5-ish Finkle
Footballguy
I’m shocked we haven’t addressed oline depth at all in free agency or the draft.
Yeah, sort of nuts.
I’m shocked we haven’t addressed oline depth at all in free agency or the draft.
Are there any vet free agents left? They should have kept Herbig considering his versatility.I’m shocked we haven’t addressed oline depth at all in free agency or the draft.
Yeah, sort of nuts.
Are there any vet free agents left? They should have kept Herbig considering his versatility.I’m shocked we haven’t addressed oline depth at all in free agency or the draft.
Yeah, sort of nuts.
I like the Sawyer pick, as a player, and we always grab an edge and depth there is important for our D, but I probably preferred a DB or oline there — though I don’t recall who was available.
Are there any vet free agents left? They should have kept Herbig considering his versatility.I’m shocked we haven’t addressed oline depth at all in free agency or the draft.
Yeah, sort of nuts.
I like the Sawyer pick, as a player, and we always grab an edge and depth there is important for our D, but I probably preferred a DB or oline there — though I don’t recall who was available.
OL over either throwaway pick in the 7th seemed sensible.
I know Jalen Travis went a few picks after Sawyer, but cant recall specifically who else was around either.
Are there any vet free agents left? They should have kept Herbig considering his versatility.I’m shocked we haven’t addressed oline depth at all in free agency or the draft.
Yeah, sort of nuts.
I like the Sawyer pick, as a player, and we always grab an edge and depth there is important for our D, but I probably preferred a DB or oline there — though I don’t recall who was available.
OL over either throwaway pick in the 7th seemed sensible.
I know Jalen Travis went a few picks after Sawyer, but cant recall specifically who else was around either.
maybe bruener is a special teams ace and others in that spot would not make the team any way
I see a few places had him as a 3rd round projected pick.Steelers signed Sebastian Castro, S, Iowa, as UFDA. 5'11'' 203 lbs. Was once a LB.
I think they still need help at NTSteelers anticipated to cut Adams after drafting 2 DL.
They just drafted a 340lb DT.I think they still need help at NTSteelers anticipated to cut Adams after drafting 2 DL.
He plays way to high to be a noseThey just drafted a 340lb DT.I think they still need help at NTSteelers anticipated to cut Adams after drafting 2 DL.
I really hope he doesn't make the team. He is a guy I have always thought was underrated, but completely washed at this point.We’re signing Robert Woods for a year according to Rap on Twitter.
OkHe plays way to high to be a noseThey just drafted a 340lb DT.I think they still need help at NTSteelers anticipated to cut Adams after drafting 2 DL.
Black played entirely B gap (more) and A gap (less), never C or D gap that I'm aware of. He'd need to drop weight to play on the end of the line. And if he plays much/at all he'll be in on running down only as his pass rush skills leave a lot to be desired. However, it sounds like Dunbar is pushing Benton as the primary NT for now, and will kick him outside on obvious passing downs.Black's probably my "least favorite" pick this year, for sure (not counting any 7th rounders. Those guys are just absolute darts by that point, usually). He should still be a rotational piece vs. the run, but expecting him to be air-lifted into the center of the defense and immediately solve their run defense woes? Ehhhh.....nah. He was a 5th rounder for a reason. I still really like that they double dipped at the spot, and he has a couple things that might let him develop with the right coaching.
I don't think it was an accident that they announced him as a DE when they made the pick. His length and his wingspan might allow him to be a really, really solid run defending 5T or 3T for them in obvious running situations: Set the edge, keep the Highsmiths/Watts/Herbigs clean to run to the football. Kick inside next to Cam in "big boy" sets with Harmon and Benton at 5 and 3.
They've sorta tried this before, though, and it didn't really work. Guess we'll see.
ESPN’s Peter Schrager reports Aaron Rodgers “has no timetable” to sign for the 2025 season.
Schrager said Rodgers has told teams — including the Giants and Steelers — that they should feel free to move on in their quarterback search if Rodgers’ timetable doesn’t fit theirs. Rodgers, 41, told ESPN’s Pat McAfee this month that he was dealing with personal issues and indicated he was in no hurry to sign with the team for 2025. The Steelers could enter the summer with Mason Rudolph and rookie QB Will Howard atop their quarterback depth chart.
*****************************************************************
Ok folks seriously what is going on here? Do the Steelers even have a plan at QB?
Rodgers is and always has been Plan A.Ok folks seriously what is going on here? Do the Steelers even have a plan at QB?
The real question to me is not if they have a plan, it's what is Plan B if what they think based on their conversations with Rodgers don't transpire the way they think it will?
I don't think Mason alone is Plan B. Part of it maybe, but not THE plan.The real question to me is not if they have a plan, it's what is Plan B if what they think based on their conversations with Rodgers don't transpire the way they think it will?
This part's easy. "Plan B" is Mason.
Sure, there's been mumbles about taking the temperature on a Cousins trade/etc. I don't really buy any of that though. I think they'll just go with Mason and let the chips fall If Rodgers were to jilt them.
Of course, they'd want a 4th QB at least for camp, certainly. So, if that "B+" portion of the plan is what you're really talking about...that, gentle reader, is when Lauren Tannehill will get the phone call from Omar/Artie asking after her availability (oh, and could she maybe see to it to bring her husband along to Pittsburgh for a chat. There may be something he could do for them).![]()
Yeah I've been operating under the assumption all offseason that Rodgers is their only plan. And I'm starting to doubt if he really signs. But I would really love to see it for Metcalf and Pickens. I think Freiermuth is maybe criminally undervalued right now for 2025 if he does sign. I just find it hard to believe they're gonna roll with Rudolph if it comes to it.Rodgers is and always has been Plan A.Ok folks seriously what is going on here? Do the Steelers even have a plan at QB?
Schrager may be plugged in, especially with McVay and anyone who worked under him the last few years, but he does not know all. Even this report is kind of silly to me to mention the Giants who obviously moved on a long time ago IMO.
I believe the other reporting that's been done that Steelers checked in with him a few days before the draft and have every reason to feel confident he will be joining them.
The real question to me is not if they have a plan, it's what is Plan B if what they think based on their conversations with Rodgers don't transpire the way they think it will? I'm sure they do and it might not be an attractive plan but I don't think not addressing it early in the draft was a concern of theirs as I get a sense they did not view any QB they could draft as a significant upgrade on Rudolph for 2025.
I'll just tell you I've been drafting for awhile now on assumption Rodgers signs and from what I've been seeing all 3 of those players are good value/underrated because I believe people are to scared of the QB situation.Yeah I've been operating under the assumption all offseason that Rodgers is their only plan. And I'm starting to doubt if he really signs. But I would really love to see it for Metcalf and Pickens. I think Freiermuth is maybe criminally undervalued right now for 2025 if he does sign. I just find it hard to believe they're gonna roll with Rudolph if it comes to it.Rodgers is and always has been Plan A.Ok folks seriously what is going on here? Do the Steelers even have a plan at QB?
Schrager may be plugged in, especially with McVay and anyone who worked under him the last few years, but he does not know all. Even this report is kind of silly to me to mention the Giants who obviously moved on a long time ago IMO.
I believe the other reporting that's been done that Steelers checked in with him a few days before the draft and have every reason to feel confident he will be joining them.
The real question to me is not if they have a plan, it's what is Plan B if what they think based on their conversations with Rodgers don't transpire the way they think it will? I'm sure they do and it might not be an attractive plan but I don't think not addressing it early in the draft was a concern of theirs as I get a sense they did not view any QB they could draft as a significant upgrade on Rudolph for 2025.
yeah same hereI'll just tell you I've been drafting for awhile now on assumption Rodgers signs and from what I've been seeing all 3 of those players are good value/underrated because I believe people are to scared of the QB situation.Yeah I've been operating under the assumption all offseason that Rodgers is their only plan. And I'm starting to doubt if he really signs. But I would really love to see it for Metcalf and Pickens. I think Freiermuth is maybe criminally undervalued right now for 2025 if he does sign. I just find it hard to believe they're gonna roll with Rudolph if it comes to it.Rodgers is and always has been Plan A.Ok folks seriously what is going on here? Do the Steelers even have a plan at QB?
Schrager may be plugged in, especially with McVay and anyone who worked under him the last few years, but he does not know all. Even this report is kind of silly to me to mention the Giants who obviously moved on a long time ago IMO.
I believe the other reporting that's been done that Steelers checked in with him a few days before the draft and have every reason to feel confident he will be joining them.
The real question to me is not if they have a plan, it's what is Plan B if what they think based on their conversations with Rodgers don't transpire the way they think it will? I'm sure they do and it might not be an attractive plan but I don't think not addressing it early in the draft was a concern of theirs as I get a sense they did not view any QB they could draft as a significant upgrade on Rudolph for 2025.
So we got a chance of picking up Kenny Pickett. Hot damnKirk Cousins is probably plan b and one of the Browns cast offs competing with Rudolph is plan c
At least it won’t cost a 1st this time.So we got a chance of picking up Kenny Pickett. Hot damnKirk Cousins is probably plan b and one of the Browns cast offs competing with Rudolph is plan c
Steelers have coaches.He plays way to high to be a noseThey just drafted a 340lb DT.I think they still need help at NTSteelers anticipated to cut Adams after drafting 2 DL.
By win now, do you mean super bowl, cause yes, I agree. But if you mean 10-7 and making playoffs, I cant agree. This team is pretty talented, TBH, upgraded WR and RB, get a 1st and 3rd rd pick from last year back into the fold, and built up the DL and added a crafty vet CB The only hole is QB. Many teams have depth issues. You think the Bills and their WR crew is crying about winning? Nope. On paper, this should be a solid team than will go nose to nose with the Ravens and Bengals again this year. Rodgers gives them a better chance to win more games this year, but they arent winning an AFC title or super bowl. But they are never going to tank a season on purpose. They have 11 picks in 7 rds next year in the draft and cap space to spend, that is their rebuild.Can we all agree that the Steelers should not be in win now mode? The bottom line is that they don’t have the QB that can take them over the hump. There are no available QBs (Rodgers, Cousins, etc) that will take them over the hump. Given that, I see no problem going with Rudolph this year and trying to address the QB gap next year in the draft. They need to have a bad year to improve their long term outlook.![]()
I disagree. If the line is healthy and meets their potential and Rodgers stays off of the ground, I think the team is competitive.Can we all agree that the Steelers should not be in win now mode? The bottom line is that they don’t have the QB that can take them over the hump. There are no available QBs (Rodgers, Cousins, etc) that will take them over the hump. Given that, I see no problem going with Rudolph this year and trying to address the QB gap next year in the draft. They need to have a bad year to improve their long term outlook.![]()
I disagree. If the line is healthy and meets their potential and Rodgers stays off of the ground, I think the team is competitive.Can we all agree that the Steelers should not be in win now mode? The bottom line is that they don’t have the QB that can take them over the hump. There are no available QBs (Rodgers, Cousins, etc) that will take them over the hump. Given that, I see no problem going with Rudolph this year and trying to address the QB gap next year in the draft. They need to have a bad year to improve their long term outlook.![]()
For me, the goal is to assemble a team that can win a Super Bowl. I don’t believe this team with Rodgers can do that. If you do believe that, then we just agree to disagree. I don’t really care about “competitive” when it inevitably results in just missing the playoffs or a 1st round exit (and subsequent draft pick in the early 20s. Aren’t we tired of this story. I would be ok with them stinking it up with Rudolph if it sets them up for the future.I disagree. If the line is healthy and meets their potential and Rodgers stays off of the ground, I think the team is competitive.Can we all agree that the Steelers should not be in win now mode? The bottom line is that they don’t have the QB that can take them over the hump. There are no available QBs (Rodgers, Cousins, etc) that will take them over the hump. Given that, I see no problem going with Rudolph this year and trying to address the QB gap next year in the draft. They need to have a bad year to improve their long term outlook.![]()
This is a fanciful idea IMO that is not rooted in NFL reality for how teams operate and surely not one where most of your elite or better core players are older.The best thing for the Steelers going forward for the next 5+ years would be for them to relatively bottom out next season and go 4-13 or 5-12.
Agreed.This is a fanciful idea IMO that is not rooted in NFL reality for how teams operate and surely not one where most of your elite or better core players are older.The best thing for the Steelers going forward for the next 5+ years would be for them to relatively bottom out next season and go 4-13 or 5-12.
This is not Madden franchise mode.