What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Alfred Morris, Redskins RB - Value (1 Viewer)

The biggest factor in Morris's perceived value is his draft pedigree. All this talk about Shanahan would be irrelevant if Morris were a high 1st round pick. Instead Morris was a long shot to even make the team. His value is pretty simple if you ask me. His ceiling is Mike Anderson 2000 and his floor is Ryan Torain.

 
Amazed that people still undervalue RBs because of the mystical Shannahan narrative. If you pay attention each year, you find that you constantly get solid RB production that is undervalued by the market.
The problem is that you rarely know which RB is going to give "solid RB production" until 3-4 games into the season.How many times as Shanahan's Week 1 starter been the team's top rusher for the year??
99 - Gary kept the job all season after Davis got hurt00 - Anderson kept the job all season after Gary tore his ACL04 - Droughns kept the job all season after Griffin sucked05 - Anderson kept the job all season from week 1
 
By mid season many wont need him but if you're like me and have Mathews and F. Jackson he might be heaven sent. Its worth the gamble at least.

 
He's an average player at best. He'll be benched or in a committee by midseason.
Finally, some sanity in this thread.
No one is projecting anything... in fact there is an overwhelming amount of people arguing against his already low value being lower...Anyway, Morris was just on ESPN radio for a small interview, he seemed confident and was looking forward to playing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's an average player at best. He'll be benched or in a committee by midseason.
What were Gary, Anderson and Droughns?
I'd take the latter two over Morris in a walk. Gary might be a good comparison, but that's not much of a compliment.

The problem for Morris is that he's less talented than Helu and probably not any better than Royster. The fact that he scored a couple short touchdowns obscured an otherwise poor game. His YPC was quite bad. If he keeps playing that poorly, he'll be replaced. You can sign a free agent off the street who can get you 3.4 YPC.

 
'Apple Jack said:
Morris's value is going to increase, not decrease.
What makes people think this? I blew 3/4 of my waiver dollars on him in a dynasty league. I got him obviously. Now I'm trying to figure out what I paid for.
 
He's an average player at best. He'll be benched or in a committee by midseason.
What were Gary, Anderson and Droughns?
I'd take the latter two over Morris in a walk. Gary might be a good comparison, but that's not much of a compliment.

The problem for Morris is that he's less talented than Helu and probably not any better than Royster. The fact that he scored a couple short touchdowns obscured an otherwise poor game. His YPC was quite bad. If he keeps playing that poorly, he'll be replaced. You can sign a free agent off the street who can get you 3.4 YPC.
I respect what you're saying and I've said all along that Helu is far more talented and Royster probably is too. However, Shanahan doesn't care about talent.
 
When things go bad for the Redskins in a game, what will Shanny do? Will he panic and go with Helu/Royster or stick with Morris? That will determine his long term value.

 
The beautify of this thread is that Morris' value will be debated regardless if he plays up until week 17, in which case the debate would go on into the post-season.

:banned:

 
However, Shanahan doesn't care about talent.
He does care about results though. Griffin isn't going to average a jillion yards per attempt every game. There will be times this season when Washington will have to rely on the running game to win. I have no confidence that Morris will be able to deliver. And as we all know, Shanny is quick to move to the next man in line. I'll be genuinely surprised if Morris is still starting by midseason.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The beautify of this thread is that Morris' value will be debated regardless if he plays up until week 17, in which case the debate would go on into the post-season. :banned:
Just looking for ideas, more of a hive mind collective. Wanna know when to hold and sell. So far my opinion that his implied value is much higher than his perceived value. His performance against STL will change that significantly, the people that were already skeptical because hes a washington RB will have the same opinion regardless, but that still accounts for a lot of people.
 
I think Morris owners are significantly over-estimating his trade value. The fact is that he still has very little name recognition and people that stayed away from that whole situation are still going to have the same view for the most part.I think Morris owners are only going to get good value if they wait a few more weeks and he can keep putting up decent fantasy numbers. Either that or keep him and trade someone else.By trying to immediately trade him, everyone just thinks you're trying to dump him before the RBBC kicks in. Nobody wants to give up much at all for a guy that most non-owners see as a guy who could be putting up 3 point performances as a role player a month from now.If he had shown some electric plays, caught some passes, or shown that he can be a truly productive back, then people would be more interested. But that 3.4 and zero catches just sits there like a big turd in the room. Here's a list of the RBs that averaged 3.7 or less ypc last year in the top 30 RBs:BenJarvus Green-EllisThat's it. And he was ranked 26th in my league. Nobody under 3.7 came even close. And maybe I'm wrong and that number goes up for Morris, but I didn't see anything out of him or the O-line to make me believe that it will rise substantially.
jfc can we stop citing one game samples of ypc as anything predictive. its going on all over this board.
So should we also discard his 28 carries as anything predictive?
Number of carries in a single game is a far, far more predictive variable than yards per carry in a single game.
 
You want some sanity in this thread? Here it is:

I don't care who the coach is, or what the situation is, but if a rookie RB rushes for 100 and 2 in his first NFL start, you go take a chance on him. Period. Regardless of what EBF of FantasyGeek48 says on the FFToday ForumBlogger. You take a chance on him.

YWIA

 
The biggest factor in Morris's perceived value is his draft pedigree. All this talk about Shanahan would be irrelevant if Morris were a high 1st round pick. Instead Morris was a long shot to even make the team. His value is pretty simple if you ask me. His ceiling is Mike Anderson 2000 and his floor is Ryan Torain.
so he will get somewhere between 200 and 1500 yards? i agreeanderson was a fullback by trade. if alfred holds onto the job for the entire year, i don't think he will be at risk to loose his job the following year.
 
You want some sanity in this thread? Here it is:I don't care who the coach is, or what the situation is, but if a rookie RB rushes for 100 and 2 in his first NFL start, you go take a chance on him. Period. Regardless of what EBF of FantasyGeek48 says on the FFToday ForumBlogger. You take a chance on him.YWIA
ThisIn a dyno I spent good money on him. He is a rookie who busted off impressive numbers, waiver wires are always thin and other players could be busts just as well.Normally the ones yellin about how much they will be a bust are the same who missed out on him with bids.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Apple Jack said:
Morris's value is going to increase, not decrease.
What makes people think this? I blew 3/4 of my waiver dollars on him in a dynasty league. I got him obviously. Now I'm trying to figure out what I paid for.
the question is not weather or not he can produce or not. we know which ever RB is in, will put up rb2+ numbers. the question is weather or not he can hold onto his job. so far, i think it looks like he can.the more time that passes where he remains the starter, the more confident everyone will be that he will hold onto his job. with each week, his value will climb. the risk is holding him too long until/if alfred looses his job, in which case his value will drop to zero.
 
So back to the original post....any action?
I may have missed one or two, but this is the condensed version:


I can't get much for him. In a deep 12 team league with a 2 RB/FLEX (with the best RB available on the WW being Hillman and then Joe McKnight) I asked for WRs. I wanted a player of Heyward Bey caliber but nothing so far. I asked a team (who starts David Wilson and Ryan Williams) for Stevie Johnson (they also have Bowe, Welker, Brown, Olgetree) and I would include Michael Bush and was laughed at. His value is so low that I think he is almost worth keeping.Sorry for a lot of parentheses.
I got offered Morris for Anquan Boldin. I declined.I got offered Morris for Mario Manningham. I declined.I think I value him too much, so I might just sit. If he offered me Mario Manningham, he won't want to do Morris & Decker for Victor Cruz (just an example, not really offering it).
In Dynasty I offeredIngramLaFellHilton/Brazil (other owner has Collie/Luck)forMorrisRoysterRichardson (Rams rookie RB)Golden TateI was turned down. I am a buyer of Morris right now. I think the Shanny fear is out of control
Traded him away for Ben Tate.
I traded him away for Decker. I wish you well, Alfred, wish you well.
0.5 ppr two keeper league. Proposed McFadden and Morris for McCoy. He is going to accept. Fair?
Just sent out four trades. Looking at the trade evaluator, each trade is a win/win for both teams overall...Greene/Morris for Jamal CharlesGreene/Morris for S. JacksonMorris/Richardson/Hardesty for CJ2K/RingerGreene/M. Bush/Morris for Sproles/Heyward BeyOverall, I doubt any will be accepted but these are starting points. Each team that I am trading with needs an extra RB for byes/flex position.
 
One thing to consider is that maybe Shanahan is going with a RBBC for the season meaning that he thought he needed a plodder/pile mover that took time off the clock in the first game so he went with Morris. Next game, he might think he needs a guy who can catch passes out of the flat. He might just go with the RB he feels give him the best advantage for the week. I doubt it, but all coaches should be thinking that way.

 
I'm in league where I've seen owners bid a large chuck of their waiver budget on players like Brandon Jackson (was that a year or two ago?).

However, I was able to get Morris this morning for a mere $9 ($100 waiver budget for the season). I think the other owners were turned off of him by the fact 1) he plays under Shanny, 2) did what he did vs. the Saints, who sport a defense that isn't terribly stout and came off a very tumultuous offseason, and 3) is in a RBBC.

At any rate I'm happy I got him so cheap. I did a throw away bid thinking I wouldn't even get him (there were 4 teams I thought would bid high for him).

I'm curious when other owners got him -- in the draft? Waivers/free agency prior to Week 1? Or did they just get him off waivers or in a trade after his big game vs. N.O.?
During his bust out preseason game for me.
Me too. I drafted him in three leagues.
i drafted both Morris and Royster late in my draft, which was after the 4th preseason game. Based on the preseason, I was convinced that they were not looking at Helu as the starter. So if either Royster or Morris could nail down the starting job, I would have the Redskins' starting RB. Unlike what others think, i believe Shanahan wants to have a workhorse RB and he has had trouble finding him. I now think Morris is that RB.
 
He's an average player at best. He'll be benched or in a committee by midseason.
What were Gary, Anderson and Droughns?
I'd take the latter two over Morris in a walk. Gary might be a good comparison, but that's not much of a compliment.

The problem for Morris is that he's less talented than Helu and probably not any better than Royster. The fact that he scored a couple short touchdowns obscured an otherwise poor game. His YPC was quite bad. If he keeps playing that poorly, he'll be replaced. You can sign a free agent off the street who can get you 3.4 YPC.
The most telling stat: Morris 28 carries, Royster 2, Helu 2, Young 2.Usually Shanahan transitions slowly to rookies. But not in this case. He sees something in Morris and has given him the starters job.

 
He's an average player at best. He'll be benched or in a committee by midseason.
What were Gary, Anderson and Droughns?
I'd take the latter two over Morris in a walk. Gary might be a good comparison, but that's not much of a compliment.

The problem for Morris is that he's less talented than Helu and probably not any better than Royster. The fact that he scored a couple short touchdowns obscured an otherwise poor game. His YPC was quite bad. If he keeps playing that poorly, he'll be replaced. You can sign a free agent off the street who can get you 3.4 YPC.
The most telling stat: Morris 28 carries, Royster 2, Helu 2, Young 2.Usually Shanahan transitions slowly to rookies. But not in this case. He sees something in Morris and has given him the starters job.
Alsm the fact that he is a young back that performed in his first game. In dynasty this guy is gold.
 
More like iron pyrite.

I would say he's the next Quentin Griffin, but Griffin was a more dynamic runner than Morris. Morris is the definition of average. Late draft pick. No special physical qualities. Ineffective in his first start. The only reason he has any value right now is because of opportunity. That opportunity will evaporate quickly if he doesn't perform better.

He's primed for another decent game against a horrible Rams team next week, but long term this guy is a mirage. He's not a hidden gem who somehow slipped through the cracks like Willie Parker, Arian Foster, or Priest Holmes. He's just an average player benefitting from a lack of competition.

 
Amazed that people still undervalue RBs because of the mystical Shannahan narrative. If you pay attention each year, you find that you constantly get solid RB production that is undervalued by the market.
The problem is that you rarely know which RB is going to give "solid RB production" until 3-4 games into the season.How many times as Shanahan's Week 1 starter been the team's top rusher for the year??
99 - Gary kept the job all season after Davis got hurt00 - Anderson kept the job all season after Gary tore his ACL04 - Droughns kept the job all season after Griffin sucked05 - Anderson kept the job all season from week 1
I was making the same argument last year when I was high on Hightower. I'm not saying Morris will lose the job but I think Shanahan is much more likely to pull the plug on a back than he used to be. If Morris doesn't fumble then I see no reason why he will not keep the job. If he fumbles, I would not be surprised if Helu goes in and takes the job. He might literally be one fumble away from irrelevance.
 
He's an average player at best. He'll be benched or in a committee by midseason.
What were Gary, Anderson and Droughns?
I'd take the latter two over Morris in a walk. Gary might be a good comparison, but that's not much of a compliment.

The problem for Morris is that he's less talented than Helu and probably not any better than Royster. The fact that he scored a couple short touchdowns obscured an otherwise poor game. His YPC was quite bad. If he keeps playing that poorly, he'll be replaced. You can sign a free agent off the street who can get you 3.4 YPC.
The most telling stat: Morris 28 carries, Royster 2, Helu 2, Young 2.Usually Shanahan transitions slowly to rookies. But not in this case. He sees something in Morris and has given him the starters job.
Alsm the fact that he is a young back that performed in his first game. In dynasty this guy is gold.
The guy won't make it to the end of the season as starter.He won't be on any fantasy dynasty roster by next.

 
More like iron pyrite.

I would say he's the next Quentin Griffin, but Griffin was a more dynamic runner than Morris. Morris is the definition of average. Late draft pick. No special physical qualities. Ineffective in his first start. The only reason he has any value right now is because of opportunity. That opportunity will evaporate quickly if he doesn't perform better.

He's primed for another decent game against a horrible Rams team next week, but long term this guy is a mirage. He's not a hidden gem who somehow slipped through the cracks like Willie Parker, Arian Foster, or Priest Holmes. He's just an average player benefitting from a lack of competition.
I disagree with your assertion that he was ineffective. You're cherry picking a small YPC sample. I can and did do the same above where I came up with a 5.1 YPC for him though the majority of this game. Either way, 100 and 2 TDs can't be called "ineffective."Fast Willie had speed going for him, but I bet a lot of people thought of Foster and Holmes as average talents coming into the league. Alf runs with power and determination and based on what seems like a high BMI, he's guaranteed to be durable, right?!?

 
'LawFitz said:
Either way, 100 and 2 TDs can't be called "ineffective."
Sure it can. 96 yards on 28 carries is not a good performance. Everyone on these forums seems to think Shonn Greene is crap. Well...Greene had 94 yards on 27 carries this week. Fact is, Morris put up numbers that would make Cedric Benson, Shonn Greene, or even William Green blush. The reason people are overlooking this is because FF players tend to judge performance by FF points, and not by how effective the player actually was with his opportunities. 3.4 YPC is a bad game. The fact that he happened to score 2 TDs doesn't change that. People say FF is opportunity + talent. But when you just have opportunity, you don't have much.
 
'LawFitz said:
Either way, 100 and 2 TDs can't be called "ineffective."
Sure it can. 96 yards on 28 carries is not a good performance. Everyone on these forums seems to think Shonn Greene is crap. Well...Greene had 94 yards on 27 carries this week. Fact is, Morris put up numbers that would make Cedric Benson, Shonn Greene, or even William Green blush. The reason people are overlooking this is because FF players tend to judge performance by FF points, and not by how effective the player actually was with his opportunities. 3.4 YPC is a bad game. The fact that he happened to score 2 TDs doesn't change that. People say FF is opportunity + talent. But when you just have opportunity, you don't have much.
He has more talent according to Shanahan, remember when he made him the starter?
 
'LawFitz said:
Either way, 100 and 2 TDs can't be called "ineffective."
Sure it can. 96 yards on 28 carries is not a good performance. Everyone on these forums seems to think Shonn Greene is crap. Well...Greene had 94 yards on 27 carries this week.

Fact is, Morris put up numbers that would make Cedric Benson, Shonn Greene, or even William Green blush. The reason people are overlooking this is because FF players tend to judge performance by FF points, and not by how effective the player actually was with his opportunities. 3.4 YPC is a bad game. The fact that he happened to score 2 TDs doesn't change that.

People say FF is opportunity + talent. But when you just have opportunity, you don't have much.
He has more talent according to Shanahan, remember when he made him the starter?
That's not why he named Morris the starter. I think even Shanny knows he's not the most talented RB in his stable. This thread literally runs in circles.
[*]he fits the ZBS better than Helu/Royster

[*]he was/is the healthiest RB, which is key if you want to flourish in any Shanny backfield (since 2007)

He also fit the week 1 game plan better than Helu/Royster, which was to keep Brees off the field.

I'm still in the camp that says it's his job to lose, which will happen if he fumbles/gets injured/severely under performs. Also, Shanny is fickle but not stupid. If and when the time arises that it'd be better to have a pass catcher in the backfield who can make plays (when WAS is down by a large sum), I don't think he'll hesitate to throw Helu in.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's an average player at best. He'll be benched or in a committee by midseason.
I love people that think this way... Its clearly wrong but it is entertaining and helps those of us with an open mind win fantasy games.Why is he average? Because he was a sixth round pick????There are very few runningbacks in the NFL that are special, Shanahan is right about runningbacks, for the most part they are pretty interchangable.. There are hundreds of runningbacks that come out of college every year that can find a hole and hit it hard when it is there, there are a handful of backs that can make something out of nothing... Those few are very rare. He is a strong back that hits the hole decisively and finishes runs, something Shanahan loves in a back. Most importantly the opportunity is there and barring injury he is going to do pretty well... Keep telling yourself he is average, most backs are, but the opportunity is above average.
 
'LawFitz said:
Either way, 100 and 2 TDs can't be called "ineffective."
Sure it can. 96 yards on 28 carries is not a good performance. Everyone on these forums seems to think Shonn Greene is crap. Well...Greene had 94 yards on 27 carries this week.

Fact is, Morris put up numbers that would make Cedric Benson, Shonn Greene, or even William Green blush. The reason people are overlooking this is because FF players tend to judge performance by FF points, and not by how effective the player actually was with his opportunities. 3.4 YPC is a bad game. The fact that he happened to score 2 TDs doesn't change that.

People say FF is opportunity + talent. But when you just have opportunity, you don't have much.
bolded is not always true.
 
'LawFitz said:
Either way, 100 and 2 TDs can't be called "ineffective."
Sure it can. 96 yards on 28 carries is not a good performance. Everyone on these forums seems to think Shonn Greene is crap. Well...Greene had 94 yards on 27 carries this week.

Fact is, Morris put up numbers that would make Cedric Benson, Shonn Greene, or even William Green blush. The reason people are overlooking this is because FF players tend to judge performance by FF points, and not by how effective the player actually was with his opportunities. 3.4 YPC is a bad game. The fact that he happened to score 2 TDs doesn't change that.

People say FF is opportunity + talent. But when you just have opportunity, you don't have much.
He has more talent according to Shanahan, remember when he made him the starter?
That's not why he named Morris the starter. I think even Shanny knows he's not the most talented RB in his stable. This thread literally runs in circles.
[*]he fits the ZBS better than Helu/Royster

[*]he was/is the healthiest RB, which is key if you want to flourish in any Shanny backfield (since 2007)

He also fit the week 1 game plan better than Helu/Royster, which was to keep Brees off the field.

I'm still in the camp that says it's his job to lose, which will happen if he fumbles/gets injured/severely under performs. Also, Shanny is fickle but not stupid. If and when the time arises that it'd be better to have a pass catcher in the backfield who can make plays (when WAS is down by a large sum), I don't think he'll hesitate to throw Helu in.
So is this just hindsight? Or is this just the residual opinions from when literally every back not named morris was touted as the starter before they werent.
 
'LawFitz said:
Either way, 100 and 2 TDs can't be called "ineffective."
Sure it can. 96 yards on 28 carries is not a good performance. Everyone on these forums seems to think Shonn Greene is crap. Well...Greene had 94 yards on 27 carries this week.

Fact is, Morris put up numbers that would make Cedric Benson, Shonn Greene, or even William Green blush. The reason people are overlooking this is because FF players tend to judge performance by FF points, and not by how effective the player actually was with his opportunities. 3.4 YPC is a bad game. The fact that he happened to score 2 TDs doesn't change that.

People say FF is opportunity + talent. But when you just have opportunity, you don't have much.
He has more talent according to Shanahan, remember when he made him the starter?
That's not why he named Morris the starter. I think even Shanny knows he's not the most talented RB in his stable. This thread literally runs in circles.
[*]he fits the ZBS better than Helu/Royster

[*]he was/is the healthiest RB, which is key if you want to flourish in any Shanny backfield (since 2007)

He also fit the week 1 game plan better than Helu/Royster, which was to keep Brees off the field.

I'm still in the camp that says it's his job to lose, which will happen if he fumbles/gets injured/severely under performs. Also, Shanny is fickle but not stupid. If and when the time arises that it'd be better to have a pass catcher in the backfield who can make plays (when WAS is down by a large sum), I don't think he'll hesitate to throw Helu in.
So is this just hindsight? Or is this just the residual opinions from when literally every back not named morris was touted as the starter before they werent.
It's what I've been saying since the third preseason game vs. CHI. Looks like I just hopped right back on the train going in circles.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Amazed that people still undervalue RBs because of the mystical Shannahan narrative. If you pay attention each year, you find that you constantly get solid RB production that is undervalued by the market.
The problem is that you rarely know which RB is going to give "solid RB production" until 3-4 games into the season.How many times as Shanahan's Week 1 starter been the team's top rusher for the year??
99 - Gary kept the job all season after Davis got hurt00 - Anderson kept the job all season after Gary tore his ACL

04 - Droughns kept the job all season after Griffin sucked

05 - Anderson kept the job all season from week 1
Also, the two QBs he had during that time are the only QBs since Elway retired to have a winning record under Shanahan. Might be time to return to some consistency in the running game.
 
In my 14 team dyno league where RBs are scarce, I got proposed the following:

He Sends:

Roddy White

Bilal Powell

I Send:

Alfred Morris

Greg Little

Am I too high on Alfred Morris because I am not running to the accept button? Right now he is my RB4 behind Foster, AP, Spiller.

 
'LawFitz said:
Either way, 100 and 2 TDs can't be called "ineffective."
Sure it can. 96 yards on 28 carries is not a good performance. Everyone on these forums seems to think Shonn Greene is crap. Well...Greene had 94 yards on 27 carries this week. Fact is, Morris put up numbers that would make Cedric Benson, Shonn Greene, or even William Green blush. The reason people are overlooking this is because FF players tend to judge performance by FF points, and not by how effective the player actually was with his opportunities. 3.4 YPC is a bad game. The fact that he happened to score 2 TDs doesn't change that. People say FF is opportunity + talent. But when you just have opportunity, you don't have much.
The last time a rookie RB put up numbers like Morris in week 1, he had 2 TDs 100 yds with a 3.1 YPC. I will concede that a "talent" comparison between Morris and Tomlinson is absurd, but if you're basing your evaluation of talent largely on YPC, then you should accept cases that defy your reasoning as well.
 
'LawFitz said:
Either way, 100 and 2 TDs can't be called "ineffective."
Sure it can. 96 yards on 28 carries is not a good performance. Everyone on these forums seems to think Shonn Greene is crap. Well...Greene had 94 yards on 27 carries this week. Fact is, Morris put up numbers that would make Cedric Benson, Shonn Greene, or even William Green blush. The reason people are overlooking this is because FF players tend to judge performance by FF points, and not by how effective the player actually was with his opportunities. 3.4 YPC is a bad game. The fact that he happened to score 2 TDs doesn't change that. People say FF is opportunity + talent. But when you just have opportunity, you don't have much.
The last time a rookie RB put up numbers like Morris in week 1, he had 2 TDs 100 yds with a 3.1 YPC. I will concede that a "talent" comparison between Morris and Tomlinson is absurd, but if you're basing your evaluation of talent largely on YPC, then you should accept cases that defy your reasoning as well.
Looking at YPC only tells so much, especially in that people haven't watched the game. His last 8 carries went for 8 yards, when the Saints had 8 in the box knowing that the Skins wouldnt pass as they were in a run down the clock mode. I wouldn't hold this against Morris as a stick to beat him with. Royster comes on for those 8 time-waste carries and 20-88 with 2 scores for Morris looks fine to me...
 
I might bench sjax for him this week :excited:

best offer I'm getting still is Cobb basically. Almost had a Wayne buyer, but he backed out.

If I wasn't excessively deep at rb (sjax, charles, Martin, sproels, mbush, Morris) then I would not be trading him at all. I think he has a great shot at being top 15 rb easy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you want to factor in that you can't run any further than the Goalline in addition to the grind out the clock 8 for 8 then he effectively had 18 for 84 which is 4.6ypc during the actual game.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top