ProstheticRGK
Footballguy
Ah, good call. He was part of the team in 2004, but Banner and Heckert were running things.was that him or Banner and Co.?
Ah, good call. He was part of the team in 2004, but Banner and Heckert were running things.was that him or Banner and Co.?
Rank these Howie trades:
A) Bradford to Vikings for 1st and 4th
B) Wentz to Colts for 1st and 3rd
C) Kiko, Maxwell and 13th overall to Miami for 8th overall pick
D) Kolb to Arizona for DRC and 2nd
E) 6th overall and 3rd for DeVonta Smith and 1st
I'd disagree, Missing on a 1st round pick doesn't weaken the trade that GOT you to the pick. Two different evaluations. No different then trade 'E' there (which isnt a NA oddly enough). Shouldn't that matter what happens with the 1st rounder next year?B). NA I don't think we can say how good this was until we see what happens with the 1st and 3rd rounders. Who knows that pick could be traded for one next year etc.
I'd disagree, Missing on a 1st round pick doesn't weaken the trade that GOT you to the pick. Two different evaluations. No different then trade 'E' there (which isnt a NA oddly enough). Shouldn't that matter what happens with the 1st rounder next year?
That’s where I am with it currently. If Howie nails the pick and gets a star that deal would be his best of all time IMO. If it’s a Reagor the deal is a wash.You could give it an NA but the Wentz trade isn't completed till that pick is made or we see what happens with it.
Bigboy10182000 said:That’s where I am with it currently. If Howie nails the pick and gets a star that deal would be his best of all time IMO. If it’s a Reagor the deal is a wash.
Bigboy10182000 said:That’s where I am with it currently. If Howie nails the pick and gets a star that deal would be his best of all time IMO. If it’s a Reagor the deal is a wash.
This isn't meant as a slam on Reagor at all(although I thought he was a curious choice at the time) but I would much rather have any WR PIT drafts in the third round more than Reagor. Somehow PIT has completely figured out how to scout college WR's. I don't see them needing to trade for one or even give a veteran deal to one of their own since they are so good at simply drafting a replacement on day 2 or day 3 of the draft.speaking of Reagor I saw a FTW article on what the Steelers should do and 3 trades with the Eagles. One was for Minshew another for Dillard as they need some Oline help. the 3rd this was great Jalen Reagor explosive speed and playmaking ability. I have yet to see either from Reagor but if PITT wants to take him for a 3rd or something I'll help him pack his bags and pay for his plane ticket
babydemon90 said:I'd disagree, Missing on a 1st round pick doesn't weaken the trade that GOT you to the pick. Two different evaluations. No different then trade 'E' there (which isnt a NA oddly enough). Shouldn't that matter what happens with the 1st rounder next year?
Look no further than the Bradford trade. It got us dumb-bell bust Derek Barnett and Josh Sweat. Getting a 1st and 4th for that stiff was a great trade even if Sweat turns into Barnett 2.0.Exactly. If Wentz was traded for a 6th, everyone would be losing their minds. But if that 6th turned into Brady 2.0, then it was a good trade? Also I think too many people stress over "winning" a trade. Using the Wentz deal again, at the time it was a good deal for the Eagles, regardless of how well Wentz played this year or going forward. He wanted out, everyone knew he wanted out, still got a 1 and 3 for a guy coming off a terrible season when the team had no leverage. So good trade no matter what happens.
This isn't meant as a slam on Reagor at all(although I thought he was a curious choice at the time) but I would much rather have any WR PIT drafts in the third round more than Reagor. Somehow PIT has completely figured out how to scout college WR's. I don't see them needing to trade for one or even give a veteran deal to one of their own since they are so good at simply drafting a replacement on day 2 or day 3 of the draft.
Look no further than the Bradford trade. It got us dumb-bell bust Derek Barnett and Josh Sweat. Getting a 1st and 4th for that stiff was a great trade even if Sweat turns into Barnett 2.0.
And for all the dumb stuff Barnett did over the years, the fact that he forced a key fumble in the 2017 NFC championship game, and recovered a key fumble in the Super Bowl, makes that trade a win for the Eagles.Look no further than the Bradford trade. It got us dumb-bell bust Derek Barnett and Josh Sweat. Getting a 1st and 4th for that stiff was a great trade even if Sweat turns into Barnett 2.0.
And for all the dumb stuff Barnett did over the years, the fact that he forced a key fumble in the 2017 NFC championship game, and recovered a key fumble in the Super Bowl, makes that trade a win for the Eagles.
Barnett is an interesting case of what makes a "good" draft pick. He clearly belongs in the NFL, has performed OK but not great and is going to get a second contract from someone. The problem is he never really developed as much as anyone hoped and takes horrible, stupid penalties at bad times. Is that on the front office or the coaching staff?sadly he has made more of an impact than ALOT of our first round picks over the years
Barnett is an interesting case of what makes a "good" draft pick. He clearly belongs in the NFL, has performed OK but not great and is going to get a second contract from someone. The problem is he never really developed as much as anyone hoped and takes horrible, stupid penalties at bad times. Is that on the front office or the coaching staff?
Barnett is an interesting case of what makes a "good" draft pick. He clearly belongs in the NFL, has performed OK but not great and is going to get a second contract from someone. The problem is he never really developed as much as anyone hoped and takes horrible, stupid penalties at bad times. Is that on the front office or the coaching staff?
The way his coaches and teammates visibly react when he does a Barnett tells me it’s himMost is on him imo. Seems like an idiot
What most within the league consider a good pick is one who starts, so he fits that description.Tom Hagen said:Barnett is an interesting case of what makes a "good" draft pick. He clearly belongs in the NFL, has performed OK but not great and is going to get a second contract from someone. The problem is he never really developed as much as anyone hoped and takes horrible, stupid penalties at bad times. Is that on the front office or the coaching staff?
But that’s essentially two starting DE’s for a QB you didn’t want/need so that’s a win for sure.Look no further than the Bradford trade. It got us dumb-bell bust Derek Barnett and Josh Sweat. Getting a 1st and 4th for that stiff was a great trade even if Sweat turns into Barnett 2.0.
I guess I look at the trades on their face because that's what is known at the time the deal is made. The realized future value (or lack thereof) can make a trade look better or worse, but the deal has to get done in the first place.But that’s essentially two starting DE’s for a QB you didn’t want/need so that’s a win for sure.
If we end up with Marcus Smith (first round) and Jaylen Watkins (4th round) it’s arguably a loss.
I think there’s more depth to it than that. I think what you’re saying is we got good VALUE at that time. I don’t disagree with that but I also think that’s just part of evaluating the entire deal. We can get good value at the the time and the trade can still end up bad after time. Using the below example the other team would have got good value at that time but over time it will have looked like a bad deal if Smith doesn’t have a good/great career.My point with the Bradford trade was even if we drafted busts, or traded the picks away for other picks that didn't pan out, getting a 1 and a 4 for him was an objectively "great" trade. Gaining a 2022 1st Rounder to move back 6 spots with MIA last year was a really good trade even if we would have stayed at 12 (and taken Slater? Paye?)
One more thought, and I think someone brought up something similar a couple days ago:
If we traded Devonta Smith tomorrow for a 7th round pick, that would be considered a "bad" trade by everyone. If that 7th rounder went on to become a 10-year pro bowler and Hall of Fame QB for us, it wouldn't re-write history and make the original trade "great", it would just mean there was a "great" decision made when using the pick that came from a very bad trade.
It would be interesting to see LOWEST %According to @TheHerd, over the last decade the QB with the highest % of his teams cap to actually win a SB is Stafford (‘21) at 12.6%. Behind him is Peyton at 11.7 and Eli at 11.6.
At est 208M cap in ‘22:
Wilson - 17.8%.
Rodgers (if he gets $50M) - 24%
Watson - 16.8%
Foles and Mahomes would have to be 2 of the top 3.It would be interesting to see LOWEST %
I wager Brady’s got the top 3 spots!
Wilson on a rookie 3rd rd contract has to be at the topFoles and Mahomes would have to be 2 of the top 3.
All comes down to cost. My breaking point is anything over 2 first round picks and Hurts.Shaping up to be "Russell Wilson Speculation Week", with a lot of comparisons to Wilson being the Eagles' version of a Harden deal and just straight up what-if scenarios.
My gut say Wilson doesn't wind up going anywhere and gets an "end my career with Seattle" extension. But, makes for a good debate in the meantime.![]()
I've been resolute that what I think is best for the Eagles is to keep Hurts this year and see if there is any growth, try and trade one of the 1st Rounders this year for one next year, and evaluate going into 2023.Shaping up to be "Russell Wilson Speculation Week", with a lot of comparisons to Wilson being the Eagles' version of a Harden deal and just straight up what-if scenarios.
My gut say Wilson doesn't wind up going anywhere and gets an "end my career with Seattle" extension. But, makes for a good debate in the meantime.![]()
That's pretty much where I am too.. My biggest fear is the contract he'll inevitably want for 'allowing ' himself to be dealt. That's going to be really expensive when you take both the picks and contract into consideration.All comes down to cost. My breaking point is anything over 2 first round picks and Hurts.
That would still leave us with a “normal” draft in terms of picks and it’s a big piece that’s filled. Still have to nail the draft though.
Bigboy10182000 said:All comes down to cost. My breaking point is anything over 2 first round picks and Hurts.
That would still leave us with a “normal” draft in terms of picks and it’s a big piece that’s filled. Still have to nail the draft though.
Yeah I don’t expect there to be a deal at all if I’m being honest.I'm not doing any deal for Wilson honestly. I know people think he's elite but he hasn't won anything since the Legion of Boom and Lynch was there. Puts up good numbers but thats about it. SB was literally over and game won by SEA before Russ even put his mark on the game.
Don't get me wrong I like Wilson as a person but I think he's incredible overrated as a QB by some for a guy who hasn't won anything in years. He's also older now. He's also had the benefit of playing in a weak NFC West outside of the occasional 49ers run for yrs. Now that is looks like LAR is legit again SEA has struggled. The Eagles also aren't "a QB away from being a serious contender.
Also put me in the NO Section for Kyler Murray. Dude seems to be very immature and that guy would get eaten alive in Philly. He's also smaller then Wilson and I think the League is figuring him out
I'm not doing any deal for Wilson honestly. I know people think he's elite but he hasn't won anything since the Legion of Boom and Lynch was there. Puts up good numbers but thats about it.
He’s been rock solid and prior to being injured last season he was putting up elite numbers in the years prior.Before this year, he never had a losing season, right? Double digit wins almost every year? 104-53 in his career? But "hasn't won anything"?
Yeah I don’t expect there to be a deal at all if I’m being honest.
I get the sense that they’re comfortable with Hurts too for next season. Hoping they can add someone with potential in the 3rd and keep them behind Hurts and Minshew.
Before this year, he never had a losing season, right? Double digit wins almost every year? 104-53 in his career? But "hasn't won anything"?