What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Ahman Green (1 Viewer)

That is the quietest $3-5 MILLION you'll ever hear a guy make. Good for Ahman...I was thinking he'd get screwed and ONLY get like a MIL and a half. He's earned some healthy coin....too bad its not for 2 years.

 
A few things to point out here about Ahman since he became a Packer:

1) Outside of 2005 he has never finished a season worse than 13th among all FF RBs

2) His worst season was in 2004 and he still had over 1400 yards and 8 TD's (40 recepts in PPR)

3) Except for 2005, he has had at least 299 touches a year in GB

People have short memories when it comes to players coming off of bad seasons, just look at when Emmitt Smith had a significant downward trend in numbers when he bottomed out in 1997 with barely over 1000 yards rushing and 4 TD's, but he put up very nice seasons in 1998 & 1999.

On the other hand, we have Gado:

1) Gado had a 4.1 YPC average last season, its not like he was monster. On the other hand, Green has a 4.6 YPC career average.

2) Gado only caught 10 passes in eight games. In comparison, Green recorded 19 catches in five games before getting hurt.

3) Nearly 50% of Gado's rushing yardage came in two games against DET & PHI. He also had a 10 carry 7 yard game against MIN, and two games against tough run defenses in PIT & CHI where he averaged less than 3 yards a carry.

4) Gado sprained his knee vs Balt and did not play in the final game. If Green can make it five seasons as a feature back but have his durability be a concern, why is Gado a safer bet if he can't make it through half a season?

Could Gado be the back-up to Green? Sure. But thinking a player with limited experience, a poorer track record, and now lesser financial commitment will unseat the incumbent pro-bowler does not seem too logical.

Stats source: FBG player pages

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Great move for the Pack.  They have a lot of holes to fill and this allows them some flexibility.  They can now use a mid-round pick and hope they get lucky with their RB of the future.  If not they can deal with this position next offseason. 

On the flipside I don't see how this makes sense for Green.  You're a day away from free agency, why not see what is out there.  It's not like the Pack offered a solid multi-year deal.  I know there's a glut of quality RBs on the market but Ahman is not getting any younger so even if he bounces back it's no guarantee he'll cash in next offseason.
Doesnt' make sense for Green? If I'm Green, I jump on it. Damn good players are getting cut left and right, and let's face it, Green is not an elite RB anymore. I highly doubt any team out there would offer Ahman a multi-year deal.
The guy signed a one year deal a day before free agency. Why is that a positive?Why not take a few days and see if anyone actually makes an offer. Again, it's not like he's turning down a solid deal from the Pack.
He would be turning down $2MM with a chance to earn $5MM if things work out. His base salary last year was just over $4MM. I think it is unlikely he would do better in free agency and there is no way the Packers leave this money on the table for him while he shops around. A good deal for everyone concerned I would say. Green has been re-habbing in Green Bay this offseason and was one of two players in attendance at McCarthy's first press conference. The Packers are very familiar with his health situation and reportedly expect him to be ready to go from day one in training camp. It is unclear how much of this $2MM base is guaranteed, but is likely they are not taking much if any chances in this deal.
Alexander just signed. That takes one stud off the market. Should an Edge or a Lewis resign in the next three days that could take another big time RB off the market and make Ahman that much more desirable. Probably won't happen but odder things have happened. If Ahman's concern was staying with Green Bay than I have zero issues with this. Yet, from a pure business standpoint he did himself no favors by not testing the waters to see if there's any takers. You don't know what's out there if you don't try and I think there are plenty of teams that would match the one year deal he just received so he eally wouldn't be risking too much.
It's too bad that Green actually wanted to show some loyalty and stay in a place that he enjoys. He has compared Green Bay to Lincoln and that means something to him. Shame on him for that! :rolleyes:
As stated I don't see a problem with this if he's doing it out of loyalty or comfort. I do think loyalty is a two way street and the Pack isn't taking much of a risk here since it's only a one year deal.
 
Now, the Pack needs to show Walker some love, resign Kevin Berry, resign Kampman, let Grady Jackson test the waters, use their cap money to grab a good O-lineman, and I like their direction. Frankly I think they can be every bit as effective as they wre two years ago, particularly as they will be able to get an impact defensive player in the draft and may even concievably be able to trade down and still add an impact defensive player as well as a solid offensive lineman in the first round.

I'm very excited.

 
Could Gado be the back-up to Green? Sure. But thinking a player with limited experience, a poorer track record, and now lesser financial commitment will unseat the incumbent pro-bowler does not seem too logical.
I agree with the conclusion but not quite the analysis. In the games he played in last year (which is far more relevant than his career stats from his glory days) Green ran for 3.3 y/c. Gado was the only back to show any signs of life last season under this offense. This was and until proven otherwise still is an offense in shambles and Brett Favre isnt what he was by any stretch. You are right that Gado isnt going to waltz in and take the job under any circumstance, but i think it is also unwise to assume Green is going to be anywhere near as productive as he was earlier in his career. He is still relatively young (29) but he has a fair amount of miles on him. You may be correct that he will just eek out a living and still put up almost respectable numbers, but in that case he will likely start losing touches to Gado in a RBBC situation. Bottom line is Gado is still a good cheap prospect with nice upside, while Green has huge upside but is a much bigger risk at his age and station. He will also be very expensive due to name recognition alone- in my opinion is set to be one of the most overvalued RBs of 06 in fantasy, while Gado will be a nice semi-sleeper
 
Another thing to consider is how Green and Gado will operate in the zone blocking scheme. Which of these two are a better fit for that type of running game? Or, won't it matter?

 
Another thing to consider is how Green and Gado will operate in the zone blocking scheme. Which of these two are a better fit for that type of running game? Or, won't it matter?
From JSOnline a few days ago..Either way, the Packers still think Green can be an effective player, even as they make the transformation to a zone running scheme. Over the past five years, the Packers have employed a power-gap scheme that blocks the opponent a different way.

McCarthy thinks Green and Gado will have no problem adjusting.

"The biggest thing about the system is you're looking for the type of runner who puts his foot down and goes," he said. "You're not making a bunch of moves at the line of scrimmage. I think from what I've seen on film, both guys will be a fit for that style of running. It's not a matter of whether they've run it; the reads will be similar to what they've done before. There will be more emphasis on one cut, one decision."

Regardless of what happens with Green, McCarthy said Gado was still in the team's plans. It's harder to predict whether an undrafted rookie who went from the practice squad to the starting lineup will be capable of handling a full-time load better than someone with Green's experience.

"I think when you're dealing with the running back position and even the quarterback position, the toll that individual takes, you never have enough good running backs," McCarthy said. "What Ahman has done in the past obviously speaks for itself. Until you've done it for a full 16 games, you never know. Monday morning there are few guys who feel worse than a running back."

 
I just think that last year's small sample size is not a fair indicator that Green is finished and Gado is the heir apparent.

Green saw his average dip to 4.3 YPC in 2002 after having back to back 1700+ total yard seasons prior to then where he averaged 4.6 and 4.5 YPC...then in 2003 he exploded for 5.3 YPC and 20 TD's.

I am not saying he will put up 2003 numbers again, but it just seems like there are too many premature nails going into this 29 year old's coffin after a season that saw everything go wrong for the Packers. :shrug:

 
Wow, I am very happy with this deal. I though for sure Green would want at least a 2 year deal. THis is a very low eisk signing. If Green is healthy, the Packers have a 1400 yard rusher. If he isn't then he is gone at the end of the year with no cap hit.

 
As I see it, Green is either healthy and Gado is an afterthought. Or Green is not healthy and it doesn't make a difference for Green owners anyway. Gado's value stems directly from Green's health, IMO. I don't see Gado taking much if anything away from a healthy Green.

 
Green was a back up in seattle for a couple of years if i remember correctly,then went to GB and got a chance to prove himself(successfully ) , what makes people think that givin the same chance Gado couldnt succeed? I for one believe this kid has something special...only time and a whole season will tell.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Were you people discounting Gado even awake last year?

Jeez Louise ...

I've never seen a player hated on more than this guy ...

I think Green goes to camp #1, but what happens after that is anyone's guess.

Samkon Gado has big-time talent and he just scratched the surface last year.
I don't understand why everyone's all the rage over Green! Seems to me there were 5 different RBs that played behind this supposedly awful offensive line last season - and only ONE was able to perform! That was Gado! Green was autrocious last season, and not very good the 2nd half of `04. Naj & Fisher have never been anything more than mediocre backups. Gado outperformed them all - and that was with the same supporting crew.
 
Were you people discounting Gado even awake last year?

Jeez Louise ...

I've never seen a player hated on more than this guy ...

I think Green goes to camp #1, but what happens after that is anyone's guess.

Samkon Gado has big-time talent and he just scratched the surface last year.
I don't understand why everyone's all the rage over Green! Seems to me there were 5 different RBs that played behind this supposedly awful offensive line last season - and only ONE was able to perform! That was Gado! Green was autrocious last season, and not very good the 2nd half of `04. Naj & Fisher have never been anything more than mediocre backups. Gado outperformed them all - and that was with the same supporting crew.
Everyone seems to forget that Green/Davenport played when the OL was in its early stages of cohesiveness. Over a season the OL becomes better and Gado made the best of his opportunity when the OL had much more cohesiveness than in game 1. Besides, when Gado was the feature back the defenses still had to respect Brett Favre. He is still just as dangerous then most QB's in the league when it comes to bringing his team back no matter who he is throwing too. Brett Favre and a more jelling OL made those yards for Gado and to think those yards would not have been there for Green/Davenport later in the year is crazy thinking. Gado still had problems holding onto the ball and still did not showcase his talent when he could have against weaker teams too.
 
Now, the Pack needs to show Walker some love, resign Kevin Berry, resign Kampman, let Grady Jackson test the waters, use their cap money to grab a good O-lineman, and I like their direction. Frankly I think they can be every bit as effective as they wre two years ago, particularly as they will be able to get an impact defensive player in the draft and may even concievably be able to trade down and still add an impact defensive player as well as a solid offensive lineman in the first round.

I'm very excited.
HAHAHA...this makes me laugh :hophead:
 
Were you people discounting Gado even awake last year?

Jeez Louise ...

I've never seen a player hated on more than this guy ...

I think Green goes to camp #1, but what happens after that is anyone's guess.

Samkon Gado has big-time talent and he just scratched the surface last year.
I don't understand why everyone's all the rage over Green! Seems to me there were 5 different RBs that played behind this supposedly awful offensive line last season - and only ONE was able to perform! That was Gado! Green was autrocious last season, and not very good the 2nd half of `04. Naj & Fisher have never been anything more than mediocre backups. Gado outperformed them all - and that was with the same supporting crew.
Everyone seems to forget that Green/Davenport played when the OL was in its early stages of cohesiveness. Over a season the OL becomes better and Gado made the best of his opportunity when the OL had much more cohesiveness than in game 1. Besides, when Gado was the feature back the defenses still had to respect Brett Favre. He is still just as dangerous then most QB's in the league when it comes to bringing his team back no matter who he is throwing too. Brett Favre and a more jelling OL made those yards for Gado and to think those yards would not have been there for Green/Davenport later in the year is crazy thinking. Gado still had problems holding onto the ball and still did not showcase his talent when he could have against weaker teams too.
Ya..Green never fumbled :rolleyes:
 
Ya..Green never fumbled :rolleyes:
Never said he didnt but when a player is given a limited opportunity he best not fumble as frequently as Gado did. Dont know the numbers but I would bet Green fumbled fewer times per carry than Gado did.
 
Ya..Green never fumbled :rolleyes:
Never said he didnt but when a player is given a limited opportunity he best not fumble as frequently as Gado did. Dont know the numbers but I would bet Green fumbled fewer times per carry than Gado did.
I like to see a statistic for heart and determination.Also,green always seemed to fumble when the game was on the line..i could be wrong but i dont think so.

 
Ya..Green never fumbled :rolleyes:
Never said he didnt but when a player is given a limited opportunity he best not fumble as frequently as Gado did. Dont know the numbers but I would bet Green fumbled fewer times per carry than Gado did.
Also,green always seemed to fumble when the game was on the line..i could be wrong but i dont think so.
You're wrong.
 
Does anyone know if Ahman tore the quad tendon on the same knee that was labelled 'degenerative' a couple seasons ago?

I thought I read an article where the people looking at his latest injury believed he has been playing with a weakened tendon since college.

If that's true, Ahman's knee may end up stronger than it was in the past...and that in turn could trigger a return to confidence in the knee that obviously wasn't there last season.

 
I enjoy watching people thinking they've made a great point and following it up with some idiotic remark about how they "owned" someone when everyone else watching it thinks the point he just made was off.

What the hell does it matter if the Ravens matched Taylor's offer, the bottom line is they agreed to pay him $3 million to not be a week 1 starter.

How much did Marshall Faulk make last year? How about Chris Perry? Cedric Benson? Duce Staley? Travis Henry? Larry Johnson?
:goodposting:
 
Does anyone know if Ahman tore the quad tendon on the same knee that was labelled 'degenerative' a couple seasons ago?

I thought I read an article where the people looking at his latest injury believed he has been playing with a weakened tendon since college.

If that's true, Ahman's knee may end up stronger than it was in the past...and that in turn could trigger a return to confidence in the knee that obviously wasn't there last season.
I read that during the season as well
 
Packers lose little if Green fails to pan out

By TOM SILVERSTEIN

tsilverstein@journalsentinel.com

Posted: Mar. 7, 2006

It turns out the Green Bay Packers didn't have to invest much into the return of running back Ahman Green.

Under terms of the deal, Green is scheduled to receive a $150,000 roster bonus and a $1.35 million base salary, both payable if the Packers choose to keep him for the regular season. Because Green is a vested veteran he would be guaranteed the entire base salary if he is on the active roster the first day of the regular season.

In addition to the roster and signing bonuses, Green can earn another $5,700 by taking part in the team's off-season workout program.

The contract also features $2.75 million of incentives. Green gets $250,000 if he rushes for 750 yards, another $500,000 if he reaches 950 yards, another $500,000 for 1,150 yards, another $500,000 for 1,350 yards and another $500,000 for 1,550 yards.

In addition, he can earn $31,250 for every game he is on the roster.

Green's salary-cap number for 2006 will be $2.011 million.
LINKWeird contract for Green to sign, as he really is not looking at a lot of money unless he puts up big numbers. Makes me question how healthy he is if he thought this was the best he could get . . .

 
Now that the contract is completely revealed, it's no wonder Green Bay re-signed him. Very team friendly and basically a no risk contract. Good move by the Pack IMO.

 
Packers lose little if Green fails to pan out

By TOM SILVERSTEIN

tsilverstein@journalsentinel.com

Posted: Mar. 7, 2006

It turns out the Green Bay Packers didn't have to invest much into the return of running back Ahman Green.

Under terms of the deal, Green is scheduled to receive a $150,000 roster bonus and a $1.35 million base salary, both payable if the Packers choose to keep him for the regular season. Because Green is a vested veteran he would be guaranteed the entire base salary if he is on the active roster the first day of the regular season.

In addition to the roster and signing bonuses, Green can earn another $5,700 by taking part in the team's off-season workout program.

The contract also features $2.75 million of incentives. Green gets $250,000 if he rushes for 750 yards, another $500,000 if he reaches 950 yards, another $500,000 for 1,150 yards, another $500,000 for 1,350 yards and another $500,000 for 1,550 yards.

In addition, he can earn $31,250 for every game he is on the roster.

Green's salary-cap number for 2006 will be $2.011 million.
LINKWeird contract for Green to sign, as he really is not looking at a lot of money unless he puts up big numbers. Makes me question how healthy he is if he thought this was the best he could get . . .
Just a theory....maybe Green is confident in his rehab and that he can attain those incentives. Those incentives may be more than anyone would have offered in a salary/bonus due to questions about his health. Plus, he has made it very known that he wanted to stay with the Packers.
 
I thought this was a weird contract for the Packers to sign at the time as well.

My understanding of the dark days when 2007 would be uncapped, was that all performance bonuses this year must be considered likely to be earned and count against this years cap. So Tom Silverstein was mistaken with the cap hit this year prior to the new deal. I think the whole contact would apply to this years cap.

The Pack must have planned to cut Green if no extension to the CBA was made. There is no way they would take 5 million out of the Salary cap for him.

As it is stated here, and with the new extension, I think this is a great deal for the packers. I am surprised that Green didn't push for the bonus money to be in total yards rather than rushing yards.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top