The Commish
Footballguy
To be fair, that's likely because those reasons don't existYou lack helpful specifics on why she’s so much more centrist than the others.

To be fair, that's likely because those reasons don't existYou lack helpful specifics on why she’s so much more centrist than the others.
They do google kamala Harris and mnuchin.To be fair, that's likely because those reasons don't exist![]()
She is influenced by corporate money. Might be good for you, deal breaker for me.ok.....now what?
Please help me connect the dots. The conversation you responded to was about Klobuchar's political positions as a "moderate" and the political positions of those labeled "extreme" or "socialist" etc. The positions are very similar yet the labels are very different. I'm really not sure what Harris, the individual has to do with it.She is influenced by corporate money. Might be good for you, deal breaker for me.ok.....now what?
Was it specifically about Klobuchar? I thought you wanted difference. Klobuchar funding was a million from corporate law firms and lawyer's.Please help me connect the dots. The conversation you responded to was about Klobuchar's political positions as a "moderate" and the political positions of those labeled "extreme" or "socialist" etc. The positions are very similar yet the labels are very different. I'm really not sure what Harris, the individual has to do with it.
Yes....JohnnyU has labeled Kobuchar a "moderate" yet her political positions are virtually identical to all those who he has labeled "extreme", "left", "socialist" etc. The question was how he justifies the labels given that reality. Where funding comes from or who supports them wasn't part of the discussion.Was it specifically about Klobuchar? I thought you wanted difference. Klobuchar funding was a million from corporate law firms and lawyer's.
I dunno, what do you want? Someone here not corrupt? Can't help you.
Is there in your opinion a moderate Democrat that may run? Genuine question here I respect your opinion.Yes....JohnnyU has labeled Kobuchar a "moderate" yet her political positions are virtually identical to all those who he has labeled "extreme", "left", "socialist" etc. The question was how he justifies the labels given that reality. Where funding comes from or who supports them wasn't part of the discussion.
Policy wise they are all very similar IMO. I think where people get caught up is in the presentation. Bernie's rough and gruff. Warren is similar. I can't say that any of their positions are "far left". Off hand, I can't think of many of their positions that don't get majority support by the general populace.....education perhaps? A majority of America is on board with healthcare for all at this point. And I think most are fed up with corporations and the super rich running the show from a monetary perspective. So, to answer your question, I think most of them are moderate as defined by the desires of the country's electorate. Where I disagree with JohnnyU in that conversation is labeling all those others as he has....not the other way around.Is there in your opinion a moderate Democrat that may run? Genuine question here I respect your opinion.
just to clarify... some of your posts don’t make sense. hope that helps.Was it specifically about Klobuchar? I thought you wanted difference. Klobuchar funding was a million from corporate law firms and lawyer's.
I dunno, what do you want? Someone here not corrupt? Can't help you.
You don’t think Bernie is far left? Is there anyone in U.S. politics you’d consider to be far left?Bernie's rough and gruff. Warren is similar. I can't say that any of their positions are "far left".
I think the way he approaches things lends to being "far left". He's over the top with his rhetoric towards big banks etc. I think he has SO many areas he wants to change, the sheer volume of issues he attempts to focus on can give the appearance of "far left".You don’t think Bernie is far left? Is there anyone in U.S. politics you’d consider to be far left?
Yes, socialized medicine, a $20/hr minimum wage, and free college tuition are all far left in the United States.Are medicare for all, living wages, providing education to the people to compete in the global economy etc "far left"?
I think you’re vastly overestimating Americans positions on several of these issues. Medicare for all hasn’t received the scrutiny that it will during the upcoming election. Just wait until it’s demonized by FoxNews and costs are scored by the top think tanks.Policy wise they are all very similar IMO. I think where people get caught up is in the presentation. Bernie's rough and gruff. Warren is similar. I can't say that any of their positions are "far left". Off hand, I can't think of many of their positions that don't get majority support by the general populace.....education perhaps? A majority of America is on board with healthcare for all at this point. And I think most are fed up with corporations and the super rich running the show from a monetary perspective. So, to answer your question, I think most of them are moderate as defined by the desires of the country's electorate. Where I disagree with JohnnyU in that conversation is labeling all those others as he has....not the other way around.
You’re a fortune teller these days? Reading peoples souls?She is influenced by corporate money. Might be good for you, deal breaker for me.
Ok....I don't see it that way. These concepts are entrenched in our society. We've had medicare for a good while now. The argument is over where to draw the line. Public education is an even more glaring example of that. Few have a problem with the concept of public education, rather where it should stop....same with minimum wage.Yes, socialized medicine, a $20/hr minimum wage, and free college tuition are all far left in the United States.
But the distinctions are there and they are important. Medicare is good; Medicare for all is socialism. Public education is good; free college tuition is socialism. Minimum wage is good: $20 minimum wage is socialism. And socialism is bad.Ok....I don't see it that way. These concepts are entrenched in our society. We've had medicare for a good while now. The argument is over where to draw the line. Public education is an even more glaring example of that. Few have a problem with the concept of public education, rather where it should stop....same with minimum wage.
None of this was part of the questions asked me.But the distinctions are there and they are important. Medicare is good; Medicare for all is socialism. Public education is good; free college tuition is socialism. Minimum wage is good: $20 minimum wage is socialism. And socialism is bad.
Of course none of this makes any logical sense. But it’s the prevailing attitude nonetheless and I don’t think you can win national elections by pretending it doesn’t exist.
I looked at her donors, I guess that is fortune telling.You’re a fortune teller these days? Reading peoples souls?
It may have been unintentional...but the umbrella line was brilliant with Trumps inability to use one.
But the distinctions are there and they are important. Medicare is good; Medicare for all is socialism. Public education is good; free college tuition is socialism. Minimum wage is good: $20 minimum wage is socialism. And socialism is bad.
Of course none of this makes any logical sense. But it’s the prevailing attitude nonetheless and I don’t think you can win national elections by pretending it doesn’t exist.
Amy is for 20.00 an hour minimum wage?But the distinctions are there and they are important. Medicare is good; Medicare for all is socialism. Public education is good; free college tuition is socialism. Minimum wage is good: $20 minimum wage is socialism. And socialism is bad.
Of course none of this makes any logical sense. But it’s the prevailing attitude nonetheless and I don’t think you can win national elections by pretending it doesn’t exist.
I doubt it; I don’t know. That wasn’t my point when I wrote that.Amy is for 20.00 an hour minimum wage?
- I'm not sure where I'm at politically these days, but I view it as different tiers for me. On Tier 1 is ethics, decency, experience, intelligence, trust, fortitude, leadership, defense of institutions. I really don't know if Klobuchar is Presidential material yet but she's in the hopper for me.
only thing she missed was demonstrating how to work the umbrella- I'm not sure where I'm at politically these days, but I view it as different tiers for me. On Tier 1 is ethics, decency, experience, intelligence, trust, fortitude, leadership, defense of institutions. I really don't know if Klobuchar is Presidential material yet but she's in the hopper for me.
George Will presents a case for Amy Klobuchar![]()
I feel like I need to learn more about Klobuchar - any good sources?
Thanks!
This line made me chuckle: "Klobuchar, who will be 59 in May, is the daughter of a newspaper columnist. Surmounting this handicap, she went to Yale, then to the University of Chicago Law School, then to a law firm. "Sinn Fein said:Thanks!
For all you aspiring writers - that first paragraph is how you write a good hook:
Surely the silliest aspirant for the Democrats’ 2020 presidential nomination is already known: “ Beto ,” a. k.a.Robert Francis, O’Rourke is a skateboarding man-child whose fascination with himself caused him to live-stream a recent dental appointment for — open wide, please — teeth cleaning. His journal about his post-election recuperation-through-road-trip-to-nowhere-in-particular is so without wit or interesting observations that it merits Truman Capote’s description of “On the Road” author Jack Kerouac’s work: That’s not writing, that’s typing.
![]()
ZOMGprosecuting attorney of Hennepin County
Attorney General would be a nice consolation prize for either her or Kamala.ZOMG![]()
while I mostly agree, Harris will most likely energize a portion of the D base that Klobuchar will not. It’s incredibly complex, at the end of the day I think likability is the biggest factor. I hope she runs, but I’m starting to think she won’t.While I agree the likes of Sen K. Harris has personable appeal someone more moderate like Sen Klobuchar will not only garner all the Democrats votes vs Trump but she will also get moderate independents as well as a few moderate conservatives. Simply put any of the Democrats progressive candidates will not.
Is that really necessary?
Her to be taken down, she does good enough on her own.Is what really necessary?
Ahe obviously pissed off someone here.Her to be taken down, she does good enough on her own.
Ahe, instead of assuming she pissed me off just name her policy positions. Before you are done typing it out, it might hit you.Ahe obviously pissed off someone here.
As far as scandals go this is pretty boring stuff. From what I have watched, it’s not been that much, her lack of charisma is a huge hurdle.
She’s just a run of the mill moderate as far as I know.Ahe, instead of assuming she pissed me off just name her policy positions. Before you are done typing it out, it might hit you.
can’t have any of that...She’s just a run of the mill moderate as far as I know.
Beto, Sherrod Brown, Biden lots of the favor Dems running are pretty down the middle, no?can’t have any of that...