What a #######. I hope this shtick costs this guy 7 figures.
Tigran Petrosian said:Well, I get that they figured the 6 year old was the only one plausibly small enough to be lifted by this mylar balloon (actually not, but regardless), so they had him hide and claimed he was carried off. The problem is that Falcon wasn't ready for prime time. He fumbled. They should have gone with Bradford. He was the only one not writhing around awaiting his next ritalin dose.
YOU ALWAYS START YOUR STUDS.![]()
so waitthe family did this countdown
What the hell is 'hip hip'?A portrait is emerging of a publicity-seeking man who fled California with unsettled financial affairs and whose recent colorful past includes an appearance on ABC's "Wife Swap," a series of unusual inventions and a self-produced hip-hip video.
To get his accidentally released balloon back for free?It is going to come out that this is a hoax............
ETA why else would the Dad have called the media?
Can someone explain to me what the intended purpose of the balloon is? Why was the father launching it in the first place?
Heene, a former weatherman, said he built the 20-foot-long, dome-shaped aircraft for commuter travel."We were working on an experimental craft -- I call it the 3D LAV, a low-altitude vehicle for people to pull out of their garage and hover above traffic for about 50 to100 feet," Heene said later. "It's still the very early stages of the invention."
"Hip hip" is bad hip hop.What the hell is 'hip hip'?A portrait is emerging of a publicity-seeking man who fled California with unsettled financial affairs and whose recent colorful past includes an appearance on ABC's "Wife Swap," a series of unusual inventions and a self-produced hip-hip video.Is Fox News really that distanced from black culture or is there a new brand of hip hop called hip hip I didn't know about?
Pretty sure they said it was intended to hover about 20 feet... I've heard two stories. one that it was intended to perhaps go into the eye of a storm to collect data, and the other says that he thought it might prove to be an alternative to cars - he said people could just hover to work 50 feet or so above the ground.Just heard confirmation that this ##### called 9 News here in Colorado to report the incident BEFORE calling the police.Can someone explain to me what the intended purpose of the balloon is? Why was the father launching it in the first place?Heene, a former weatherman, said he built the 20-foot-long, dome-shaped aircraft for commuter travel."We were working on an experimental craft -- I call it the 3D LAV, a low-altitude vehicle for people to pull out of their garage and hover above traffic for about 50 to100 feet," Heene said later. "It's still the very early stages of the invention."
Agreed. And their money and their freedom.these people should lose their kids
Do you think the Dad threw-up when he saw the rescue crew attack the balloon with shovels?To get his accidentally released balloon back for free?It is going to come out that this is a hoax............
ETA why else would the Dad have called the media?![]()
link?Pretty sure they said it was intended to hover about 20 feet... I've heard two stories. one that it was intended to perhaps go into the eye of a storm to collect data, and the other says that he thought it might prove to be an alternative to cars - he said people could just hover to work 50 feet or so above the ground.Just heard confirmation that this ##### called 9 News here in Colorado to report the incident BEFORE calling the police.Can someone explain to me what the intended purpose of the balloon is? Why was the father launching it in the first place?Heene, a former weatherman, said he built the 20-foot-long, dome-shaped aircraft for commuter travel.
"We were working on an experimental craft -- I call it the 3D LAV, a low-altitude vehicle for people to pull out of their garage and hover above traffic for about 50 to100 feet," Heene said later. "It's still the very early stages of the invention."
Do you think the Dad threw-up when he saw the rescue crew attack the balloon with shovels?To get his accidentally released balloon back for free?It is going to come out that this is a hoax............
ETA why else would the Dad have called the media?![]()
No link... Ed Chultz, on AM 760 Air America Radio, said that is what is being reported now. I guess it's not confirmation per se, but figured it was worth noting.link?Pretty sure they said it was intended to hover about 20 feet... I've heard two stories. one that it was intended to perhaps go into the eye of a storm to collect data, and the other says that he thought it might prove to be an alternative to cars - he said people could just hover to work 50 feet or so above the ground.Just heard confirmation that this ##### called 9 News here in Colorado to report the incident BEFORE calling the police.Can someone explain to me what the intended purpose of the balloon is? Why was the father launching it in the first place?Heene, a former weatherman, said he built the 20-foot-long, dome-shaped aircraft for commuter travel.
"We were working on an experimental craft -- I call it the 3D LAV, a low-altitude vehicle for people to pull out of their garage and hover above traffic for about 50 to100 feet," Heene said later. "It's still the very early stages of the invention."
and genitalsdo not forget genitalsAgreed. And their money and their freedom.these people should lose their kids
Bill Paxton. I can see the resemblance to Bill Pullman with the kind of squinty eyes. I don't think he looks like Bill Paxton.This whole story paves the way for "Twister 2". The guy even looks like Bill Pullman.
Link - when you get it.No link... Ed Chultz, on AM 760 Air America Radio, said that is what is being reported now. I guess it's not confirmation per se, but figured it was worth noting.link?Pretty sure they said it was intended to hover about 20 feet... I've heard two stories. one that it was intended to perhaps go into the eye of a storm to collect data, and the other says that he thought it might prove to be an alternative to cars - he said people could just hover to work 50 feet or so above the ground.Just heard confirmation that this ##### called 9 News here in Colorado to report the incident BEFORE calling the police.Heene, a former weatherman, said he built the 20-foot-long, dome-shaped aircraft for commuter travel.
"We were working on an experimental craft -- I call it the 3D LAV, a low-altitude vehicle for people to pull out of their garage and hover above traffic for about 50 to100 feet," Heene said later. "It's still the very early stages of the invention."
everyone wants a piece of that Wife Swap money.Obviously a ploy by the family to get a "reality show". Hopefully it fails.Don't lump me in with the ridiculous "take their kids away" or "send the parents to jail" crowd, but this family should certainly be fined a significant % of the costs of the "rescue" mission.
I'm not sure why, but this made me burst out laughing.Hip-hip.What the hell is 'hip hip'?A portrait is emerging of a publicity-seeking man who fled California with unsettled financial affairs and whose recent colorful past includes an appearance on ABC's "Wife Swap," a series of unusual inventions and a self-produced hip-hip video.Is Fox News really that distanced from black culture or is there a new brand of hip hop called hip hip I didn't know about?
everyone wants a piece of that Wife Swap money.Obviously a ploy by the family to get a "reality show". Hopefully it fails.Don't lump me in with the ridiculous "take their kids away" or "send the parents to jail" crowd, but this family should certainly be fined a significant % of the costs of the "rescue" mission.
I'm not sure why, but this made me burst out laughing.Hip-hip.What the hell is 'hip hip'?A portrait is emerging of a publicity-seeking man who fled California with unsettled financial affairs and whose recent colorful past includes an appearance on ABC's "Wife Swap," a series of unusual inventions and a self-produced hip-hip video.Is Fox News really that distanced from black culture or is there a new brand of hip hop called hip hip I didn't know about?
![]()
He will have his personal aircraft with him and just fly away.Hope the dad feels real proud when Jimbo, Dolph and Kearney are beating the #### out of balloon boy in the schoolyard next week.
There was zero skepticism until the balloon was empty. This is a farce.TobiasFunke said:Howard Kurtz doesn't find much fault with news networks on this one.
Gotta admit, I kind of agree with him here. The blame for the hysteria seems like it may well lie with the cops, who appear to have taken something that was a slight possibility and treated it as a fact when relaying information to the media.
Of course, I wasn't watching CNN/MSNBC/Fox News at the time, so I can't really say for sure. Curious what those who were watching think. To the extent they played it up, was that just a function of living in a world with multiple 24 hour news stations and other sources? What could they have done differently?
Well Heene and his wife did meet in acting class while both were aspiring actors in California. His emotion is way too forced and awkward. I think when he gets choked up, he is forcing himself to imagine a week or two from now when all the cameras are gone and he's left footing the bill.Just watched the morning spot. I think I may be becoming a believer. Either that or Heene took acting lessons in his sleep.
This is starting to really affect these kids. Enough of him being trotted out in front of the media.K-funk said:Here it is.Wild Young Billy said:Did anyone just see the kid barf on-air during the interview on the Today Show?![]()
Painting LOOK AT ME on the side was a little too obvious.Can someone explain to me what the intended purpose of the balloon is? Why was the father launching it in the first place?
Are you referring to the 911 call?The video linked in the Fox story is just more proof that this dad is an attention hound.
It's not time to zig when others are zagging. Not yet.Just watched the morning spot. I think I may be becoming a believer. Either that or Heene took acting lessons in his sleep.
Did the hosts/anchors give the caveat that "police are reporting XYZ" or "we're being told XYZ"? If so, I don't think the problem lies with the media. If the authorities had no skepticism there was no reason for the media to have any, at least not until they'd had a decent amount of time to sit back and consider things. It's my understanding (and the times on this thread back me up) that they never really had that kind of time.When police tell the media something, the media run with it as told for hours and maybe days. 24 hour news stations require this- they can't wait until they can get independent verification and expert analysis, or they will be hours behind the times, and if that's the case, they might as well not exist.There was zero skepticism until the balloon was empty. This is a farce.TobiasFunke said:Howard Kurtz doesn't find much fault with news networks on this one.
Gotta admit, I kind of agree with him here. The blame for the hysteria seems like it may well lie with the cops, who appear to have taken something that was a slight possibility and treated it as a fact when relaying information to the media.
Of course, I wasn't watching CNN/MSNBC/Fox News at the time, so I can't really say for sure. Curious what those who were watching think. To the extent they played it up, was that just a function of living in a world with multiple 24 hour news stations and other sources? What could they have done differently?
That thing can barely support its own weight.
Thought the timing was perfect.At some point we have to ask ourselves: "What if this happened to my child?"It's not time to zig when others are zagging. Not yet.Just watched the morning spot. I think I may be becoming a believer. Either that or Heene took acting lessons in his sleep.
Honestly, it makes no difference. This didn't pass the smell test from moment one. If the authorities can't sleuth this out given simple observable facts, there's no reason to propagate the misconception.You're forgetting that this went on for hours. In the immediate moments, it was very confusing as to what to think. There was no real information or analysis. What gets me is that no one seems to have realized that this guy was a known loon and that Occam's Razor pointed to it being a hoax with the kid hiding at the behest of his family. If the cops couldn't discern that, the media really should have stepped up. Instead, they were reporting, as they always do, unsubstantiated claims. Hell, CNN must've called this a hot-air balloon two dozen times.Did the hosts/anchors give the caveat that "police are reporting XYZ" or "we're being told XYZ"? If so, I don't think the problem lies with the media. If the authorities had no skepticism there was no reason for the media to have any, at least not until they'd had a decent amount of time to sit back and consider things. It's my understanding (and the times on this thread back me up) that they never really had that kind of time.When police tell the media something, the media run with it as told for hours and maybe days. 24 hour news stations require this- they can't wait until they can get independent verification and expert analysis, or they will be hours behind the times, and if that's the case, they might as well not exist.There was zero skepticism until the balloon was empty. This is a farce.TobiasFunke said:Howard Kurtz doesn't find much fault with news networks on this one.
Gotta admit, I kind of agree with him here. The blame for the hysteria seems like it may well lie with the cops, who appear to have taken something that was a slight possibility and treated it as a fact when relaying information to the media.
Of course, I wasn't watching CNN/MSNBC/Fox News at the time, so I can't really say for sure. Curious what those who were watching think. To the extent they played it up, was that just a function of living in a world with multiple 24 hour news stations and other sources? What could they have done differently?
Which one: trapped in a runaway balloon, or being manipulated by his parents for attention?Thought the timing was perfect.At some point we have to ask ourselves: "What if this happened to my child?"It's not time to zig when others are zagging. Not yet.Just watched the morning spot. I think I may be becoming a believer. Either that or Heene took acting lessons in his sleep.
shouldn't your derision, then, weigh much heavier on the armed forces and the FAA then on the media? They had blackhawks scrambled, they diverted air traffic, they had high paid people trying to come up with a rescue plan for something that shuld not have passed their smell test.All the networks did is show people a balloonHonestly, it makes no difference. This didn't pass the smell test from moment one. If the authorities can't sleuth this out given simple observable facts, there's no reason to propagate the misconception.You're forgetting that this went on for hours. In the immediate moments, it was very confusing as to what to think. There was no real information or analysis. What gets me is that no one seems to have realized that this guy was a known loon and that Occam's Razor pointed to it being a hoax with the kid hiding at the behest of his family. If the cops couldn't discern that, the media really should have stepped up. Instead, they were reporting, as they always do, unsubstantiated claims. Hell, CNN must've called this a hot-air balloon two dozen times.Did the hosts/anchors give the caveat that "police are reporting XYZ" or "we're being told XYZ"? If so, I don't think the problem lies with the media. If the authorities had no skepticism there was no reason for the media to have any, at least not until they'd had a decent amount of time to sit back and consider things. It's my understanding (and the times on this thread back me up) that they never really had that kind of time.When police tell the media something, the media run with it as told for hours and maybe days. 24 hour news stations require this- they can't wait until they can get independent verification and expert analysis, or they will be hours behind the times, and if that's the case, they might as well not exist.There was zero skepticism until the balloon was empty. This is a farce.TobiasFunke said:Howard Kurtz doesn't find much fault with news networks on this one.
Gotta admit, I kind of agree with him here. The blame for the hysteria seems like it may well lie with the cops, who appear to have taken something that was a slight possibility and treated it as a fact when relaying information to the media.
Of course, I wasn't watching CNN/MSNBC/Fox News at the time, so I can't really say for sure. Curious what those who were watching think. To the extent they played it up, was that just a function of living in a world with multiple 24 hour news stations and other sources? What could they have done differently?
Did it go on for hours? I was under the impression that it was over in a matter of two hours or so. Hardly enough time to contact experts for their analysis, formulate a theory that the cops had no idea what they were talking about, and then come on the air and question the appropriate authorities. That is simply not the role of the 24-hours news stations in my opinion. They have to report when they are told and what they can immediately observe and deduce. I don't think we want them coming up with their own theories. There's a reason that investigative journalism reports take weeks and months to compile.Honestly, it makes no difference. This didn't pass the smell test from moment one. If the authorities can't sleuth this out given simple observable facts, there's no reason to propagate the misconception.You're forgetting that this went on for hours. In the immediate moments, it was very confusing as to what to think. There was no real information or analysis. What gets me is that no one seems to have realized that this guy was a known loon and that Occam's Razor pointed to it being a hoax with the kid hiding at the behest of his family. If the cops couldn't discern that, the media really should have stepped up. Instead, they were reporting, as they always do, unsubstantiated claims. Hell, CNN must've called this a hot-air balloon two dozen times.Did the hosts/anchors give the caveat that "police are reporting XYZ" or "we're being told XYZ"? If so, I don't think the problem lies with the media. If the authorities had no skepticism there was no reason for the media to have any, at least not until they'd had a decent amount of time to sit back and consider things. It's my understanding (and the times on this thread back me up) that they never really had that kind of time.When police tell the media something, the media run with it as told for hours and maybe days. 24 hour news stations require this- they can't wait until they can get independent verification and expert analysis, or they will be hours behind the times, and if that's the case, they might as well not exist.There was zero skepticism until the balloon was empty. This is a farce.TobiasFunke said:Howard Kurtz doesn't find much fault with news networks on this one.
Gotta admit, I kind of agree with him here. The blame for the hysteria seems like it may well lie with the cops, who appear to have taken something that was a slight possibility and treated it as a fact when relaying information to the media.
Of course, I wasn't watching CNN/MSNBC/Fox News at the time, so I can't really say for sure. Curious what those who were watching think. To the extent they played it up, was that just a function of living in a world with multiple 24 hour news stations and other sources? What could they have done differently?
Wow. Just wow.video of this part?Dad flips out and says that CNN has underhanded motives and is trying to vilify them. Wolf acts dumb and kisses their butt in the last two minutes.What did I miss?BWAHAHAHAHAHA
The other big factor IMO is: what media outlet is going to take an overly skeptical and questioning position on something like this, only to have it turn out that the kid was actually in there and worst case scenario play out? They would like gigantic tools. It's much easier to have a little bit of egg on your face while reporting an otherwise happy ending, than to look like insensitive jackasses while a little kid is dying.Did the hosts/anchors give the caveat that "police are reporting XYZ" or "we're being told XYZ"? If so, I don't think the problem lies with the media. If the authorities had no skepticism there was no reason for the media to have any, at least not until they'd had a decent amount of time to sit back and consider things. It's my understanding (and the times on this thread back me up) that they never really had that kind of time.When police tell the media something, the media run with it as told for hours and maybe days. 24 hour news stations require this- they can't wait until they can get independent verification and expert analysis, or they will be hours behind the times, and if that's the case, they might as well not exist.There was zero skepticism until the balloon was empty. This is a farce.TobiasFunke said:Howard Kurtz doesn't find much fault with news networks on this one.
Gotta admit, I kind of agree with him here. The blame for the hysteria seems like it may well lie with the cops, who appear to have taken something that was a slight possibility and treated it as a fact when relaying information to the media.
Of course, I wasn't watching CNN/MSNBC/Fox News at the time, so I can't really say for sure. Curious what those who were watching think. To the extent they played it up, was that just a function of living in a world with multiple 24 hour news stations and other sources? What could they have done differently?
One of the press conferences yesterday when the balloon was still in the air, the police woman said he was "definitely" in there.TobiasFunke said:Howard Kurtz doesn't find much fault with news networks on this one.
Gotta admit, I kind of agree with him here. The blame for the hysteria seems like it may well lie with the cops, who appear to have taken something that was a slight possibility and treated it as a fact when relaying information to the media.
Of course, I wasn't watching CNN/MSNBC/Fox News at the time, so I can't really say for sure. Curious what those who were watching think. To the extent they played it up, was that just a function of living in a world with multiple 24 hour news stations and other sources? What could they have done differently?
The derision is shared. The networks did much more than show people a balloon. They obsessed about a pending death (at least on CNN) for a few hours. Then Wolf gushed about how amazing it was that the kid was found and how everyone was going to "celebrate" when it was beyond clear they were being had.shouldn't your derision, then, weigh much heavier on the armed forces and the FAA then on the media? They had blackhawks scrambled, they diverted air traffic, they had high paid people trying to come up with a rescue plan for something that shuld not have passed their smell test.All the networks did is show people a balloonHonestly, it makes no difference. This didn't pass the smell test from moment one. If the authorities can't sleuth this out given simple observable facts, there's no reason to propagate the misconception.You're forgetting that this went on for hours. In the immediate moments, it was very confusing as to what to think. There was no real information or analysis. What gets me is that no one seems to have realized that this guy was a known loon and that Occam's Razor pointed to it being a hoax with the kid hiding at the behest of his family. If the cops couldn't discern that, the media really should have stepped up. Instead, they were reporting, as they always do, unsubstantiated claims. Hell, CNN must've called this a hot-air balloon two dozen times.Did the hosts/anchors give the caveat that "police are reporting XYZ" or "we're being told XYZ"? If so, I don't think the problem lies with the media. If the authorities had no skepticism there was no reason for the media to have any, at least not until they'd had a decent amount of time to sit back and consider things. It's my understanding (and the times on this thread back me up) that they never really had that kind of time.When police tell the media something, the media run with it as told for hours and maybe days. 24 hour news stations require this- they can't wait until they can get independent verification and expert analysis, or they will be hours behind the times, and if that's the case, they might as well not exist.There was zero skepticism until the balloon was empty. This is a farce.TobiasFunke said:Howard Kurtz doesn't find much fault with news networks on this one.
Gotta admit, I kind of agree with him here. The blame for the hysteria seems like it may well lie with the cops, who appear to have taken something that was a slight possibility and treated it as a fact when relaying information to the media.
Of course, I wasn't watching CNN/MSNBC/Fox News at the time, so I can't really say for sure. Curious what those who were watching think. To the extent they played it up, was that just a function of living in a world with multiple 24 hour news stations and other sources? What could they have done differently?