Kool-Aid Larry
Footballguy
how many games before kc fans are cheering for smith to get carted off the field?
FWIW, Cassel was the #12 QB in 2010. I think that's the upside for Smith but he should at least make a good backup.'TheFanatic said:I don't know about top 12, but definitely in the top 20, so he could easily be a QB2 to fill in when Brees/Rodgers/Mannings/Brady/Big Ben/RGIII/Luck/etc are on bye. He might even be a top 15 or so guy who could be paired with another middle of the pack guy to play the matchups. If you have this guy in a 2QB league, he just became gold! He was doing well before the injury and I expect Reid to make the guy even better.'Bigboy10182000 said:I'm not sure I agree with that yet. Reid will surely keep him throwing no matter what the situation is so that's a plus. The KC D will surely keep them in garbage time a lot as well. Assuming they keep Bowe I could see Smith finishing as a top 12 guy.I dunno. Harbaugh had him averaging 27 throws a game until he got hurt this year. Smith was QB19 after 7 weeks. Can't see Smith suddenly becoming a fantasy factor. I think he probably hurts Bowe as well if Bowe stays. (not necessarily from Bowe's 2012 numbers, but his career averages).Given Reid will have him throw 35-40 times a game, does he have any upside? Would have liked Foles or Geno better, but I still think it's a system that will produce stats.
He is available at one, when the chefs pick.'FUBAR said:Geno won't be available in the 2nd.'MAC_32 said:I believe geno will make this statement and trade false. Admittedly worried about where he ends up though. Needs a strong organization. Strong leadership.'Judge Smails said:Granted I'm not an expert judging the value of a player vs a future round draft pick, but this was my thought as well. This QB class stinks. I personally don't hate the move.'The Comedian said:So you think trading for a 28 year old starting quarterback at the expense of a 2nd round pick in an admittedly weak draft sets the team back?'Biabreakable said:What this move tells me is that Reid is not planning on being the coach in KC long. If he was planning on being the HC there for awhile I do not see the reason for this move. Build from the draft that is the main advantage that having a losing season gives a team is high draft position. This trade sets the Chiefs back in the long term for short term stability at the QB position.
The other thing this tells me is that this years draft may be viewed by the KC front office (as well as perhaps around the league)as a weak one.
I do not think this was a good deal for KC but at least it is not as much as they paid for Cassell when they traded for him.
The Chachinator finds this greatly misleading.Matt Cassel - 58.9 completion %, 13,495 yards, 82 TD, 57 INT, 24 Fumbles, 80.4 Passer RatingAlex Smith - 59.3 completion %, 14,280 yards, 81 TD, 63 INT, 36 Fumbles, 79.1 Passer Rating
You are right, Alex Smith has played on a better team.The Chachinator finds this greatly misleading.Matt Cassel - 58.9 completion %, 13,495 yards, 82 TD, 57 INT, 24 Fumbles, 80.4 Passer RatingAlex Smith - 59.3 completion %, 14,280 yards, 81 TD, 63 INT, 36 Fumbles, 79.1 Passer Rating
Particularly when you look at the trends over the last four years. One is trending up and one is trending down. And one just got the best QB improving HC in the league while another is being scouted by the Cardinals.This post is going to be so bumpable later on. I envision something like the Cheifs having as many or more wins in their first four games than they did all of last year and the haters will say, "But Alex Smith's numbers aren't that great. He's only averaging 220 yards passing 2 TD's and .6 picks a game," while those that know anything about football (real football, not this silly #### we do here) will point to the W's.The Chachinator finds this greatly misleading.Matt Cassel - 58.9 completion %, 13,495 yards, 82 TD, 57 INT, 24 Fumbles, 80.4 Passer RatingAlex Smith - 59.3 completion %, 14,280 yards, 81 TD, 63 INT, 36 Fumbles, 79.1 Passer Rating
Particularly when you look at the trends over the last four years. One is trending up and one is trending down. And one just got the best QB improving HC in the league while another is being scouted by the Cardinals.This post is going to be so bumpable later on. I envision something like the Cheifs having as many or more wins in their first four games than they did all of last year and the haters will say, "But Alex Smith's numbers aren't that great. He's only averaging 220 yards passing 2 TD's and .6 picks a game," while those that know anything about football (real football, not this silly #### we do here) will point to the W's.The Chachinator finds this greatly misleading.Matt Cassel - 58.9 completion %, 13,495 yards, 82 TD, 57 INT, 24 Fumbles, 80.4 Passer RatingAlex Smith - 59.3 completion %, 14,280 yards, 81 TD, 63 INT, 36 Fumbles, 79.1 Passer Rating
After seeing the plan to get Alex Smith, it only affirms my belief that Andy Reid needs serious psychological help.
0http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270465how many games before kc fans are cheering for smith to get carted off the field?
and in case their feeling wasn't clear:http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270494&page=2There's still hope, guys.Alex Smith could die in a fire between now and March 12. I think that would invalidate the deal, right?
I hate Jovan Belcher for not killing Clark Hunt first.
I'd give that title to Harbaugh after what he did with Smith.And one just got the best QB improving HC in the league while another is being scouted by the Cardinals.
As a Chargers fan I'd like to see this too.I have never been a Matt Cassel fan but I would like to see him end up starting for the Raiders. It would be somewhat entertaining to see him face the Smith lead Chiefs twice a year.
as a player in an idp league, I'd also like to see itAs a Chargers fan I'd like to see this too.I have never been a Matt Cassel fan but I would like to see him end up starting for the Raiders. It would be somewhat entertaining to see him face the Smith lead Chiefs twice a year.
Don't forget about:Josh Johnson at a non-scholarship San Diego collegeAndrew LuckColin KaepernickI'd give that title to Harbaugh after what he did with Smith.And one just got the best QB improving HC in the league while another is being scouted by the Cardinals.
You say that Smith can only take a team so far and then mention he took the team to the NFCC? Had there not been two special teams fumbles in that game Smith is probably still the starter. He took a team with a strong d and great line a bisciut from the super bowl. KC has a good D, albeit tired D from the lack of offense, and a good LT available at the 1.1. He could thrive in that system.Is Reid not bright enough to figure out Harbaugh realized Smith could only take him so far? Did he see the market for Smith last year after the NFCC run?
Tom BradyBig BenJoe FlaccoAndy DaltonAndrew LuckMatt SchaubPeyton ManningEli ManningPhillip RiversRG IIIMichael Vick Tony RomoAaron RodgersMatt StaffordDrew BreesMatt RyanColin KaepernickRussell WilsonI would say Alex Smith is a borderline top 20, top 25 QB, a huge step off from the top 10 QBs in the league. I just don't think he is gonna do well in Andy's system but that said I don't remember McNabb throwing a lot of deep balls. The system is geared around a short controlled passing game. I don't see Smith taking the Chiefs past a showdown with the likes of Brady, Manning, Flacco, and Big Ben...11 trips to the Super Bowl in the last 12 years, 7 rings between them, just stating the facts my friend. I do wish Smith the best in KC, hope he gets a little respect back after what happened with CK.You say that Smith can only take a team so far and then mention he took the team to the NFCC? Had there not been two special teams fumbles in that game Smith is probably still the starter. He took a team with a strong d and great line a bisciut from the super bowl. KC has a good D, albeit tired D from the lack of offense, and a good LT available at the 1.1. He could thrive in that system.Is Reid not bright enough to figure out Harbaugh realized Smith could only take him so far? Did he see the market for Smith last year after the NFCC run?
I don't know if he will be all that fantasy relevant, but I think he will definitely be relevant in the NFL. Remember, Aikman was a terrible FFB QB but he won a lot of games. Look who the Ravens won the SB with the first time. He's not Brady, Mannings, or Brees, but he can win games. Flacco didn't put up stud fantasy numbers over his career and he is the highest paid QB in the league. Two different discussions here.Tom BradyBig BenJoe FlaccoAndy DaltonAndrew LuckMatt SchaubPeyton ManningEli ManningPhillip RiversRG IIIMichael Vick Tony RomoAaron RodgersMatt StaffordDrew BreesMatt RyanColin KaepernickRussell WilsonI would say Alex Smith is a borderline top 20, top 25 QB, a huge step off from the top 10 QBs in the league. I just don't think he is gonna do well in Andy's system but that said I don't remember McNabb throwing a lot of deep balls. The system is geared around a short controlled passing game. I don't see Smith taking the Chiefs past a showdown with the likes of Brady, Manning, Flacco, and Big Ben...11 trips to the Super Bowl in the last 12 years, 7 rings between them, just stating the facts my friend. I do wish Smith the best in KC, hope he gets a little respect back after what happened with CK.You say that Smith can only take a team so far and then mention he took the team to the NFCC? Had there not been two special teams fumbles in that game Smith is probably still the starter. He took a team with a strong d and great line a bisciut from the super bowl. KC has a good D, albeit tired D from the lack of offense, and a good LT available at the 1.1. He could thrive in that system.Is Reid not bright enough to figure out Harbaugh realized Smith could only take him so far? Did he see the market for Smith last year after the NFCC run?
Dilfer won a super bowl because he played on a team with an elite defense and the offense was not centered around him (Priest Holmes/Jamal Lewis led run game).If you watch Troy and Aikman and Alex Smith play, it is like night and day. Aikman threw a great deep ball, and he was not only accurate statistically, but he threw the ball where receivers could make plays, something Alex Smith could not do on a consistent basis.I don't know if he will be all that fantasy relevant, but I think he will definitely be relevant in the NFL. Remember, Aikman was a terrible FFB QB but he won a lot of games. Look who the Ravens won the SB with the first time. He's not Brady, Mannings, or Brees, but he can win games. Flacco didn't put up stud fantasy numbers over his career and he is the highest paid QB in the league. Two different discussions here.Tom BradyBig BenJoe FlaccoAndy DaltonAndrew LuckMatt SchaubPeyton ManningEli ManningPhillip RiversRG IIIMichael Vick Tony RomoAaron RodgersMatt StaffordDrew BreesMatt RyanColin KaepernickRussell WilsonI would say Alex Smith is a borderline top 20, top 25 QB, a huge step off from the top 10 QBs in the league. I just don't think he is gonna do well in Andy's system but that said I don't remember McNabb throwing a lot of deep balls. The system is geared around a short controlled passing game. I don't see Smith taking the Chiefs past a showdown with the likes of Brady, Manning, Flacco, and Big Ben...11 trips to the Super Bowl in the last 12 years, 7 rings between them, just stating the facts my friend. I do wish Smith the best in KC, hope he gets a little respect back after what happened with CK.You say that Smith can only take a team so far and then mention he took the team to the NFCC? Had there not been two special teams fumbles in that game Smith is probably still the starter. He took a team with a strong d and great line a bisciut from the super bowl. KC has a good D, albeit tired D from the lack of offense, and a good LT available at the 1.1. He could thrive in that system.Is Reid not bright enough to figure out Harbaugh realized Smith could only take him so far? Did he see the market for Smith last year after the NFCC run?
Point 1: KC defense plus Jamaal Charles could be that same model.Point 2: you totally missed the point I was making.'Balco said:Dilfer won a super bowl because he played on a team with an elite defense and the offense was not centered around him (Priest Holmes/Jamal Lewis led run game).If you watch Troy and Aikman and Alex Smith play, it is like night and day. Aikman threw a great deep ball, and he was not only accurate statistically, but he threw the ball where receivers could make plays, something Alex Smith could not do on a consistent basis.'TheFanatic said:I don't know if he will be all that fantasy relevant, but I think he will definitely be relevant in the NFL. Remember, Aikman was a terrible FFB QB but he won a lot of games. Look who the Ravens won the SB with the first time. He's not Brady, Mannings, or Brees, but he can win games. Flacco didn't put up stud fantasy numbers over his career and he is the highest paid QB in the league. Two different discussions here.'Ministry of Pain said:Tom BradyBig BenJoe FlaccoAndy DaltonAndrew LuckMatt SchaubPeyton ManningEli ManningPhillip RiversRG IIIMichael Vick Tony RomoAaron RodgersMatt StaffordDrew BreesMatt RyanColin KaepernickRussell WilsonI would say Alex Smith is a borderline top 20, top 25 QB, a huge step off from the top 10 QBs in the league. I just don't think he is gonna do well in Andy's system but that said I don't remember McNabb throwing a lot of deep balls. The system is geared around a short controlled passing game. I don't see Smith taking the Chiefs past a showdown with the likes of Brady, Manning, Flacco, and Big Ben...11 trips to the Super Bowl in the last 12 years, 7 rings between them, just stating the facts my friend. I do wish Smith the best in KC, hope he gets a little respect back after what happened with CK.'TheFanatic said:You say that Smith can only take a team so far and then mention he took the team to the NFCC? Had there not been two special teams fumbles in that game Smith is probably still the starter. He took a team with a strong d and great line a bisciut from the super bowl. KC has a good D, albeit tired D from the lack of offense, and a good LT available at the 1.1. He could thrive in that system.Is Reid not bright enough to figure out Harbaugh realized Smith could only take him so far? Did he see the market for Smith last year after the NFCC run?
A lot of things could happen, but the Chiefs D is far from the Ravens was back in 1999/2000 and frankly I don't see reason for it to rise to that level.Point 1: KC defense plus Jamaal Charles could be that same model.Dilfer won a super bowl because he played on a team with an elite defense and the offense was not centered around him (Priest Holmes/Jamal Lewis led run game).If you watch Troy and Aikman and Alex Smith play, it is like night and day. Aikman threw a great deep ball, and he was not only accurate statistically, but he threw the ball where receivers could make plays, something Alex Smith could not do on a consistent basis.I don't know if he will be all that fantasy relevant, but I think he will definitely be relevant in the NFL. Remember, Aikman was a terrible FFB QB but he won a lot of games. Look who the Ravens won the SB with the first time. He's not Brady, Mannings, or Brees, but he can win games. Flacco didn't put up stud fantasy numbers over his career and he is the highest paid QB in the league. Two different discussions here.Tom BradyBig BenYou say that Smith can only take a team so far and then mention he took the team to the NFCC? Had there not been two special teams fumbles in that game Smith is probably still the starter. He took a team with a strong d and great line a bisciut from the super bowl. KC has a good D, albeit tired D from the lack of offense, and a good LT available at the 1.1. He could thrive in that system.Is Reid not bright enough to figure out Harbaugh realized Smith could only take him so far? Did he see the market for Smith last year after the NFCC run?
Joe Flacco
Andy Dalton
Andrew Luck
Matt Schaub
Peyton Manning
Eli Manning
Phillip Rivers
RG III
Michael Vick
Tony Romo
Aaron Rodgers
Matt Stafford
Drew Brees
Matt Ryan
Colin Kaepernick
Russell Wilson
I would say Alex Smith is a borderline top 20, top 25 QB, a huge step off from the top 10 QBs in the league. I just don't think he is gonna do well in Andy's system but that said I don't remember McNabb throwing a lot of deep balls. The system is geared around a short controlled passing game. I don't see Smith taking the Chiefs past a showdown with the likes of Brady, Manning, Flacco, and Big Ben...11 trips to the Super Bowl in the last 12 years, 7 rings between them, just stating the facts my friend. I do wish Smith the best in KC, hope he gets a little respect back after what happened with CK.
Point 2: you totally missed the point I was making.
Please explain how you think this to be true because the stats sure don't support it. KC's D was on the field for 973 plays last year - 3rd fewest in the NFL. They gave up tied for 4th mosst yards per play. They had the fewest interceptions, and generally stunk.KC has a good D, albeit tired D from the lack of offense
They were 20th in time of possession so they may not have been on the field for that many plays, but that stat shows that they were pounded with the run all the time. Maybe because they were constantly playing from behind and other teams could just kill the clock. 3rd fewest plays seems like a knock on my statement, but I think it actually bolsters it in that they were in run defense all game long.They played for a lame duck coaching staff seemingly from day one and still have six players that went to the pro bowl. They have a lot of talent on that side of the ball. Look for them to be greatly improved next year, particularly if they are not constantly playing from behind. I highly doubt Andy Reid will be asked why Charles only had five carries in a game. He won't be stupid enough to limit his best offensive player so stupidly unless there's an injury.Please explain how you think this to be true because the stats sure don't support it. KC's D was on the field for 973 plays last year - 3rd fewest in the NFL. They gave up tied for 4th mosst yards per play. They had the fewest interceptions, and generally stunk.
Really? Im pretty sure Andy has been known to get too pass happy and stop running the ball with Westbrook & McCoy.Ill let a Eagle homer verify but that seems to be how he has rolled befoeeThey were 20th in time of possession so they may not have been on the field for that many plays, but that stat shows that they were pounded with the run all the time. Maybe because they were constantly playing from behind and other teams could just kill the clock. 3rd fewest plays seems like a knock on my statement, but I think it actually bolsters it in that they were in run defense all game long.They played for a lame duck coaching staff seemingly from day one and still have six players that went to the pro bowl. They have a lot of talent on that side of the ball. Look for them to be greatly improved next year, particularly if they are not constantly playing from behind. I highly doubt Andy Reid will be asked why Charles only had five carries in a game. He won't be stupid enough to limit his best offensive player so stupidly unless there's an injury.Please explain how you think this to be true because the stats sure don't support it.
KC's D was on the field for 973 plays last year - 3rd fewest in the NFL. They gave up tied for 4th mosst yards per play. They had the fewest interceptions, and generally stunk.
I will agree, but not to the point of 5 carries.Really? Im pretty sure Andy has been known to get too pass happy and stop running the ball with Westbrook & McCoy.They were 20th in time of possession so they may not have been on the field for that many plays, but that stat shows that they were pounded with the run all the time. Maybe because they were constantly playing from behind and other teams could just kill the clock. 3rd fewest plays seems like a knock on my statement, but I think it actually bolsters it in that they were in run defense all game long.They played for a lame duck coaching staff seemingly from day one and still have six players that went to the pro bowl. They have a lot of talent on that side of the ball. Look for them to be greatly improved next year, particularly if they are not constantly playing from behind. I highly doubt Andy Reid will be asked why Charles only had five carries in a game. He won't be stupid enough to limit his best offensive player so stupidly unless there's an injury.Please explain how you think this to be true because the stats sure don't support it.
KC's D was on the field for 973 plays last year - 3rd fewest in the NFL. They gave up tied for 4th mosst yards per play. They had the fewest interceptions, and generally stunk.
AR is known to be pass happy. Every knows his track record. Philly fans know it. Alex Smith performed better when his attempts were limited in the 25 to 30 per game range. Harbaugh figured that out about Alex. And now expect AR to push Alex Smith's attempts much higher than he's used to or maybe even is comfortable with.Really? Im pretty sure Andy has been known to get too pass happy and stop running the ball with Westbrook & McCoy.Ill let a Eagle homer verify but that seems to be how he has rolled befoee
They did have the 6th most rushing attempts against them. And the least # of passes, so good point. Also explains why they didn't get many interceptions if teams didn't have to throw. Still don't think they're a good defense, but they should be improved.They were 20th in time of possession so they may not have been on the field for that many plays, but that stat shows that they were pounded with the run all the time. Maybe because they were constantly playing from behind and other teams could just kill the clock. 3rd fewest plays seems like a knock on my statement, but I think it actually bolsters it in that they were in run defense all game long.They played for a lame duck coaching staff seemingly from day one and still have six players that went to the pro bowl. They have a lot of talent on that side of the ball. Look for them to be greatly improved next year, particularly if they are not constantly playing from behind. I highly doubt Andy Reid will be asked why Charles only had five carries in a game. He won't be stupid enough to limit his best offensive player so stupidly unless there's an injury.Please explain how you think this to be true because the stats sure don't support it. KC's D was on the field for 973 plays last year - 3rd fewest in the NFL. They gave up tied for 4th mosst yards per play. They had the fewest interceptions, and generally stunk.
I think they have some good players on D, but as a unit, no they are not good. They need someone to get them into line and play to their potential as 11 guys. Shore up the O Line, grab draft some players on the other side of the ball and resign Bowe and they could win some games. I doubt there is much fantasy impact from these guys, but they should be much improved in terms of the NFL.They did have the 6th most rushing attempts against them. And the least # of passes, so good point. Also explains why they didn't get many interceptions if teams didn't have to throw. Still don't think they're a good defense, but they should be improved.They were 20th in time of possession so they may not have been on the field for that many plays, but that stat shows that they were pounded with the run all the time. Maybe because they were constantly playing from behind and other teams could just kill the clock. 3rd fewest plays seems like a knock on my statement, but I think it actually bolsters it in that they were in run defense all game long.They played for a lame duck coaching staff seemingly from day one and still have six players that went to the pro bowl. They have a lot of talent on that side of the ball. Look for them to be greatly improved next year, particularly if they are not constantly playing from behind. I highly doubt Andy Reid will be asked why Charles only had five carries in a game. He won't be stupid enough to limit his best offensive player so stupidly unless there's an injury.Please explain how you think this to be true because the stats sure don't support it. KC's D was on the field for 973 plays last year - 3rd fewest in the NFL. They gave up tied for 4th mosst yards per play. They had the fewest interceptions, and generally stunk.
I give that one to Norv Turner when it comes to Smith.I'd give that title to Harbaugh after what he did with Smith.And one just got the best QB improving HC in the league while another is being scouted by the Cardinals.
That 49er team wasn't that different from Singletary's teams. It was Harbaugh and Fangio, not all Smith, whose season was more smoke and mirrors (he took 44 sacks that year).You say that Smith can only take a team so far and then mention he took the team to the NFCC? Had there not been two special teams fumbles in that game Smith is probably still the starter. He took a team with a strong d and great line a bisciut from the super bowl. KC has a good D, albeit tired D from the lack of offense, and a good LT available at the 1.1. He could thrive in that system.Is Reid not bright enough to figure out Harbaugh realized Smith could only take him so far? Did he see the market for Smith last year after the NFCC run?
I meant to bring this up about Smith - his sack rate is one of the biggest negatives about him. Sure he doesn't throw many INT's but how many of those sacks were drive killers?That 49er team wasn't that different from Singletary's teams. It was Harbaugh and Fangio, not all Smith, whose season was more smoke and mirrors (he took 44 sacks that year).You say that Smith can only take a team so far and then mention he took the team to the NFCC? Had there not been two special teams fumbles in that game Smith is probably still the starter. He took a team with a strong d and great line a bisciut from the super bowl. KC has a good D, albeit tired D from the lack of offense, and a good LT available at the 1.1. He could thrive in that system.Is Reid not bright enough to figure out Harbaugh realized Smith could only take him so far? Did he see the market for Smith last year after the NFCC run?
That season the 49ers were one of the least successful offenses in the League on 3rd down, and part of that was Smith just taking sacks to protect the ball. You can do that when you have the #1 giveaway/takeaway ratio in the League, as well as David Akers being your leading scorer. This past season Smith was at 29 sacks IIRC through nine games until injury. For comparison, Kaepernick would have to take 13 sacks in three remaining games of his starts to match Smith. So it's far to say that Smith takes those sacks instead of trying to make plays out if them, and it helps a completion percentage as well by not throwing a ball or two away.I meant to bring this up about Smith - his sack rate is one of the biggest negatives about him. Sure he doesn't throw many INT's but how many of those sacks were drive killers?That 49er team wasn't that different from Singletary's teams. It was Harbaugh and Fangio, not all Smith, whose season was more smoke and mirrors (he took 44 sacks that year).You say that Smith can only take a team so far and then mention he took the team to the NFCC? Had there not been two special teams fumbles in that game Smith is probably still the starter. He took a team with a strong d and great line a bisciut from the super bowl. KC has a good D, albeit tired D from the lack of offense, and a good LT available at the 1.1. He could thrive in that system.Is Reid not bright enough to figure out Harbaugh realized Smith could only take him so far? Did he see the market for Smith last year after the NFCC run?
Any chance Smith was asked to throw more when the team was in catch-up mode? Think there might be some reverse causation here?I don't have a dog in the Alex Smith fight, but this kind of statistic annoys me. (Not a dig on you for re-posting it; people who get paid to come up with this nonsense are the ones who annoy me.)@IanKenyonNFL: Alex Smith is 3-16 as a starter when asked to throw 35+ times. Andy Reid's Eagles threw the ball 35.7 times per game over the past 4 years.
Of course there's the chance but is that the case?There was a similar stats to Vick but the Eagles just trhow that much so I'm not sure.'Bamac said:Any chance Smith was asked to throw more when the team was in catch-up mode? Think there might be some reverse causation here?I don't have a dog in the Alex Smith fight, but this kind of statistic annoys me. (Not a dig on you for re-posting it; people who get paid to come up with this nonsense are the ones who annoy me.)'Bigboy10182000 said:@IanKenyonNFL: Alex Smith is 3-16 as a starter when asked to throw 35+ times. Andy Reid's Eagles threw the ball 35.7 times per game over the past 4 years.
Certainly part of what's being measured is that Smith isn't asked to throw 35 times unless he's losing. Probably part of what's being measured is that Smith isn't good enough to be relied on as the focal point of the offense.I just ran some stats for comparison sake, and here's some interesting data points for QBs in games with > 35 attempts.'Bamac said:Any chance Smith was asked to throw more when the team was in catch-up mode? Think there might be some reverse causation here?I don't have a dog in the Alex Smith fight, but this kind of statistic annoys me. (Not a dig on you for re-posting it; people who get paid to come up with this nonsense are the ones who annoy me.)'Bigboy10182000 said:@IanKenyonNFL: Alex Smith is 3-16 as a starter when asked to throw 35+ times. Andy Reid's Eagles threw the ball 35.7 times per game over the past 4 years.
A lot of those games where he had to throw +35 attempts was in Jimmy Raye's offense, and most of those games they did have to play catch up. Opposing teams would be up 2 or 3 scores in the second half, and dared Smith to throw, ultimately to make that DeBerg "played well enough to lose you a game" mistake. His TD to INT rate was 18-12 in 2009, 14-10 in 2010, again in Jimmy Raye's offense. Both those seasons were truncated seasons, not full 16 game seasons due to injury or starting the second half of 2009. As I posted earlier, Smith had only played 2 full seasons as starter - in 2006 and in 2011. This past season of course he was replaced by Kaepernick. The key here is how long he will last as starter in KC. If he has to dropback and throw over 30+ attempts, stuff will start to leak. Or he will get injured.Certainly part of what's being measured is that Smith isn't asked to throw 35 times unless he's losing. Probably part of what's being measured is that Smith isn't good enough to be relied on as the focal point of the offense.I just ran some stats for comparison sake, and here's some interesting data points for QBs in games with > 35 attempts.'Bamac said:Any chance Smith was asked to throw more when the team was in catch-up mode? Think there might be some reverse causation here?I don't have a dog in the Alex Smith fight, but this kind of statistic annoys me. (Not a dig on you for re-posting it; people who get paid to come up with this nonsense are the ones who annoy me.)'Bigboy10182000 said:@IanKenyonNFL: Alex Smith is 3-16 as a starter when asked to throw 35+ times. Andy Reid's Eagles threw the ball 35.7 times per game over the past 4 years.
Farve, 65-73 (.471) (most)
Manning, 70-41 (.633)
Brees, 49-52 (.485) (perhaps a bit surprising)
Elway, 40-41 (.494) (disputes the assertion that he was limited because of Reeves' conservative offense)
Brady, 54-24 (.692) (highest win pecentage)
Montana, 37-26 (.583)
Rogers 19-18 (.514)
Steve DeBerg, 8-45-1 (.157) (worst with > 40 games)
Chris Miller, 2-27(.069) (ouch)
Ryan Fitzpatrick, 3-21-1 (.140)
David Carr, 1-12 (.077) (worst active, if you count him active)
Cam Newton, 1-11 (.083) (worst active, if you don't count Carr)
Dave Brown, Bob Griese, 0-11 (most games without a win)
According to PFR, Smith is actually 3-13 (.231), and he's 1-0 in playoff games. Don't know where 3-16 comes from. But it does seem that Smith is more likely to be Steve DeBerg than Joe Montana.
What's the crime? His career stats?Smith is criminally undervalued in this thread.
The BOOOOO's will be louder in Arrowhead than they were at Candlestick.how many games before kc fans are cheering for smith to get carted off the field?
Again, Smith had only played 2 full seasons in the NFL. That's looking past 365 days.I don't know if he will be all that fantasy relevant, but I think he will definitely be relevant in the NFL. Remember, Aikman was a terrible FFB QB but he won a lot of games. Look who the Ravens won the SB with the first time. He's not Brady, Mannings, or Brees, but he can win games. Flacco didn't put up stud fantasy numbers over his career and he is the highest paid QB in the league. Two different discussions here.Tom BradyBig BenJoe FlaccoAndy DaltonAndrew LuckMatt SchaubPeyton ManningEli ManningPhillip RiversRG IIIMichael Vick Tony RomoAaron RodgersMatt StaffordDrew BreesMatt RyanColin KaepernickRussell WilsonI would say Alex Smith is a borderline top 20, top 25 QB, a huge step off from the top 10 QBs in the league. I just don't think he is gonna do well in Andy's system but that said I don't remember McNabb throwing a lot of deep balls. The system is geared around a short controlled passing game. I don't see Smith taking the Chiefs past a showdown with the likes of Brady, Manning, Flacco, and Big Ben...11 trips to the Super Bowl in the last 12 years, 7 rings between them, just stating the facts my friend. I do wish Smith the best in KC, hope he gets a little respect back after what happened with CK.You say that Smith can only take a team so far and then mention he took the team to the NFCC? Had there not been two special teams fumbles in that game Smith is probably still the starter. He took a team with a strong d and great line a bisciut from the super bowl. KC has a good D, albeit tired D from the lack of offense, and a good LT available at the 1.1. He could thrive in that system.Is Reid not bright enough to figure out Harbaugh realized Smith could only take him so far? Did he see the market for Smith last year after the NFCC run?
Particularly when you look at the trends over the last four years. One is trending up and one is trending down. And one just got the best QB improving HC in the league while another is being scouted by the Cardinals.This post is going to be so bumpable later on. I envision something like the Cheifs having as many or more wins in their first four games than they did all of last year and the haters will say, "But Alex Smith's numbers aren't that great. He's only averaging 220 yards passing 2 TD's and .6 picks a game," while those that know anything about football (real football, not this silly #### we do here) will point to the W's.The Chachinator finds this greatly misleading.Matt Cassel - 58.9 completion %, 13,495 yards, 82 TD, 57 INT, 24 Fumbles, 80.4 Passer RatingAlex Smith - 59.3 completion %, 14,280 yards, 81 TD, 63 INT, 36 Fumbles, 79.1 Passer Rating
i agree, there is a lot more to this trade than meets the eye. but i havent seen the shark pool stirred up like this in a while.I just wanted to say that in light of the contract with Bowe that if trading for Alex Smith helped get that done it makes the deal a lot better in my eyes.
I blame Joe Flacco.i agree, there is a lot more to this trade than meets the eye. but i havent seen the shark pool stirred up like this in a while.I just wanted to say that in light of the contract with Bowe that if trading for Alex Smith helped get that done it makes the deal a lot better in my eyes.
You're one of those guys. PRobably called for Smith to be benched the second they lost the NFCC in 2011. In the right system, the guy can win. He didn't lose the NFCC game and was a biscuit of getting you guys to the SB two years ago. Just because you're a homer doesn't mean you know football.Particularly when you look at the trends over the last four years. One is trending up and one is trending down. And one just got the best QB improving HC in the league while another is being scouted by the Cardinals.This post is going to be so bumpable later on. I envision something like the Cheifs having as many or more wins in their first four games than they did all of last year and the haters will say, "But Alex Smith's numbers aren't that great. He's only averaging 220 yards passing 2 TD's and .6 picks a game," while those that know anything about football (real football, not this silly #### we do here) will point to the W's.The Chachinator finds this greatly misleading.Matt Cassel - 58.9 completion %, 13,495 yards, 82 TD, 57 INT, 24 Fumbles, 80.4 Passer RatingAlex Smith - 59.3 completion %, 14,280 yards, 81 TD, 63 INT, 36 Fumbles, 79.1 Passer Rating![]()
![]()
![]()
Things turn around very quickly in the NFL. Look at the Rams last year. had the 2nd overall pick with just 2 wins. This year 7-8-1 and had the best record in the NFC west over even San Fran and Seattle. The Chiefs have 6 pro bowlers on the team, Bowe is back, Charles is there, they franchised their LT and have the 1st overall pick. If their LT can move to RT and they draft Joekel, then they have a strong O line, particularly for passing. I think they need another weapon on offense who may or may not be on the team already.I see them being middle of the pack next year in the 7-9/8-8 range as the pieces come together. Remember, Reid is pretty good at coaching up QB's. So the idea that we know exactly what we have in Smith (whether the haters or the people that see the improvement over the last 4 years), there is little doubt in my mind that the guy improves. Maybe not right away as he adjusts to the system, but I think by the end of the year next year, there will be lots of crow to dish out. Maybe I'll be eating it, but I doubt it.Yes, the Chiefs have Charles and Bowe and they might not be god awful on offense, but they seem to be aways away from being a good team. Smith should be better than when he first came into the league (and was very young and very green even if he was a high draft pick).