What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2024-25 NBA Thread: for the second time, somebody in Dallas hits low percentage shot that leads to a generation of conspiracy theories (32 Viewers)

Bronny played allright in what was otherwise a horrific game for the Lakers (they sat 8 of their first 9 rotation guys, so to be expected).

I hope they find a way to retain Ollivari. He's shown more this preseason than I've seen in a year plus from guys like Hood-Schifino and Max Lewis. Pelinka has really screwed up this roster giving out guaranteed deals to people who aren't going to amount to anything in the NBA.
They could just cut those ****ty players and sign replacements but in addition to having one of the worst GMs, they also have one of the worst owners.

They are right at the second apron with fifteen guaranteed contracts so there's very little wiggle room.
 
Bronny played allright in what was otherwise a horrific game for the Lakers (they sat 8 of their first 9 rotation guys, so to be expected).

I hope they find a way to retain Ollivari. He's shown more this preseason than I've seen in a year plus from guys like Hood-Schifino and Max Lewis. Pelinka has really screwed up this roster giving out guaranteed deals to people who aren't going to amount to anything in the NBA.
They could just cut those ****ty players and sign replacements but in addition to having one of the worst GMs, they also have one of the worst owners.

They are right at the second apron with fifteen guaranteed contracts so there's very little wiggle room.
I think they overreacted to what happened with Caruso and Talen Horton Tucker, and entered this mode of locking up their young players early to keep them under team control cheaply. Problem is they're mostly just young players, not good young players. That first part of the equation seems to have been overlooked. Now they have no flexibility roster wise.
 
Bronny played allright in what was otherwise a horrific game for the Lakers (they sat 8 of their first 9 rotation guys, so to be expected).

I hope they find a way to retain Ollivari. He's shown more this preseason than I've seen in a year plus from guys like Hood-Schifino and Max Lewis. Pelinka has really screwed up this roster giving out guaranteed deals to people who aren't going to amount to anything in the NBA.
They could just cut those ****ty players and sign replacements but in addition to having one of the worst GMs, they also have one of the worst owners.

They are right at the second apron with fifteen guaranteed contracts so there's very little wiggle room.
I think they overreacted to what happened with Caruso and Talen Horton Tucker, and entered this mode of locking up their young players early to keep them under team control cheaply. Problem is they're mostly just young players, not good young players. That first part of the equation seems to have been overlooked. Now they have no flexibility roster wise.
I’m not sure what you mean about Caruso and tucker? They did give Tucker a contract early, I think the longest they could since he was a second rounder and had to dump it because he wasn’t good enough. And They easily could have matched the contract that caruso got from the bulls, if memory serves.
 
I am not sure if 50 losses for the 10 seed has happened (it probably has) but looking back over the past decade or so it has been close.

2015-2016 Sacramento and Denver tied for the 10th seed with 49 losses
2016-2017 New Orleans had 48 losses
2021-2022 San Antonio had 48 losses
Somewhat related, the bulls made the playoffs at 30-52 in 1985, though there were only 11 teams in the conference. I think that’s they worst ever for a playoff team
 
Bronny played allright in what was otherwise a horrific game for the Lakers (they sat 8 of their first 9 rotation guys, so to be expected).

I hope they find a way to retain Ollivari. He's shown more this preseason than I've seen in a year plus from guys like Hood-Schifino and Max Lewis. Pelinka has really screwed up this roster giving out guaranteed deals to people who aren't going to amount to anything in the NBA.
Looks like Ollivari was just signed to a two-way, unless you already knew that and were hoping for something guaranteed
 
Bronny played allright in what was otherwise a horrific game for the Lakers (they sat 8 of their first 9 rotation guys, so to be expected).

I hope they find a way to retain Ollivari. He's shown more this preseason than I've seen in a year plus from guys like Hood-Schifino and Max Lewis. Pelinka has really screwed up this roster giving out guaranteed deals to people who aren't going to amount to anything in the NBA.
They could just cut those ****ty players and sign replacements but in addition to having one of the worst GMs, they also have one of the worst owners.

They are right at the second apron with fifteen guaranteed contracts so there's very little wiggle room.
I think they overreacted to what happened with Caruso and Talen Horton Tucker, and entered this mode of locking up their young players early to keep them under team control cheaply. Problem is they're mostly just young players, not good young players. That first part of the equation seems to have been overlooked. Now they have no flexibility roster wise.
I’m not sure what you mean about Caruso and tucker? They did give Tucker a contract early, I think the longest they could since he was a second rounder and had to dump it because he wasn’t good enough. And They easily could have matched the contract that caruso got from the bulls, if memory serves.
IIRC they let Caruso go so they could keep Tucker. They had opportunities to sign both of them sooner for less and didn't. Now they're doing the opposite - with also bad results.
 
Bronny played allright in what was otherwise a horrific game for the Lakers (they sat 8 of their first 9 rotation guys, so to be expected).

I hope they find a way to retain Ollivari. He's shown more this preseason than I've seen in a year plus from guys like Hood-Schifino and Max Lewis. Pelinka has really screwed up this roster giving out guaranteed deals to people who aren't going to amount to anything in the NBA.
Looks like Ollivari was just signed to a two-way, unless you already knew that and were hoping for something guaranteed
I hadn't seen that when I wrote initially, so I'm glad they kept him on the 2 way deal. Castleton's useless, so no real loss there.
 
Bronny played allright in what was otherwise a horrific game for the Lakers (they sat 8 of their first 9 rotation guys, so to be expected).

I hope they find a way to retain Ollivari. He's shown more this preseason than I've seen in a year plus from guys like Hood-Schifino and Max Lewis. Pelinka has really screwed up this roster giving out guaranteed deals to people who aren't going to amount to anything in the NBA.
They could just cut those ****ty players and sign replacements but in addition to having one of the worst GMs, they also have one of the worst owners.

They are right at the second apron with fifteen guaranteed contracts so there's very little wiggle room.
I think they overreacted to what happened with Caruso and Talen Horton Tucker, and entered this mode of locking up their young players early to keep them under team control cheaply. Problem is they're mostly just young players, not good young players. That first part of the equation seems to have been overlooked. Now they have no flexibility roster wise.
I’m not sure what you mean about Caruso and tucker? They did give Tucker a contract early, I think the longest they could since he was a second rounder and had to dump it because he wasn’t good enough. And They easily could have matched the contract that caruso got from the bulls, if memory serves.
IIRC they let Caruso go so they could keep Tucker. They had opportunities to sign both of them sooner for less and didn't. Now they're doing the opposite - with also bad results.
I don’t think that’s true about Caruso: https://www.silverscreenandroll.com...cago-bulls-luxury-tax-rob-pelinka-jeanie-buss
 
Bronny played allright in what was otherwise a horrific game for the Lakers (they sat 8 of their first 9 rotation guys, so to be expected).

I hope they find a way to retain Ollivari. He's shown more this preseason than I've seen in a year plus from guys like Hood-Schifino and Max Lewis. Pelinka has really screwed up this roster giving out guaranteed deals to people who aren't going to amount to anything in the NBA.
Looks like Ollivari was just signed to a two-way, unless you already knew that and were hoping for something guaranteed
Speaking of Olivari, this is great

 
Bronny played allright in what was otherwise a horrific game for the Lakers (they sat 8 of their first 9 rotation guys, so to be expected).

I hope they find a way to retain Ollivari. He's shown more this preseason than I've seen in a year plus from guys like Hood-Schifino and Max Lewis. Pelinka has really screwed up this roster giving out guaranteed deals to people who aren't going to amount to anything in the NBA.
They could just cut those ****ty players and sign replacements but in addition to having one of the worst GMs, they also have one of the worst owners.

They are right at the second apron with fifteen guaranteed contracts so there's very little wiggle room.
I think they overreacted to what happened with Caruso and Talen Horton Tucker, and entered this mode of locking up their young players early to keep them under team control cheaply. Problem is they're mostly just young players, not good young players. That first part of the equation seems to have been overlooked. Now they have no flexibility roster wise.
I’m not sure what you mean about Caruso and tucker? They did give Tucker a contract early, I think the longest they could since he was a second rounder and had to dump it because he wasn’t good enough. And They easily could have matched the contract that caruso got from the bulls, if memory serves.
IIRC they let Caruso go so they could keep Tucker. They had opportunities to sign both of them sooner for less and didn't. Now they're doing the opposite - with also bad results.
I don’t think that’s true about Caruso: https://www.silverscreenandroll.com...cago-bulls-luxury-tax-rob-pelinka-jeanie-buss
From the comments on that article:

"Once Nunn and THT were signed, there was zero chance of re-signing AC."

So it wasn't just Tucker, it was also Nunn that led the the Lakers not having room under the 2nd threshhold to sign Caruso. Whom they could have signed to an extension more cheaply a few years prior.
 
Bronny played allright in what was otherwise a horrific game for the Lakers (they sat 8 of their first 9 rotation guys, so to be expected).

I hope they find a way to retain Ollivari. He's shown more this preseason than I've seen in a year plus from guys like Hood-Schifino and Max Lewis. Pelinka has really screwed up this roster giving out guaranteed deals to people who aren't going to amount to anything in the NBA.
They could just cut those ****ty players and sign replacements but in addition to having one of the worst GMs, they also have one of the worst owners.

They are right at the second apron with fifteen guaranteed contracts so there's very little wiggle room.
I think they overreacted to what happened with Caruso and Talen Horton Tucker, and entered this mode of locking up their young players early to keep them under team control cheaply. Problem is they're mostly just young players, not good young players. That first part of the equation seems to have been overlooked. Now they have no flexibility roster wise.
I’m not sure what you mean about Caruso and tucker? They did give Tucker a contract early, I think the longest they could since he was a second rounder and had to dump it because he wasn’t good enough. And They easily could have matched the contract that caruso got from the bulls, if memory serves.
IIRC they let Caruso go so they could keep Tucker. They had opportunities to sign both of them sooner for less and didn't. Now they're doing the opposite - with also bad results.
I don’t think that’s true about Caruso: https://www.silverscreenandroll.com...cago-bulls-luxury-tax-rob-pelinka-jeanie-buss
From the comments on that article:

"Once Nunn and THT were signed, there was zero chance of re-signing AC."

So it wasn't just Tucker, it was also Nunn that led the the Lakers not having room under the 2nd threshhold to sign Caruso. Whom they could have signed to an extension more cheaply a few years prior.
I guess what I’m saying is that at that time, there was no structural cba problem or downside to giving him the same contract as the bulls did. The team is the second most valuable in the league and was coming off of a championship with a star player who was aging out of being the best player on a championship team. And it was just to save money.

Didn’t necessarily mean to make this a big thing. It would aggravate me if I were a laker fan that they were unwilling to pay more in taxes to try to win another championship. But I’m not and they wouldn’t have won anyone since Lebron got hurt so :shrug:
 
Bronny played allright in what was otherwise a horrific game for the Lakers (they sat 8 of their first 9 rotation guys, so to be expected).

I hope they find a way to retain Ollivari. He's shown more this preseason than I've seen in a year plus from guys like Hood-Schifino and Max Lewis. Pelinka has really screwed up this roster giving out guaranteed deals to people who aren't going to amount to anything in the NBA.
They could just cut those ****ty players and sign replacements but in addition to having one of the worst GMs, they also have one of the worst owners.

They are right at the second apron with fifteen guaranteed contracts so there's very little wiggle room.
I think they overreacted to what happened with Caruso and Talen Horton Tucker, and entered this mode of locking up their young players early to keep them under team control cheaply. Problem is they're mostly just young players, not good young players. That first part of the equation seems to have been overlooked. Now they have no flexibility roster wise.
I’m not sure what you mean about Caruso and tucker? They did give Tucker a contract early, I think the longest they could since he was a second rounder and had to dump it because he wasn’t good enough. And They easily could have matched the contract that caruso got from the bulls, if memory serves.
IIRC they let Caruso go so they could keep Tucker. They had opportunities to sign both of them sooner for less and didn't. Now they're doing the opposite - with also bad results.
I don’t think that’s true about Caruso: https://www.silverscreenandroll.com...cago-bulls-luxury-tax-rob-pelinka-jeanie-buss
From the comments on that article:

"Once Nunn and THT were signed, there was zero chance of re-signing AC."

So it wasn't just Tucker, it was also Nunn that led the the Lakers not having room under the 2nd threshhold to sign Caruso. Whom they could have signed to an extension more cheaply a few years prior.
I guess what I’m saying is that at that time, there was no structural cba problem or downside to giving him the same contract as the bulls did. The team is the second most valuable in the league and was coming off of a championship with a star player who was aging out of being the best player on a championship team. And it was just to save money.

Didn’t necessarily mean to make this a big thing. It would aggravate me if I were a laker fan that they were unwilling to pay more in taxes to try to win another championship. But I’m not and they wouldn’t have won anyone since Lebron got hurt so :shrug:
No argument, it was definitely just to save money. Beyond that they made really bad choices about how to save money / who to save money on - they prioritized Nunn and Tucker (who they paid more money to than they offered Caruso) over Caruso. :loco:

And now they're making sort of the opposite types of bad decisions by handing out guaranteed contracts beyond the minimum necessary to all their unproven guys to try to avoid being in the situation they were in with Caruso. That's the point I was initially making. It's probably a better mistake to make than the Caruso one, but it's left them with very little roster flexibility as they're locked into guys like Max Lewis, Bronny, and Hood-Schifino (who was a mistake on multiple levels). Hooray, you've got your young cheap non-talent locked up!
 
Bronny played allright in what was otherwise a horrific game for the Lakers (they sat 8 of their first 9 rotation guys, so to be expected).

I hope they find a way to retain Ollivari. He's shown more this preseason than I've seen in a year plus from guys like Hood-Schifino and Max Lewis. Pelinka has really screwed up this roster giving out guaranteed deals to people who aren't going to amount to anything in the NBA.
They could just cut those ****ty players and sign replacements but in addition to having one of the worst GMs, they also have one of the worst owners.

They are right at the second apron with fifteen guaranteed contracts so there's very little wiggle room.
I think they overreacted to what happened with Caruso and Talen Horton Tucker, and entered this mode of locking up their young players early to keep them under team control cheaply. Problem is they're mostly just young players, not good young players. That first part of the equation seems to have been overlooked. Now they have no flexibility roster wise.
I’m not sure what you mean about Caruso and tucker? They did give Tucker a contract early, I think the longest they could since he was a second rounder and had to dump it because he wasn’t good enough. And They easily could have matched the contract that caruso got from the bulls, if memory serves.
IIRC they let Caruso go so they could keep Tucker. They had opportunities to sign both of them sooner for less and didn't. Now they're doing the opposite - with also bad results.
I don’t think that’s true about Caruso: https://www.silverscreenandroll.com...cago-bulls-luxury-tax-rob-pelinka-jeanie-buss
From the comments on that article:

"Once Nunn and THT were signed, there was zero chance of re-signing AC."

So it wasn't just Tucker, it was also Nunn that led the the Lakers not having room under the 2nd threshhold to sign Caruso. Whom they could have signed to an extension more cheaply a few years prior.
I guess what I’m saying is that at that time, there was no structural cba problem or downside to giving him the same contract as the bulls did. The team is the second most valuable in the league and was coming off of a championship with a star player who was aging out of being the best player on a championship team. And it was just to save money.

Didn’t necessarily mean to make this a big thing. It would aggravate me if I were a laker fan that they were unwilling to pay more in taxes to try to win another championship. But I’m not and they wouldn’t have won anyone since Lebron got hurt so :shrug:
No argument, it was definitely just to save money. Beyond that they made really bad choices about how to save money / who to save money on - they prioritized Nunn and Tucker (who they paid more money to than they offered Caruso) over Caruso. :loco:

And now they're making sort of the opposite types of bad decisions by handing out guaranteed contracts beyond the minimum necessary to all their unproven guys to try to avoid being in the situation they were in with Caruso. That's the point I was initially making. It's probably a better mistake to make than the Caruso one, but it's left them with very little roster flexibility as they're locked into guys like Max Lewis, Bronny, and Hood-Schifino (who was a mistake on multiple levels). Hooray, you've got your young cheap non-talent locked up!
The Nuggets and Lakers just love giving out unnecessary player options. Sometimes I get it (Christian Wood last year, Bruce Brown two years ago) to incentivize player that may have multiple teams pursuing them for similar money, but sometimes it makes zero ****ing sense (Reddish last year, Saric and Westbrook this year) - if that is what it is taking to get guys like that, let them find different homes.
 
GSW extends Moses Moody for 3/$39M. I haven't seen enough from him in games to justify it but the Warriors' braintrust know him much better.

It could be smart if he breaks out in his fourth season but it's basically MLE money.
 
GSW extends Moses Moody for 3/$39M. I haven't seen enough from him in games to justify it but the Warriors' braintrust know him much better.

It could be smart if he breaks out in his fourth season but it's basically MLE money.
It’s a pretty good move for the warriors even though Kerr doesn’t really seem to like him that much. Like you said, at the MLE, a quality rotation player on the wing who still has some more theoretical upside
 
GSW extends Moses Moody for 3/$39M. I haven't seen enough from him in games to justify it but the Warriors' braintrust know him much better.

It could be smart if he breaks out in his fourth season but it's basically MLE money.
I think he’s a rotation player and he got rotation player money. Seems fair.
 
I need a motivational speech from Kevin Garnett every Monday morning. That dude gets me fired up.

:lmao: at this story about Dirk calling Garnett the N word


At least the German link textbox makes sense for a Dirk story
 
Ok buckle up, here is what I’m thinking for the draft/auction with dice randomization. I’ll create a new thread where we can discuss the finer points more once I know enough people are interested in this format.

Who’d He Play For 24-25 NBA Draftauction

- 12 rounds to create one 12-man team for the upcoming 2024-25 NBA season

- Players are bucketed into one of eight buckets based on where they played prior to the NBA (we can discuss intricacies in the thread once up, but I tried to balance them out as much as I could based on some various media rankings for the season). Players are only eligible in one bucket.

- Everyone must take at least 1 and at most 2 players from each bucket.

- Everyone starts with a $1000 budget to determine draft order each round. You bid on your draft position before each round, highest bid goes first, lowest goes last. You must save enough left to have at least $1 remaining for all remaining rounds. Dollars only, no cents.

- Before bidding for draft position, I will roll a dice randomizer to determine which bucket we will be drafting from in the upcoming round, and also to make @Eephus happy. Once a bucket is rolled twice we will no longer draft from it.

- We’ll vote to see who has the best team after the draft and I can also throw everything into a Fantrax site to track the stats for us nerds who like to watch.

- Option 1 - we roll one bucket at a time and auction for draft order each round and do that 12 times.

- Option 2 - we roll for two buckets at a time and auction for the two-round order. Bidding is for the first of two rounds with a serpentine/reverse order for the second (last pick in the first round goes first in the second round). You can pick from either bucket first, but have to pick from both buckets in the two-round drafting. We do this six times until the 12- man rosters are filled.


Option 1 example - I roll the dice and we land on the ACC bucket. Everyone bids for draft order for that bucket and highest bid goes first. When that round is complete with only players from the ACC bucket drafted, we roll for the next round bucket and bid for the next round. Do this for 12 rounds.

Option 2 example - I roll the dice twice and we land on the ACC and PAC-12 buckets. Everyone bids for the first round, with the second round reverse order of the first. Highest bidder picks first in the first round and last in the second round. Only players from the ACC and PAC-12 buckets can be selected, and everyone has to take one player from each bucket, but you can choose which bucket you pick from first.

Easy as Pi?

Let me know if either of these options sounds good (we can vote once I set up the new thread for the draft/auction). I could simplify if needed but that would be lame.

🏀🎲💲:shrug:
 
Ok buckle up, here is what I’m thinking for the draft/auction with dice randomization. I’ll create a new thread where we can discuss the finer points more once I know enough people are interested in this format.

Who’d He Play For 24-25 NBA Draftauction

- 12 rounds to create one 12-man team for the upcoming 2024-25 NBA season

- Players are bucketed into one of eight buckets based on where they played prior to the NBA (we can discuss intricacies in the thread once up, but I tried to balance them out as much as I could based on some various media rankings for the season). Players are only eligible in one bucket.

- Everyone must take at least 1 and at most 2 players from each bucket.

- Everyone starts with a $1000 budget to determine draft order each round. You bid on your draft position before each round, highest bid goes first, lowest goes last. You must save enough left to have at least $1 remaining for all remaining rounds. Dollars only, no cents.

- Before bidding for draft position, I will roll a dice randomizer to determine which bucket we will be drafting from in the upcoming round, and also to make @Eephus happy. Once a bucket is rolled twice we will no longer draft from it.

- We’ll vote to see who has the best team after the draft and I can also throw everything into a Fantrax site to track the stats for us nerds who like to watch.

- Option 1 - we roll one bucket at a time and auction for draft order each round and do that 12 times.

- Option 2 - we roll for two buckets at a time and auction for the two-round order. Bidding is for the first of two rounds with a serpentine/reverse order for the second (last pick in the first round goes first in the second round). You can pick from either bucket first, but have to pick from both buckets in the two-round drafting. We do this six times until the 12- man rosters are filled.


Option 1 example - I roll the dice and we land on the ACC bucket. Everyone bids for draft order for that bucket and highest bid goes first. When that round is complete with only players from the ACC bucket drafted, we roll for the next round bucket and bid for the next round. Do this for 12 rounds.

Option 2 example - I roll the dice twice and we land on the ACC and PAC-12 buckets. Everyone bids for the first round, with the second round reverse order of the first. Highest bidder picks first in the first round and last in the second round. Only players from the ACC and PAC-12 buckets can be selected, and everyone has to take one player from each bucket, but you can choose which bucket you pick from first.

Easy as Pi?

Let me know if either of these options sounds good (we can vote once I set up the new thread for the draft/auction). I could simplify if needed but that would be lame.

🏀🎲💲:shrug:
I am in
 
Apparently everyone was waiting on moody in order to break the rookie extension logjam…

Murphy
The Bulls and Josh Giddey did not reach an extension. Giddey is looking for 30M a year. Murphy at 4 years/112M is 28 per year.

Maybe not such an excessive request from Giddey.
He's got A LOT to prove this season.

No shot I'd have given him 30/mil right now. He's shown to be a liability on both ends so far (w/o the ball and defensively). He's going to have every opportunity to stuff the stat sheet in Chicago. I still don't think that'll parlay to a $30m/yr long term deal unless he morphs into a player able to play off ball some and starts defending. He just turned 22 so I guess it's still possible. Even on a team with Lavine/Coby White/Buzelis/Vuc, he's going to have to play off ball some.

I am surprised how good Lonzo Ball looks so far after almost 3 years away from the court. He never relied on his athleticism but he definitely still looks like he belongs on an NBA court. He's looked very confident shooting from deep.
 
Last edited:
The Rockets are making a big commitment to their current roster.
They've got an embarrassment of riches of talent there. Just silly.

They're the first team I'm going to if I have a superstar and I'm looking to move to start a rebuild.

Yep, I worry they have so many good players but not enough great ones.

They're going to have to extend Jabari Smith this time next year which will push them into apronville.

If they're going to attract a star, I guess they can plug him into Van Vleet's slot in 26-27 but then they'll have to replace FVV. They have a bunch of draft picks to play with as well.
 
First, and most importantly, I'm in.

Second, Gordon opted in to his player option for next year ($23 million) and then signed what amounts to a 2+1 for about $104 million. I assume the reported 4/133 accounts for a trade kicker on the $104 million.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top