Pip's Invitation
Footballguy
Count me in the "she's in black because her ex left her and she can't get over it" camp. I don't think it makes as much sense if he's dead. "And though it's only a whim, she thinks of him" is not how you'd describe grieving a dead partner. "Oh how long will it take 'til she sees the mistake she has made" is another line that doesn't support the death interpretation -- why would his death be her mistake?Baby’s In Black
2022 Ranking: 139
2022 Lists: 2
2022 Points: 16
Ranked Highest by: @rockaction (14) Krista (TJ/Michael) (22)
2019 Ranking/Lists/Pts: 96/1/18
Getz: YT is live from Shea Stadium. Song has been ear worm for me that past few days.
Krista4
My 2019 ranking: 182
2019 write-up:
Baby's in Black (Beatles for Sale, 1964)
This song about a love triangle among three people, only two of them living, was a staple of the Beatles's live performances, all the way through the last concert (setting aside the rooftop thingie) at Candlestick Park in 1966. It's one of the best examples of true co-writing of Paul and John, having been written by them together in one day in a room at John's house in Kenwood. There's a ton I like about this song - the harmonies, the 3/4 waltz time, the darker mood, whatever the hell that is that George is doing on guitar - but we're in the realm now of good songs that I just don't enjoy as much as those above them.
Mr. krista: "It’s hard to conceive of a more selfish song, or someone who is less considerate of a protagonist in mourning. But I really like it. What the #### man. I think they were trying to write a county song. Of all the people in there, you’re the most prutnate.* There’s the dead dude, the woman who loved the dead dude, and you have nothing to do with this. But again the harmonies are killer, the refrains are great, the melody’s great, so everything is enjoyable. But they’re so powerful at this time that you could put any horrible message in your song, but it’s great. Oh, here, murder your kids, and we would have all just been singing along."
*Since there was drinking involved in some of our forced listening sessions, sometimes my notes are a little hard to interpret. Like "covfefe," take it to mean whatever you wish.
Suggested cover: Wish I could find a better-quality live version than this one, but I think Earle sounds good (and he's a favorite of mine); actual song starts around 0:57 Shawn Colvin and Steve Earle; also if anyone can find the Elvis Costello/T-Bone Burnett version that I know exists but cannot seem to locate again, you'd be my hero.
2022 Supplement: I know some were outraged at the low ranking of this song in 2019, and they were probably right. I don’t enjoy it any more now than I did then, but it really was misplaced at this low a spot. Hell, waltz time alone should put it more in the 150 range.
Paul said that they all loved this one as it showed their growth as songwriters, writing something darker and more adult rather than pure pop songs. They were also, as often was the case in the early days, trying to imitate the Everly Brothers with their harmonies. This song has always had the “feel” of a John song to me, maybe due to the lyrics, but Paul has identified it as one that was a true 50/50 collaboration: “It was very much co-written and we both sang it. Sometimes the harmony that I was writing in sympathy to John's melody would take over and become a stronger melody. Suddenly a piebald rabbit came out of the hat! When people wrote out the music score they would ask, 'Which one is the melody?' because it was so co-written that you could actually take either. We rather liked this one. It was not so much a work job, there was a bit more cred about this one. It's got a good middle.” Note: I don’t know what a piebald rabbit is, but I’m going to take it in the food draft.
I’m not sure which live version Getz will be posting, but I love the little twirl Paul did when they performed this song; it’s at 1:19 in this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwuIHR_e4y
Guido Merkins
By late 1964 many things were coming together that were changing the Beatles songwriting. Bob Dylan is one of them. The exhaustion of being on the road was also a factor. Both of these combined created an atmosphere of darker, more personal songwriting. Perhaps the darkest of their songs, certainly up to that point is Baby’s In Black from the Beatles For Sale album.
The lyrics talk about a grieving girl who “thinks of him and so she dresses in black” and “though he’ll never come back, she’s dressed in black.” Now, is she grieving becasue the relationship is over or because the guy died? I don’t know. If it’s the former, then it’s a sad song. If it’s the latter, it’s an even sadder song, but with a little sadistic twist because the singer is in effect saying “get over it and be with me.”
In any event, the darkness of the lyrics is contrasted by the song in waltz time, which makes it lighter than the actual story being presented. The vocal and guitar also suggest a country/blues kind of thing. So this song has a bunch of different elements.
The Beatles, themselves, must have thought a lot of this song because it was part of their setlist. I love John and Paul singing lead together in harmony the entire time. I also love George’s guitar solo. Very good song on an underrated album.
25 years later she'd have been a Goth chick listening to the Cure all day.
I went through this kind of thing myself in my Lost Years. I had a major crush on a girl I met in the NYC music scene but she just couldn't get over her ex and friend-zoned me. It took a few months for my heart to get the message* and eventually it did, but it was an emotional rollercoaster.
Baby's in Black a nice enough song musically but one that doesn't stick out a whole lot in that aspect for me.
* - also, for me to realize that she really liked cocaine and thus a relationship with her would probably have been a total cluster.
every time. And now, three years later, she has graced us by submitting a list and her first song to make the list is this beautiful song.