Well, I have seen the devastation that allowing old growth forests can have on the verdant hills. Failure to remove the growth allows for the proliferation of pests, an unhealthy situation and one to be avoided. I have always been a bit of an enthusiast and I have a sound eye for esthetics, and I am willing to work overtime with no additional compensation.What are your qualifications?If your Administration needs a Secretary of Waxing to inspect the bikini lines of hot, size two coeds I would make myself available.By the way, if this will advance my ticket in any way, here's what I'd do on days 2 and 3 of my term (before knocking off for a 4-day weekend):
Day 2: Outlaw the breeding of pitbulls and similar breeds. I'd get some sciency and statistics guys to come in and show me which are the most deadly breeds. Little Gunther can still get a puppy for Christmas. He can even get a BIG puppy for Christmas, like a Black Lab or a St. Bernard. But let's stop the proliferation of violent, powerful animals that have time and again been at the center of tragedy.
Day 3: Legalize marijuana nationwide. Seriously, it's go time.
Hey Doc. Get over yourself.Hey Jayrod>I hear Golden Retriever is good eatin.
Plus if you take two of them out, you can shoot one and the other one will retrieve it. win/win![]()
FTR I never said I was anti-hunting...because I'm not.Jesus Christ, I'm not even a hunter but I sure do hope none of you anti hunting guys broke a leg climbing down from your high horse.
Same here. I said I think it's stupid but should be permitted.FTR I never said I was anti-hunting...because I'm not.Jesus Christ, I'm not even a hunter but I sure do hope none of you anti hunting guys broke a leg climbing down from your high horse.
Ah yes, killing and sex, the same. Not weird at all.I have often thought it would be really cool to experience a hunt like the native Americans did. I've gotten a taste of the rush that would be hunting big game with rifles but to go out with a spear and a non compound bow that be a rush. Maybe hunt seal like the Eskimos do. Some guys can tap into that primal feeling much easier than others, that is how some people call it a sport, although I wouldn't call it that. More like having sex, a primal experience.
Only you would start a thread like this out with that statement.Jesus
I don't care what any of you gun-loving hillbillies say, if you're putting an uzi in your NINE YEAR OLD DAUGHTER's hands, you're the dumbest ####### on the planet.
Instructor dead, and this poor girl will be a complete mess because the people who are supposed to take care of her in life allowed her to be put in this position.
Between crap like this and the pitbull thread, I just can't understand why people take such stupid, needless risks. So, so, so stupid.
But Otis, you're a liberal northern city wuss, you don't understand that it's part of our CULTURE
:facepalm:
Come again?Only you would start a thread like this out with that statement.Jesus
I don't care what any of you gun-loving hillbillies say, if you're putting an uzi in your NINE YEAR OLD DAUGHTER's hands, you're the dumbest ####### on the planet.
Instructor dead, and this poor girl will be a complete mess because the people who are supposed to take care of her in life allowed her to be put in this position.
Between crap like this and the pitbull thread, I just can't understand why people take such stupid, needless risks. So, so, so stupid.
But Otis, you're a liberal northern city wuss, you don't understand that it's part of our CULTURE
:facepalm:
He's saying you're acting elitist again.Come again?Only you would start a thread like this out with that statement.Jesus
I don't care what any of you gun-loving hillbillies say, if you're putting an uzi in your NINE YEAR OLD DAUGHTER's hands, you're the dumbest ####### on the planet.
Instructor dead, and this poor girl will be a complete mess because the people who are supposed to take care of her in life allowed her to be put in this position.
Between crap like this and the pitbull thread, I just can't understand why people take such stupid, needless risks. So, so, so stupid.
But Otis, you're a liberal northern city wuss, you don't understand that it's part of our CULTURE
:facepalm:
Bush meat especially.I'd rather play golf or watch a good movie, but the meat you get from a baboon is good food and very inexpensive.
When you hypocrites go out and eat your tasty burger from the steer that was likely castrated with no anesthesia, had it's horns cut off with bolt cutters and was branded multiple times(again without anesthesia ) before it had it's throat slit and bled to death(or if it was lucky got a bolt to the brain) you can pat yourself on the back for just how much you give a rats ### about animals and how they are treated.Exactly.100% not fishing. I've post this same opinion numerous times over the year. None of the other "reasons" really wash.Hunters like to kill animals. Period. All of those other things might be 100% true but that doesn't change the fact that hunters dig the thrill of ending another creatures life...for sport food.![]()
If the Uzis for Kids crowd thinks I'm acting elitist, I can live with that.He's saying you're acting elitist again.Come again?Only you would start a thread like this out with that statement.Jesus
I don't care what any of you gun-loving hillbillies say, if you're putting an uzi in your NINE YEAR OLD DAUGHTER's hands, you're the dumbest ####### on the planet.
Instructor dead, and this poor girl will be a complete mess because the people who are supposed to take care of her in life allowed her to be put in this position.
Between crap like this and the pitbull thread, I just can't understand why people take such stupid, needless risks. So, so, so stupid.
But Otis, you're a liberal northern city wuss, you don't understand that it's part of our CULTURE
:facepalm:
You're missing the point, either intentionally or unintentionally. I can't tell which. You usually strike me as a really smart guy, so I have my suspicions.When you hypocrites go out and eat your tasty burger from the steer that was likely castrated with no anesthesia, had it's horns cut off with bolt cutters and was branded multiple times(again without anesthesia ) before it had it's throat slit and bled to death(or if it was lucky got a bolt to the brain) you can pat yourself on the back for just how much you give a rats ### about animals and how they are treated.Exactly.100% not fishing. I've post this same opinion numerous times over the year. None of the other "reasons" really wash.Hunters like to kill animals. Period. All of those other things might be 100% true but that doesn't change the fact that hunters dig the thrill of ending another creatures life...for sport food.![]()
I come from a family of hunters and support the right to do so absolutely. But you're totally twisting the point. Many, many hunters are at least slightly dishonest about their reasoning for hunting. They give out platitudes about doing it for meat or to benefit the habitats/environment. Or my favorite, that without hunters the animals would die gruesome deaths due to overcrowding. But the reality is that the hunters want that thrill. When a hunter shoots a deer, it is rarely a somber moment where they take a moment to reflect on the life they just took. It's a celebration for having conquered. I can't spend five minutes at the Thanksgiving table without hearing story after story about the deer that was shot or just missed. It's never about pride for the amount of meat, it's about the size of the rack (isn't it always).When you hypocrites go out and eat your tasty burger from the steer that was likely castrated with no anesthesia, had it's horns cut off with bolt cutters and was branded multiple times(again without anesthesia ) before it had it's throat slit and bled to death(or if it was lucky got a bolt to the brain) you can pat yourself on the back for just how much you give a rats ### about animals and how they are treated.Exactly.100% not fishing. I've post this same opinion numerous times over the year. None of the other "reasons" really wash.Hunters like to kill animals. Period. All of those other things might be 100% true but that doesn't change the fact that hunters dig the thrill of ending another creatures life...for sport food.![]()
THAT DUCK PUT UP A HELLUVA FIGHT!I come from a family of hunters and support the right to do so absolutely. But you're totally twisting the point. Many, many hunters are at least slightly dishonest about their reasoning for hunting. They give out platitudes about doing it for meat or to benefit the habitats/environment. Or my favorite, that without hunters the animals would die gruesome deaths due to overcrowding. But the reality is that the hunters want that thrill. When a hunter shoots a deer, it is rarely a somber moment where they take a moment to reflect on the life they just took. It's a celebration for having conquered. I can't spend five minutes at the Thanksgiving table without hearing story after story about the deer that was shot or just missed. It's never about pride for the amount of meat, it's about the size of the rack (isn't it always).When you hypocrites go out and eat your tasty burger from the steer that was likely castrated with no anesthesia, had it's horns cut off with bolt cutters and was branded multiple times(again without anesthesia ) before it had it's throat slit and bled to death(or if it was lucky got a bolt to the brain) you can pat yourself on the back for just how much you give a rats ### about animals and how they are treated.Exactly.100% not fishing. I've post this same opinion numerous times over the year. None of the other "reasons" really wash.Hunters like to kill animals. Period. All of those other things might be 100% true but that doesn't change the fact that hunters dig the thrill of ending another creatures life...for sport food.![]()
Just own it. People like to hunt because it's fun. Just stop with the noble pursuit bullcrap.
Christ almighty thank you.I come from a family of hunters and support the right to do so absolutely. But you're totally twisting the point. Many, many hunters are at least slightly dishonest about their reasoning for hunting. They give out platitudes about doing it for meat or to benefit the habitats/environment. Or my favorite, that without hunters the animals would die gruesome deaths due to overcrowding. But the reality is that the hunters want that thrill. When a hunter shoots a deer, it is rarely a somber moment where they take a moment to reflect on the life they just took. It's a celebration for having conquered. I can't spend five minutes at the Thanksgiving table without hearing story after story about the deer that was shot or just missed. It's never about pride for the amount of meat, it's about the size of the rack (isn't it always).When you hypocrites go out and eat your tasty burger from the steer that was likely castrated with no anesthesia, had it's horns cut off with bolt cutters and was branded multiple times(again without anesthesia ) before it had it's throat slit and bled to death(or if it was lucky got a bolt to the brain) you can pat yourself on the back for just how much you give a rats ### about animals and how they are treated.Exactly.100% not fishing. I've post this same opinion numerous times over the year. None of the other "reasons" really wash.Hunters like to kill animals. Period. All of those other things might be 100% true but that doesn't change the fact that hunters dig the thrill of ending another creatures life...for sport food.![]()
Just own it. People like to hunt because it's fun. Just stop with the noble pursuit bullcrap.
I seriously doubt any gun advocate would argue against a law that forbids 9 year olds from firing fully automatic, or even semi automatic weapons. The problem is, these laws that are proposed are never that narrow and usually far overreach their intention.I find it pretty ridiculous that gun advocates will denounce the idea of giving a nine year old an Uzi but will fight tooth and nail if someone actually suggests we make a law forbidding some of this stupid stuff from happening.
Thread was dying, and needed a little spice.what does hunting have to do with a 9yo killing someone with an uzi?
Totally disagree. I can't count the number of times I've heard someone say they are opposed to virtually any gun law because of the 'slippery slope' argument. I don't care how narrow the wording on a bill would be, the NRA and gun advocates would fight it.I seriously doubt any gun advocate would argue against a law that forbids 9 year olds from firing fully automatic, or even semi automatic weapons. The problem is, these laws that are proposed are never that narrow and usually far overreach their intention.I find it pretty ridiculous that gun advocates will denounce the idea of giving a nine year old an Uzi but will fight tooth and nail if someone actually suggests we make a law forbidding some of this stupid stuff from happening.
Not exactly what I was saying,Good point. I guess the solution is to introduce them at a young age to...dohYou do realize that 99% of the time, it's not the GunGuys that introduce them to these things, but rather television and the media, right? These kinds of things are so prevalent in every culture that it's basically inevitable. You can keep them from shooting a gun, but they're going to know about them. Even kids who have never shot a gun IRL love video games where they get to blast people.Otis said:To make this crystal clear for the GunGuys:
- I have no problem with dad taking 15 year old Johnny out to shoot deer. I think it's completely and utterly stupid, but if someone else enjoys it, go for it.
- I have a problem with any culture that introduces small children to implements of violence, whether they be assault rifles, handguns, throwing stars, or anything else that is intended to inflict harm on other beings. That's a really, really twisted message to be sending to a 9 year old, regardless of whether it's what my Pa, and my Pa's Pa and General Lee did.
Those are the bright lines for me. Sorry if you guys disagree.
Toy cowboy pistols and video games are a far cry from the gun culture that centers family activities around handling and shooting deadly weapons.Not exactly what I was saying,Good point. I guess the solution is to introduce them at a young age to...dohYou do realize that 99% of the time, it's not the GunGuys that introduce them to these things, but rather television and the media, right? These kinds of things are so prevalent in every culture that it's basically inevitable. You can keep them from shooting a gun, but they're going to know about them. Even kids who have never shot a gun IRL love video games where they get to blast people.Otis said:To make this crystal clear for the GunGuys:
- I have no problem with dad taking 15 year old Johnny out to shoot deer. I think it's completely and utterly stupid, but if someone else enjoys it, go for it.
- I have a problem with any culture that introduces small children to implements of violence, whether they be assault rifles, handguns, throwing stars, or anything else that is intended to inflict harm on other beings. That's a really, really twisted message to be sending to a 9 year old, regardless of whether it's what my Pa, and my Pa's Pa and General Lee did.
Those are the bright lines for me. Sorry if you guys disagree.but you're smart enough to know that.
My point is that you have a lot of hatred towards people who have/use/enjoy guns when in reality, the "gun culture" is a lot more deply rooted in society. There are millions of people who are exposed to guns who have never held one in real life. Focusing on one little group who actually enjoy firearms for whatever reason (whether you agree or not) and blaming them is kind of ignoring the bigger picture.
For the record, I'm not saying that we should ignore it, or that it's OK to introduce youngsters to guns. Much like my view on gun control in general, I agree with the principal behind it all. I just have yet to find any solution or proposal that will actually work to get us to where we need to be.
bra ####### voI come from a family of hunters and support the right to do so absolutely. But you're totally twisting the point. Many, many hunters are at least slightly dishonest about their reasoning for hunting. They give out platitudes about doing it for meat or to benefit the habitats/environment. Or my favorite, that without hunters the animals would die gruesome deaths due to overcrowding. But the reality is that the hunters want that thrill. When a hunter shoots a deer, it is rarely a somber moment where they take a moment to reflect on the life they just took. It's a celebration for having conquered. I can't spend five minutes at the Thanksgiving table without hearing story after story about the deer that was shot or just missed. It's never about pride for the amount of meat, it's about the size of the rack (isn't it always).When you hypocrites go out and eat your tasty burger from the steer that was likely castrated with no anesthesia, had it's horns cut off with bolt cutters and was branded multiple times(again without anesthesia ) before it had it's throat slit and bled to death(or if it was lucky got a bolt to the brain) you can pat yourself on the back for just how much you give a rats ### about animals and how they are treated.Exactly.100% not fishing. I've post this same opinion numerous times over the year. None of the other "reasons" really wash.Hunters like to kill animals. Period. All of those other things might be 100% true but that doesn't change the fact that hunters dig the thrill of ending another creatures life...for sport food.![]()
Just own it. People like to hunt because it's fun. Just stop with the noble pursuit bullcrap.
Can it be both? It's as much about the comradery as the "kill".I come from a family of hunters and support the right to do so absolutely. But you're totally twisting the point. Many, many hunters are at least slightly dishonest about their reasoning for hunting. They give out platitudes about doing it for meat or to benefit the habitats/environment. Or my favorite, that without hunters the animals would die gruesome deaths due to overcrowding. But the reality is that the hunters want that thrill. When a hunter shoots a deer, it is rarely a somber moment where they take a moment to reflect on the life they just took. It's a celebration for having conquered. I can't spend five minutes at the Thanksgiving table without hearing story after story about the deer that was shot or just missed. It's never about pride for the amount of meat, it's about the size of the rack (isn't it always).When you hypocrites go out and eat your tasty burger from the steer that was likely castrated with no anesthesia, had it's horns cut off with bolt cutters and was branded multiple times(again without anesthesia ) before it had it's throat slit and bled to death(or if it was lucky got a bolt to the brain) you can pat yourself on the back for just how much you give a rats ### about animals and how they are treated.Exactly.100% not fishing. I've post this same opinion numerous times over the year. None of the other "reasons" really wash.Hunters like to kill animals. Period. All of those other things might be 100% true but that doesn't change the fact that hunters dig the thrill of ending another creatures life...for sport food.![]()
Just own it. People like to hunt because it's fun. Just stop with the noble pursuit bullcrap.
I find it pretty ridiculous that gun advocates will denounce the idea of giving a nine year old an Uzi but will fight tooth and nail if someone actually suggests we make a law forbidding some of this stupid stuff from happening.
I'm sure if you use some of that well developed reading ability you display so often you might realize that there was a time and place where only animal killers got laid.Ah yes, killing and sex, the same. Not weird at all.I have often thought it would be really cool to experience a hunt like the native Americans did. I've gotten a taste of the rush that would be hunting big game with rifles but to go out with a spear and a non compound bow that be a rush. Maybe hunt seal like the Eskimos do. Some guys can tap into that primal feeling much easier than others, that is how some people call it a sport, although I wouldn't call it that. More like having sex, a primal experience.
Except for that whole prohibition thing.How many people needlessly die due to alcohol related incidents? Yet you don't see people jumping up and down saying the alcohol is stupid and should be banned.
otis =I'm sure if you use some of that well developed reading ability you display so often you might realize that there was a time and place where only animal killers got laid.Ah yes, killing and sex, the same. Not weird at all.I have often thought it would be really cool to experience a hunt like the native Americans did. I've gotten a taste of the rush that would be hunting big game with rifles but to go out with a spear and a non compound bow that be a rush. Maybe hunt seal like the Eskimos do. Some guys can tap into that primal feeling much easier than others, that is how some people call it a sport, although I wouldn't call it that. More like having sex, a primal experience.
Just own it. People like to hunt because it's fun. Just stop with the noble pursuit bullcrap.
I agree with BOTH of the above truthfully. I don't hunt. I have zero problem with guns used responsibly. I don't have an issue with people who choose to hunt. Hunting is fun. It is also, as Cliff Clavin said, a means to an end. I know plenty of people who hunt for the economics of it. My mother grew up dirt poor. Her father hunted deer and squirrels so they could have meat over the winter. With that said, I think many who hunt do enjoy the act of shooting something. Is that a sin? I don't think so, but if you want to, cool.Jesus Christ, I'm not even a hunter but I sure do hope none of you anti hunting guys broke a leg climbing down from your high horse.
NRA and "gun advocates" <> The average person who owns and shoots a gun. I wouldn't call any of us here hard-core NRA members. In fact, many of the GunGuys have specifically said that they hate these issues because of the Anti-gun protests AND the NRA's zero-tolerance for anything else.Totally disagree. I can't count the number of times I've heard someone say they are opposed to virtually any gun law because of the 'slippery slope' argument. I don't care how narrow the wording on a bill would be, the NRA and gun advocates would fight it.I seriously doubt any gun advocate would argue against a law that forbids 9 year olds from firing fully automatic, or even semi automatic weapons. The problem is, these laws that are proposed are never that narrow and usually far overreach their intention.I find it pretty ridiculous that gun advocates will denounce the idea of giving a nine year old an Uzi but will fight tooth and nail if someone actually suggests we make a law forbidding some of this stupid stuff from happening.
Because, duh.Explain this to me like I'm a 9 year old: why isn't there a law that kids can't operate firearms?
You have a serious problem over-reaching what people are saying. You started by posting about introducing people to weapons. I said that the larger culture is often the one that introduces people to weapons, not the GunGuys. Now you've backtracked and it sounds like you are saying that you think the only unacceptable "introduction" of firearms to small children is via real guns? i.e. it sounds like you're saying you don't have an issue with kids playing Grand Theft Auto and shooting hookers because that's not IRL.Toy cowboy pistols and video games are a far cry from the gun culture that centers family activities around handling and shooting deadly weapons.Not exactly what I was saying,Good point. I guess the solution is to introduce them at a young age to...dohYou do realize that 99% of the time, it's not the GunGuys that introduce them to these things, but rather television and the media, right? These kinds of things are so prevalent in every culture that it's basically inevitable. You can keep them from shooting a gun, but they're going to know about them. Even kids who have never shot a gun IRL love video games where they get to blast people.Otis said:To make this crystal clear for the GunGuys:
- I have no problem with dad taking 15 year old Johnny out to shoot deer. I think it's completely and utterly stupid, but if someone else enjoys it, go for it.
- I have a problem with any culture that introduces small children to implements of violence, whether they be assault rifles, handguns, throwing stars, or anything else that is intended to inflict harm on other beings. That's a really, really twisted message to be sending to a 9 year old, regardless of whether it's what my Pa, and my Pa's Pa and General Lee did.
Those are the bright lines for me. Sorry if you guys disagree.but you're smart enough to know that.
My point is that you have a lot of hatred towards people who have/use/enjoy guns when in reality, the "gun culture" is a lot more deply rooted in society. There are millions of people who are exposed to guns who have never held one in real life. Focusing on one little group who actually enjoy firearms for whatever reason (whether you agree or not) and blaming them is kind of ignoring the bigger picture.
For the record, I'm not saying that we should ignore it, or that it's OK to introduce youngsters to guns. Much like my view on gun control in general, I agree with the principal behind it all. I just have yet to find any solution or proposal that will actually work to get us to where we need to be.
So de-evolution is the trump card in this?otis =I'm sure if you use some of that well developed reading ability you display so often you might realize that there was a time and place where only animal killers got laid.Ah yes, killing and sex, the same. Not weird at all.I have often thought it would be really cool to experience a hunt like the native Americans did. I've gotten a taste of the rush that would be hunting big game with rifles but to go out with a spear and a non compound bow that be a rush. Maybe hunt seal like the Eskimos do. Some guys can tap into that primal feeling much easier than others, that is how some people call it a sport, although I wouldn't call it that. More like having sex, a primal experience.![]()
I think this is the point...I don't hunt and it's not for me either...but I also don't feel the need to chastise people who do enjoy it.Of course hunters hunt for the stalk and kill. It's ridiculous to say otherwise. I don't think it's stupid or immoral, but it is slightly weird that they get off on it. My uncles and older brother are hunters. I would hunt and shoot pheasant or deer if invited for the experience of it (and the meat truly is really good) but I don't really enjoy it so it's not a hobby for me.![]()
We're really gonna make this about video games now?You have a serious problem over-reaching what people are saying. You started by posting about introducing people to weapons. I said that the larger culture is often the one that introduces people to weapons, not the GunGuys. Now you've backtracked and it sounds like you are saying that you think the only unacceptable "introduction" of firearms to small children is via real guns? i.e. it sounds like you're saying you don't have an issue with kids playing Grand Theft Auto and shooting hookers because that's not IRL.Toy cowboy pistols and video games are a far cry from the gun culture that centers family activities around handling and shooting deadly weapons.Not exactly what I was saying,Good point. I guess the solution is to introduce them at a young age to...dohYou do realize that 99% of the time, it's not the GunGuys that introduce them to these things, but rather television and the media, right? These kinds of things are so prevalent in every culture that it's basically inevitable. You can keep them from shooting a gun, but they're going to know about them. Even kids who have never shot a gun IRL love video games where they get to blast people.Otis said:To make this crystal clear for the GunGuys:
- I have no problem with dad taking 15 year old Johnny out to shoot deer. I think it's completely and utterly stupid, but if someone else enjoys it, go for it.
- I have a problem with any culture that introduces small children to implements of violence, whether they be assault rifles, handguns, throwing stars, or anything else that is intended to inflict harm on other beings. That's a really, really twisted message to be sending to a 9 year old, regardless of whether it's what my Pa, and my Pa's Pa and General Lee did.
Those are the bright lines for me. Sorry if you guys disagree.but you're smart enough to know that.
My point is that you have a lot of hatred towards people who have/use/enjoy guns when in reality, the "gun culture" is a lot more deply rooted in society. There are millions of people who are exposed to guns who have never held one in real life. Focusing on one little group who actually enjoy firearms for whatever reason (whether you agree or not) and blaming them is kind of ignoring the bigger picture.
For the record, I'm not saying that we should ignore it, or that it's OK to introduce youngsters to guns. Much like my view on gun control in general, I agree with the principal behind it all. I just have yet to find any solution or proposal that will actually work to get us to where we need to be.
Gun Culture RomanceSo de-evolution is the trump card in this?otis =I'm sure if you use some of that well developed reading ability you display so often you might realize that there was a time and place where only animal killers got laid.Ah yes, killing and sex, the same. Not weird at all.I have often thought it would be really cool to experience a hunt like the native Americans did. I've gotten a taste of the rush that would be hunting big game with rifles but to go out with a spear and a non compound bow that be a rush. Maybe hunt seal like the Eskimos do. Some guys can tap into that primal feeling much easier than others, that is how some people call it a sport, although I wouldn't call it that. More like having sex, a primal experience.![]()
If we're going to go that route, why not just club the ##### over the head, drag her by the hair, and have your way?
Exactly. I go fishing every few weekends. If I did it for the thrill of the kill, I'd have stopped a long time ago, because I'm horrible at it and rarely catch anything. I don't even like to eat any of the kinds of fish I would hypothetically catch.I totally agree that hunters just like to kill. And they do it for the thrill of the kill. Same with fishermen. Or butterfly collectors. All vicious murders just getting high off of the thrill of killing.![]()
NRA and "gun advocates" <> The average person who owns and shoots a gun. I wouldn't call any of us here hard-core NRA members. In fact, many of the GunGuys have specifically said that they hate these issues because of the Anti-gun protests AND the NRA's zero-tolerance for anything else.Totally disagree. I can't count the number of times I've heard someone say they are opposed to virtually any gun law because of the 'slippery slope' argument. I don't care how narrow the wording on a bill would be, the NRA and gun advocates would fight it.I seriously doubt any gun advocate would argue against a law that forbids 9 year olds from firing fully automatic, or even semi automatic weapons. The problem is, these laws that are proposed are never that narrow and usually far overreach their intention.I find it pretty ridiculous that gun advocates will denounce the idea of giving a nine year old an Uzi but will fight tooth and nail if someone actually suggests we make a law forbidding some of this stupid stuff from happening.