Well, there's always this.
Right, I mean they can accommodate their German fans, but not Paul's dad? Maybe they should have done it in the same song. The Germans might prefer the more formal version.
Well, there's always this.
i always found "Things We Said Today" and "I'll Be Back" to be the perfect Paul/John call and answer ... cojoined tracks, if you will.
both have similar musical tone and ambiance, with Paul's lyric drifting to a more winsome, hopeful ending: "someday when we're dreaming - deep in love, not a lot to say"
... John's being more dire & urgent: "you - if you break my heart, i'll go - but i'll be back again" (one of my favorite lyric passages ever).
both on side 2 of HDN, with John's more fatalistic bow closing the platter out, on those achingly haunting acoustic riffs.
yin and yang on full display.
Back In The USSR is far from my favorite tune on The White Album, but love the way it lands/glides right into Dear Prudence.
Great ####### songRevolution
2022 Ranking: 36
2022 Lists: 16
2022 Points: 211
Ranked Highest by: @jamny (1) Doug (3) Son2 (3) @lardonastick (8) @Dwayne Hoover (8) @ConstruxBoy (8) @DaVinci (10) @rockaction (10) @prosopis (13)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 39/11/100
Getz: Strong showing for this rocker. Lot of bottom chalkers on this one.
Krista4
My 2019 ranking: 34
2019 write-up:
Revolution (single, 1968)
At this point I could randomly choose anything from 13-34 and be happy with it making my top 25, so please consider all of the songs I list from 1-34 as being in my top 25, just as I consider all of my 1-12 to be in my top 10. Getzlaf will be by to explain the math there.
As discussed above, this was the b-side to "Hey Jude," much to John's dismay. He lobbied hard first for Revolution 1 to be the next single, but was vetoed by Paul and George Martin, who told him it was too slow. Convinced that this could be a single, he reworked the song into this faster, more biting version, but unfortunately for him, before they were done Paul brought in "Hey Jude," which everyone agreed would be more commercially appealing. It appears, since this is at #34 and "Hey Jude" hasn't yet been ranked, that I consider this the greatest single of all time, surpassing Strawberry Fields/Penny Lame and We Can Work It Out/Day Tripper. Hmph.
As touched on above, John wanted to try a song that commented upon the Vietnam War and other concepts of revolution. He'd been restrained by Brian Epstein from doing so, but after Epstein's death he felt free to share more of his political thoughts with the world. As mentioned above, while on "Revolution 1" John expressed ambivalence with "Count me out...in," by the time of the single version he clearly indicated in the lyrics that he should be counted out: "Count me out if it's for violence. Don't expect me on the barricades unless it's with flowers. ... I want to see the plan. Waving Chairman Mao badges or being a Marxist or a thisist or a thatist is going to get you shot, locked up. If that's what you want, you subconsciously want to be a martyr. As for as overthrowing something in the name of Marxism or Christianity, I want to know what you're going to do after you've knocked it all down. If you want to change the system, change the system. It's no good shooting people." So while the song is entitled "Revolution," it's actually an anti-revolution song - or at least a critique of the actions of revolution thought perhaps not the ideas - and it was met with scorn and severe attacks from some on the Left.*
I don't really have to say what I love about this song, right? It's obvious to everyone? Fuzzy guitars!!! Filthy, filthy, filthy. But so unheard of at the time that many record buyers tried to exchange their singles because they thought the "Revolution" side was damaged. John hammered Geoff Emerick on this notion of wanting the guitar to be biting and dirty. During the sessions for the White Album, John wanted everything to be louder and louder, winding his guitar amp to its loudest position and becoming angry when anyone told him that at some point the volume caused the sound to become a mess. In response to John's demand to make his guitar dirtier on this song, Emerick overloaded two preamps for the two guitars and patched them together into each other, then moved the knobs ever-so-gently as they played to try to find the maximum overload the sound board could take without bursting into flames. The entire song has that feel, of being on the precipice of burning up, from John's shriek at the beginning continuing through to the crescendo of "All right"s at the end and finally Ringo's amped-up snare fill over the searing guitars fading in and out...a listener must have found himself exhausted upon first hearing this song. It was the heaviest song the Beatles had recorded to this point, perhaps only to be outdone by "Helter Skelter" a few months later.
Mr. krista: "I love that absolutely filthy guitar sound. All the instruments are completely distorted, just totally blowed. His voice is that muffled, singing through a megaphone type thing. Another ironic song called Revolution but the lyrics are endorsing the status quo. I think charitably you could say he’s advocating more nuanced thinking. But you don’t have to go revolution, do you? I think he took some #### from the left for that."
Suggested cover: See above.
*Some more Lennon quotes I found interesting regarding the meaning of this song, left here just so as not to muck up the whole write-up above with quotes. Keep in mind, though, that all of these quotes are well after the recording, and Paul has indicated that he thinks John ascribed more meaning to the lyrics later than he actually had at the time:
"What I said in 'Revolution' is 'change your head.' These people that are trying to change the world can't even get it all together. They're attacking and biting each others' faces, and all the time they're all pushing the same way. And if they keep going on like that it's going to kill it before it's even moved. It's silly to ##### about each other and be trivial. They've got to think in terms of at least the world or the universe, and stop thinking in terms of factories and one country. ... If they'd just realize the Establishment can't last forever. The only reason it has lasted forever is that the only way people have ever tried to change it is by revolution. And the idea is just to move in on the scene, so they can take over the universities, do all the things that are practically feasible at the time. But not try and take over the state, or smash the state, or slow down the works. All they've got to do is get through and change it, because they will be it."
"These left-wing people talk about giving the power to the people. That's nonsense – the people have the power. All we're trying to do is make people aware that they have the power themselves, and the violent way of revolution doesn't justify the ends."
"If you want peace, you won't get it with violence. Please tell me one militant revolution that worked. Sure, a few of them took over, but what happened? Status quo. And if they smash it down, who do they think is going to build it up again? And then when they've built it up again, who do they think is going to run it? And how are they going to run it? They don't look further than their noses."
2022 Supplement: “Revolution” was the first song the band worked on for the White Album, and as discussed above, John wanted a shower version for the single release but was overruled. As a result, the song ended up in three versions, with the notorious “Revolution 9” arising out of ideas from the six minutes of the original “Revolution” recording that were spliced off the end. Despite John’s slower pace in “Revolution 1,” his original Esher demo was at a tempo much closer to that of the eventual single version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKh6XiFF1J8 Unlike the final single version, in the absence of the huge fuzzy guitar sound this sounds like an upbeat hippie singalong. To me it’s one of the most pleasing and fully formed demos in the Esher series.
Guido Merkins
John had a song called Revolution for the White Album and he wanted to release it as a statement on how the Beatles felt about revolution. The other Beatles liked the song, but they thought that if they sped it up, it would be single material. John didn’t like that, but he complied and so the version on the White Album became Revolution 1 and the single version became Revolution.
There are several differences. First, the single version was sped up. Second, the single version had an absolute wall of really distorted guitars. Third, on Revolution John was definitely out on destruction, whereas on Revolution 1, he couldn’t make up his mind whether he was out or in.
Revolution is musically an extremely heavy record and Lennon snarls the lyrics which gives it a bite that the slower version doesn’t have. So, I disagree with John’s opinion as the sound of the record gives his opinion more forcefully. The dirty guitar sound was achieved by direct injection of the guitars directly into the recording console. EMI management would not have been happy if they had known the abuse Geoff Emerick was inflicting on the equipment, but that sound makes it totally worth it.
The message of Revolution was not well accepted by the counterculture at the time who most definitely wanted violent revolution to achieve their goals. Lennon’s pacifist message was out of step with the times, for sure.
If you go to youtube and watch the promotional video for Revolution, my favorite part is right at the beginning when John starts to sing. George looks right at Paul and says “John’s mic is ####!!!” I laugh every time I see it!!!!!!
yep...@Getzlaf15
Just to clarify, this is the single Revolution.
The slowed down album version, Revolution 1, received zero votes in 2022 (and only 1 in 2019.) That makes 5 songs from three years ago which received no votes.
All correct, right?
don't feel bad. Four others had Revolution also. We wound up with 13 entries.My prognosticator skills have let me down. Already lost 2 of my top 15 poll.![]()
Then they got betterI have seen this live twice, by 2 bands you’d think were quite disparate, Umphrey’s McGee and Ambrosia. But remember that Ambrosia began their career as a prog band.![]()
My rank: 36Revolution
2022 Ranking: 36
2022 Lists: 16
2022 Points: 211
Ranked Highest by: @jamny (1) Doug (3) Son2 (3) @lardonastick (8) @Dwayne Hoover (8) @ConstruxBoy (8) @DaVinci (10) @rockaction (10) @prosopis (13)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 39/11/100
Getz: Strong showing for this rocker. Lot of bottom chalkers on this one.
Krista4
My 2019 ranking: 34
2019 write-up:
Revolution (single, 1968)
At this point I could randomly choose anything from 13-34 and be happy with it making my top 25, so please consider all of the songs I list from 1-34 as being in my top 25, just as I consider all of my 1-12 to be in my top 10. Getzlaf will be by to explain the math there.
As discussed above, this was the b-side to "Hey Jude," much to John's dismay. He lobbied hard first for Revolution 1 to be the next single, but was vetoed by Paul and George Martin, who told him it was too slow. Convinced that this could be a single, he reworked the song into this faster, more biting version, but unfortunately for him, before they were done Paul brought in "Hey Jude," which everyone agreed would be more commercially appealing. It appears, since this is at #34 and "Hey Jude" hasn't yet been ranked, that I consider this the greatest single of all time, surpassing Strawberry Fields/Penny Lame and We Can Work It Out/Day Tripper. Hmph.
As touched on above, John wanted to try a song that commented upon the Vietnam War and other concepts of revolution. He'd been restrained by Brian Epstein from doing so, but after Epstein's death he felt free to share more of his political thoughts with the world. As mentioned above, while on "Revolution 1" John expressed ambivalence with "Count me out...in," by the time of the single version he clearly indicated in the lyrics that he should be counted out: "Count me out if it's for violence. Don't expect me on the barricades unless it's with flowers. ... I want to see the plan. Waving Chairman Mao badges or being a Marxist or a thisist or a thatist is going to get you shot, locked up. If that's what you want, you subconsciously want to be a martyr. As for as overthrowing something in the name of Marxism or Christianity, I want to know what you're going to do after you've knocked it all down. If you want to change the system, change the system. It's no good shooting people." So while the song is entitled "Revolution," it's actually an anti-revolution song - or at least a critique of the actions of revolution thought perhaps not the ideas - and it was met with scorn and severe attacks from some on the Left.*
I don't really have to say what I love about this song, right? It's obvious to everyone? Fuzzy guitars!!! Filthy, filthy, filthy. But so unheard of at the time that many record buyers tried to exchange their singles because they thought the "Revolution" side was damaged. John hammered Geoff Emerick on this notion of wanting the guitar to be biting and dirty. During the sessions for the White Album, John wanted everything to be louder and louder, winding his guitar amp to its loudest position and becoming angry when anyone told him that at some point the volume caused the sound to become a mess. In response to John's demand to make his guitar dirtier on this song, Emerick overloaded two preamps for the two guitars and patched them together into each other, then moved the knobs ever-so-gently as they played to try to find the maximum overload the sound board could take without bursting into flames. The entire song has that feel, of being on the precipice of burning up, from John's shriek at the beginning continuing through to the crescendo of "All right"s at the end and finally Ringo's amped-up snare fill over the searing guitars fading in and out...a listener must have found himself exhausted upon first hearing this song. It was the heaviest song the Beatles had recorded to this point, perhaps only to be outdone by "Helter Skelter" a few months later.
Mr. krista: "I love that absolutely filthy guitar sound. All the instruments are completely distorted, just totally blowed. His voice is that muffled, singing through a megaphone type thing. Another ironic song called Revolution but the lyrics are endorsing the status quo. I think charitably you could say he’s advocating more nuanced thinking. But you don’t have to go revolution, do you? I think he took some #### from the left for that."
Suggested cover: See above.
*Some more Lennon quotes I found interesting regarding the meaning of this song, left here just so as not to muck up the whole write-up above with quotes. Keep in mind, though, that all of these quotes are well after the recording, and Paul has indicated that he thinks John ascribed more meaning to the lyrics later than he actually had at the time:
"What I said in 'Revolution' is 'change your head.' These people that are trying to change the world can't even get it all together. They're attacking and biting each others' faces, and all the time they're all pushing the same way. And if they keep going on like that it's going to kill it before it's even moved. It's silly to ##### about each other and be trivial. They've got to think in terms of at least the world or the universe, and stop thinking in terms of factories and one country. ... If they'd just realize the Establishment can't last forever. The only reason it has lasted forever is that the only way people have ever tried to change it is by revolution. And the idea is just to move in on the scene, so they can take over the universities, do all the things that are practically feasible at the time. But not try and take over the state, or smash the state, or slow down the works. All they've got to do is get through and change it, because they will be it."
"These left-wing people talk about giving the power to the people. That's nonsense – the people have the power. All we're trying to do is make people aware that they have the power themselves, and the violent way of revolution doesn't justify the ends."
"If you want peace, you won't get it with violence. Please tell me one militant revolution that worked. Sure, a few of them took over, but what happened? Status quo. And if they smash it down, who do they think is going to build it up again? And then when they've built it up again, who do they think is going to run it? And how are they going to run it? They don't look further than their noses."
2022 Supplement: “Revolution” was the first song the band worked on for the White Album, and as discussed above, John wanted a shower version for the single release but was overruled. As a result, the song ended up in three versions, with the notorious “Revolution 9” arising out of ideas from the six minutes of the original “Revolution” recording that were spliced off the end. Despite John’s slower pace in “Revolution 1,” his original Esher demo was at a tempo much closer to that of the eventual single version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKh6XiFF1J8 Unlike the final single version, in the absence of the huge fuzzy guitar sound this sounds like an upbeat hippie singalong. To me it’s one of the most pleasing and fully formed demos in the Esher series.
Guido Merkins
John had a song called Revolution for the White Album and he wanted to release it as a statement on how the Beatles felt about revolution. The other Beatles liked the song, but they thought that if they sped it up, it would be single material. John didn’t like that, but he complied and so the version on the White Album became Revolution 1 and the single version became Revolution.
There are several differences. First, the single version was sped up. Second, the single version had an absolute wall of really distorted guitars. Third, on Revolution John was definitely out on destruction, whereas on Revolution 1, he couldn’t make up his mind whether he was out or in.
Revolution is musically an extremely heavy record and Lennon snarls the lyrics which gives it a bite that the slower version doesn’t have. So, I disagree with John’s opinion as the sound of the record gives his opinion more forcefully. The dirty guitar sound was achieved by direct injection of the guitars directly into the recording console. EMI management would not have been happy if they had known the abuse Geoff Emerick was inflicting on the equipment, but that sound makes it totally worth it.
The message of Revolution was not well accepted by the counterculture at the time who most definitely wanted violent revolution to achieve their goals. Lennon’s pacifist message was out of step with the times, for sure.
If you go to youtube and watch the promotional video for Revolution, my favorite part is right at the beginning when John starts to sing. George looks right at Paul and says “John’s mic is ####!!!” I laugh every time I see it!!!!!!
Todd Rundgren?Not an exciting day in Beatles history, so I'll do a little trivia...
On today's date in 1964, the band simultaneously held the top three slots on the Billboard charts with "I Want to Hold Your Hand," "She Loves You," and "Please Please Me." They would later end up with the top five at the same time, adding "Can't Buy Me Love" and "Twist and Shout" to those three.
Without looking it up (we all have the internet, guys), can you name the next artist to hold the top three on the Billboard charts at the same time? Bonus points for the year and the songs.
(I would not have gotten this, by the way.)
The Monkees?Not an exciting day in Beatles history, so I'll do a little trivia...
On today's date in 1964, the band simultaneously held the top three slots on the Billboard Hot 100 with "I Want to Hold Your Hand," "She Loves You," and "Please Please Me." They would later end up with the top five at the same time, adding "Can't Buy Me Love" and "Twist and Shout" to those three.
Without looking it up (we all have the internet, guys), can you name the next artist to hold the top three on the Billboard charts at the same time? Bonus points for the year and the songs.
(I would not have gotten this, by the way.)
Then I learned the Hollies attempted disco in 1977 (Nash was long gone): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9Vknd6OSVUIf I Needed Someone
I mentioned in 2019, George spoke derisively of the Hollies’ cover, and the Hollies blamed George for the song stalling at #20 on the charts as a result. But Graham Nash was one of the group of musicians who became part of the live telecast of “All You Need Is Love” and appeared to have smoothed relations with the Beatles by then. Not smoothed enough, it seems, since George later rejected Crosby, Stills and Nash for a recording contract when they auditioned for Apple Records. Since I feel sorry for Nash, here’s the Hollies’ version of the song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6mIMbAq03E
Just looked it up, this was wrong. I think I was thinking of one of these records:For some reason I think the answer to the trivia question is Drake from a few years ago. I know he matched some Beatles record not sure if this is the one.
Same - although neither in my own top 25. I just thought others liked them more than I do.My prognosticator skills have let me down. Already lost 2 of my top 15 poll.![]()
Without looking it up, my guess is Michael Jackson during the Thriller era. I'll take a stab that the three songs were Beat It, Thriller and, Billie Jean. Now I will look it up.Not an exciting day in Beatles history, so I'll do a little trivia...
On today's date in 1964, the band simultaneously held the top three slots on the Billboard Hot 100 with "I Want to Hold Your Hand," "She Loves You," and "Please Please Me." They would later end up with the top five at the same time, adding "Can't Buy Me Love" and "Twist and Shout" to those three.
Without looking it up (we all have the internet, guys), can you name the next artist to hold the top three on the Billboard charts at the same time? Bonus points for the year and the songs.
(I would not have gotten this, by the way.)
Bee Gees? Probably not right, as you say “I would not have gotten this”. I seem to remember you LOVE The Bee Gees (guilty pleasure), so it’s likely someone obscure.Not an exciting day in Beatles history, so I'll do a little trivia...
On today's date in 1964, the band simultaneously held the top three slots on the Billboard Hot 100 with "I Want to Hold Your Hand," "She Loves You," and "Please Please Me." They would later end up with the top five at the same time, adding "Can't Buy Me Love" and "Twist and Shout" to those three.
Without looking it up (we all have the internet, guys), can you name the next artist to hold the top three on the Billboard charts at the same time? Bonus points for the year and the songs.
(I would not have gotten this, by the way.)
Bee GeesNot an exciting day in Beatles history, so I'll do a little trivia...
On today's date in 1964, the band simultaneously held the top three slots on the Billboard Hot 100 with "I Want to Hold Your Hand," "She Loves You," and "Please Please Me." They would later end up with the top five at the same time, adding "Can't Buy Me Love" and "Twist and Shout" to those three.
Without looking it up (we all have the internet, guys), can you name the next artist to hold the top three on the Billboard charts at the same time? Bonus points for the year and the songs.
(I would not have gotten this, by the way.)
Getting warmer, in a sense.I'm thinking it was a diva type - Mariah Carey?
Close. They had #1 and #2, and five of the top 10, but never the top three.Bee Gees? Probably not right, as you say “I would not have gotten this”. I seem to remember you LOVE The Bee Gees (guilty pleasure), so it’s likely someone obscure.
I remember him getting the tattoo of himself waving at them while crossing Abbey Road.For some reason I think the answer to the trivia question is Drake from a few years ago. I know he matched some Beatles record not sure if this is the one.
I was going to say Madonna but can't recall 3 songs off of True Blue /Like a Virgin and don't want to cheat to look them up .The “warmer” is that it’s a female.
Good guess as well, but no.I was going to say Madonna but can't recall 3 songs off of True Blue /Like a Virgin and don't want to cheat to look them up .
Pink?Good guess as well, but no.
New hint: after the Beatles accomplished this, no one else did until 2019.![]()
Helter Skelter
2022 Ranking: 35
2022 Lists: 20
2022 Points: 211
Ranked Highest by: @otb_lifer (3) @wikkidpissah (3) @jamny (5) @ConstruxBoy (10) @Oliver Humanzee (12) @Pip's Invitation (12) @Alex P Keaton (14)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 47/11/80
Getz: First song to get 20 votes.Top song in this tier that never cracked the Top 25 while counting the votes. Meaning the final 34 all appeared in the Top 25 while processing the votes. Just like all of us had to deal with. LOL. Nice bump up from 2019, 12 slots higher with nine more votes and 131 more points. I had this at #21, after not ranking it in 2019. Fab 3 all had this one. Everyone has had five songs listed now.
Krista4
My 2019 ranking: 25
2019 write-up:
Helter Skelter (White Album, 1968)
@wikkidpissah, do you want to comment on this one, since (1) it's in your top three, and (2) you're a better writer than the rest of us combined? If not (and probably also if so), I'll come back in and do a write-up later.
Mr. krista: "Everything about it is great. Everybody calls it proto-heavy-hetal, but there were heavy bands already playing (Blue Cheer, etc.), but there are whole bands that wouldn’t exist without that. Hüsker Dü owes a huge debt to how terrifyingly noisy that was. There are thousands of noisy, heavy bands that can just point their origin story to that song. I think Paul McCartney tried to out-Who the Who, and it turns out they were better than that. And they were ####ed up as a band, so it’s a chaotic recording. It’s just a ####### mint jam from a mint band."
Suggested cover: This seems like a bad idea.
Wikkid’s 2019 post: To be honest, this is my favorite Beatle song. For all you headbangers who know how glorious it is when music hits that spot where rage turns into triumph, imagine the first time that spot was ever hit by music and you have Helter Skelter. The fact that every scintilla of noise in this thing is as musical and and tactile and sensible to me as Chopin makes it indeed a triumph. I also actually knew the Helter Skelter "ride" in Blackpool from my Irish summers and the first stanza...
When I get to the bottom I go back to the top of the slide
Where I stop and I turn and I go for a ride
Till I get to the bottom and I see you again
....of the song actually meant something to me, because i know the buzz of cheap joy, as well as the smells of rancid chip grease and holiday coach buttsweat, that came with a hazy, July day on a Lancashire boardwalk. nufced.
2022 Supplement: I hesitate to go after wikkid. It’s like I’m 1963 Helen Shapiro with the Beatles as my opener. This song continues to be in my top 25, even moving up several notches this year to #20. Something I learned from doing my solo Beatles thread was to appreciate Paul as one of the greatest rock-and-roll voices in history. Not “Yesterday” or “Blackbird” Paul with the pure voice and ridiculous range, but shout-y, scream-y, but-still-staying-melodic Paul. I hope wikkid can come in and give some more thoughts on this aspect of the song. I’ll hold off on further thoughts on this song until he’s had his chance.
Guido Merkins
In an interview, Pete Townsend talked about making “the loudest, dirtiest rock and roll record ever” (I Can See for Miles.) Paul heard that and wanted to make one of those, so what he came up with was Helter Skelter on the White Album.
Helter Skelter’s lyrics use the image of a “helter skelter” which is a fairground slide winding around a tower. Helter skelter can also refer to chaos.
The main attraction in Helter Skelter is the volume and loudness of the guitars, bass, drums and vocal. Paul’s vocal is from some other planet. Take Little Richard and turn it up to 100, and you get Paul screaming his head off from the bowels of hell. The guitars are fuzzed and overloaded and totally distorted. Ringo is absolutely destroying his drum kit. The thing sounds like it’s gonna fall apart at any minute. Some people have called this proto metal, but it sounds more to me like proto grunge or thrash. Whatever you call it, the track is just stunning and shocking in it’s intensity. On the stereo version, it fades out, then fades back in with Ringo exclaiming “I got blisters on my fingers.”
One of the holy grail moments in the Beatles career is a 27 minute version of Helter Skelter that was totally out of control and chaotic. George running around the room with a lit ashtray over his head. George Martin apparently wasn’t in the studio that night so the inmates were running the asylum.
Unfortunately, some people took the chaos a little too seriously as Charles Manson and his followers believed the Beatles were telling us about a race war that was coming, sending them coded messages and justifying all the horrendous things they did. A truly innovative and and memorable track got saddled with that tragedy and that is sad.
Also an excellent stab at it, but incorrect.Pink?
I couldn't name 3 of her songs.Also an excellent stab at it, but incorrect.
I’ll put everyone, particularly me, out of their misery and stop mucking up the thread: Ariana Grande.
I couldn’t name one, and I just read the titles yesterday!I couldn't name 3 of her songs.#getoffmylawn
Nice! Thanks for the covers; I dig them.legit BEHEMOTH, and prolly my most listened to song ever - only 2 tunes worthy of placement above this, but i can be convinced it's a 3 way tie, because it really/kindasorta is.
I LOVE BUTCH MACCA! LOVE.
what else can be said, it's a legendary piece of work from the most legendary band - can't add much more than that, it speaks for itself.
as far as covers ... Siouxsie did a few Beatles covers, with this one being on the Banshees debut album, "The Scream" - (post punk masterpiece, that).
they were not bothered to do a note by note rehash, opting instead for deconstructing it, and i really dig how they did:
STUDIO
LIVE
I had it #28, but honestly should probably have had it higher. I think I was feeling a little more "psychedelic" when I was doing the final rankings, but on a day when I'm in more of a "rocker" mood, this would be easily in the top 25.Helter Skelter
2022 Ranking: 35
2022 Lists: 20
2022 Points: 211
Ranked Highest by: @otb_lifer (3) @wikkidpissah (3) @jamny (5) @ConstruxBoy (10) @Oliver Humanzee (12) @Pip's Invitation (12) @Alex P Keaton (14)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 47/11/80
I didn't rank this song in my top 25, but I do love it, and it would be in my next set had I ranked more than 25 favorites. The song is in my U2 rankings. I love their cover of the song.
Thank U! (Next)Also an excellent stab at it, but incorrect.
I’ll put everyone, particularly me, out of their misery and stop mucking up the thread: Ariana Grande.
Helter Skelter
2022 Ranking: 35
2022 Lists: 20
2022 Points: 211
Ranked Highest by: @otb_lifer (3) @wikkidpissah (3) @jamny (5) @ConstruxBoy (10) @Oliver Humanzee (12) @Pip's Invitation (12) @Alex P Keaton (14)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 47/11/80
2022 Supplement: I hope wikkid can come in and give some more thoughts on this aspect of the song. I’ll hold off on further thoughts on this song until he’s had his chance.
Thank U! (Next)