What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2022 FBG, 172 to 1 Beatles Countdown 1-25 lists... And 173 to 1 Countdown from 1-64 lists! (1 Viewer)

On today's date in 1931, the first electric shavers went on sale to the public.  Seemed apt to mention this somehow.

More directly relevant to the Beatles, on today's date in 1996, Anthology 2 went on sale.  The release had been delayed a few weeks due to a re-ordering of the tracks by request of Paul.  He wanted "I'm Down" to be track three instead of track six.  :shrug:  The record debuted at #1 on the charts and sold over 1.7 million copies.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
On today's date in 1931, the first electric shavers went on sale to the public.  Seemed apt to mention this somehow.

More directly relevant to the Beatles, on today's date in 1996, Anthology 2 went on sale.  The release had been delayed a few weeks due to a re-ordering of the tracks by request of Paul.  He wanted "I'm Down" to be track three instead of track six.  :shrug:  The record debuted at #1 on the charts and sold over 1.7 million copies.
If Paul McCartney says “Her Majesty should be track three,” I say “yes, sir.”

 
I love stumbling across Beatles fans trying to discern what John really meant (any song.) Here's a good one for Come Together:

Each verse is Beatle-specific albeit written in John's jokey surreal style.

  • Verse one is about Ringo e.g. "Grooving up slowly"/"Holy roller" (drumming)/"Got to be a joker", etc.
     
  • Verse two is about George e.g. "He wear no shoe shine" (Old Brown Shoe)/"One thing I can tell you is you got to be free" (Typical George lyrical message), etc.
     
  • Verse three is about John e.g. "Walrus gumboot"/"Ono Sideboard", "Feel his disease" (heroin), etc.
     
  • Verse four is about Paul e.g "He roller coaster" (Helter Skelter)/"He say one and one and one is three"('One and One is Two')/"Got to be good-looking cos he's so hard to see", etc.

 
You’ve Got To Hide Your Love Away
2022 Ranking: 19
2022 Lists: 29
2022 Points: 355
Ranked Highest by: @DaVinci (2) @Eephus (3) @Gr00vus (5) @whoknew (5) @Tom Hagen (6) @Dennis Castro (7) @prosopis(7) Son1 (8) @Encyclopedia Brown (9) Holly (10) @fatguyinalittlecoat (10)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 16/18/181

Getz: 29 votes is a high for the count down so far. Only slots #1, #4, #18 and #24 failed to get a vote for this one.  We enter a much greater tier in the countdown as this song had 49 more points than the #20 song. Eleven Top 10 votes is the first song to crack double digits. The rest will all do this.


Krista4
My 2019 ranking:  21


2019 write-up:

You've Got To Hide Your Love Away (Help!, 1965)

C'mon.  I realize some Beatles songs are love/hate, but this has to be one that nobody hates, right?  Every person in the world sings along starting with that "Hey!", don't they?  C'mon.

Everybody knows this was heavily influenced by Bob Dylan, but did you also know that it was banned in Lilliput because the line "feeling two-foot small" was deemed offensive to the island's inhabitants?  Well of course not, because that's just dumb.  C'mon.

Back to Dylan, though.  The musical influence of Dylan is obvious, from the (nearly all) acoustic nature to the folky feel; perhaps even John's sometimes off-key vocal are an homage?  In addition to the music, though, we can hear Dylan's influence on John's lyrics.  While John had started to explore more personal themes on a few songs in this same time period (such as "I'm a Loser," also influenced by Dylan), this song seemed like the most significant break from the lighter lyrics on earlier works, becoming more introspective and delving much deeper into John's personal pain.  Some of the themes seen in many of John's later works - isolation, bitterness, vulnerability - seem to have first been explored here.  I guess I should mention that some have speculated that this was about Brian Epstein, or about John's alleged tryst with Epstein, but none of that has ever been confirmed.

As @Nigel Tufnel pointed out, this song is simpler than many that I have rated lower than it.  As a result, I don't have a ton to say about the musical style or structure.  What I love about it is more the overall feel; it hits some unidentifiable magic for me.  I love the folk ballad style in 3/4 time.  I love that the lyrics are evocative rather than obvious.  I love John's slightly off-key and subdued vocal performance that then gains strength in the later verses, and I love that in this case there aren't harmonies or double-tracked vocals that would detract from the gravelly lead.  I love the gradual addition of more percussion and other instrumentation, from the tambourine to the maracas to, of course, those flutes.  To me the most musically interesting part of the song is that final verse, which is all instrumental and acts as the finale to the song instead of going into another chorus; that was a bold and unexpected step at the time.

Fun fact:  This was the first Beatles song to feature a session musician, flautist Johnnie White.  (I pretend the Andy White session on "Love Me Do" did not happen.)  "Flautist" is a fun word to say.  Fla-u-tist.  Flau-tist.

Mr. krista:  "Obviously I really like it and especially what Lennon does with his voice, in that lower register like Alex Chilton in the Box Tops. Cool anthemic quality.  Singing in that register means everybody can sing that song.  All folk songs should be in that key."

Suggested cover:  Since @JZilla just rejoined the thread, this is a good time for Eddie Vedder.  So many covers by him of this song, but I guess this is "official"?  I like this live version quite a bit.  

2022 Supplement:  Falling out of my top 25 this year for no particular reason, this song is still one of my favorites.  What to say, what to say?  Let’s re-read my 2019 write-up…  Dylan influence?  Check.  Almost entirely acoustic sound?  Check.  Possible affair with Brian Epstein?  Check.  Hmmm…how about a fun fact?  Apparently the line “feeling two foot small” was originally “feeling two foot tall,” but John, as usual, mis-sang his lyrics and decided to keep it in because pseudo-intellectuals would love it, which I don’t exactly understand, but I do like the line better, so now I’m wondering if I am one.

Say, how about an alternate take of the song?  Take 5, released on Anthology 2, starts out adorable, with John riffing on Paul’s accidentally breaking a glass, and proceeds to a lovely, slightly slower version with a fantastic John vocal that might be better than the released version:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS4WmUVq51o  No fla-u-tist, though.

Guido Merkins

John, once again, channeling Bob Dylan as he did on I’m A Loser and comes up with a song called You’ve Got to Hide Your Love Away.  It’s mostly an acoustic song, except for Paul’s bass.  The song is also notable that it’s the first time since Love Me Do, where an outside musician (other than George Martin) performed on a Beatles record.  Love Me Do had Andy White on drums with Ringo playing tambourine.  This was when Ringo first joined and George Martin was still unsure about Ringo.  On You’ve Got to Hide Your Love Away, a session musician named Johnnie Scott played tenor and alto flute.

My favorite version of the song is actually on Anthology 2 and, once again, I ask myself why they re-recorded it.  I love the Lennon vocal more on Anthology 2, not that the recorded version is bad, but you wonder what they hear that makes them re-record songs.

So what is the song about?  The most scandalous version is that it’s about John and Brian Epstein’s supposed affair in Spain.  John denied that it ever got physical, but others have said otherwise.  We’ll never know since both men are gone.  John never really said what the song was about other than he was in his Dylan period so it was certainly written about something specific.  Maybe it was like Norwegian Wood and it was about an affair he was having.  

 
You’ve Got To Hide Your Love Away
2022 Ranking: 19
2022 Lists: 29
2022 Points: 355
Ranked Highest by: @DaVinci (2) @Eephus (3) @Gr00vus (5) @whoknew (5) @Tom Hagen (6) @Dennis Castro (7) @prosopis(7) Son1 (8) @Encyclopedia Brown (9) Holly (10) @fatguyinalittlecoat (10)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 16/18/181

Getz: 29 votes is a high for the count down so far. Only slots #1, #4, #18 and #24 failed to get a vote for this one.  We enter a much greater tier in the countdown as this song had 49 more points than the #20 song. Eleven Top 10 votes is the first song to crack double digits. The rest will all do this.


Krista4
My 2019 ranking:  21


2019 write-up:

You've Got To Hide Your Love Away (Help!, 1965)

C'mon.  I realize some Beatles songs are love/hate, but this has to be one that nobody hates, right?  Every person in the world sings along starting with that "Hey!", don't they?  C'mon.

Everybody knows this was heavily influenced by Bob Dylan, but did you also know that it was banned in Lilliput because the line "feeling two-foot small" was deemed offensive to the island's inhabitants?  Well of course not, because that's just dumb.  C'mon.

Back to Dylan, though.  The musical influence of Dylan is obvious, from the (nearly all) acoustic nature to the folky feel; perhaps even John's sometimes off-key vocal are an homage?  In addition to the music, though, we can hear Dylan's influence on John's lyrics.  While John had started to explore more personal themes on a few songs in this same time period (such as "I'm a Loser," also influenced by Dylan), this song seemed like the most significant break from the lighter lyrics on earlier works, becoming more introspective and delving much deeper into John's personal pain.  Some of the themes seen in many of John's later works - isolation, bitterness, vulnerability - seem to have first been explored here.  I guess I should mention that some have speculated that this was about Brian Epstein, or about John's alleged tryst with Epstein, but none of that has ever been confirmed.

As @Nigel Tufnel pointed out, this song is simpler than many that I have rated lower than it.  As a result, I don't have a ton to say about the musical style or structure.  What I love about it is more the overall feel; it hits some unidentifiable magic for me.  I love the folk ballad style in 3/4 time.  I love that the lyrics are evocative rather than obvious.  I love John's slightly off-key and subdued vocal performance that then gains strength in the later verses, and I love that in this case there aren't harmonies or double-tracked vocals that would detract from the gravelly lead.  I love the gradual addition of more percussion and other instrumentation, from the tambourine to the maracas to, of course, those flutes.  To me the most musically interesting part of the song is that final verse, which is all instrumental and acts as the finale to the song instead of going into another chorus; that was a bold and unexpected step at the time.

Fun fact:  This was the first Beatles song to feature a session musician, flautist Johnnie White.  (I pretend the Andy White session on "Love Me Do" did not happen.)  "Flautist" is a fun word to say.  Fla-u-tist.  Flau-tist.

Mr. krista:  "Obviously I really like it and especially what Lennon does with his voice, in that lower register like Alex Chilton in the Box Tops. Cool anthemic quality.  Singing in that register means everybody can sing that song.  All folk songs should be in that key."

Suggested cover:  Since @JZilla just rejoined the thread, this is a good time for Eddie Vedder.  So many covers by him of this song, but I guess this is "official"?  I like this live version quite a bit.  

2022 Supplement:  Falling out of my top 25 this year for no particular reason, this song is still one of my favorites.  What to say, what to say?  Let’s re-read my 2019 write-up…  Dylan influence?  Check.  Almost entirely acoustic sound?  Check.  Possible affair with Brian Epstein?  Check.  Hmmm…how about a fun fact?  Apparently the line “feeling two foot small” was originally “feeling two foot tall,” but John, as usual, mis-sang his lyrics and decided to keep it in because pseudo-intellectuals would love it, which I don’t exactly understand, but I do like the line better, so now I’m wondering if I am one.

Say, how about an alternate take of the song?  Take 5, released on Anthology 2, starts out adorable, with John riffing on Paul’s accidentally breaking a glass, and proceeds to a lovely, slightly slower version with a fantastic John vocal that might be better than the released version:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS4WmUVq51o  No fla-u-tist, though.

Guido Merkins

John, once again, channeling Bob Dylan as he did on I’m A Loser and comes up with a song called You’ve Got to Hide Your Love Away.  It’s mostly an acoustic song, except for Paul’s bass.  The song is also notable that it’s the first time since Love Me Do, where an outside musician (other than George Martin) performed on a Beatles record.  Love Me Do had Andy White on drums with Ringo playing tambourine.  This was when Ringo first joined and George Martin was still unsure about Ringo.  On You’ve Got to Hide Your Love Away, a session musician named Johnnie Scott played tenor and alto flute.

My favorite version of the song is actually on Anthology 2 and, once again, I ask myself why they re-recorded it.  I love the Lennon vocal more on Anthology 2, not that the recorded version is bad, but you wonder what they hear that makes them re-record songs.

So what is the song about?  The most scandalous version is that it’s about John and Brian Epstein’s supposed affair in Spain.  John denied that it ever got physical, but others have said otherwise.  We’ll never know since both men are gone.  John never really said what the song was about other than he was in his Dylan period so it was certainly written about something specific.  Maybe it was like Norwegian Wood and it was about an affair he was having.  
I’d like to have some deep, meaningful reason why I ranked this so high but the truth is it’s simply my favorite Beatles song to sing along to. 
 

Hey!

 
# of Songs to Have Appeared in the Top 25 to Date (7 songs have been posted)

1 --Oliver Humanzee(Dad)---5

2 --DocHolliday---5

3 --Gr00vus---5

4 --Krista (TJ/Slug)---5

5 --Heckmanm---4

6 --Krista (Doug)---4

7 --falguy---4

8 --Tom Hagen---4

9 --ProsteticRKG---4

10 --Krista (TJ/Holly)---4

11 --WorrierKing---4

12 --Bobby Layne---4

13 --Shaft41(Son2)---3

14 --FairWarning---3

15 --Shaft41(Daughter)---3

16 --ekbeats---3

17 --Krista4---3

18 --Krista (TJ/Alex)---3

19 --yankee23fan---3

20 --Wrighteous Ray(Hub)---3

21 --Lardonastick---3

22 --Shaft41(Son1)---3

23 --shuke---3

24 --Westerberg---3

25 --Dennis Castro---3

26 --WhoKnew---3

27 --Eephus---3

28 --prosopis---3

29 --DaVinci---3

30 --Uruk-Hai---2

31 --Krista (TJ/Michael)---2

32 --Oliver Humanzee---2

33 --murph---2

34 --OTB_Lifer---2

35 --Dr. Octopus---2

36 --John Maddens Lunchbox---2

37 --Dinsy Ejotuz---2

38 --AAABatteries---2

39 --jamny---2

40 --Pip's Invitation---2

41 --wikkidpissah---2

42 --Ted Lange as your Bartender---2

43 --Wrighteous Ray---2

44 --BinkyTheDoormat---2

45 --turnjose7---2

46 --Just Win Baby---2

47 --pecorino---2

48 --Encyclopedia Brown---2

49 --fatguyinalttlecoat---2

50 --jwb---2

51 --ConstruxBoy---2

52 --zamboni---1

53 --PIK 95---1

54 --Krista (Rob)---1

55 --Neal Cassady---1

56 --ManOfSteelhead---1

57 --Krista (Sharon)---1

58 --Dwayne Hoover---1

59 --anarchy99---1

60 --Alex P Keaton---1

61 --Getzlaf15---1

62 --rockaction---1

63 --Man Of Constant Sorrow---1

64 --Simey---1

65 --Ilov80s---1

66 --landryshat---1

67 --Mac32---1

68 --Guido Merkins---0

69 --Krista (Craig)---0

70 --Krista (Worth)---0

71 --Shaft41---0

 
I can’t believe "I Want To Hold Your Hand" wasn't in my top twenty-five. Huh. Great song, and one of my favorites. 

I guess Peter Fonda took precedence over a great love song. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
hopefully you didn't miss fatguy's post that might have got lost in the  :tfp:  crap that hopefully is gone forever.
Ah, I did. I hope the train wreck is over. I like all the people involved, so I'm not sure what the impetus was, what its effect was, is, or what the resolution hoped for is, so I'll just sort of keep my mouth shut. I hope it was all in good fun. I'm not sure it was delivered or taken that way. I have nothing to add on that front. That's too bad. 

Where's fatguy's post? Seems like a doozy of a good one.  

 
My cover of I Want to Hold Your Hand

I’m in the middle of some stuff right now but will hopefully come back later to talk about how much I love this song.


Ah, I did. I hope the train wreck is over. I like all the people involved, so I'm not sure what the impetus was, what its effect was, is, or what the resolution hoped for is, so I'll just sort of keep my mouth shut. I hope it was all in good fun. I'm not sure it was delivered or taken that way. I have nothing to add on that front. That's too bad. 

Where's fatguy's post? Seems like a doozy of a good one.  
enjoy

 
I Want To Hold Your Hand - Performed Live On The Ed Sullivan Show 2/9/64
2022 Ranking: 21
2022 Lists: 22
2022 Points: 295
Ranked Highest by: Doug (1) @fatguyinalittlecoat (1) @whoknew (3) @DocHolliday (4) Holly (6) Slug (7) @Eephus (8) @Getzlaf15 (10) @AAABatteries (10) @John Maddens Lunchbox (12) @lardonastick (13) OH Dad (13) @Dinsy Ejotuz (14) @ProstheticRGK (15) @BobbyLayne (16)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 22/12/153

Getz: Had it at #11 in 2019, #10 in 2022. Moved up on the count down one slot also!
Just a timeless Beatles classic. Love everything about it. Our first song with two #1 votes!


The Beatles were in the midst of their Paris shows when word came in that they had hit #1 in the US, and Paul said they all jumped on Mal Evans and tried to ride him around the hotel room while, as Ringo described it, they “all just started acting like people from Texas, hollering and shouting ‘Yahoo!’” 
And so it begins.  They celebrated that night at a fancy restaurant until 5:00 am.  I love this picture - Brian Epstein with a pot on his head.  Look how happy they all look.  https://www.beatlesbible.com/wp/media/640116-beatles-brian-epstein-george-martin_01.jpg

 
I Want To Hold Your Hand - Performed Live On The Ed Sullivan Show 2/9/64
2022 Ranking: 21
2022 Lists: 22
2022 Points: 295
Ranked Highest by: Doug (1) @fatguyinalittlecoat (1) @whoknew (3) @DocHolliday (4) Holly (6) Slug (7) @Eephus (8) @Getzlaf15 (10) @AAABatteries (10) @John Maddens Lunchbox (12) @lardonastick (13) OH Dad (13) @Dinsy Ejotuz (14) @ProstheticRGK (15) @BobbyLayne (16)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 22/12/153
 
I never really stopped to think about the time period when Beatlemania erupted in the United States.  December of 1963 - a month after the Kennedy assassination.  Probably the perfect time to come along and provide a much needed distraction and boost of happiness.  Anyone old enough to remember that time period?  

 
You’ve Got To Hide Your Love Away
2022 Ranking: 19
2022 Lists: 29
2022 Points: 355
Ranked Highest by: @DaVinci (2) @Eephus (3) @Gr00vus (5) @whoknew (5) @Tom Hagen (6) @Dennis Castro (7) @prosopis(7) Son1 (8) @Encyclopedia Brown (9) Holly (10) @fatguyinalittlecoat (10)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 16/18/181

Getz: 29 votes is a high for the count down so far. Only slots #1, #4, #18 and #24 failed to get a vote for this one.  We enter a much greater tier in the countdown as this song had 49 more points than the #20 song. Eleven Top 10 votes is the first song to crack double digits. The rest will all do this.


Krista4
My 2019 ranking:  21


2019 write-up:

You've Got To Hide Your Love Away (Help!, 1965)

C'mon.  I realize some Beatles songs are love/hate, but this has to be one that nobody hates, right?  Every person in the world sings along starting with that "Hey!", don't they?  C'mon.

Everybody knows this was heavily influenced by Bob Dylan, but did you also know that it was banned in Lilliput because the line "feeling two-foot small" was deemed offensive to the island's inhabitants?  Well of course not, because that's just dumb.  C'mon.

Back to Dylan, though.  The musical influence of Dylan is obvious, from the (nearly all) acoustic nature to the folky feel; perhaps even John's sometimes off-key vocal are an homage?  In addition to the music, though, we can hear Dylan's influence on John's lyrics.  While John had started to explore more personal themes on a few songs in this same time period (such as "I'm a Loser," also influenced by Dylan), this song seemed like the most significant break from the lighter lyrics on earlier works, becoming more introspective and delving much deeper into John's personal pain.  Some of the themes seen in many of John's later works - isolation, bitterness, vulnerability - seem to have first been explored here.  I guess I should mention that some have speculated that this was about Brian Epstein, or about John's alleged tryst with Epstein, but none of that has ever been confirmed.

As @Nigel Tufnel pointed out, this song is simpler than many that I have rated lower than it.  As a result, I don't have a ton to say about the musical style or structure.  What I love about it is more the overall feel; it hits some unidentifiable magic for me.  I love the folk ballad style in 3/4 time.  I love that the lyrics are evocative rather than obvious.  I love John's slightly off-key and subdued vocal performance that then gains strength in the later verses, and I love that in this case there aren't harmonies or double-tracked vocals that would detract from the gravelly lead.  I love the gradual addition of more percussion and other instrumentation, from the tambourine to the maracas to, of course, those flutes.  To me the most musically interesting part of the song is that final verse, which is all instrumental and acts as the finale to the song instead of going into another chorus; that was a bold and unexpected step at the time.

Fun fact:  This was the first Beatles song to feature a session musician, flautist Johnnie White.  (I pretend the Andy White session on "Love Me Do" did not happen.)  "Flautist" is a fun word to say.  Fla-u-tist.  Flau-tist.

Mr. krista:  "Obviously I really like it and especially what Lennon does with his voice, in that lower register like Alex Chilton in the Box Tops. Cool anthemic quality.  Singing in that register means everybody can sing that song.  All folk songs should be in that key."

Suggested cover:  Since @JZilla just rejoined the thread, this is a good time for Eddie Vedder.  So many covers by him of this song, but I guess this is "official"?  I like this live version quite a bit.  

2022 Supplement:  Falling out of my top 25 this year for no particular reason, this song is still one of my favorites.  What to say, what to say?  Let’s re-read my 2019 write-up…  Dylan influence?  Check.  Almost entirely acoustic sound?  Check.  Possible affair with Brian Epstein?  Check.  Hmmm…how about a fun fact?  Apparently the line “feeling two foot small” was originally “feeling two foot tall,” but John, as usual, mis-sang his lyrics and decided to keep it in because pseudo-intellectuals would love it, which I don’t exactly understand, but I do like the line better, so now I’m wondering if I am one.

Say, how about an alternate take of the song?  Take 5, released on Anthology 2, starts out adorable, with John riffing on Paul’s accidentally breaking a glass, and proceeds to a lovely, slightly slower version with a fantastic John vocal that might be better than the released version:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS4WmUVq51o  No fla-u-tist, though.

Guido Merkins

John, once again, channeling Bob Dylan as he did on I’m A Loser and comes up with a song called You’ve Got to Hide Your Love Away.  It’s mostly an acoustic song, except for Paul’s bass.  The song is also notable that it’s the first time since Love Me Do, where an outside musician (other than George Martin) performed on a Beatles record.  Love Me Do had Andy White on drums with Ringo playing tambourine.  This was when Ringo first joined and George Martin was still unsure about Ringo.  On You’ve Got to Hide Your Love Away, a session musician named Johnnie Scott played tenor and alto flute.

My favorite version of the song is actually on Anthology 2 and, once again, I ask myself why they re-recorded it.  I love the Lennon vocal more on Anthology 2, not that the recorded version is bad, but you wonder what they hear that makes them re-record songs.

So what is the song about?  The most scandalous version is that it’s about John and Brian Epstein’s supposed affair in Spain.  John denied that it ever got physical, but others have said otherwise.  We’ll never know since both men are gone.  John never really said what the song was about other than he was in his Dylan period so it was certainly written about something specific.  Maybe it was like Norwegian Wood and it was about an affair he was having.  


John Lennon in his lengthy Rolling Stone in 1971*:

"I was in Kenwood (his home at the time) and I would just be songwriting. The period would be for songwriting and so every day I would attempt to write a song and it's one of those that you sort of sing a bit sadly to yourself, 'Here I stand, head in hand...'"

"I started thinking about my own emotions - I don't know when exactly it started like 'I'm a Loser' or 'Hide Your Love Away' or those kind of things- instead of projecting myself into a situation I would just try to express what I felt about myself which I'd done in me books. I think it was Dylan helped me realize that - not by any discussion or anything but just by hearing his work - I had a sort of professional songwriter's attitude to writing pop songs; he would turn out a certain style of song for a single and we would do a certain style of thing for this and the other thing. I was already a stylized songwriter on the first album. But to express myself I would write Spaniard in the Works or In His Own Write, the personal stories which were expressive of my personal emotions. I'd have a separate songwriting John Lennon who wrote songs for the sort of meat market, and I didn't consider them - the lyrics or anything - to have any depth at all. They were just a joke. Then I started being me about the songs, not writing them objectively, but subjectively."

*There is audio of it somewhere out there, maybe YouTube - it's like 3-1/2 hours, Yoko is (of course) with him. Never got all the way through it but then one I found the unedited transcript.

I love this song. #nohomo

Sometimes when I hear this, I think about childhood mates who came out later. I grew up in a village of 200, our high school was 8 miles away in a blue collar factory town of 7,000. Off the top of my head, at least six friends out of the 290 who graduated with the Class of 1980 were LBGTQ2. Many of them didn't come out for decades - one of my best friends from Junior High only came out at the beginning of the pandemic. Two of them married their female high school sweethearts, came to realize they were gay, got divorced (one spouse was supportive, the other....it got messy.) The first girl I kissed (Traci, 6th grade science camp) later became a single mom, adopting a little girl from Guatemala. She didn't come out until she had Stage 4 cancer. We lost her a couple years ago.

Sorry. It's a beautiful song. I'm a huge Dylan fan and I love how he influenced them. Turned them on to weed, and freed them from pop music. 

 
Hey all, thanks for all the nice comments about my video, I had a ton of fun trying to learn the song.  To answer to some questions, yes it’s a Pokey LaFarge T-shirt, and yes I am excited to receive granny panties by Pony Express.  That seems more authentic to the time period anyway, I’m sure Paul’s stage was littered with undergarments that provide full coverage.

Anyway, I do just want to write a few words of praise for my #1 song I Want to Hold Your Hand.  This is the second of my “perfect” Beatles songs to be posted.  I love the cheeky lyrics, I love how they clearly sing “I get high” for “I can’t hide” because of course they did.  I love the harmonies, I love the hand claps, I love that the song just never takes a breath it just plows through with just a burst of a couple minutes of awesome fun and energy.  I love the “ha-ya-ya-ya-ya-ya-yand” at the very end, it feels like the entire song has been just one giant breath and they’ve like totally spent themselves and are just squeezing every last bit of breath into those last notes before they play that last chord and can inhale again.  Every bit of the song feels fun and fresh and full or promise and hope and energy and excitement.

I don’t know why this one just resonates with me so much but I’m so glad I learned it on guitar I’m going to play it and enjoy it for the rest of my life.

 
I love the “ha-ya-ya-ya-ya-ya-yand” at the very end, it feels like the entire song has been just one giant breath and they’ve like totally spent themselves and are just squeezing every last bit of breath into those last notes before they play that last chord and can inhale again.  


Perfect.

 
Get Back
2022 Ranking: 26
2022 Lists: 23
2022 Points: 265
Ranked Highest by: @falguy (3) @ConstruxBoy (4) @prosopis (4) @Getzlaf15 (5) @heckmanm (6) @jwb (7) @Wrighteous Ray (8) @Pip's Invitation (9) @rockaction (13) @jamny (13) @Westerberg (15)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 53/8/63

Getz: Misses Top 25 by 5 points  :kicksrock:  No bandwagon here as I had this at #16 in 2019. #5 this time. I found 7 of the 8 voters from 2019, and only @worrierking also had it back then. The other five didn't vote this time. So 15 more voters, 202 more points and moves up 27 slots.  I wonder why?    Rank it 63rd?  I wanna hit her with that frying pan I tell you!  :D


Krista4
My 2019 ranking:  63

2019 write-up:

Get Back (Let It Be, 1969)

John called this "a better version of 'Lady Madonna'," and I agree.  Adding Billy Preston elevates any song about 16 levels, and this is no exception - his electric piano shines throughout the song and gives it an excellent groove, and Preston was actually featured on the label of this single ("The Beatles with Billy Preston"), being the only non-Beatle ever so credited.  This also features a great guitar solo by...John!  I've a special fondness in my heart for this song being the opener and closer of the London rooftop show, and the guys seemed to have a fabulous time with it.  Well, maybe not George, who never looked like he was enjoying that performance.  

This is a fun groove but doesn't get me rocking the way it does for some people; I almost feel like I don't quite understand the song.  This might be a function of its history, as it was meant to be a satirical look at the UK's racial unrest at the time.  But eventually some of the lyrics were dropped as being too open to possible misinterpretation, such as an entire section on Pakistani people that included the line, "Don't dig no Pakistani taking all the people's jobs."  Paul was likely right to drop all that, as evidenced by the fact that when those versions were discovered, the group was accused of racism when, of course, they were instead trying to make an anti-racist statement.  But in losing the political statements, the song might have lost some of the edge or grittiness that I wish I heard in it.  The grittiness is there in each of the covers I've linked below.  Still an awesome song that's painful to rank in the 60s.

Mr. krista:  "It’s the Billy Preston and Ringo show.  And Paul McCartney – the bass is really good.  I like Ringo’s galloping bumpadudump.  My least favorite part is Paul’s vocals, and the lyrics are dumb."

Suggested cover:  Actually I like each of these better than the Beatles version.  Al Green   Billy Preston, naturally  Holy hell you can try to tell me there's a sexier woman than Tina Turner in her prime but I won't believe you

2022 Supplement:  Well, I’m not sure there’s much new to say now that the documentary has dropped.  Even though this is still not one of my top favorites from Let It Be, seeing Paul pull the song out of thin air might have been, aside from the rooftop performance itself, the most amazing scene in the doc.  Watching them in a later rehearsal was great fun, too: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVi8V5_jHRo

Paul has indicated that the song “Get Back” contains a wistful aspect. He knew that the band was breaking up, and he was hopeful that they could “get back” to their roots, how they were in Liverpool, before they did so.  The idea of “getting back” was also imbued in the song’s style of flat-out rock and roll.  Paul desperately wanted them to become “a damn good little band” again, to be the group that simply knew how to fall in with each other and play together.  While John was escaping to a new place in his new relationship with Yoko, Paul in his own words thought they “should escape to an old place.”  He knew it was impractical, and he says the others laughed at the notion, but Paul’s dream was to get back to where they once belonged.  Eventually, Paul says he came to a place where he didn’t just accept John’s decision to leave the band, but to where he actually admired John for it, for his ability to “get back” to a new place instead of an old one.

Guido Merkins

I loved the Get Back movie by Peter Jackson.  It really put a more balanced spin on January 1969.  One of my favorite parts is one morning when they are still at Twickenham and John is late (again) Paul just starts strumming his bass and gets a rhythm going.  It seems to be very random.  George and Ringo look kind of bored, but Paul starts humming the unmistakable melody of Get Back, within like 2 minutes.  Suddenly Ringo and George are paying attention and soon after, Paul has “get back, get back, get back to where you once belonged.”  I’m sure everyone can make up a #1 song and a rock classic in just a few minutes, right?  Right?

Get Back is a great, rocking track that features Paul on bass, Ringo on drums, Billy Preston on organ, John on lead guitar and George on rhythm guitar.  John was on lead because George quit the group temporarily and John worked out the solo.  The guitar solo and the organ solo are outstanding on the song.  Ringo, as usual, hit’s the perfect shuffle rhythm on the song, on fact he starts clapping said rhythm within the first 2 minutes of Paul making up the riff.  It’s an amazing moment.  Maybe the most amazing moment in the whole 8 hours. 

John called the song “a better version of Lady Madonna” which, I love Lady Madonna, so I guess that’s really good.  The song is also notable in that there is the infamous “No Pakistanis” verse that was originally in the song that was taken out.  This has been colored by some people as proof that the Beatles were racist, but it was actually an anti racist verse because he was speaking against a prevailing anti immigrant feeling in Britain at the time.  

Also there is some confusion about the version of Get Back on the Let It Be album.  Phil Spector edited it to make it sound like it was played live on the roof, but the truth is, it was just the single version with the ending edited out and John edited in saying “I’d like to say thank you on behalf of the group and myself I hope we passed the audition.”  There were 3 versions of the song done on the roof and, for whatever reason, they were not included on the Let It Be album.
My rank: 9

Was already a favorite, and watching Paul come up with it spontaneously in Get Back made it even more so. It's got a driving groove that offers serious movement and grit, while sacrificing none of their pop gifts. I have always loved John's solo and Billy Preston's electric piano fills. 

 
Don’t Let Me Down
2022 Ranking: 25
2022 Lists: 23
2022 Points: 270
Ranked Highest by: @shuke (3) @Westerberg (4) @zamboni (6) @heckmanm (10) @ProstheticRGK (10) @Oliver Humanzee (11) @Wrighteous Ray (12) @Gr00vus (13) @prosopis (14) @falguy (15)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 43/6/89

Getz: Get Back influence strikes again and we get 19 more votes and 181 more points than in 2019, and into The Top 25, moving up 18 slots.


Krista4
My 2019 ranking:  49

2019 write-up:

Don't Let Me Down (single, 1970)

Originally submitted during the Get Back sessions but omitted by Phil Spector from Let It Be, this instead became the b-side to "Get Back."  This is the last song I'll be ranking that was played at the London rooftop concert, and the penultimate song they ever played live as a band (the last was a final version of "Get Back").  To me the highlight is John's raw and desperate vocal, countered by Billy Preston's soulful electric piano.  His switches between the vulnerability of verses to the passionate intensity of the choruses is sublime.  John explained his screams:  "When you're drowning, you don't say, 'I would be incredibly pleased if someone would have the foresight to notice me drowning and come and help me.'  You just scream."   The rest of the band is exactly on point here, too, from Paul's superb bass line to George's descending guitar lines during the verses that set up a compelling counter-melody.  Ringo is a standout in keeping up with the frequent tempo changes and odd meters, such as the addition of an extra beat during some measures of the solo parts (e.g., "nobody ever loved me like she does").  The only slight downside of this song is knowing his obsession was with icky Yoko.  Below, Mr. krista explains the interesting composition better than I do.

Mr. krista:  "I like this song.   That is a really strange Beatles tune.  It’s unlike almost everything.  It’s the Bach contrapuntal side.  There’s an ascending and a descending part on each of the lead guitar.  And Billy Preston plays it different on each verse. And in the last one it sounds like the bass is the lead instrument.  Man, they’re a really ####### good band.  It’s a counter-melody played in the same key but in different octaves so everything stands out.  It’s just really good.  It also sounds like John Lennon is giving a command but he’s really vulnerable, like please please really don’t let me down."

Suggested cover:  Ben E. King   It occurred to me the thread needs more mullets:  Hall & Oates

2022 Supplement:  Welcome to my top 25, “Don’t Let Me Down”!  This song took a significant upward (Binky, downward) movement in my rankings this year.  Yes yes, in part that’s due to watching the Get Back documentary, but it’s also a song I knew I had misranked in 2019, when it should have been mid-30s.  This year it weighs in at #19 on the basis of John’s vocal and Billy Preston’s electric piano. 

John’s performance here is one of his best, alternating between soft pleas and shouted desperation.  He wrote the song just after Yoko had experienced a miscarriage, heightening his feelings for and devotion to her.  Paul has characterized this song as a genuine cry for help:  “John was with Yoko and had escalated to heroin and all the accompanying paranoias and he was putting himself out on a limb. I think that as much as it excited and amused him, at the same time it secretly terrified him. … It was saying to Yoko, 'I'm really stepping out of line on this one. I'm really letting my vulnerability be seen, so you must not let me down’.”

Interesting to see from the documentary that they worked on some cheesy echoing harmonies from Paul and George but dropped them:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yaf4K_9fmeI In that clip, the idea of a keyboard part was first floated, with John suggesting Nicky Hopkins.  Later in the documentary, you see how integral Billy Preston became to the success of this song, not just for the piano part itself, but for the energy in the room.  In this clip, they’re all smiles again as the song develops:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=385eTo76OzA   I can’t get enough of stuff like this.  Peter Jackson, please give me more!  

John’s original demo of this song is particularly sweet (“That’ll do”): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMXZFIWBAQs

Guido Merkins

One of the great mysteries to me is this….why was Don’t Let Me Down not put on the Let It Be album?  The rooftop performance of Don’t Let Me Down was one of the best songs they did on the roof.  Let It Be Naked fixed this mistake and put the rooftop performance on the album, editing together two versions to fix Lennon’s vocal gaffe on the 2nd verse.

The coolest thing about Don’t Let Me Down is the vocal by Lennon.  Urgent on the chorus, sweeter on the verses, and outright  sentimental in the middle (I’m in love for the first time…)  Also, the countermelody during the middle between John’s vocal and Paul’s bass and George’s guitar is a cool moment.  There is also a very cool electric piano played by Billy Preston.

Don’t Let Me Down was released as the B side of the Get Back single, which was #1.  Another brilliant B side that easily could have been an A side.
My rank: 30

Get Back/Don't Let Me Down is up there with the best Beatles single pairs, which is saying a lot. John's vocal is raw but soulful, the rhythm section twists and turns in unexpected ways, and the electric piano solo is fantastic. It has a little Beatles Grunge in it and made my 90-minute cassette. I don't know why this wasn't put on the Let It Be album proper, since its A-side was. 

 
Penny Lane
2022 Ranking: 24
2022 Lists: 26
2022 Points: 280
Ranked Highest by: @Dennis Castro (2) @Yankee23Fan (7) @FairWarning (7) Son2 (8) @AAABatteries (9) @Uruk-Hai (11) @whoknew(11) @worrierking (14) @DaVinci (14) @Dinsy Ejotuz (15) @Just Win Baby (15)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 14/18/247

Getz:  2019 - Two 3rds and a 5th vote.  2022 - One 2nd vote. That’s quite a hit from 2019. 26 voters in 2022, is more than six songs yet to show up. Five had this at #11 and four had it at #15 and #25. 12 more votes in 2022, but only 33 more points.


Krista4
My 2019 ranking:  86


2019 write-up:

Penny Lane (single, 1967)

From the beginning, I knew that this would be one of two absolutely beloved songs that I don't dig as much as other people do (little did I know The Fool on the Hill was a third), and that it would rank on my list much lower than it would be on any list of "best" Beatles songs.  Of course I love the song, or it wouldn't be this high, but it clearly doesn't connect with me the way it does for most other people.  The best explanation I have is that, as I think I mentioned earlier in the thread, I mostly don't get nostalgia as a concept.  And if I look at this in comparison to the "nostalgia" of the other a-side of the same single, "Strawberry Fields Forever," I prefer the slight angst of the latter to the idyllic descriptions of this one.  It's sweet and lovely, but I must like the edgier parts of life.

There's a lot I love about this song, though.  It is perfectly polished and clean, and it lilts in a way that puts a smile on my face.  Love that piccolo trumpet.  If some of John's lyrics can read like poetry, I think this song shows that Paul can do the same; I especially love the opening line:  Penny Lane there is a barber showing photographs, of every head he's had the pleasure to know.  That's lovely imagery.  And I'm very taken with the rises and falls and especially the way the refrains rise back into the verses.  I even enjoy the modulation near the end, which is a device I'm not usually keen on.  There's nothing I would change about this song; as it is it's a perfect love letter to where they grew up.  Most days, though, there are just ~85 songs I'd rather listen to. 

I'm sure others here could do a better job of detailing what's great about the song.  So instead of saying, "top 10 for me!!!111" let us know what you love about it, too.   

Mr. krista:  "You could take all the songs from the last four records and make a nifty musical, and I won’t give a #### about any of them."  [NOTE:  I don't remember what he was talking about here.]

Suggested cover:  Elvis Costello

2022 Supplement:  While one of Paul’s most beloved songs still didn’t make it to my top 25 again this year, I continue to appreciate it more as the years go by.  I’m talking, of course, of “Let It Be.”  This one?   [whispers] I still don’t like this one as much as the rest of you do.  Paul does, though!  His favorite line is the one I called out as mine, too, because he imagines the barbershop as being like a gallery displaying an exhibition of paintings in its window, and you can go in and say, “I want the Tony Curtis” or whatever.  Reminds me of when Mr. krista told a barber in Nicaragua he wanted “The Clooney.”  That didn’t turn out so well.

Well…moving on!

Guido Merkins

 Penny Lane is a district in Liverpool that Paul spent time in as a child.  Ironically, it was John who first mentioned Penny Lane in a early draft of what would become "In My Life", but he didn't like it.  Listing a bunch of places and trying to tell stories about it wasn't in John's wheelhouse, BUT it was in Paul's.  

Unlike Strawberry Fields Forever, there aren't a bunch of outtakes and demos of Penny Lane.  Why?  because Paul was musically more literate and more aware of what he wanted in a song that he wrote.  This is probably why both John and George reported that Paul never wanted input on his songs.  Paul usually knew what he wanted.  Paul started with the song on piano and layered everything else on top.  He wanted a very clean recording, so they recorded everything on a separate track.  Paul heard Brandenburg Concerto and heard a piccolo trumpet and wanted to use it for Penny Lane.  They did and it's the most distinguishing characteristic of the final recording.  Penny Lane is told about various places and characters that Paul remembers from his childhood.  The "pretty nurses", "firemen", "barber", etc.  Like John, however, Paul also tells his story in a slightly surreal and vivid way. The barber with "every head he's had the pleasure to know" or the pretty nurses who "feels as if she's in a play". The banker "never wears a mac in the pouring rain".  And all of it is "very strange". Even a little smut with the phrase "finger pie."

Notice, Paul knew exactly what he wanted, unlike John with Strawberry Fields Forever.  Second, the melody is rangy and bounces along on more than just a few notes.  Third the chord progression is a bit more standard than John.  It almost sounds like a standard from the Great American Songbook.  Fourth, Paul writes from his experience, but it's not about himself directly.  He is story telling his own experiences in Penny Lane, what he saw and what he heard.  In this case, you don't learn about what Paul actually thought about his childhood, just that he remembers this stuff.

Strawberry Fields Forever along with Penny Lane are, IMO, the greatest single the Beatles every released (and maybe the greatest anyone’s ever released) so it went straight to #1 in the UK, right?  Nope, the first single since Love Me Do to not reach #1.  Englebert Humperdink’s Release Me, of all things, kept this unbelievable single at #2.  Strange but true facts.
This is really no different from the poppier material they did between 1964 and 1966. The arrangement is more ornate and the lyrics go a different direction into nostalgia, but otherwise it's the same stuff. Much to krista's chagrin, this is one of Paul's most enduring songs and will still be remembered long after all of us are gone. 

 
The Long And Winding Road (Naked Version / Remastered 2013)
2022 Ranking: 23
2022 Lists: 20
2022 Points: 283
Ranked Highest by: Rob (1) Daughter (4) Son2 (4) @PIK95 (5) @otb_lifer (6) @falguy (6) @Tom Hagen (7) Michael (7) @ekbeats (12) @neal cassady (13) @pecorino (13) @Gr00vus (14) @FairWarning (15)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 65/4/45

Getz: Or is this the song that moved up the most in 2022?  Depends on how you want to define it, I guess. Ob-La-Di moved up 68 slots. Road moved up 42 slots.  It went from 1 vote to 13, 10 points to 154. Winding Road went from 4 votes to 20, and 45 points to 283.  That’s an increase of 238 points, which is 84 more points than “dot” increased.  So which one moved up the most?

The four votes in 2019 ranged from #12 to #18.
In 2022, Winding Road had EIGHT votes in the Top 7. There are five songs yet to be posted that can’t make that claim.

So Get Back was a major influence on this countdown, except for one song. I’m wondering why this song had the greatest impact on the list? Hope that can be discussed.


Krista4
My 2019 ranking:  104

2019 write-up:

The Long and Winding Road (Let It Be, 1970)

My view of the Spector-ing of this song is completely the opposite of what I posted above about "I Me Mine."  In this instance, if I were forced to rank the Spector-ed version, it would be in my bottom 20 songs.  I hate what he did on this one that much - to me, it feels like he made it into a Disney song or the part in a particularly schmaltzy rom-com where the two leads run across the screen finally landing into each other's arms.  I also especially despise the "Yeah yeah yeah" from Paul at the end.  I realize some people prefer the Spector version, and I'm not saying those people are all murderers or rapists in their spare time, but that they are not people I'd feel safe being in the same room with.

On my side in the "Spector or no Spector" argument on this song I have some pretty good company - Paul McCartney.  Paul was absolutely livid about Spector being brought in to remix the album, which was done without informing either him or George Martin.  It seems to have been an idea coming from John and Allen Klein (the hiring of whom was another source of huge rancor between Paul and the others), and George and Ringo didn't object.   But Paul's ire was particularly strong in terms of what they did to this song, especially the addition of a female choir, which Paul said never should have been a Beatles record.  In typical nice Paul fashion he later said, "I don't think it made it the worst record ever, but the fact that now people were putting stuff on our records that certainly one of us didn't know about was wrong," but at the time, he was more direct:  God how I  Paul's letter to Allen Klein about this.

Unfortunately the letter didn't do any good.  Nor was George Martin's suggestion accepted that the liner notes should read "Produced by George Martin, over-produced by Phil Spector."

So, I'm evaluating the "Naked" version instead, which is what I've linked above - by the way, I was a little worried about googling "long winding naked" but it all turned out OK.  Listening to that one, what I love most about this song is Paul's voice.  It just might be my favorite Paul vocal in all of Beatledom; it is so pure, tender, and vulnerable.  The problem is that I just don't connect with the rest of the song that well.  Maybe it's just PTSD from the Spector version.  I don't find the lyrics bad, but they also don't do anything for me.  The music is just OK to me - John flubs the bass quite a bit, and I actively dislike some of the piano accompaniment.  But because I love that vocal so hard, I still find this song hauntingly beautiful and count it as a favorite.  Well, a top 100-ish favorite.

Mr. krista:  "The naked version is a lot better, but it’s still not any good.  It just seems so maudlin and affected.  There’s a pomposity about it.  The strings and all that had been the focus of my ire, but hearing it without all that…what I like best are John Lennon’s ####ed-up bass notes."

Suggested cover:  As you'd expect, there are a lot of good covers of this song.  Since Paul said he wrote this song with Ray Charles in mind, and Ray said he cried the first time he heard the song, seems most fitting to post his cover.  Plus, he's Ray Charles.

2022 Supplement:  In 1966, Paul bought a farmhouse on the Mull of Kintyre, a remote retreat from which he could see in the distance a twisting road that would take him to Campbeltown.  Two years later, he developed this song, which became the Beatles’ last #1 hit in the US, reaching that position on June 13, 1970.

Paul has said that what he loves about the song is that it resonates with people in powerful ways:  “For those who were there at the time, there seems to be a double association of terrific sadness and also a sense of hope, particularly in the assertion that the road that ‘leads to your door / will never disappear’.”  He says that he likes to disappear in the writing of his songs, pretending that it is being written or recorded by someone else (as he did with Ray Charles in this one), because “the last thing I’d want to be writing is a Paul McCartney song.”  By putting on a mask, it frees him up and takes away any anxiety, and then at the end, the song takes on its own meaning, with the road leading “not to Campbeltown, but to somewhere you never expected.”

Guido Merkins

One of the most controversial recordings from the Beatles is The Long and Winding Road from the Let It Be album.  Paul brought the song in during the Twickenham sessions in January 1969.  When the idea of a live concert was dropped it was decided that some of the songs could be studio recordings, so at Apple Studios they worked on the song.

Once the album got shelved, John and George brought in Phil Spector who added all kinds of things to the recordings.  The most embellishments were placed on the Long and Winding Road, a harp, heavenly choirs, lots of over the top strings and brass.  After initially approving the mix, Paul began to resent what was done to the song (not sure when he changed his mind or if originally he just went along to keep the peace.)  In any event, this song was front and center in the lawsuit, Paul claiming he would never have done that to the song.  In fairness, however, horns and strings were first suggested by Paul and George during the original sessions. 

I find this song frustrating because there has never been, what I call, a truly satisfactory version of this song released.  The one on the original Let It Be album has too much of the Spector enhancements.  The one on Let It Be Naked is a totally different version, which is not quite as good as the finished version without the enhancements.  The one on Anthology 3 has no enhancements, which it kind of needs a little bit of and it has an annoying spoken word section by Paul.  The best version, I think, is the live one on Wings Over America.  

I like the song a lot, but it’s a shame that the lack of communication and the lack of will near the end resulted in a good song never realizing it’s potential.
My wife is a Disney obsessive, so I have a high tolerance for "Disney music." Say what you will about those folks, but they are VERY good at creating and deploying music that evokes emotions. And that is what Paul does here (in both versions). This song makes me sad and wistful and I can't exactly explain why. 

Given how much Paul hated the Spector arrangement, it doesn't surprise me that this was one of the five Beatles songs he played when Wings toured internationally for the first time.  

I found it amusing in Get Back that when they were listening to the version of this song from which the basic tracks were used on the album, Paul and George Martin said something to the effect of "well, this is a good start, we'll just have to add a few things to finish it off." Little did they know what "adding a few things" would turn out to be. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Taxman
2022 Ranking: 22
2022 Lists: 22
2022 Points: 285
Ranked Highest by: @FairWarning (1) @Gr00vus (2) @heckmanm (5) @Oliver Humanzee (5) @wikkidpissah (5) @DocHolliday (6) @Encyclopedia Brown (8) @Dwayne Hoover (10) @Anarchy99 (10) @Pip's Invitation (11) Sharon (12) @Alex P Keaton (13) @otb_lifer (14)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 34/7/114

Getz: Another song that did surprisingly well in 2022. Up 12 slots on 15 more votes and 171 more points. Wasn’t a fan in 2019 at all. But the song has grown on me in the past year. Maybe because I keep getting hit hard by the man and seeing my dollars wasted instead of helping others.


Krista4
My 2019 ranking:  32

2019 write-up:

Taxman (Revolver, 1966)

George's "Oh, so this is what happens to grown-ups" song where he, like the rest of us, first gets a paycheck and sees the government bite out of it.  Unlike my first job at an ice cream joint paying me $2/hour, George perhaps could have afforded to pay a little more, but I can't blame him for protesting what was in fact a 90-95% combined income tax rate in his bracket at the time. Then he learned that the taxes wouldn't even go away when you die due to the "death tax" ("Now my advice for those who die; declare the pennies on your eyes.").  George wasn't the only Beatle upset by this - they all expressed their disgust with this at one time or another.  In fact, since John helped George with the lyrics to this song - notably the lines about the current Prime Minister Mr. Wilson and the opposition party leader and future Prime Minister Mr. Heath - I wouldn't be surprised if some of that cynicism crept into the song from John himself.    

This song represented a first for George, as it was the first time he was given such a coveted spot on a Beatles record - opening track on side one.  This placement as well as the significant time the group put into the song's production indicate to me that this was considered to be one of the record strongest songs...on a record where pretty much every song was insanely good.  Until this thread, I had no idea this was a love/hate song; I assumed all reasonable people loved it.    I assume that those who hate it are mostly turned off by the lyrics, which would be understandable.  Sometimes I find them terribly clever, especially the bridge; sometimes they strike me as irritating or worse as childish or self-serving.  It's my ambivalence over the lyrics that leads to this song missing the top 25.  

wikkid mentioned after I ranked "She's A Woman" that this was the same song.  I should let him point out what he sees as the similarities, but among other things I think the stabby guitars sound similar, and as with the other song, I love that part of this one.  I don't much like Paul's husky vocal on "She's A Woman," though, and prefer George's clear but sneering performance here.  I love the harmonies that come into the call-and-response-style bridge, building to a frenzy that is heightened by the searing guitar solo that follows.  I even love the slightly disturbed-sounding count-in that's not really a count-in, as you can here in the distance the real count-in, all of this harkening back to "I Saw Her Standing There" while simultaneously announcing that this is going to be different.  

The highlights for me, though, are in the bass line/drums, as well as that crazy, brilliant guitar solo.  Credit for almost all of those items goes to Paul.  First, he and Ringo establish a wicked groove with the ever-changing, impossibly quick bass lines and percussion.  Love how these are punctuated after each line of the verse with those cymbal crashes followed by jabby, jarring crashes of simultaneous dueling minor and major chords on the guitars.  Am I the only one who sings "Taxman!!" to those chords even though no one else is singing?  Most importantly, despite this being a George song, Paul performs the guitar solo.  According to Geoff Emerick, "George had a great deal of trouble playing the solo – in fact, he couldn’t even do a proper job of it when we slowed the tape down to half speed.  After a couple of hours of watching him struggle, both Paul and George Martin started becoming quite frustrated.  So George Martin went into the studio and, as diplomatically as possible, announced that he wanted Paul to have a go at the solo instead."  ( @OrtonToOlsen alert.)  Paul told this story slightly differently, indicating that he went to George with an idea for the solo, bringing in an Indian element, and that George suggested he play it.  Despite Emerick's further claim that George was pissed that Paul stole the solo, George stated in an interview in the 1980s that he was pleased to have had Paul play and appreciated that he brought in the Indian feel that George was so intrigued by at the time.  However it came about, there's no doubt that the solo, which was done in one or two takes, was fiercely energetic and stunning, so much so that they decided to re-use it by dubbing it (along with its backing track) over George's vocal at the end of the song.  

Also there's cowbell.

Mr. krista:  "What planet does that guitar solo come from? The 1,2,3,4 is nowhere near the tempo. I’m not sure but I feel like the solos and leads were recorded one way and played backwards.  There’s a real Indian quality.  Ringo’s drums have never sounded like that before.  Just a killer way to open a record.  Doesn’t get any better.  It rocks so hard.  It’s like here, guys, it’s a different thing now.  Surpasses the juvenile lyrics.  Bass line is straight out Jamerson/Motown.  Using his fingers but really heavy, walking all over without stepping on anybody.  He and Ringo just right there – bam."

Suggested cover:  Junior Parker

2022 Supplement:  This song snuck onto my list in the #25 spot this year.  Someone alert the Harrison family!  Am I sure it’s in my top 25?  Of course not, since I’m sure of very little when it comes to Beatles songs.  But the acerbic but clever lyrics that seem to “build” over the course of the song, the bass line, the stabby guitars, and Paul’s guitar solo continue to make it one of my top songs and one of a handful of my favorites from George.

Taxman can be seen as kind of a turning point for George.  Not only, as I mentioned in 2019, did he get his first truly prominent spot on the album, but it was this song that led John to realize that George had become an excellent songwriter.  John claims that he helped George with the lyrics here because Paul wouldn’t, a claim I find doubtful given all the other evidence of Paul helping out on this and other George songs, while John often disappeared when it came to George’s songs.  But whether or not John did participate, he acknowledged that this song changed the dynamic among the three of them, becoming a real songwriter at this point, when prior to that John considered himself and Paul as the only ones (despite George’s prior efforts).  After he became “a composer” in John’s eyes, he produced some of his best and most memorable works with the Beatles on the White Album and Abbey Road.

A near-complete version of this song, with irritating falsetto vocals by John and Paul, was released as part of Anthology 2:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DGn7eUU4kA  This was their last recorded version on the first day of working on this song, and I’m glad they came back the next day to try it again.  This wouldn’t sniff my top 25 with those falsetto parts.

Guido Merkins

Paying taxes is an unfortunate part of life.  When we first realize how much of our money goes to taxes, it can be a little shocking.  Imagine you are a famous rock star in the 1960s and 9 out of every 10 dollars goes to the taxman.  George Harrison realized this and wrote a song called Taxman as a protest against it.

Taxman was a Harrison song given the opening spot on the Revolver album for the first (and only) time.  Lyrics like “one for you 19 for me” and “declare the pennies on your eyes” and “if you get too cold, I’ll tax the heat” make it obvious George is anti-taxation.  He even calls out politicians Wilson and Heath.  John helped him with the lyrics, recalling that Paul “wouldn’t have helped him” and that he didn't want to, but did it because he loved George.

The best part of the song, without a doubt, is the unreal guitar solo played by Paul.  Geoff Emerick in his book, which was very anti-Harrison, made it seem like George couldn’t do the solo so Paul showed him up.  Paul and George both tell a very different story claiming that Paul had an idea for the solo, so Paul played it.  George said he was very happy to have Paul play it and he even put a little Indian thing on it.  In any event, it’s one of the best solos of the 1960s (certainly up to that point, and holds it’s own with the late 60s too) to my ear.  It was so good, they flew it in over the outro as well.  

The rest of the song is just as good with everyone else.  George playing the non-solo lead part.  Ringo and Paul cooking in the engine room and John chiming in with great background vocals with Paul. 
My rank: 11

One of my favorite George songs. The bass and drums drive this song in the grooviest of ways, and the guitars are stunning, especially Paul's solo (for the reasons that everyone said above). The lyrics may come from a simplistic urge, but they are cleverly done. This is one of those songs where I HAVE to turn it up every time it comes on. 

This song is so powerful that The Jam rewrote it as Start! and turned it into a UK #1. 

 
I Want To Hold Your Hand - Performed Live On The Ed Sullivan Show 2/9/64
2022 Ranking: 21
2022 Lists: 22
2022 Points: 295
Ranked Highest by: Doug (1) @fatguyinalittlecoat (1) @whoknew (3) @DocHolliday (4) Holly (6) Slug (7) @Eephus (8) @Getzlaf15 (10) @AAABatteries (10) @John Maddens Lunchbox (12) @lardonastick (13) OH Dad (13) @Dinsy Ejotuz (14) @ProstheticRGK (15) @BobbyLayne (16)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 22/12/153

Getz: Had it at #11 in 2019, #10 in 2022. Moved up on the count down one slot also!
Just a timeless Beatles classic. Love everything about it. Our first song with two #1 votes!


Krista4
My 2019 ranking:  19


2019 write-up:

I Want To Hold Your Hand (single, 1963)

"I Want To Hold Your Hand" knocked "She Loves You" off the top spot on the UK charts, selling over a million copies in advance of its release!  While Beatlemania was in full swing in the UK, it hadn't blossomed much yet in the US.  Maybe everybody knows the background of this song, but in case someone wandered into the thread from Mars or Mississippi...  An interview with the Beatles and story about their UK success was aired on CBS News on December 10, 1963, and a teenage viewer named Marsha Albert wrote to Carroll James, a DJ in DC, asking him to play something from the Beatles.  James secured a copy of the song in advance of its official release and asked Albert onto the show to introduce it, which she did with the now-famous words, "Ladies and gentlemen, for the first time on the air in the United States, here are The Beatles singing 'I Want To Hold Your Hand.'"  Soon the song was being played by DJs around the country, and Capitol advanced its release to accommodate the overwhelming response, selling over a million copies in ten days.  It quickly became the first Beatles song to hit #1 in the US, coincidentally being replaced by "She Loves You" after a seven-week run.  

It's hard to imagine now how monumental it was at that time for a British band to maintain this kind of presence on the US charts, but it just didn't happen before that.  Even for the Beatles, three singles - "Please Please Me," "From Me To You," and "She Loves You" - had previously been released mostly to yawns.  The Beatles were in the midst of their Paris shows when word came in that they had hit #1 in the US, and Paul said they all jumped on Mal Evans and tried to ride him around the hotel room while, as Ringo described it, they “all just started acting like people from Texas, hollering and shouting ‘Yahoo!’”  A US tour was quickly organized, including the iconic first appearance on the Ed Sullivan show that had more than 73 million viewers!  There were only like 73.5 million people in the US at that time, meaning more than 99% of Americans were watching, including infants and prisoners.  Sure, I totally made that up.  But holy hell, 73 million was a lot of viewers in 1963.

As their works tended to be at the time, this was a true collaboration between Paul and John - "eyeball to eyeball" as they termed it.  It was so well-crafted by the first time they brought it into the studio that Geoff Emerick thought to himself how much time they must have put into writing and rehearsing it, and though they made 17 takes, the Beatles were on point from the very beginning, sounding polished and confident.  George even laid down his guitar licks to everyone's immediate delight.  Emerick described the atmosphere during this recording as joyous, such as when they recorded the handclaps:  "As I watched the four Beatles gathered around a single mic, clowning around as they added the part, it was apparent to me how much fun they were having, how much they loved doing what they were doing."  

That intoxicating energy exudes from this song, as does the dollop of confidence they'd gain with their success in the UK market.  The song is best enjoyed for me as just a "feel," to get swept up in the excitement and fever and not think about it too deeply.  But since I am still me, I'll note a few things I particularly love.  Like several of my highly ranked songs, it starts with an infectious hook and then builds excitement, though this one is unusual in that respect; though it's hard to imagine not knowing what happens after those opening guitar licks, for just a second try to put yourself in the place of someone who's never heard this song before.  Where is it going?  How do I dance to this?  It's only ~5-6 seconds in that the song starts to resolve itself and give you an idea where it's going.  Like "She Loves You," it gives me the feeling of having been plopped into the middle of something wondrous that I don't yet quite understand.

The verses then start out normally enough, with some melodic unison singing punctuated by fun handclaps, until we get to that last line, where suddenly there's a break into an extremely high harmony for "I want to hold your hand," followed by - oh my god it's another reference to a drum fill but here we go - a phenomenal little drum fill.  Things turn normal again for most of a line in unison, whew, until again the vocal breaks into an unexpected harmony that descends in a staggered pattern.  What just happened here?  I don't know.  Luckily, we then go into a mellow bridge, and all is right with the world until oh my god there are those harmonies again and they're getting kind of loud and aggressively ascending and why are they shouting "I get high!" at me??  Relax, they're actually saying, "I can't hide," though Bob Dylan misheard those lyrics as "I get high" until the Beatles corrected him.  (I did not make that part up.)  Then we settle back into some verses and another bridge and everything goes fine because the harmonies are more consistent and we get to that "ha-a-a-a-a-and" part that all seems perfectly normal and is in waltz time and so no, mom, they are not bad boys, they are nice because look they are in suits and flicking their heads around cutely and that was 3/4 time and so you see this is all perfectly safe and you needn't worry and screeeeaam shrieeeeeek I'm gonna die if I can't make babies with them RIGHT NOW.  

Mr. krista:  "That’s a song that has gone up in my estimation. I love the chords that open it. I’m not 100% sure the rest of the song lives up to it, since it seems like something overwhelming is going to happen but it’s just 'I want to hold your hand.'  I feel like that’s a substitute phrase for something desperate and full of pathos."

Suggested cover:  Al Green

2022 Supplement:  As I mentioned in 2019, the type of success this song had in the US was previously unheard of for a UK artist.  The band had always seen US popularity as their goal but also largely a fantasy.  As John pointed out, Cliff Richard, a huge star in the UK, “went to America and died. He was fourteenth on the bill with Frankie Avalon.” So the scene I described in my prior write-up, when they learned they had hit #1, was one of pure joy.  And they didn’t just go to #1 with the song; they smashed sales records.  250,000 sold in the US in the first three days.  3.4 million in the first three months.  The hunger for a new generation of rock-and-roll was evident, and the historical significance of this release can’t be overstated. 

There are a crap-ton of live versions available of this song, and I’ll be interested to see which one Getz chooses.  Notably and surprisingly, though, Paul has never played this at any of his post-Beatles shows.  I should text him about that.

Fun fact:  This was the first song to be recorded by the Beatles on four-track recording equipment. 

Guido Merkins

Everything that made She Loves You so great is present on I Want to Hold Your Hand.  For us Americans, it was I Want to Hold Your Hand that broke the Beatles, but as we know, She Loves You had already made them superstars.

So why was Hand the one that broke America?  I think it was just because it’s the one that followed She Loves You.  It so happens that She Loves You had made them such stars that the next record would start to make inroads in America, whereas the others had not.  Hand has slightly less energy than She Loves You, but still a lot of energy.  Great intro that grabs you by the throat immediately.  Nice guitar licks.  Great drumming.  Great bluesy vocals.  John and Paul singing in harmony.  A great middle that kind of brings it down into a minor feel before “I can’t hide, I can’t hide” brings it back up.  Also on the word “understand”, the way it goes from Em to Bm is the chord that made the whole thing according to John and Paul.  When Paul hit that Bm, “John said ‘that’s it, do it again.’”  It’s an unusual movement to go from Em to Bm in that key, but once again, they were going with what sounded good, not with what was “correct”  

Like She Loves You, I’m not sure you can get a whole lot better than I Want to Hold Your Hand.  It’s a perfect expression of what rock and roll would be in the early 60s and it sounded like nothing else on the radio.  She Loves You and I Want to Hold Your Hand combined was like the Big Bang.  Everything after was forever changed.
Along with She Loves You, this is the best example of the excitement and frenzy of Beatlemania. The unison vocals on "HAAAAAAAAAAAND!!!!!!!!" are some the most exuberant sounds that ever emerged from the radio. And the rest of the song is no slouch either. 

 
Huh...I only have 4 songs listed between 20 and 50. I figured I was a mix of clearly chalk and clearly not, but wasn't expecting that. 

 
Come Together
2022 Ranking: 20
2022 Lists: 21
2022 Points: 306
Ranked Highest by: @jamny (2) @prosopis (5) @Yankee23Fan (6) @Gr00vus (8) @BobbyLayne (9) OH Dad (10) @Pip's Invitation (10) @falguy (10) Doug (10) @lardonastick (11) Slug (12) @DaVinci (13) @Man of Constant Sorrow (13) Alex (13) @wikkidpissah(13) @jwb (14) @worrierking (15) @heckmanm (15) @ConstruxBoy (15)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 35/8/106

Getz: And yet another song with a really strong showing compared to 2019. 19 of the 21 votes in 2022, were under #16. 
13 more lists and 200 more points that 2019.
Also the top of a 5-song tier as the next song has 49 more points with a 355 total.


Krista4
My 2019 ranking:  98


2019 write-up:

Come Together (Abbey Road, 1969)

I might manage to piss off everyone in one feel swoop with this one!  I know many people would have it very high, top 10 even, and then the likes of @Mister CIA, @shuke, @Dinsy Ejotuz, and @Shaft41 might have it much lower.

It's middle-ish to me because there are some aspects of it that are outstanding, but overall I find my mind wandering a little by the end.  On the negative side, the lyrics...I"m OK with non-sensical lyrics as evidenced by some future rankings, but if I'm going to be listening to gibberish I'd rather be sitting on a cornflake.  Plus, some of the lyrics were stolen from Chuck Berry, which led to an out-of-court settlement by which John agreed to record three songs for Berry's publisher.  I also am not a fan of John's vocal on this.  Like, at all.  And I think if you're going to make this song, go all-in and make it more menacing than it sounds.  The song makes me a little sad for showing some of the splits in the group, too - Paul has expressed how much he would have loved to sing harmonies on it, but he was too embarrassed and maybe a bit angry to ask.  Likewise, John shut Paul out of the piano part, which Paul actually composed and would have done masterfully (not that there was anything wrong with John's version).

On the plus side, and this is why it gets to be so high, it's a great funky rock song with George's stunning guitar work, Paul's fantastic bass riff and, far more important than anything else in the song, those drums.  I heard an interview once with Stewart Copeland, about a tribute to Ringo put on at the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame at which Copeland participated.  He said that they producers of the tribute asked the drummers participating which was their favorite song for Ringo's drumming, and that they all had the same answer:  "Come Together."  Copeland then waxed poetic for a while about how ground-breaking and amazing this piece was in that respect, and when I listen to it, I feel the same way.  I basically hear nothing but the drumming on this song; I'm simply fascinated with it.

The song was originally composed at the request of Timothy Leary, who had attended John and Yoko's second "bed-in" (even joining in on the singing of "Give Peace a Chance") and asked John if he could help with a campaign song for Leary's candidacy against incumbent Ronald Reagan for governor of California, a campaign the slogan of which was "Come together, join the party."  Leary used an early rough demo of the song in alternative radio campaign ads for a short time - a demo that bears no resemblance to the finished product - before his arrest for marijuana possession derailed his candidacy (isn't that quaint?), since he was kept in jail until the election was over.  The final version also doesn't bear so much resemblance to the version John brought into the studio for the band, as, among other things, it was later slowed down considerably to make it "swampy," at the suggestion of Paul.

Mr. krista:  "The organ is awesome, and of course it takes a genius like Ringo Starr to write that drum fill.  It’s so inventive.  Only someone who’s forced to play and therefore think backwards could come up with that.  A right-handed drummer just doesn’t play like that.  It’s not supposed to be music.  Ringo taking everybody to drum school.  If you don't like Ringo, why don't you just throw yourself in a volcano.  Or shoot yourself directly into the center of the Earth."

Suggested covers:  I'm not posting "that one cover" despite its being a favorite of others.  I like a cover either to take the best parts of a song (in this case the rhythm section) and expand around them, or do more of a reimagining of it.  That cover does neither.   Here are several I'd suggest instead:  Cassandra Wilson   The Meters   The Brothers Johnson   Arctic Monkeys   Ike & Tina   Michael Jackson  Nevermind, I could go on...

2022 Supplement:  Meh.  To me the only terribly interesting part of this song remains the fact that is is A RINGO SHOWCASE!  Otherwise, meh.  I know most will disagree, though.  I also blame this song for leading directly to John’s most dreadful post-Beatles album, Rock ‘n’ Roll.  As I described in my solo Beatles thread:

“To talk about this album, we first have to turn back to a Beatles song (yay!), “Come Together.”  While the title of the song came from Timothy Leary’s political slogan in his quest to become California governor, unfortunately the music and lyrics borrowed heavily from Chuck Berry, including a near word-for-word lifting of a line from Berry’s “You Can’t Catch Me”:  “Here come a flat-top, he was movin' up with me.”  In the recording sessions for “Come Together,” at Paul’s urging the song’s arrangement was altered and the tempo slowed to try to make it more distinguishable, but the similarities didn’t escape the notice of Morris Levy, the owner of Big Seven Music (which in turn owned Berry’s catalog), who brought suit against John to claim a portion of the royalties for the song.

To his credit, John didn’t fight the notion that he had “lifted” this and quickly settled with Levy not for royalties but with an obligation to record and release three other songs from the Big Seven catalog on his next album.  It was a good deal for John as he had been planning an “oldies” record anyway, to be produced by Phil Spector.  Unfortunately, the sessions for the planned album went horribly, as they began in 1973 during a period where John was particularly out of control in his alcohol consumption.  When you add the specter of Spector – who has plenty of his own madness to go around – into this mix, the whole endeavor ended in gunshots.  Ok, not as dramatic as it might sound, but at one point Spector pulled a gun on longtime Beatle-mate Mal Evans and ended up shooting a hole into the studio ceiling.  Not long thereafter, Spector left John a message saying he was terminating the project because the studio had burned down.  This hadn’t actually happened, and then Spector left John another message saying he had the Watergate Tapes - what he actually did have were the master tapes for the record, which he then held hostage until Capital Records paid him a $90k bounty for their return.

So this project lay dead in the water for a year while John focused instead on Walls and Bridges, but oops!  The agreement with Big Seven Music/Morris Levy was that John was to release the requisite three songs on his next album.  John met with Levy to assure him he would turn back to the recordings that would fulfill this obligation.  John had already recorded the three Big Seven songs in his Spector sessions, but when he got the tapes back, he found that they were, unsurprisingly, ####e and not worthy of release.  John then knocked out new recording sessions in a week or so and presented Levy with a reel of the initial mixes to show that he was working in good faith through the recordings.

Oops again!  Levy somehow claimed the presentation by John of these rough mixes became an oral agreement that Levy could release them.  Levy took these mixes, unfinished and not intended to be heard, and prepared to release them on a mail-order basis as an album named Roots.  Knowing that this was about to happen, instead of putting all the planned finishing touches on the songs that would become Rock ‘n’ Roll, Capitol rushed the release so as not to lose too many sales to Roots, even dropping the price by a dollar to be within a dollar of the bargain-basement price that Levy planned for Roots.  More lawsuits and countersuits followed, with Levy eventually ordered to pay damages to John and the record companies.”

Guido Merkins

Timothy Leary was going to run for office, so he had a campaign slogan with the words “Come Together….” in it.  He asked John to write a song with that phrase.  John did, but said “it was a good track, I’m not giving it away.”  So that’s how Come Together came to be.

Chuck Berry had a song called You Can’t Catch Me with the line “here comes old flattop” which John borrowed for the song.  Apparently an early version of the song was very much like the Chuck Berry song, until Paul suggested a slower, swampier arrangement.  John got sued anyway and had to record songs to compensate the publisher, which he did on the Rock and Roll album, which John very much resented.

As far as the song itself, it is the funkiest Beatles track on record, IMO.  Paul’s swampy bass, Ringo’s highly original drumming, great lead guitar by George, and John’s great vocal and nonsense lyrics.  People who claim to not like the Beatles love this song.  I’ve met very few people who don’t like this song.  It was on Abbey Road and the B side of the Something single.  

Lots of people have covered this song……Aerosmith, Michael Jackson, and Ike and Tina Turner.  It is notable that John performed this song live in New York in 1972 with the words “we’ll go back in the past just once.”  This was one of John’s favorites, I think.
My rank: 10

Even my son, who has ADHD and finds most rock and roll too loud and overwhelming for him, loves this song. It has been a favorite of mine since I was young, for the awe-inducing drum fills, groovy electric piano, triumphant lead guitar and keening vocals. Its also emblematic of the "warmer" sound I love so much that they achieved on Abbey Road due to technological advances.

 
You’ve Got To Hide Your Love Away

Well.  Well.   Another of the great songs from Help!  It’s a simple song that is mostly an acoustic guitar and voice.   Of course, the voice is magic and the chorus is always a sing along. 

 
You’ve Got To Hide Your Love Away
2022 Ranking: 19
2022 Lists: 29
2022 Points: 355
Ranked Highest by: @DaVinci (2) @Eephus (3) @Gr00vus (5) @whoknew (5) @Tom Hagen (6) @Dennis Castro (7) @prosopis(7) Son1 (8) @Encyclopedia Brown (9) Holly (10) @fatguyinalittlecoat (10)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 16/18/181

Getz: 29 votes is a high for the count down so far. Only slots #1, #4, #18 and #24 failed to get a vote for this one.  We enter a much greater tier in the countdown as this song had 49 more points than the #20 song. Eleven Top 10 votes is the first song to crack double digits. The rest will all do this.


Krista4
My 2019 ranking:  21


2019 write-up:

You've Got To Hide Your Love Away (Help!, 1965)

C'mon.  I realize some Beatles songs are love/hate, but this has to be one that nobody hates, right?  Every person in the world sings along starting with that "Hey!", don't they?  C'mon.

Everybody knows this was heavily influenced by Bob Dylan, but did you also know that it was banned in Lilliput because the line "feeling two-foot small" was deemed offensive to the island's inhabitants?  Well of course not, because that's just dumb.  C'mon.

Back to Dylan, though.  The musical influence of Dylan is obvious, from the (nearly all) acoustic nature to the folky feel; perhaps even John's sometimes off-key vocal are an homage?  In addition to the music, though, we can hear Dylan's influence on John's lyrics.  While John had started to explore more personal themes on a few songs in this same time period (such as "I'm a Loser," also influenced by Dylan), this song seemed like the most significant break from the lighter lyrics on earlier works, becoming more introspective and delving much deeper into John's personal pain.  Some of the themes seen in many of John's later works - isolation, bitterness, vulnerability - seem to have first been explored here.  I guess I should mention that some have speculated that this was about Brian Epstein, or about John's alleged tryst with Epstein, but none of that has ever been confirmed.

As @Nigel Tufnel pointed out, this song is simpler than many that I have rated lower than it.  As a result, I don't have a ton to say about the musical style or structure.  What I love about it is more the overall feel; it hits some unidentifiable magic for me.  I love the folk ballad style in 3/4 time.  I love that the lyrics are evocative rather than obvious.  I love John's slightly off-key and subdued vocal performance that then gains strength in the later verses, and I love that in this case there aren't harmonies or double-tracked vocals that would detract from the gravelly lead.  I love the gradual addition of more percussion and other instrumentation, from the tambourine to the maracas to, of course, those flutes.  To me the most musically interesting part of the song is that final verse, which is all instrumental and acts as the finale to the song instead of going into another chorus; that was a bold and unexpected step at the time.

Fun fact:  This was the first Beatles song to feature a session musician, flautist Johnnie White.  (I pretend the Andy White session on "Love Me Do" did not happen.)  "Flautist" is a fun word to say.  Fla-u-tist.  Flau-tist.

Mr. krista:  "Obviously I really like it and especially what Lennon does with his voice, in that lower register like Alex Chilton in the Box Tops. Cool anthemic quality.  Singing in that register means everybody can sing that song.  All folk songs should be in that key."

Suggested cover:  Since @JZilla just rejoined the thread, this is a good time for Eddie Vedder.  So many covers by him of this song, but I guess this is "official"?  I like this live version quite a bit.  

2022 Supplement:  Falling out of my top 25 this year for no particular reason, this song is still one of my favorites.  What to say, what to say?  Let’s re-read my 2019 write-up…  Dylan influence?  Check.  Almost entirely acoustic sound?  Check.  Possible affair with Brian Epstein?  Check.  Hmmm…how about a fun fact?  Apparently the line “feeling two foot small” was originally “feeling two foot tall,” but John, as usual, mis-sang his lyrics and decided to keep it in because pseudo-intellectuals would love it, which I don’t exactly understand, but I do like the line better, so now I’m wondering if I am one.

Say, how about an alternate take of the song?  Take 5, released on Anthology 2, starts out adorable, with John riffing on Paul’s accidentally breaking a glass, and proceeds to a lovely, slightly slower version with a fantastic John vocal that might be better than the released version:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS4WmUVq51o  No fla-u-tist, though.

Guido Merkins

John, once again, channeling Bob Dylan as he did on I’m A Loser and comes up with a song called You’ve Got to Hide Your Love Away.  It’s mostly an acoustic song, except for Paul’s bass.  The song is also notable that it’s the first time since Love Me Do, where an outside musician (other than George Martin) performed on a Beatles record.  Love Me Do had Andy White on drums with Ringo playing tambourine.  This was when Ringo first joined and George Martin was still unsure about Ringo.  On You’ve Got to Hide Your Love Away, a session musician named Johnnie Scott played tenor and alto flute.

My favorite version of the song is actually on Anthology 2 and, once again, I ask myself why they re-recorded it.  I love the Lennon vocal more on Anthology 2, not that the recorded version is bad, but you wonder what they hear that makes them re-record songs.

So what is the song about?  The most scandalous version is that it’s about John and Brian Epstein’s supposed affair in Spain.  John denied that it ever got physical, but others have said otherwise.  We’ll never know since both men are gone.  John never really said what the song was about other than he was in his Dylan period so it was certainly written about something specific.  Maybe it was like Norwegian Wood and it was about an affair he was having.  
One of the best things to come out of their Dylan influence. The emotions conveyed in these lyrics are very complex, and weren't the kind of stuff you saw in pop music in 1965 except in a few cases like Dylan. 

I don't remember this song being put in the pantheon of greatest Beatles songs until Eddie Vedder covered it. That could just be a function of the friend groups/bubbles I moved in, or it could be that by the time of Vedder's cover, the world was more attuned to the issues that would make someone write lyrics like these. 

 
Across The Universe
2022 Ranking: 18
2022 Lists: 23
2022 Points: 363
Ranked Highest by: @whoknew (1) @Man of Constant Sorrow (1) @krista4 (2) @jwb (4) @ProstheticRGK (5) @ManOfSteelhead(6) @Oliver Humanzee (6) @turnjose7 (6) @simey (7) @DocHolliday (8) @Uruk-Hai (9) @pecorino (9) @ekbeats (10) @shuke (13) @landrys hat (15)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 23/11/153

Getz: 15 Top 10 votes out of 23 votes cast is quite impressive. Moves up five slots in 2022.


Krista4
My 2019 ranking:  2


2019 write-up:

Across The Universe (Let It Be, 1970)

There’s no reason I should love this song so much.  I can’t connect with the spiritual vibe of “Jai guru deva om” (approximate translation is “Victory to God divine”), and I don’t get some soccer-mom-faux-empowerment feeling from the “nothing’s gonna change my world” part.  And yet, if I could hear the right recording of it, it would probably be my #1 song.  Something in there just scratches my musical itch.  What do I mean by the right recording?  Well, there are four officially released versions, not to mention any bootlegs, and each of them has something that I wish were slightly different in order to make it my “perfect” version.  

I’ll get to the issue of the recordings below, but first here’s what I love most about the song:  John’s vocal, the meter, the phrasing, and the lyrics.  On the not-messed-with recordings, his voice sounds delicate and gentle, intimate and as beautiful as it’s ever sounded.  As for the meter, I love the breathless propulsion and then dramatic slow-down resulting from John’s only singing one note for every syllable in the verses until each time he gets to “universe,” where he gives it a little trill.  And finally, there are the lyrics and phrasing.  My favorite non-Beatle songwriter is legit-poet Leonard Cohen, and the lines in this song are to me as stunning a work of poetry as some of Cohen’s best works.  The imagery is stunningly evocative, and the internal rhymes are sublime.  The verses are every bit as masterful when read simply as poetry as when committed to song:

Words are flowing out

Like endless rain into a paper cup

They slither wildly as they slip away across the universe

Pools of sorrow waves of joy

Are drifting through my opened mind

Possessing and caressing me

Images of broken light

Which dance before me like a million eyes

They call me on and on across the universe

Thoughts meander like a

Restless wind inside a letter box

They tumble blindly as they make their way across the universe

Sounds of laughter, shades of life

Are ringing through my opened ears

Inciting and inviting me

Limitless undying love

Which shines around me like a million suns

It calls me on and on across the universe

The lyrics came to John as he was lying in bed with his first wife and irritated with her for some reason, but they quickly turned into a “cosmic song” for him:  “They were purely inspirational and were given to me.  I don't own it, you know; it came through like that. I don't know where it came from, what meter it's in, and I've sat down and looked at it and said, 'Can I write another one with this meter?' Such an extraordinary meter and I can never repeat it! It's not a matter of craftsmanship; it wrote itself. It drove me out of bed. It's like being possessed; like a psychic or a medium. The thing has to go down. It won't let you sleep, so you have to get up, make it into something, and then you're allowed to sleep.”  John considered these possibly the best lyrics he ever wrote, and this time I agree with John – they’re perfectly breathtaking.

As to those recordings…  The song was originally recorded in early 1968 and intended as a possible single, but it was shelved in favor of “Lady Madonna” and others.  On these first recordings were John on vocal, George on a sitar for the intro and tambura elsewhere, John and Paul on acoustic guitars, and Ringo on svaramandal.  Take two of these recordings was released on Anthology 2 in 1996.

As the band continued to record and re-record the song, Paul decided to step outside the studio and ask a couple of the Apple Scruffs to join the newly harmonized chorus on backing vocals.  Two teenage girls then joined as singers on the chorus, and the group also added the wah-wah guitar part, maracas, and Paul on piano.  The first officially released version was based on this version and released in December 1969 on a charity album for the World Wildlife Fund. But before release, the sounds of birds and children playing were added, and the song was sped up a semitone from D to E flat.

The next version to be released was the Spector-ized version on Let It Be in 1970.  For this version, Spector slowed the song back down, all the way to D flat, stripped out the existing backing vocals, and added a 50-piece orchestra and a choir. 

In 2003, the Let It Be...Naked version was mixed and released, stripping out from the Let It Be version all but John’s vocal and acoustic guitar and George’s tambura. 

Or something like that.  Whew.

What we ended up with, then, were wildly different versions of the same song, all with different tempos and feels.  John loved the Spector version, calling it one of his best songs, and he even went so far as to accuse Paul of having sabotaged the earlier versions (for instance, by bringing in girls from the street to sing backing vocals).  I, as usual, don’t enjoy the Spector-ization at all.  But I also am not a fan of the WWF version due to all the bird noises and faster tempo, which I think makes John vocal sound wrong.  That leaves me with the naked version, which I find too stripped down, and the Anthology version, which ends up as my favorite but I really want that wah-wah guitar and some other elements on there.

Ideally, this is what someone needs to do for me:  take the version recorded for WWF before the birds and #### were added and it was sped up, then also strip out the crappy girls’ voices and add the sitar from Anthology 2.  Or, take the Anthology 2 version and add the backing harmonies from Paul and George, the maracas, the bass, and the wah-wah guitar. Get to it!

Fun fact: In 2008, to celebrate the 40th anniversary of this song and NASA’s 50th anniversary, the song was transmitted into space, toward the star Polaris, 431 light years from Earth, becoming the first song ever intentionally transmitted into deep space.

Mr. krista:

[Regarding naked version.]  “That’s definitely what John Lennon sounds like.  He doesn’t sound like that in the other one.  

[Regarding Let It Be version.] It’s slowed down, so it sounds like a lower key.  There’s all that reverb because that’s how Phil Spector could make it sound dreamy, because he’s a hack.  Listen to all that whoo-ooo-ooo part.  

 “Obviously I really like that song.  The naked version is the best version.  Really not digging Phil Spector version.  Seems like the studio stuff they’d done before was for joyful experimentation or to make a point on the record, and this is just tricks and hacks and Phil Spector’s trying to justify a paycheck.  That orchestration is how you’d orchestrate an Esther Williams dream sequence in a Hollywood production, which is where he’s at. It’s a lovely song.  I like the straight eighth-notes, because it seems breathless since the end of the line is the beginning of the next line.  It’s strange that more people don’t recognize it as one of the best Beatles songs, and that they seemed so unsatisfied even though they recorded it 500 different times.”

Suggested covers – Rufus Wainwright  Fiona Apple  David Bowie

2022 Supplement:  This song remains my second favorite but is still a “what else could have been” for me, due to the issues with the various versions of this song, none of which were exactly finished to the point where John would have liked them.  It had the potential to be one of few songs that I would deem “perfect.”  But good news!  Amazingly enough, in addition to the four versions I linked in 2019, we have several more to choose from as well:

There’s Take 6, which was released in the 50th anniversary edition of the White Album (despite not being on that album):  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-kDjCi5DP4  This is now my favorite!

There’s Glyn Johns’s 1970 mixing of what sounds like the same take, which was released last year as part of the super-deluxe 50th anniversary set for Let It Be:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auTzvaAbpVs   Not sure why this one was rejected.  Sounds great to me.

There’s Giles Martin’s 2021 re-mixing that was issued in the same anniversary set:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqUzU552X8A    He toned down the Spector but not enough for me.  Sounds pleasantly lush, though.

And, there are various electric snippets that we’ve seen now due to the Get Back documentary:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLtAzE3izng  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZfn1Wm5E74   :lmao:

And more audio only of those sessions here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdRk31viNgg

Please, Peter Jackson – I want more!  I’ve asked nicely twice now.  Next time might not be so nice, if you know what I mean.  [NARRATOR:  No one, in fact, knew what she meant.]

Guido Merkins

John expressed dissatisfaction with the way some of his Beatles songs were recorded.  One such some was Across the Universe.  Across the Universe, for my money, is John’s best set of lyrics being poetry set to music.  The vivid imagery of “words flowing out like rain into a paper cup” or “limitless undying love that shines around me like a million suns” are first-class rock lyrics.

There are 2 released versions of Across the Universe and an outtake on Anthology 2, plus a reworked version on Let It Be Naked.  The first released version was given to the World Wildlife Fund and you know it because it has the female vocals on the chorus.  The 2nd released version was from the Let It Be album with John on an acoustic guitar with Phil Spector’s choirs and strings.  They slowed it down, so to my ears, John sounds stoned.  The version on Let It Be Naked is the same version as the one on Let It Be, except they sped John’s voice back up and removed the Spector stuff and added some Leslie speaker effect to John’s guitar.  This is my favorite version.  My second favorite version is the one on Anthology 2, which is different entirely with sitar, tambura and swarmandel.  

Once again, I am actually not sure why the version that is on Anthology 2, which I think is the earliest version, was not released.  I don’t like it as much as the Naked version, but if they had released it, the Naked version wouldn’t have existed and I wouldn’t have known the difference anyway.

 
Across The Universe
2022 Ranking: 18
2022 Lists: 23
2022 Points: 363
Ranked Highest by: @whoknew (1) @Man of Constant Sorrow (1) @krista4 (2) @jwb (4) @ProstheticRGK (5) @ManOfSteelhead(6) @Oliver Humanzee (6) @turnjose7 (6) @simey (7) @DocHolliday (8) @Uruk-Hai (9) @pecorino (9) @ekbeats (10) @shuke (13) @landrys hat (15)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 23/11/153

Getz: 15 Top 10 votes out of 23 votes cast is quite impressive. Moves up five slots in 2022.


Krista4
My 2019 ranking:  2


2019 write-up:

Across The Universe (Let It Be, 1970)

There’s no reason I should love this song so much.  I can’t connect with the spiritual vibe of “Jai guru deva om” (approximate translation is “Victory to God divine”), and I don’t get some soccer-mom-faux-empowerment feeling from the “nothing’s gonna change my world” part.  And yet, if I could hear the right recording of it, it would probably be my #1 song.  Something in there just scratches my musical itch.  What do I mean by the right recording?  Well, there are four officially released versions, not to mention any bootlegs, and each of them has something that I wish were slightly different in order to make it my “perfect” version.  

I’ll get to the issue of the recordings below, but first here’s what I love most about the song:  John’s vocal, the meter, the phrasing, and the lyrics.  On the not-messed-with recordings, his voice sounds delicate and gentle, intimate and as beautiful as it’s ever sounded.  As for the meter, I love the breathless propulsion and then dramatic slow-down resulting from John’s only singing one note for every syllable in the verses until each time he gets to “universe,” where he gives it a little trill.  And finally, there are the lyrics and phrasing.  My favorite non-Beatle songwriter is legit-poet Leonard Cohen, and the lines in this song are to me as stunning a work of poetry as some of Cohen’s best works.  The imagery is stunningly evocative, and the internal rhymes are sublime.  The verses are every bit as masterful when read simply as poetry as when committed to song:

Words are flowing out

Like endless rain into a paper cup

They slither wildly as they slip away across the universe

Pools of sorrow waves of joy

Are drifting through my opened mind

Possessing and caressing me

Images of broken light

Which dance before me like a million eyes

They call me on and on across the universe

Thoughts meander like a

Restless wind inside a letter box

They tumble blindly as they make their way across the universe

Sounds of laughter, shades of life

Are ringing through my opened ears

Inciting and inviting me

Limitless undying love

Which shines around me like a million suns

It calls me on and on across the universe

The lyrics came to John as he was lying in bed with his first wife and irritated with her for some reason, but they quickly turned into a “cosmic song” for him:  “They were purely inspirational and were given to me.  I don't own it, you know; it came through like that. I don't know where it came from, what meter it's in, and I've sat down and looked at it and said, 'Can I write another one with this meter?' Such an extraordinary meter and I can never repeat it! It's not a matter of craftsmanship; it wrote itself. It drove me out of bed. It's like being possessed; like a psychic or a medium. The thing has to go down. It won't let you sleep, so you have to get up, make it into something, and then you're allowed to sleep.”  John considered these possibly the best lyrics he ever wrote, and this time I agree with John – they’re perfectly breathtaking.

As to those recordings…  The song was originally recorded in early 1968 and intended as a possible single, but it was shelved in favor of “Lady Madonna” and others.  On these first recordings were John on vocal, George on a sitar for the intro and tambura elsewhere, John and Paul on acoustic guitars, and Ringo on svaramandal.  Take two of these recordings was released on Anthology 2 in 1996.

As the band continued to record and re-record the song, Paul decided to step outside the studio and ask a couple of the Apple Scruffs to join the newly harmonized chorus on backing vocals.  Two teenage girls then joined as singers on the chorus, and the group also added the wah-wah guitar part, maracas, and Paul on piano.  The first officially released version was based on this version and released in December 1969 on a charity album for the World Wildlife Fund. But before release, the sounds of birds and children playing were added, and the song was sped up a semitone from D to E flat.

The next version to be released was the Spector-ized version on Let It Be in 1970.  For this version, Spector slowed the song back down, all the way to D flat, stripped out the existing backing vocals, and added a 50-piece orchestra and a choir. 

In 2003, the Let It Be...Naked version was mixed and released, stripping out from the Let It Be version all but John’s vocal and acoustic guitar and George’s tambura. 

Or something like that.  Whew.

What we ended up with, then, were wildly different versions of the same song, all with different tempos and feels.  John loved the Spector version, calling it one of his best songs, and he even went so far as to accuse Paul of having sabotaged the earlier versions (for instance, by bringing in girls from the street to sing backing vocals).  I, as usual, don’t enjoy the Spector-ization at all.  But I also am not a fan of the WWF version due to all the bird noises and faster tempo, which I think makes John vocal sound wrong.  That leaves me with the naked version, which I find too stripped down, and the Anthology version, which ends up as my favorite but I really want that wah-wah guitar and some other elements on there.

Ideally, this is what someone needs to do for me:  take the version recorded for WWF before the birds and #### were added and it was sped up, then also strip out the crappy girls’ voices and add the sitar from Anthology 2.  Or, take the Anthology 2 version and add the backing harmonies from Paul and George, the maracas, the bass, and the wah-wah guitar. Get to it!

Fun fact: In 2008, to celebrate the 40th anniversary of this song and NASA’s 50th anniversary, the song was transmitted into space, toward the star Polaris, 431 light years from Earth, becoming the first song ever intentionally transmitted into deep space.

Mr. krista:

[Regarding naked version.]  “That’s definitely what John Lennon sounds like.  He doesn’t sound like that in the other one.  

[Regarding Let It Be version.] It’s slowed down, so it sounds like a lower key.  There’s all that reverb because that’s how Phil Spector could make it sound dreamy, because he’s a hack.  Listen to all that whoo-ooo-ooo part.  

 “Obviously I really like that song.  The naked version is the best version.  Really not digging Phil Spector version.  Seems like the studio stuff they’d done before was for joyful experimentation or to make a point on the record, and this is just tricks and hacks and Phil Spector’s trying to justify a paycheck.  That orchestration is how you’d orchestrate an Esther Williams dream sequence in a Hollywood production, which is where he’s at. It’s a lovely song.  I like the straight eighth-notes, because it seems breathless since the end of the line is the beginning of the next line.  It’s strange that more people don’t recognize it as one of the best Beatles songs, and that they seemed so unsatisfied even though they recorded it 500 different times.”

Suggested covers – Rufus Wainwright  Fiona Apple  David Bowie

2022 Supplement:  This song remains my second favorite but is still a “what else could have been” for me, due to the issues with the various versions of this song, none of which were exactly finished to the point where John would have liked them.  It had the potential to be one of few songs that I would deem “perfect.”  But good news!  Amazingly enough, in addition to the four versions I linked in 2019, we have several more to choose from as well:

There’s Take 6, which was released in the 50th anniversary edition of the White Album (despite not being on that album):  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-kDjCi5DP4  This is now my favorite!

There’s Glyn Johns’s 1970 mixing of what sounds like the same take, which was released last year as part of the super-deluxe 50th anniversary set for Let It Be:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auTzvaAbpVs   Not sure why this one was rejected.  Sounds great to me.

There’s Giles Martin’s 2021 re-mixing that was issued in the same anniversary set:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqUzU552X8A    He toned down the Spector but not enough for me.  Sounds pleasantly lush, though.

And, there are various electric snippets that we’ve seen now due to the Get Back documentary:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLtAzE3izng  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZfn1Wm5E74   :lmao:

And more audio only of those sessions here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdRk31viNgg

Please, Peter Jackson – I want more!  I’ve asked nicely twice now.  Next time might not be so nice, if you know what I mean.  [NARRATOR:  No one, in fact, knew what she meant.]

Guido Merkins

John expressed dissatisfaction with the way some of his Beatles songs were recorded.  One such some was Across the Universe.  Across the Universe, for my money, is John’s best set of lyrics being poetry set to music.  The vivid imagery of “words flowing out like rain into a paper cup” or “limitless undying love that shines around me like a million suns” are first-class rock lyrics.

There are 2 released versions of Across the Universe and an outtake on Anthology 2, plus a reworked version on Let It Be Naked.  The first released version was given to the World Wildlife Fund and you know it because it has the female vocals on the chorus.  The 2nd released version was from the Let It Be album with John on an acoustic guitar with Phil Spector’s choirs and strings.  They slowed it down, so to my ears, John sounds stoned.  The version on Let It Be Naked is the same version as the one on Let It Be, except they sped John’s voice back up and removed the Spector stuff and added some Leslie speaker effect to John’s guitar.  This is my favorite version.  My second favorite version is the one on Anthology 2, which is different entirely with sitar, tambura and swarmandel.  

Once again, I am actually not sure why the version that is on Anthology 2, which I think is the earliest version, was not released.  I don’t like it as much as the Naked version, but if they had released it, the Naked version wouldn’t have existed and I wouldn’t have known the difference anyway.
I love people who write words good. John wrote words real good in this one.

One of my favorites, and kudos on the Leonard Cohen drop. Yuge fan.

 
Across The Universe
2022 Ranking: 18
2022 Lists: 23
2022 Points: 363
Ranked Highest by: @whoknew (1) @Man of Constant Sorrow (1) @krista4 (2) @jwb (4) @ProstheticRGK (5) @ManOfSteelhead(6) @Oliver Humanzee (6) @turnjose7 (6) @simey (7) @DocHolliday (8) @Uruk-Hai (9) @pecorino (9) @ekbeats (10) @shuke (13) @landrys hat (15)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 23/11/153

Getz: 15 Top 10 votes out of 23 votes cast is quite impressive. Moves up five slots in 2022.


Krista4
My 2019 ranking:  2


2019 write-up:

Across The Universe (Let It Be, 1970)

There’s no reason I should love this song so much.  I can’t connect with the spiritual vibe of “Jai guru deva om” (approximate translation is “Victory to God divine”), and I don’t get some soccer-mom-faux-empowerment feeling from the “nothing’s gonna change my world” part.  And yet, if I could hear the right recording of it, it would probably be my #1 song.  Something in there just scratches my musical itch.  What do I mean by the right recording?  Well, there are four officially released versions, not to mention any bootlegs, and each of them has something that I wish were slightly different in order to make it my “perfect” version.  

I’ll get to the issue of the recordings below, but first here’s what I love most about the song:  John’s vocal, the meter, the phrasing, and the lyrics.  On the not-messed-with recordings, his voice sounds delicate and gentle, intimate and as beautiful as it’s ever sounded.  As for the meter, I love the breathless propulsion and then dramatic slow-down resulting from John’s only singing one note for every syllable in the verses until each time he gets to “universe,” where he gives it a little trill.  And finally, there are the lyrics and phrasing.  My favorite non-Beatle songwriter is legit-poet Leonard Cohen, and the lines in this song are to me as stunning a work of poetry as some of Cohen’s best works.  The imagery is stunningly evocative, and the internal rhymes are sublime.  The verses are every bit as masterful when read simply as poetry as when committed to song:

Words are flowing out

Like endless rain into a paper cup

They slither wildly as they slip away across the universe

Pools of sorrow waves of joy

Are drifting through my opened mind

Possessing and caressing me

Images of broken light

Which dance before me like a million eyes

They call me on and on across the universe

Thoughts meander like a

Restless wind inside a letter box

They tumble blindly as they make their way across the universe

Sounds of laughter, shades of life

Are ringing through my opened ears

Inciting and inviting me

Limitless undying love

Which shines around me like a million suns

It calls me on and on across the universe

The lyrics came to John as he was lying in bed with his first wife and irritated with her for some reason, but they quickly turned into a “cosmic song” for him:  “They were purely inspirational and were given to me.  I don't own it, you know; it came through like that. I don't know where it came from, what meter it's in, and I've sat down and looked at it and said, 'Can I write another one with this meter?' Such an extraordinary meter and I can never repeat it! It's not a matter of craftsmanship; it wrote itself. It drove me out of bed. It's like being possessed; like a psychic or a medium. The thing has to go down. It won't let you sleep, so you have to get up, make it into something, and then you're allowed to sleep.”  John considered these possibly the best lyrics he ever wrote, and this time I agree with John – they’re perfectly breathtaking.

As to those recordings…  The song was originally recorded in early 1968 and intended as a possible single, but it was shelved in favor of “Lady Madonna” and others.  On these first recordings were John on vocal, George on a sitar for the intro and tambura elsewhere, John and Paul on acoustic guitars, and Ringo on svaramandal.  Take two of these recordings was released on Anthology 2 in 1996.

As the band continued to record and re-record the song, Paul decided to step outside the studio and ask a couple of the Apple Scruffs to join the newly harmonized chorus on backing vocals.  Two teenage girls then joined as singers on the chorus, and the group also added the wah-wah guitar part, maracas, and Paul on piano.  The first officially released version was based on this version and released in December 1969 on a charity album for the World Wildlife Fund. But before release, the sounds of birds and children playing were added, and the song was sped up a semitone from D to E flat.

The next version to be released was the Spector-ized version on Let It Be in 1970.  For this version, Spector slowed the song back down, all the way to D flat, stripped out the existing backing vocals, and added a 50-piece orchestra and a choir. 

In 2003, the Let It Be...Naked version was mixed and released, stripping out from the Let It Be version all but John’s vocal and acoustic guitar and George’s tambura. 

Or something like that.  Whew.

What we ended up with, then, were wildly different versions of the same song, all with different tempos and feels.  John loved the Spector version, calling it one of his best songs, and he even went so far as to accuse Paul of having sabotaged the earlier versions (for instance, by bringing in girls from the street to sing backing vocals).  I, as usual, don’t enjoy the Spector-ization at all.  But I also am not a fan of the WWF version due to all the bird noises and faster tempo, which I think makes John vocal sound wrong.  That leaves me with the naked version, which I find too stripped down, and the Anthology version, which ends up as my favorite but I really want that wah-wah guitar and some other elements on there.

Ideally, this is what someone needs to do for me:  take the version recorded for WWF before the birds and #### were added and it was sped up, then also strip out the crappy girls’ voices and add the sitar from Anthology 2.  Or, take the Anthology 2 version and add the backing harmonies from Paul and George, the maracas, the bass, and the wah-wah guitar. Get to it!

Fun fact: In 2008, to celebrate the 40th anniversary of this song and NASA’s 50th anniversary, the song was transmitted into space, toward the star Polaris, 431 light years from Earth, becoming the first song ever intentionally transmitted into deep space.

Mr. krista:

[Regarding naked version.]  “That’s definitely what John Lennon sounds like.  He doesn’t sound like that in the other one.  

[Regarding Let It Be version.] It’s slowed down, so it sounds like a lower key.  There’s all that reverb because that’s how Phil Spector could make it sound dreamy, because he’s a hack.  Listen to all that whoo-ooo-ooo part.  

 “Obviously I really like that song.  The naked version is the best version.  Really not digging Phil Spector version.  Seems like the studio stuff they’d done before was for joyful experimentation or to make a point on the record, and this is just tricks and hacks and Phil Spector’s trying to justify a paycheck.  That orchestration is how you’d orchestrate an Esther Williams dream sequence in a Hollywood production, which is where he’s at. It’s a lovely song.  I like the straight eighth-notes, because it seems breathless since the end of the line is the beginning of the next line.  It’s strange that more people don’t recognize it as one of the best Beatles songs, and that they seemed so unsatisfied even though they recorded it 500 different times.”

Suggested covers – Rufus Wainwright  Fiona Apple  David Bowie

2022 Supplement:  This song remains my second favorite but is still a “what else could have been” for me, due to the issues with the various versions of this song, none of which were exactly finished to the point where John would have liked them.  It had the potential to be one of few songs that I would deem “perfect.”  But good news!  Amazingly enough, in addition to the four versions I linked in 2019, we have several more to choose from as well:

There’s Take 6, which was released in the 50th anniversary edition of the White Album (despite not being on that album):  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-kDjCi5DP4  This is now my favorite!

There’s Glyn Johns’s 1970 mixing of what sounds like the same take, which was released last year as part of the super-deluxe 50th anniversary set for Let It Be:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auTzvaAbpVs   Not sure why this one was rejected.  Sounds great to me.

There’s Giles Martin’s 2021 re-mixing that was issued in the same anniversary set:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqUzU552X8A    He toned down the Spector but not enough for me.  Sounds pleasantly lush, though.

And, there are various electric snippets that we’ve seen now due to the Get Back documentary:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLtAzE3izng  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZfn1Wm5E74   :lmao:

And more audio only of those sessions here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdRk31viNgg

Please, Peter Jackson – I want more!  I’ve asked nicely twice now.  Next time might not be so nice, if you know what I mean.  [NARRATOR:  No one, in fact, knew what she meant.]

Guido Merkins

John expressed dissatisfaction with the way some of his Beatles songs were recorded.  One such some was Across the Universe.  Across the Universe, for my money, is John’s best set of lyrics being poetry set to music.  The vivid imagery of “words flowing out like rain into a paper cup” or “limitless undying love that shines around me like a million suns” are first-class rock lyrics.

There are 2 released versions of Across the Universe and an outtake on Anthology 2, plus a reworked version on Let It Be Naked.  The first released version was given to the World Wildlife Fund and you know it because it has the female vocals on the chorus.  The 2nd released version was from the Let It Be album with John on an acoustic guitar with Phil Spector’s choirs and strings.  They slowed it down, so to my ears, John sounds stoned.  The version on Let It Be Naked is the same version as the one on Let It Be, except they sped John’s voice back up and removed the Spector stuff and added some Leslie speaker effect to John’s guitar.  This is my favorite version.  My second favorite version is the one on Anthology 2, which is different entirely with sitar, tambura and swarmandel.  

Once again, I am actually not sure why the version that is on Anthology 2, which I think is the earliest version, was not released.  I don’t like it as much as the Naked version, but if they had released it, the Naked version wouldn’t have existed and I wouldn’t have known the difference anyway.
My rank: 29

This is one of my go-to songs when I want to get blissed-out and Zen. The lyrics are extraordinary engaging and the music, regardless of which version, has a calming effect on me. I like all the versions, and am not really bothered by the Spector-ization of the Let It Be version or the birds and Apple Scruffs in the WWF version. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top