off-season.Man, missing out on McCoy is gonna hurt:
Ian RapoportVerified account@RapSheet
If #Chiefs lose, co-OC Brad Childress could be coaching his last game in KC. Sources say he’s a top target for #Bills OC, as is Greg Olson.
6:21 AM - 15 Jan 2017
Sounds like Van Pelt has a decent chance of being the guy. 4 days ago Thurman Thomas tweeted out "......Alex Van Pelt." Very possible there is already a handshake agreement in place. I'm happier with Van Pelt over Olsen.Apparently Childress is not an option. Not sure if Andy Reid blocked the move but they're interviewing Olsen who was fired from Jax. There isn't a lot of options after DEN stole the TOP TWO guys in McCoy and Musgrave. Not sure how they managed to do that. But NYJ have been needing to hire an OC and didn't have to hire a HC first and they still haven't found anybody. It's really slim pickings going on. JAX needs one as well. SF obviously will when they hire Shanahan. I think some of the optimists are hoping that GB loses so the Bills can interview Alex Van Pelt. The disgruntled "fans" will blame Buffalo and make comments like "Bills being Bills" but it was known all along there wasn't much available after McCoy or Musgrave. If we end up with some turd like Olsen, have to hope it's only for 1 season until someone better is available next off-season.
As a TEN fan, I'm lovin' it so farAnd man, the Bills have their troubles, but I feel awful for Jags fans having to deal with the Martine/Hackett combo again.
I totally forgot he was actually our OC for a year back in 2009.Sounds like Van Pelt has a decent chance of being the guy. 4 days ago Thurman Thomas tweeted out "......Alex Van Pelt." Very possible there is already a handshake agreement in place. I'm happier with Van Pelt over Olsen.
McDaniels didn't do well his first go around, but there are a lot of coaches in the NFL that didn't succeed the first time around and are successful now. So that doesn't necessarily mean he won't do well.flysack said:I totally forgot he was actually our OC for a year back in 2009.
Been working with Rodgers and his WRs for a few years now. I don't know if that's great or bad. GB runs a good offense, but how much of that performance is just Aaron Rodgers.
This is kind of the same question with Josh McDaniels, except everyone knows he sucks as an HC.
Vic Carucci reporting that there isn't any substance to the Bills interest in AVP. La Canfora previously reported that the Bills "may be inclined" to pursue him. Basically in a nutshell he was guessing and had no sources on the matter. Not that La Canfora is ever accurate when it comes to Bills news anyways. It appears as though Ken Dorsey was interviewed yesterday by McDermott for the OC position and the only name being mentioned at this time.
I actually like Dorsey. Super smart guy that hung around the league as a backup QB almost solely based on his knowledge and understanding of the game.Vic Carucci reporting that there isn't any substance to the Bills interest in AVP. La Canfora previously reported that the Bills "may be inclined" to pursue him. Basically in a nutshell he was guessing and had no sources on the matter. Not that La Canfora is ever accurate when it comes to Bills news anyways. It appears as though Ken Dorsey was interviewed yesterday by McDermott for the OC position and the only name being mentioned at this time.