Aaron Rodgers Career Stats on Monday Night (1 Viewer)

[ISUDESTROYERS]

These stats all ALL ROAD MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL GAMES from 2008-2012. I did this to provide a good analysis on how Aaron Rodgers performs on road Monday Night Football games.

7 TDS Passing, 6 Interceptions (over 4 road games total on MNF)

Please don't make me list the exact games...but trust me...the stats are valid. Noticed he plays CONSIDERABLE BETTER playing Monday Night Football at home versus away. In terms of stats, I didn't look for any rushing TDS or passing yards so please note that. I just wanted to gauge how many potential tds I might be getting Monday night against a good Seattle defense as I have Rodgers, Jennings and Nelson in my matchup this week.

P.S. Looks like a good 1TD 1INT or a 2TD 1INT performance is just about a right expectation.

 

[Donsmith753]

This is the push I need to start Russel Wilson over him. Thanks guy.

 

[ISUDESTROYERS]

This is the push I need to start Russel Wilson over him. Thanks guy.

Your welcome....any other thoughts out there?

 

[eoMMan]

Definitely start Cassel over him in fantasy leagues this weekend.

 

[Assani Fisher]

When dealing with a 4 game sample size you can get all sorts of whacky "_____ player when playing at home/on the road on ______ day of the week has put up way better/worse stats than anyone would ever think."

 

[ImTheScientist]

These stats all ALL ROAD MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL GAMES from 2008-2012. I did this to provide a good analysis on how Aaron Rodgers performs on road Monday Night Football games.

7 TDS Passing, 6 Interceptions (over 4 road games total on MNF)

Please don't make me list the exact games...but trust me...the stats are valid. Noticed he plays CONSIDERABLE BETTER playing Monday Night Football at home versus away. In terms of stats, I didn't look for any rushing TDS or passing yards so please note that. I just wanted to gauge how many potential tds I might be getting Monday night against a good Seattle defense as I have Rodgers, Jennings and Nelson in my matchup this week.

P.S. Looks like a good 1TD 1INT or a 2TD 1INT performance is just about a right expectation.

 

[The Jerk]

Russell Wilson has never thrown a TD pass on Monday Night Football.

No link, but trust me.

 

[ISUDESTROYERS]

When dealing with a 4 game sample size you can get all sorts of whacky "_____ player when playing at home/on the road on ______ day of the week has put up way better/worse stats than anyone would ever think."

All of Aaron Rodger's Monday Night Football games (on the road - in his entire career) is a pretty good sample size to me.

 

[Short Corner]

When dealing with a 4 game sample size you can get all sorts of whacky "_____ player when playing at home/on the road on ______ day of the week has put up way better/worse stats than anyone would ever think."

All of Aaron Rodger's Monday Night Football games (on the road - in his entire career) is a pretty good sample size to me.

I think you missed the important part.

 

[Deamon]

These stats all ALL ROAD MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL GAMES from 2008-2012. I did this to provide a good analysis on how Aaron Rodgers performs on road Monday Night Football games.

7 TDS Passing, 6 Interceptions (over 4 road games total on MNF)

Please don't make me list the exact games...but trust me...the stats are valid. Noticed he plays CONSIDERABLE BETTER playing Monday Night Football at home versus away. In terms of stats, I didn't look for any rushing TDS or passing yards so please note that. I just wanted to gauge how many potential tds I might be getting Monday night against a good Seattle defense as I have Rodgers, Jennings and Nelson in my matchup this week.

P.S. Looks like a good 1TD 1INT or a 2TD 1INT performance is just about a right expectation.

Is this guy for real? haha... i don't know if this is meant to be a joke post or not, but it's really hard to not make fun of this one.

 

[Deamon]

When dealing with a 4 game sample size you can get all sorts of whacky "_____ player when playing at home/on the road on ______ day of the week has put up way better/worse stats than anyone would ever think."

All of Aaron Rodger's Monday Night Football games (on the road - in his entire career) is a pretty good sample size to me.

No, a 4 game sample size is not a good one regardless if it's "every one". Maybe you should look at Rodgers tds/ints vs teams who wear blue... or vs teams that have a bird in their team name... these would probably be as 'effective' as your 4 road game monday night stats.

 

[Statcruncher]

If you're going to discuss stats at least put them up:

.DATE..........LOC......OPPONENT.......RESULT......ATT/COMP....%........YDS......TD......INT......RATING......RUSH/YDS/TD

12/19/05.......Away.......Baltimore...........L 3-48..............8/15.........53%.......65..........0.........1...........36.8............1./.8./.0 *

10/02/06.......Away.......Philadelphia.......L 9-31..............2/3...........67%.......14..........0.........0...........77.1............0./.0./.0 *

12/22/08.......Home......Minnesota..........W 24-19..........18/22........82%......178........1.........0...........116.............8./.35./.1

11/24/08.......Away.......New Orleans......L 29-51...........23/41........56%......248........2.........3...........59.8............8./.36./.1

09/08/08.......Away.......Chicago.............L 17-20............24/39........62%......260........2.........1...........87.6............2./.-6./.0

12/07/09.......Away.......Minnesota..........L 23-30............26/37........70%.....384........2.........1...........111.............2./.16./.0

10/05/09.......Home......Baltimore...........W 27-14...........26/40........65%......263........3.........2...........87.8...........4./.30./.0

09/27/10.......Away.......Chicago.............L 17-20............34/45........76%......316........1.........1...........92.5...........2./.20./.1

11/14/11.......Home......Minnesota..........W 45-7............23/30........77%......250........4.........0...........140.............6./.21./.0

* Rodgers did not start these games

 

[ImTheScientist]

When dealing with a 4 game sample size you can get all sorts of whacky "_____ player when playing at home/on the road on ______ day of the week has put up way better/worse stats than anyone would ever think."

All of Aaron Rodger's Monday Night Football games (on the road - in his entire career) is a pretty good sample size to me.

No, a 4 game sample size is not a good one regardless if it's "every one". Maybe you should look at Rodgers tds/ints vs teams who wear blue... or vs teams that have a bird in their team name... these would probably be as 'effective' as your 4 road game monday night stats.

What is a good sample size?

 

[Donsmith753]

When dealing with a 4 game sample size you can get all sorts of whacky "_____ player when playing at home/on the road on ______ day of the week has put up way better/worse stats than anyone would ever think."

All of Aaron Rodger's Monday Night Football games (on the road - in his entire career) is a pretty good sample size to me.

No, a 4 game sample size is not a good one regardless if it's "every one". Maybe you should look at Rodgers tds/ints vs teams who wear blue... or vs teams that have a bird in their team name... these would probably be as 'effective' as your 4 road game monday night stats.

What is a good sample size?

Depends on what you're sampling.http://www.ehow.com/how_5328613_choose-appropriate-sample-size.html

 

[Deamon]

When dealing with a 4 game sample size you can get all sorts of whacky "_____ player when playing at home/on the road on ______ day of the week has put up way better/worse stats than anyone would ever think."

All of Aaron Rodger's Monday Night Football games (on the road - in his entire career) is a pretty good sample size to me.

No, a 4 game sample size is not a good one regardless if it's "every one". Maybe you should look at Rodgers tds/ints vs teams who wear blue... or vs teams that have a bird in their team name... these would probably be as 'effective' as your 4 road game monday night stats.

What is a good sample size?

One that is more then that, and you can actually see some trends.... from the above list of total stats, there's no real emerging trend from those games. He actually had pretty decent away Monday nighters, and we'd have to look at all the factors such as the defenses he was playing, injuries on his team, total yards he threw, rushing tds, completion percentage, etc. GB put up around 23 points (give or take 5) on each of those monday night games, both wins and losses, home or away ( Besides the minny game). With such a small sample size, that minny game totally skews the stats. Take out that minny game and he has 7tds, 6ints in away games and in the TWO game sample size of home games he has 2tds and 1int. Not that crazy of a difference, anyone analyzing these stats to conclude there is any sort of significant trend between home and away monday nighters and using that for this week is extremely naive and it's quite the stretch looking at that.To properly project this week there's much better things to look at then simply how he did on his 4 away monday nighters. I think 2 passing tds and 1 passing int is probably a fairly good projection (it's what fbg has projected), but please don't base it on meaningless stats. Had this game been IN new orleans, I'm sure the OP wouldn't have predicted the same 2td 1int stats that he did even though thats what he expects from ANY rodgers away monday nighter.

 

[ImTheScientist]

When dealing with a 4 game sample size you can get all sorts of whacky "_____ player when playing at home/on the road on ______ day of the week has put up way better/worse stats than anyone would ever think."

All of Aaron Rodger's Monday Night Football games (on the road - in his entire career) is a pretty good sample size to me.

No, a 4 game sample size is not a good one regardless if it's "every one". Maybe you should look at Rodgers tds/ints vs teams who wear blue... or vs teams that have a bird in their team name... these would probably be as 'effective' as your 4 road game monday night stats.

What is a good sample size?

One that is more then that, and you can actually see some trends....

You didn't answer my question. What is a good sample size. The OP gave good information and you just discounted it with nothing behind it. "one that is more than that" or "is not a good sample size" is not a good answer. Whats a good sample size?

 

[Reepicheep]

I for one and not convinced that "MNF road games" is a significant factor in a player's performance. Has anyone ever statistically demonstrated such a dependence?

 

[ISUDESTROYERS]

I for one and not convinced that "MNF road games" is a significant factor in a player's performance. Has anyone ever statistically demonstrated such a dependence?

It is ONE variable to consider. The other variable to consider is the team they are playing and their defense. Seattle is a good defense and has allowed 1TD rushing and 2TD receiving in 2 games. I can easily see a 1TD and 1INT....once you compile the data.....you make your best forecast but on the data and GUT FEELING. This is was marketing analysts, forecasters and trends analysts do for a living. You can easily take this skillset into fantasy football.And please don't be the whiny drama queen that now gets all SUPER SCIENTIFIC on research protocal. We are not trying to pass a THESIS PAPER that is to be in a scholarly journal here. Just take the principles of good research, and make an educated forecast. Don't be out of balance of what I was trying to prove ...which is the best predicted outcome of his performance this Monday night. ITS NOT AN EXACT SCIENCE FOLKS....ITS A BEST EDUCATED GUESS BASED ON DECENTLY DATA THAT IS AVAILABLE.....THATS IT....NOTHING MORE. I swear...you have some tool about to post that says....NO....YOUR RESEARCH IS WRONG BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T DO REGRESSION ANALYSIS OR A CHI SQUARE ANALYSIS TEST.

P.S. I swear ....some people on this forum want to be sissy little drama queens if every little detail is not spelled out in a post. Its like ...common folks....get a clue and be real. I guess that is why BostonFred post the truth about some members on this forum: http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=650642

PLEASE DON'T BE LIKE THE GUYS THAT BOSTON FRED ARE TALKING ABOUT. THE AGITATOR SPIRIT THAT WANTS TO NOT PUT THE WHOLE TOPIC IN PERSPECTIVE....CONTRIBUTE TO A NICE FORUM....GIVE PEOPLE THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT.....YOU KNOW...NORMAL ##### that people do to contribute to a healthy online forum.

 

[Reepicheep]

So . . . what does a guy have to do to get his Member Title changed from "Footballguy" to "SUPER SCIENTIFIC AGITATOR SPIRIT"? It has a nice ring to it.

 

[Statcruncher]

The dude who said:

Please don't make me list the exact games...but trust me...the stats are valid. Noticed he plays CONSIDERABLE BETTER playing Monday Night Football at home versus away. In terms of stats, I didn't look for any rushing TDS or passing yards so please note that. I just wanted to gauge how many potential tds I might be getting Monday night against a good Seattle defense as I have Rodgers, Jennings and Nelson in my matchup this week.

Is calling out someone as:

And please don't be the whiny drama queen that now gets all SUPER SCIENTIFIC on research protocal

for coming to a different conclusion? You do realize that your "away game" 4 game subset of data ranges from 2 to 4 years old right? So you basically come up with a theory, do incomplete research on it as you're too lazy to look up all the stats, ignore that the data is older than an iPhone 3, and then call a dissenting opinion a whiny drama queen.

 

[The Jerk]

PLEASE DON'T BE LIKE THE GUYS THAT BOSTON FRED ARE TALKING ABOUT. THE AGITATOR SPIRIT THAT WANTS TO NOT PUT THE WHOLE TOPIC IN PERSPECTIVE....CONTRIBUTE TO A NICE FORUM....GIVE PEOPLE THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT.....YOU KNOW...NORMAL ##### that people do to contribute to a healthy online forum.

If you read Bfred's first post in that thread, and all you were able to infer from it was that the problem with the Shark Pool is some posters possessing an "agitator spirit", excuse me, "AGITATOR SPIRIT" with their super scientific ways, I fear you missed many salient points. Fred referred to the days when posters would start a thread asserting one position on a given player, team, situation, whatever, and others would probe and counter with their own positions. Shockingly, they often would contest aspects of the issue like track record, or even, dare I say it, sample size.While it is true that gut feeling plays a role in what you or I or others do as fantasy owners choosing a lineup or making trades, etc., most people prefer to inform their gut with at least some level of analysis. The problem with gut feel alone is that all guts don't shake out the same way when it comes time to make a decision. What if my gut feel is different from your gut feel? By all means, go with your gut. I've found I enjoy my successes more and find failures less bothersome when I trust myself above all else.However, if you want to advocate for gut feelings, don't trot out data to support that gut feel without the expectation that you may be challenged on it. Expect to have the criticism. That's what we do here. The best part is that when you wade into an argument/discussion in these threads, you may find that you learn something. And once in awhile, hopefully more often than that, you end up with information that will allow you to be a better fantasy owner.Seriously, don't be so defensive and try to be open to the criticism of other posters. Sure, some posts are just going for sarcasm. Others stick mainly or exclusively to the point. Many combine both, and don't lose sight of what you could learn from a given poster even if they needle you in the process of offering criticism. Try to be open to the information that comes from posters, regardless of their level of tact, and see if you can use it to your advantage.

 

[DoubleG]

So . . . what does a guy have to do to get his Member Title changed from "Footballguy" to "SUPER SCIENTIFIC AGITATOR SPIRIT"? It has a nice ring to it.

 

[ISUDESTROYERS]

The dude who said:

Please don't make me list the exact games...but trust me...the stats are valid. Noticed he plays CONSIDERABLE BETTER playing Monday Night Football at home versus away. In terms of stats, I didn't look for any rushing TDS or passing yards so please note that. I just wanted to gauge how many potential tds I might be getting Monday night against a good Seattle defense as I have Rodgers, Jennings and Nelson in my matchup this week.

Is calling out someone as:

And please don't be the whiny drama queen that now gets all SUPER SCIENTIFIC on research protocal

for coming to a different conclusion? You do realize that your "away game" 4 game subset of data ranges from 2 to 4 years old right? So you basically come up with a theory, do incomplete research on it as you're too lazy to look up all the stats, ignore that the data is older than an iPhone 3, and then call a dissenting opinion a whiny drama queen.

NICE...TROLL ALERT....JUST LIKE BOSTONFRED MENTIONED:Here is the facts goof ball:



Edited: Sorry for the green font...but some need help to understand things more clearly. You need to spell everything out for them. Again..please except my apologies.

1) That stats were correct (7tds 6Int in Rodgers away games on Monday night. Yeah...A LAZY guy researches all of the stats of a QB's away games on Monday Night Football. In fact, I said this upfront in my analysis. Big deal...I didn't post the exact day and opponents. Bottom line the stats were correct....which is the most important thing.....but yeah...I like the lazy comment...haha See what I mean....you prove my point....YOUR EXPECTING "A-GRADE" THESIS PAPER STYLE RESEARCH. Complete Troll behavior....this is the problem with what BostonFred (and many others) have scene on this forum. Its people LIKE YOU...that is giving this forum a bad reputation.

2) Ahh....I SEE....SO ALL THE DATA AVAILABLE ON RODGERS PLAY [ON AWAY MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL GAMES] IS ILL-RELEVANT?????? WOW ....THIS SHOWS HOW FAR YOUR NOT IN TOUCH WITH REALITY MAN. Rodgers has been a star player the last 4 years....his game hasn't changed that much ..especially in the last 3 years. The guy has been a STUD PERIOD.....but yeah...then a troll would say ...but oh....he has learned so much more....and that has to be a factored into his potential on away games on Monday Night Football.

In research, you can go down rabbit trails that [in the end] is meaningless roads to go down. But again...AND AGAIN....this is not suppose to be a Scholarly

Article on predicting [as fact] how he is going to perform on Monday Night. Again...I never guaranteed this..... In fact...no one knows how he is actually going to perform on MNF. Its just some preliminary research to potentially help those who may or may start Rodgers...so they can make an informed decision with data they never had before....but no....the troll drama queen needs to blow this out of proportion and not put a proper prospective on my post (how pathetic actually)

If you have a brain...you would know the athletes performance can elevate (or decrease)when the national spot light is on them ....and whether they are home versus away. Away games on Monday Night Football provides a unique atmosphere and psychology that is different then a Home game on Monday Night Football. People can play better at home versus away.

But again...I trained researcher like you....who didn't graduate from a Research 1 University (and a Masters degree in Marketing Research would know this). Again....your wanting a A-Grade Research paper to counteract my response. Your comment saying "incomplete research"...just supports your A-GRADE professional research expectation. The original posts and purpose is NEVER INTENDED TO DO THIS....but your wanting it to go that way.....SO SAD ACTUALLY THAT YOU CAN SEE WHERE YOU ARE TRYING TO TAKE YOUR ARGUMENT!

3)And by the way....I'll be watching your TROLL LIKE BEHAVIOR...BLOWING UP POSTS THAT DON'T NEED TO BE BLOWN UP....AND REPORT THIS BEHAVIOR TO THE ADMINS.....PLEASE CONTRIBUTE TO A HEALTHY GROWING COMMUNITY MORON ....OR GET OUT ! THE AGITATOR SPIRIT...HAS GOT TO STOP ...AND MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO POLICE THIS TYPE OF BEHAVIOR.....its like a little dirt in a big glass of water. A little dirt....EFFECTS THE WHOLE GLASS!

Instead of getting pissed off at my post and what I've wrote here....you should thank me so we can stop the meaningless BS posting that tries to insight a bunch nonsense. And trust me...there is a difference between good dialogue and the nonsense that some post on this forum.

P.S. Have a good day my friend ...this is the last time I will take this amount of time to educate a fool....its just easier to let the admins take care of it

 

[ISUDESTROYERS]

PLEASE DON'T BE LIKE THE GUYS THAT BOSTON FRED ARE TALKING ABOUT. THE AGITATOR SPIRIT THAT WANTS TO NOT PUT THE WHOLE TOPIC IN PERSPECTIVE....CONTRIBUTE TO A NICE FORUM....GIVE PEOPLE THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT.....YOU KNOW...NORMAL ##### that people do to contribute to a healthy online forum.

However, if you want to advocate for gut feelings, don't trot out data to support that gut feel without the expectation that you may be challenged on it.

You analyze the data FIRST....then go with your gut. I don't advocate going with your gut all by itself. Never said or implied this ....which it seems you are trying to advocate. Going with your gut is what forecasters and trend analysis do...otherwise they would be prophets who are suppose to be right all the time....with no data at all

 

[The Jerk]

I tried, dude. Whatever. I couldn't even follow your last couple of posts. Are you a researcher? Or do you not like them? Or both?

In any case, by all means carry on in your cocoon. To anyone else reading this thread, a basic fundamental of research is that correlation does not imply causation. I'm out.

 

[DoubleG]

I for one and not convinced that "MNF road games" is a significant factor in a player's performance. Has anyone ever statistically demonstrated such a dependence?

Oh - ummm...no.Especially when you are referencing such a small sample size compared to the much larger body of work. Also, the poorer performances came 4 years ago - Rodgers' stats on MNF have gotten progressively better....similar to his stats overall.But I don't want to be too super scientific...or an agitator spirit. So I'll just stop now.

 

[Statcruncher]

Yeah...A LAZY guy researches all of the stats of a QB's away games on Monday Night Football. Big deal.

Your stated purpose for this trainwreck of a thread was your attempt to calculate how many TD's Rodgers might get you. Yet you were too lazy to research his rushing TD's, which in fact average .5 per game. Or does your league not count QB rushing TD's?

2) Ahh....THE DATA SET MORON IS 1-4 YEARS OLD (not 2-4 as you say).

Since you were too lazy to supply the data someone took pity on you and posted the information here. The most recent MNF game Rodgers has played as an away team was 09/27/10. I'll wait here while you get your abacus and work through some math figuring out if that was 1 year or 2 years ago. Here's a hint, it's currently 2012.

3)And by the way....I'll be watching your TROLL LIKE BEHAVIOR...BLOWING UP POSTS THAT DON'T NEED TO BE BLOWN UP....AND REPORT THIS BEHAVIOR TO THE ADMINS.....CONTRIBUTE TO A HEALTHY GROWING COMMUNITY MORON ....OR GET OUT !

You have my blessing to report any post I've ever made on this board. Godspeed.

 

[comfortably numb]

Christ you people are dooshes.

Guy brought an interesting thought/stat to the table and we give him sarcastic jokes and laugh at him.

 

[DoubleG]

Christ you people are dooshes.Guy brought an interesting thought/stat to the table and we give him sarcastic jokes and laugh at him.

Aliases are funny.

 

[ISUDESTROYERS]

Yeah...A LAZY guy researches all of the stats of a QB's away games on Monday Night Football. Big deal.

Your stated purpose for this trainwreck of a thread was your attempt to calculate how many TD's Rodgers might get you. Yet you were too lazy to research his rushing TD's, which in fact average .5 per game. Or does your league not count QB rushing TD's?

2) Ahh....THE DATA SET MORON IS 1-4 YEARS OLD (not 2-4 as you say).

Since you were too lazy to supply the data someone took pity on you and posted the information here. The most recent MNF game Rodgers has played as an away team was 09/27/10. I'll wait here while you get your abacus and work through some math figuring out if that was 1 year or 2 years ago. Here's a hint, it's currently 2012.

3)And by the way....I'll be watching your TROLL LIKE BEHAVIOR...BLOWING UP POSTS THAT DON'T NEED TO BE BLOWN UP....AND REPORT THIS BEHAVIOR TO THE ADMINS.....CONTRIBUTE TO A HEALTHY GROWING COMMUNITY MORON ....OR GET OUT !

You have my blessing to report any post I've ever made on this board. Godspeed.

Re-read the first paragraph in my post ....7 posts from this one. In fact...I will highlight it in green for you ...to make it easier for you. It will come to you my friend. Sometimes it take a little longer to digest for some. Trust me....look at my post again...it will come to you

 

[Statcruncher]

Re-read the first paragraph in my post ....4 posts from this one. In fact...I will highlight it in green for you ...to make it easier for you. It will come to you my friend. Sometimes it take a little longer to digest for some. Trust me....look at my post again...it will come to you

You've edited your posts so much it's not worth my time. Bottom line, you started this to figure out how many TD's Rodgers would account for yet you were too lazy to include his rushing TD's. Then you go off on people and start calling names when they get a different conclusion. And who really cares how many TD's Rodgers and crew get for your team, this probably belongs in the Assistant Coach forum anyway. Have a great season guy.

 

[fred_1_15301]

The dude who said:

Please don't make me list the exact games...but trust me...the stats are valid. Noticed he plays CONSIDERABLE BETTER playing Monday Night Football at home versus away. In terms of stats, I didn't look for any rushing TDS or passing yards so please note that. I just wanted to gauge how many potential tds I might be getting Monday night against a good Seattle defense as I have Rodgers, Jennings and Nelson in my matchup this week.

Is calling out someone as:

And please don't be the whiny drama queen that now gets all SUPER SCIENTIFIC on research protocal

for coming to a different conclusion? You do realize that your "away game" 4 game subset of data ranges from 2 to 4 years old right? So you basically come up with a theory, do incomplete research on it as you're too lazy to look up all the stats, ignore that the data is older than an iPhone 3, and then call a dissenting opinion a whiny drama queen.

NICE...TROLL ALERT....JUST LIKE BOSTONFRED MENTIONED:Here is the facts goof ball:



Edited: Sorry for the green font...but some need help to understand things more clearly. You need to spell everything out for them. Again..please except my apologies.

1) That stats were correct (7tds 6Int in Rodgers away games on Monday night. Yeah...A LAZY guy researches all of the stats of a QB's away games on Monday Night Football. In fact, I said this upfront in my analysis. Big deal...I didn't post the exact day and opponents. Bottom line the stats were correct....which is the most important thing.....but yeah...I like the lazy comment...haha See what I mean....you prove my point....YOUR EXPECTING "A-GRADE" THESIS PAPER STYLE RESEARCH. Complete Troll behavior....this is the problem with what BostonFred (and many others) have scene on this forum. Its people LIKE YOU...that is giving this forum a bad reputation.

2) Ahh....I SEE....SO THE ONLY DATA AVAILABLE ON RODGERS PLAY [ON AWAY MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL GAMES] IS ILL-RELEVANT?????? WOW ....THIS SHOWS HOW FAR YOUR NOT IN TOUCH WITH REALITY MAN. Rodgers was has been a star player the last 4 years....his game hasn't changed that much ..especially in the last 3 years. The guy has been a STUD PERIOD.....but yeah...then a troll would say ...but oh....he has learned so much more....and that has to be a factored into his potential on away games on Monday Night Football.

In research, you can go down rabbit trails that [in the end] is meaningless roads to go down. But again...AND AGAIN....this is not suppose to be a Scholarly

Article on predicting [as fact] how he is going to perform on Monday Night. Again...I never guaranteed this..... In fact...no one knows how he is actually going to perform on MNF. Its just some preliminary research to potentially help those who may or may start Rodgers...so they can make an informed decision with data they never had before....but no....the troll drama queen needs to blow this out of proportion and not put a proper prospective on my post (how pathetic actually)

If you have a brain...you would know the athletes performance can elevate (or decrease)when the national spot light is on them ....and whether they are home versus away. Away games on Monday Night Football provides a unique atmosphere and psychology that is different then a Home game on Monday Night Football. People can play better at home versus away.

But again...I trained researcher like you....who didn't graduate from a Research 1 University (and a Masters degree in Marketing Research would know this). Again....your wanting a A-Grade Research paper to counteract my response. Your comment saying "incomplete research"...just supports your A-GRADE professional research expectation. The original posts and purpose is NEVER INTENDED TO DO THIS....but your wanting it to go that way.....SO SAD ACTUALLY THAT YOU CAN SEE WHERE YOU ARE TRYING TO TAKE YOUR ARGUMENT!

3)And by the way....I'll be watching your TROLL LIKE BEHAVIOR...BLOWING UP POSTS THAT DON'T NEED TO BE BLOWN UP....AND REPORT THIS BEHAVIOR TO THE ADMINS.....PLEASE CONTRIBUTE TO A HEALTHY GROWING COMMUNITY MORON ....OR GET OUT ! THE AGITATOR SPIRIT...HAS GOT TO STOP ...AND MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO POLICE THIS TYPE OF BEHAVIOR.....its like a little dirt in a big glass of water. A little dirt....EFFECTS THE WHOLE GLASS!

Instead of getting pissed off at my post and what I've wrote here....you should thank me so we can stop the meaningless BS posting that tries to insight a bunch nonsense. And trust me...there is a difference between good dialogue and the nonsense that some post on this forum.

P.S. Have a good day my friend ...this is the last time I will take this amount of time to educate a fool....its just easier to let the admins take care of it

Do you actually believe that anyone is going to bench Rodgers? By the way, I'm pretty sure Rodgers performs just fine in the spotlight (did you watch the superbowl?)

 

[ISUDESTROYERS]

You've edited your posts so much it's not worth my time. Bottom line, you started this to figure out how many TD's Rodgers would account for yet you were too lazy to include his rushing TD's. Then you go off on people and start calling names when they get a different conclusion. And who really cares how many TD's Rodgers and crew get for your team, this probably belongs in the Assistant Coach forum anyway. Have a great season guy.

Your the one that first said I was "lazy" by not sharing the exact games in reference. Heck..I even told mentioned [in advance]...that I didn't do this in my original post...so what is your point. So...when you start to character assassinate someone by saying I resorted to calling names...trying checking your own post above. I'll even make it easy for you and past it below. Point is...this is blown way out of proportion. And I'm done with it...and letting the admins wrestle with it.

You do realize that your "away game" 4 game subset of data ranges from 2 to 4 years old right? So you basically come up with a theory, do incomplete research on it as you're too lazy to look up all the stats, ignore that the data is older than an iPhone 3, and then call a dissenting opinion a whiny drama queen.

 

[ISUDESTROYERS]

The dude who said:

Please don't make me list the exact games...but trust me...the stats are valid. Noticed he plays CONSIDERABLE BETTER playing Monday Night Football at home versus away. In terms of stats, I didn't look for any rushing TDS or passing yards so please note that. I just wanted to gauge how many potential tds I might be getting Monday night against a good Seattle defense as I have Rodgers, Jennings and Nelson in my matchup this week.

Is calling out someone as:

And please don't be the whiny drama queen that now gets all SUPER SCIENTIFIC on research protocal

for coming to a different conclusion? You do realize that your "away game" 4 game subset of data ranges from 2 to 4 years old right? So you basically come up with a theory, do incomplete research on it as you're too lazy to look up all the stats, ignore that the data is older than an iPhone 3, and then call a dissenting opinion a whiny drama queen.

NICE...TROLL ALERT....JUST LIKE BOSTONFRED MENTIONED:Here is the facts goof ball:



Edited: Sorry for the green font...but some need help to understand things more clearly. You need to spell everything out for them. Again..please except my apologies.

1) That stats were correct (7tds 6Int in Rodgers away games on Monday night. Yeah...A LAZY guy researches all of the stats of a QB's away games on Monday Night Football. In fact, I said this upfront in my analysis. Big deal...I didn't post the exact day and opponents. Bottom line the stats were correct....which is the most important thing.....but yeah...I like the lazy comment...haha See what I mean....you prove my point....YOUR EXPECTING "A-GRADE" THESIS PAPER STYLE RESEARCH. Complete Troll behavior....this is the problem with what BostonFred (and many others) have scene on this forum. Its people LIKE YOU...that is giving this forum a bad reputation.

2) Ahh....I SEE....SO THE ONLY DATA AVAILABLE ON RODGERS PLAY [ON AWAY MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL GAMES] IS ILL-RELEVANT?????? WOW ....THIS SHOWS HOW FAR YOUR NOT IN TOUCH WITH REALITY MAN. Rodgers was has been a star player the last 4 years....his game hasn't changed that much ..especially in the last 3 years. The guy has been a STUD PERIOD.....but yeah...then a troll would say ...but oh....he has learned so much more....and that has to be a factored into his potential on away games on Monday Night Football.

In research, you can go down rabbit trails that [in the end] is meaningless roads to go down. But again...AND AGAIN....this is not suppose to be a Scholarly

Article on predicting [as fact] how he is going to perform on Monday Night. Again...I never guaranteed this..... In fact...no one knows how he is actually going to perform on MNF. Its just some preliminary research to potentially help those who may or may start Rodgers...so they can make an informed decision with data they never had before....but no....the troll drama queen needs to blow this out of proportion and not put a proper prospective on my post (how pathetic actually)

If you have a brain...you would know the athletes performance can elevate (or decrease)when the national spot light is on them ....and whether they are home versus away. Away games on Monday Night Football provides a unique atmosphere and psychology that is different then a Home game on Monday Night Football. People can play better at home versus away.

But again...I trained researcher like you....who didn't graduate from a Research 1 University (and a Masters degree in Marketing Research would know this). Again....your wanting a A-Grade Research paper to counteract my response. Your comment saying "incomplete research"...just supports your A-GRADE professional research expectation. The original posts and purpose is NEVER INTENDED TO DO THIS....but your wanting it to go that way.....SO SAD ACTUALLY THAT YOU CAN SEE WHERE YOU ARE TRYING TO TAKE YOUR ARGUMENT!

3)And by the way....I'll be watching your TROLL LIKE BEHAVIOR...BLOWING UP POSTS THAT DON'T NEED TO BE BLOWN UP....AND REPORT THIS BEHAVIOR TO THE ADMINS.....PLEASE CONTRIBUTE TO A HEALTHY GROWING COMMUNITY MORON ....OR GET OUT ! THE AGITATOR SPIRIT...HAS GOT TO STOP ...AND MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO POLICE THIS TYPE OF BEHAVIOR.....its like a little dirt in a big glass of water. A little dirt....EFFECTS THE WHOLE GLASS!

Instead of getting pissed off at my post and what I've wrote here....you should thank me so we can stop the meaningless BS posting that tries to insight a bunch nonsense. And trust me...there is a difference between good dialogue and the nonsense that some post on this forum.

P.S. Have a good day my friend ...this is the last time I will take this amount of time to educate a fool....its just easier to let the admins take care of it

Do you actually believe that anyone is going to bench Rodgers? By the way, I'm pretty sure Rodgers performs just fine in the spotlight (did you watch the superbowl?)

Honestly...I don't know. But I will say...the psychology is much different on a regular Monday Night Football game versus trying to win the Superbowl when you have 2 weeks of media coverage and your whole season comes down to this one game. For the record, NO WAY am I benching Rodgers.....that said...I was merely giving people information so they can come to their own conclusions....simple actually...nothing more...nothing less !

 

[Statcruncher]

You've edited your posts so much it's not worth my time. Bottom line, you started this to figure out how many TD's Rodgers would account for yet you were too lazy to include his rushing TD's. Then you go off on people and start calling names when they get a different conclusion. And who really cares how many TD's Rodgers and crew get for your team, this probably belongs in the Assistant Coach forum anyway. Have a great season guy.

Your the one that first said I was "lazy" by not sharing the exact games in reference. Heck..I even told mentioned [in advance]...that I didn't do this in my original post...so what is your point. So...when you start to character assassinate someone by saying I resorted to calling names...trying checking your own post above. I'll even make it easy for you and past it below. Point is...this is blown way out of proportion. And I'm done with it...and letting the admins wrestle with it.

You do realize that your "away game" 4 game subset of data ranges from 2 to 4 years old right? So you basically come up with a theory, do incomplete research on it as you're too lazy to look up all the stats, ignore that the data is older than an iPhone 3, and then call a dissenting opinion a whiny drama queen.

Read the thread. I never said you're lazy because you didn't link the data, I actually provided it for you to help you out. I said you're lazy because when formulating your opinon (how many TD's Rodgers would get you) you didn't research all the variables (passing and rushing TD's). Yes, you admitted you didn't research rushing TD's, that just makes you lazy and apathetic.Edited to add: Just noticed you went through and deleted all the name-calling. Would you like me to delete it in the quotes I have from your responses?

 

[DoubleG]

You've edited your posts so much it's not worth my time. Bottom line, you started this to figure out how many TD's Rodgers would account for yet you were too lazy to include his rushing TD's. Then you go off on people and start calling names when they get a different conclusion. And who really cares how many TD's Rodgers and crew get for your team, this probably belongs in the Assistant Coach forum anyway. Have a great season guy.

Your the one that first said I was "lazy" by not sharing the exact games in reference. Heck..I even told mentioned [in advance]...that I didn't do this in my original post...so what is your point. So...when you start to character assassinate someone by saying I resorted to calling names...trying checking your own post above. I'll even make it easy for you and past it below. Point is...this is blown way out of proportion. And I'm done with it...and letting the admins wrestle with it.

You do realize that your "away game" 4 game subset of data ranges from 2 to 4 years old right? So you basically come up with a theory, do incomplete research on it as you're too lazy to look up all the stats, ignore that the data is older than an iPhone 3, and then call a dissenting opinion a whiny drama queen.

Read the thread. I never said you're lazy because you didn't link the data, I actually provided it for you to help you out. I said you're lazy because when formulating your opinon (how many TD's Rodgers would get you) you didn't research all the variables (passing and rushing TD's). Yes, you admitted you didn't research rushing TD's, that just makes you lazy and apathetic.

Stats - easy there buddy. It's shtick - and he's fishing. Just sit down. It'll be okay.ETA: You know this is ###### when I am the one talking sense.

 

[ISUDESTROYERS]

You've edited your posts so much it's not worth my time. Bottom line, you started this to figure out how many TD's Rodgers would account for yet you were too lazy to include his rushing TD's. Then you go off on people and start calling names when they get a different conclusion. And who really cares how many TD's Rodgers and crew get for your team, this probably belongs in the Assistant Coach forum anyway. Have a great season guy.

Your the one that first said I was "lazy" by not sharing the exact games in reference. Heck..I even told mentioned [in advance]...that I didn't do this in my original post...so what is your point. So...when you start to character assassinate someone by saying I resorted to calling names...trying checking your own post above. I'll even make it easy for you and past it below. Point is...this is blown way out of proportion. And I'm done with it...and letting the admins wrestle with it.

You do realize that your "away game" 4 game subset of data ranges from 2 to 4 years old right? So you basically come up with a theory, do incomplete research on it as you're too lazy to look up all the stats, ignore that the data is older than an iPhone 3, and then call a dissenting opinion a whiny drama queen.

Read the thread. I never said you're lazy because you didn't link the data, I actually provided it for you to help you out. I said you're lazy because when formulating your opinon (how many TD's Rodgers would get you) you didn't research all the variables (passing and rushing TD's). Yes, you admitted you didn't research rushing TD's, that just makes you lazy and apathetic.Edited to add: Just noticed you went through and deleted all the name-calling. Would you like me to delete it in the quotes I have from your responses?

Oh My God....I can't believe I"m even hearing this. So STATMAN....YOU DID CALL ME LAZY RIGHT ????? Who cares why you called me lazy...the fact is you still did. Heck...AGAIN...I even admitted I didn't post the actual games of my research.....AND YOU RESORT TO NAME CALLING FOR IT....WHEN I EVEN ADMITTED IT IN THE FIRST PLACE. YOUR EITHER CONTRIBUTING TO A HEALTHY DIALOGUE AND BUILDING A HEALTHY COMMUNITY OR NOT....YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH !....WOW !!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm just letting the admins handle this....I feel like I"m literally in grade school again.

Sorry for the inconvenience guys...but someone needs to stand up to this nonsense style journalism. Everyone needs a healthy place to have good and peaceful dialogue and one that contributes to a growing and thriving community.

My references of calling people out...was to get WAKE THEM UP on what they are doing to peoples threads. I don't resort to making fun of people...just because. I resort to it TO WAKE THEM UP FROM THEIR STUPOR on what they are really doing to a thread....UN#######G BELIEVALBE ACTUALLY !

Wow...still can't believe I'm dealing with this type of grade school mentality....but I will resort to it TO WAKE THEM UP FROM THEIR DRUNKEN STUPOR !

I"m out man....

 

[Eminence]

Correlation does not equal causation. Can we look at the starts and see if there is some anomaly? If he were playing a different team on Monday night would he still have a bad game because it's "Monday Night"?

 

[eoMMan]

He's going to have a bad game because he's facing Seattle in Seattle....not because it's a Monday Night Game. It he was home in GB and facing the Saints, I'm sure he's tear it up.

 

[ISUDESTROYERS]

He's going to have a bad game because he's facing Seattle in Seattle....not because it's a Monday Night Game. It he was home in GB and facing the Saints, I'm sure he's tear it up.

You could be very spot on EOMMAN. I hope you wrong because I'm starting him along with Rodgers, Nelson and Jennings....I researched the stats because I wanted to see if there was a small trend we can formulate OUR OWN opinions. Its tough either way...go with the data...and your gut and go for it.All the best,ISU

 

[DoubleG]

Correlation does not equal causation. Can we look at the starts and see if there is some anomaly? If he were playing a different team on Monday night would he still have a bad game because it's "Monday Night"?

Actually, this is another good point. 2 of the 4 away games are Chicago. For whatever reason, Aaron Rodgers' numbers are not nearly as impressive against the Bears - either in Green Bay or Chicago. Even last week's game, the offense only scored 16 points. So, if two of the 4 games are against a team he is usually not quite as good against, and one of the 4 is from 4 years ago, I think our sample is flawed...incredibly. Especially since he is not playing against the Bears this coming week. But I don't want to get all super scientific on you.