No worries Adam.  Things could have gone differently.  Situation is still fluid, but more like molasses than water.  Thinking back to the Michael Vick scenario, no one thought he would have gotten another chance and he did.  You can't be blamed for holding out on judgement until more evidence came to light.  Some guys guessed correctly, some guys guessed wrong.  No one KNEW anything.
And of course he hasn't been convicted yet, but it looks bad.
		
		
	 
Michael Vick has absolutely ZERO to do with Aaron Hernandez.  No valid comparisons can be made between the two.
		
 
		
	 
I disagree. Obviously the nature of their crime is very different, but both were star players facing serious allegations that carried hefty penalties. Both were facing the possibility of a lengthy, perhaps even lifetime, suspension from the league (and yes, there was a lot of talk of giving Vick a lifetime ban).
Vick's crimes didn't carry as big of a maximum sentence as Hernandez's potential crimes (obviously this depends on what he eventually gets charged with), but Vick was facing indictment by the feds, who essentially have a 100% conviction rate, so Hernandez's chances of drawing a "not guilty" verdict and getting off with nothing are substantially higher than Vick's were.
Carruth's crime was more similar than Vick's, but Vick is a much closer comp in terms of talent, which is important because teams will risk more if there's enough talent involved.
Obviously situations like these are so unique and unprecedented that there really aren't any great comps, but I think there is insight to be gained from the Michael Vick comparison.