50 topics on a page vs 25 (1 Viewer)

[Joe Bryant]

Better?

 

[ShamrockPride]

I'll take a bit more scrolling than a bit more clicking. Having to load the next page of topics takes more time, so less is more with regard to that.

 

[Epic Problem]

50

 

[Kanil]

Better... Make it 250, imo.

Edit: Or even better, time based.  Any topic with a post in the last 24 hours = front page.

 

[rockaction]

I'm with Epic on this. I vote for 50.

I think?   

 

[dino259]

was it always 50?  If so keep it as day one.

 

[tommyboy]

51 would be better

 

[Epic Problem]

was it always 50?  If so keep it as day one.

It was 50 until last upgrade. Since then its been 25. 

 

[El Floppo]

51 would be better

yeah... that's what I used to think.

but 53 is money.

 

[rockaction]

I get the weird feeling I'm going to get a lot of "I'm confused" reactions on my postings. Hmm...

 

[El Floppo]

I get the weird feeling I'm going to get a lot of "I'm confused" reactions on my postings. Hmm...

I don't even know what this means... so take that as a yes.

 

[tommyboy]

yeah... that's what I used to think.

but 53 is money.

I would like this if the mobile version let me.   Until then you have my everlasting respect and admiration

 

[rockaction]

I don't even know what this means... so take that as a yes.

It's a new feature on desktop, at least. 

Don't worry. I still "like" you. 

Aww...

Still, new Savages and Meredith Graves and Zinner? Sounds like Beast Mode, FF-style.

eta* cosjobs, just from another thread about music. Floppo had pointed out a new supergroup, and it interested me.   

 

[rockaction]

Oh, wrong thread. 

Today was a good day...footsteps in the dark, backtracking

 

[James Daulton]

MUCH

 

[Angry Beavers]

50 - more scoll, less click

HTH

 

[Dedfin]

53, I prefer prime numbers

 

[Dedfin]

yeah... that's what I used to think.

but 53 is money.

 

[UOFI_316]

220, 221, whatever it takes.

 

[Van Dyman]

What happened around here? Stuff looks weird and I had to opt out of daily emails again. The images for Like, Thanks, Haha, Confused, and Sad are all messed up.

 

[gianmarco]

220, 221, whatever it takes.

Damn you.

I was about to make the 50, 51, whatever it takes joke.

 

[ChiefD]

I would turn it up to 11.

 

[JoeSteeler]

these results are like a Massillon High School football score

 

[Insein]

Think of all the room in the shark pool now!

 

[Chemical X]

there should only be 1 page, just a perpetual page......like a run on sentence.  

 

[apalmer]

there should only be 1 page, just a perpetual page......like a run on sentence.  

But then you'd have to take it to the bank, bromingo

 

[Capella]

Don’t see many poll routs like this. 

 

[AhrnCityPahnder]

YAY 50.   

The cynic in me always thought the move to 25 was to drive up pageloads for advertising revenue.

 

[Joe Bryant]

YAY 50.   

The cynic in me always thought the move to 25 was to drive up pageloads for advertising revenue.

I'm not that smart.

25 is a performance thing. Page loads faster. But we've made some changes and it seems like 50 loads just as fast. I like it much better. 

 

[El Floppo]

Great. Now my thumb hurts from all this scrolling with so many threads.

 

[Dan Lambskin]

?‍ 

 

[Mrs. Rannous]

This is pretty hard to read.  The pale grey on white for the 'like' button is wrong, as is the slide out whatever that is.

 

[Mrs. Rannous]

How is the search function doing?

 

[GregR]

How is the search function doing?

I was able to find Man in the High Castle posts searching for "high castle".  So good so far.

 

[AhrnCityPahnder]

But we've made some changes and it seems like 50 loads just as fast. I like it much better. 

Yep, I do too.  Good stuff.  

 

[Insein]

Great. Now my thumb hurts from all this scrolling with so many threads.

Where's the "suck it up, Nancy" reaction?

 

[Brony]

this is pretty great.  thank you. 

Can we fire up a vote on embedded pics or video? 

 

[NotSmart]

Where's the "suck it up, Nancy" reaction?

I think it's this one

?

 

[Binky The Doormat]

who can possibly not like 50 per page??

 

[SWC]

Great. Now my thumb hurts from all this scrolling with so many threads.

why would your thumb hurt i think you are using your mouse wrong el guappo take that to the bank brochacho 

 

[NotSmart]

why would your thumb hurt i think you are using your mouse wrong el guappo take that to the bank brochacho 

Exhibit A

 

[SWC]

why would your thumb hurt i think you are using your mouse wrong el guappo take that to the bank brochacho 

Exhibit A

i dont go in for the foreign stuff brohan i like my mouse like i like my cars made in america and with a hemi take that to the bank brohan

 

[[icon]]

there should only be 1 page, just a perpetual page......like a run on sentence.  

This. 

#neverendingstory 

 

[[icon]]

Exhibit A

New game:

__ computer peripheral. 

__ sex toy 

 

[BroncoFreak_2K3]

69

 

[Despyzer]

this is pretty great.  thank you. 

Can we fire up a vote on embedded pics or video? 

... and bring back the Test Forum? No vote, just bring it back.

 

[NotSmart]

69

Nice.

 

[Ignoramus]

I'll take a bit more scrolling than a bit more clicking. Having to load the next page of topics takes more time, so less is more with regard to that.

It's the same amount of scrolling to peruse 50 topic titles whether they're on one page of 50 or two pages of 25.

 

[ShamrockPride]

It's the same amount of scrolling to peruse 50 topic titles whether they're on one page of 50 or two pages of 25.

Correct, but I've noticed sometimes when clicking to the next page the little loading wheel gets hung up for a bit on occasion. So needing to do that less makes it all slightly quicker.

 

[Despyzer]

It's the same amount of scrolling to peruse 50 topic titles whether they're on one page of 50 or two pages of 25.

If we're going to get technical, there would be less scrolling with 25 because you wouldn't have to scroll to see the first entries on the second page.