What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2024 College Football Thread: Ohio State advances to play unbeaten hypothetical SEC team (2 Viewers)

No one is coming off of their opinions, so quit the incessant whining.

I've seen some good discussion on both sides with opinions.

It may be just me, but I think discussion usually works best when the people don't drop down to accuse anyone with a different opinion as whining. :shrug:

Big difference in deserving and belonging. These teams def dont belong (proof is these last 2 crappy games) and its questionable that they deserve to be here.

Its only going to get worse. Clemson is going to lose by 3 tds to texas. Book it.
Hell miami was the best acc team and they didnt get in. They are better than smu and clemson. Stupid they didnt play each other.

I just want the 12 best teams that you know can compete for the title. Didnt get it this year for sure.
So you want arbitrary eye-test as the deciding factor in who make the playoff and not the ON THE FIELD RESULTS?
 
Despite the bitching and moaning, this format is wayyyy better than 2 or even 4 teams.

For sure. Definitely better to have more teams in.

End of season games like Oregon vs. Penn St and Texas vs. Georgia that would normally be gigantic games instead became essentially meaningless so we could watch some team that everyone knew was garbage get blown out by 5 touchdowns. Yay.

First round byes are essentially meaningless?

I mean, kinda of. I think "Bye week" might have put up a better fight againsit Oregon than SMU put up against Penn St. That game which normally would have been borderline Super Bowl atmosphere was just a friendly contest to see who got to have fun boatracing an out of place team this week. Completely different atmosphere.

College football was the one sport that had it right. It was like the playoffs were all season long. Now teams can slip up multiple times, do absolutely nothing impressive, the best games against the best teams mean little since both teams are getting in anyway, etc. Michigan has a down year but rallies to wreck Ohio State's championship hopes? Amazing! Except, nevermind, it was meaningless to those championship hopes.

All of the biggest regular season and historic regular season matchups down the drain so we can watch this dreck. It's so much worse.
 
Despite the bitching and moaning, this format is wayyyy better than 2 or even 4 teams.

For sure. Definitely better to have more teams in.

End of season games like Oregon vs. Penn St and Texas vs. Georgia that would normally be gigantic games instead became essentially meaningless so we could watch some team that everyone knew was garbage get blown out by 5 touchdowns. Yay.

First round byes are essentially meaningless?

I mean, kinda of. I think "Bye week" might have put up a better fight againsit Oregon than SMU put up against Penn St. That game which normally would have been borderline Super Bowl atmosphere was just a friendly contest to see who got to have fun boatracing an out of place team this week. Completely different atmosphere.

College football was the one sport that had it right. It was like the playoffs were all season long. Now teams can slip up multiple times, do absolutely nothing impressive, the best games against the best teams mean little since both teams are getting in anyway, etc. Michigan has a down year but rallies to wreck Ohio State's championship hopes? Amazing! Except, nevermind, it was meaningless to those championship hopes.

All of the biggest regular season and historic regular season matchups down the drain so we can watch this dreck. It's so much worse.
Yeah, if MIchigan doesn't beat Ohio State, then Ohio State has a chance at a B1G championship and the #1 overall seed. Instead, they play someone from the mighty SEC and then if they win have to play the #1 team. Beating Michigan would have guaranteed them the #5 seed and a Clemson/Arizona St path or #6 with an SMU/Boise path. You think that game is meaningless?

SMU fought just fine. The difference in the game was the QB not taking an easy first down early in the game and then throwing 3 interceptions that probably cost his team 21 points. When that happens, the scoreboard usually will get ugly against good teams. It did today.
 
Notre Dame added names to jerseys for last night.

This says they do it just for post season. Is that right?

Have they done it other times for post season?

 
Predictions for next two games?

I think Texas rolls Clemson. 2 touchdowns plus.

I don't have a good feel for my Vols tonight. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see an SMU like performance but who knows. I'd say Ohio State by 8.
 
Some of this is pretty sad. I haven't spent much time in the sports threads (thanks Dores for lighting that spark) here so this is an honest question. Do you also complain about the 1vs16 match ups in the bball tourney?

:confused: Where teams should be ranked/seeded is a popular topic here. Has been for 25 years. Not sure what is sad about that. Discussing this type of thing is pretty much what we do here.
Who do you think are the 12 best teams? I can't get anyone to answer this question.
Oregon, Ohio State, ND, and 9 SEC teams taken in any order honestly.
 
Predictions for next two games?

I think Texas rolls Clemson. 2 touchdowns plus.

I don't have a good feel for my Vols tonight. I wouldn't be at all surprised to see an SMU like performance but who knows. I'd say Ohio State by 8.
Texas 24
Clemson 21

Tennessee 20
Ohio State 17
 
If Texas wins then SEC honks use that as more ammo that SEC should have everyone in the playoffs. If Clemson wins then the SEC honks say they are really a BIG 12 team and got lucky to get in.

Maybe you know some "SEC Honks" that I don't know. Not sure what that even means. I live in Knoxville so I think I understand SEC a little. Everyone I know, SEC fan or not, thinks Texas is an elite team. :shrug:
 
If Texas wins then SEC honks use that as more ammo that SEC should have everyone in the playoffs. If Clemson wins then the SEC honks say they are really a BIG 12 team and got lucky to get in.

Maybe you know some "SEC Honks" that I don't know. Not sure what that even means. I live in Knoxville so I think I understand SEC a little. Everyone I know, SEC fan or not, thinks Texas is an elite team. :shrug:
Thinking Texas is elite has absolutely nothing to do what WVU posted
 
Lot of takes on here, but...sure seems to me like WAY more games mattered this year. Not fewer.

That Bama OU game makes one. Every South Carolina game the second half of the season. The ACC title game. tOSU Michigan. Every OU game from the first loss until the 4th loss. Every A&M game until the second conference loss. Every Boise St and UNLV and BYU and ASU game.

Prior years if OU lost once I was less interested and if they lost twice I kinda stopped watching altogether.
 
Ok dumb question I never have understood...when they show a stat like: 11 Sacks and 19 TFL, are the sacks included in the 19 TFL or is it 19 MORE plus the sacks? I've assumed the former, but maybe I'm wrong?
 
Some of this is pretty sad. I haven't spent much time in the sports threads (thanks Dores for lighting that spark) here so this is an honest question. Do you also complain about the 1vs16 match ups in the bball tourney?

:confused: Where teams should be ranked/seeded is a popular topic here. Has been for 25 years. Not sure what is sad about that. Discussing this type of thing is pretty much what we do here.
Who do you think are the 12 best teams? I can't get anyone to answer this question.
Oregon, Ohio State, ND, and 9 SEC teams taken in any order honestly.
That’s ridiculous.

It should just be the SEC
 
If Texas wins then SEC honks use that as more ammo that SEC should have everyone in the playoffs. If Clemson wins then the SEC honks say they are really a BIG 12 team and got lucky to get in.

Maybe you know some "SEC Honks" that I don't know. Not sure what that even means. I live in Knoxville so I think I understand SEC a little. Everyone I know, SEC fan or not, thinks Texas is an elite team. :shrug:
**ahem**
Some of this is pretty sad. I haven't spent much time in the sports threads (thanks Dores for lighting that spark) here so this is an honest question. Do you also complain about the 1vs16 match ups in the bball tourney?

:confused: Where teams should be ranked/seeded is a popular topic here. Has been for 25 years. Not sure what is sad about that. Discussing this type of thing is pretty much what we do here.
Who do you think are the 12 best teams? I can't get anyone to answer this question.
Oregon, Ohio State, ND, and 9 SEC teams taken in any order honestly.
 
Another dud. FCS was much better. And the Final will be great, too.

Montana State and South Dakota State are a combined 28-2 and play their butts off, it's good stuff.
FCS Round of 16 scores were:

49-17
34-13
42-10
42-31
35-18
13-6
17-10
51-31

The semi-finals were:
52-19
35-21
55-14
31-7

They have a clear top 4 and everyone else in that division too.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top