What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Andrew Luck Not Practicing Today (1 Viewer)

I have to start Fitzpatrick if Luck is a true GTD. Jets play at 9:30AM and waivers don't clear until 11.
There is absolutely no one else?
It's a 2QB league, so Mallett, Weeden or Foles who was just dropped. Fitz is the only droppable player, and I'm pretty sure I have to drop him before his game starts. I was counting on Fitz to be serviceable until Romo comes back, so I guess I'll just ride this out. Other team is stacked so I'm probably ####ed either way.
So you was going to start luck and fitz I guess?
Oh my bad, I can flex in Luck at 1:00 if he plays. So baked right now.
 
I have to start Fitzpatrick if Luck is a true GTD. Jets play at 9:30AM and waivers don't clear until 11.
There is absolutely no one else?
It's a 2QB league, so Mallett, Weeden or Foles who was just dropped. Fitz is the only droppable player, and I'm pretty sure I have to drop him before his game starts. I was counting on Fitz to be serviceable until Romo comes back, so I guess I'll just ride this out. Other team is stacked so I'm probably ####ed either way.
So you was going to start luck and fitz I guess?
Oh my bad, I can flex in Luck at 1:00 if he plays. So baked right now.
Lol nice

 
So what other options are Luck owners looking at this weekend if Luck is a no-go? Any good sleeper candidates who may still be on WW?

 
So what other options are Luck owners looking at this weekend if Luck is a no-go? Any good sleeper candidates who may still be on WW?
Slim mother####ing pickings - I'm between Bortles (who is my leading candidate), Fitzpatrick, and Hasselback.

Kaep is also available...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
@wingoz: Andrew Luck not on practice field for the Colts...But Matt Hasselbeck, Alex Tanney and Josh Johnson are.

@AdamSchefter: Read into this what you want as it pertains to Andrew Luck's status, but Colts signed quarterback Josh Johnson.

@Ballou1010xl: Andrew Luck not at practice again today. I was destroyed yesterday on air for saying that there's a chance he may not play. #Jaguars

 
So what other options are Luck owners looking at this weekend if Luck is a no-go? Any good sleeper candidates who may still be on WW?
I drafted Dalton as my backup for Luck.... I think I'm better off starting him over Luck at this point even if Luck was fully healthy.

 
Anyone else getting the feeling something is seriously wrong with Luck? Watching last weeks game, his throws were pretty bad. Pair that with 7 ints in 3 games. Not getting a warm and fuzzy about him until later in the year (perhaps)

 
Reason #34 to never take a QB in round 1, remember this moment folks for next year.
Some of us play in dynasty leagues. Plus first round picks like Jeremy Hill, Dez and Marshawn are either injured or aren't performing well. Silly post.

 
So what other options are Luck owners looking at this weekend if Luck is a no-go? Any good sleeper candidates who may still be on WW?
I drafted Dalton as my backup for Luck.... I think I'm better off starting him over Luck at this point even if Luck was fully healthy.
Things I thought I would never say for $800 Alec.
Yeah who would of thought [SIZE=small]Scut Farkus would make Luck look like a backup.[/SIZE]

Reason #34 to never take a QB in round 1, remember this moment folks for next year.
Some of us play in dynasty leagues. Plus first round picks like Jeremy Hill, Dez and Marshawn are either injured or aren't performing well. Silly post.
Thanks for your commentary, I was referring to redraft chief.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So what other options are Luck owners looking at this weekend if Luck is a no-go? Any good sleeper candidates who may still be on WW?
I drafted Dalton as my backup for Luck.... I think I'm better off starting him over Luck at this point even if Luck was fully healthy.
Things I thought I would never say for $800 Alec.
Yeah who would of thought [SIZE=small]Scut Farkus would make Luck look like a backup.[/SIZE]

Reason #34 to never take a QB in round 1, remember this moment folks for next year.
Some of us play in dynasty leagues. Plus first round picks like Jeremy Hill, Dez and Marshawn are either injured or aren't performing well. Silly post.
Thanks for your commentary, I was referring to redraft chief.
My bad it was an incredibly stupid post not silly...I was trying to be nice. No reason to even make a post like that which adds absolutely nothing to this thread other than to take a shot at Luck owners.

 
So what other options are Luck owners looking at this weekend if Luck is a no-go? Any good sleeper candidates who may still be on WW?
I drafted Dalton as my backup for Luck.... I think I'm better off starting him over Luck at this point even if Luck was fully healthy.
Things I thought I would never say for $800 Alec.
Yeah who would of thought [SIZE=small]Scut Farkus would make Luck look like a backup.[/SIZE]

Reason #34 to never take a QB in round 1, remember this moment folks for next year.
Some of us play in dynasty leagues. Plus first round picks like Jeremy Hill, Dez and Marshawn are either injured or aren't performing well. Silly post.
Thanks for your commentary, I was referring to redraft chief.
My bad it was an incredibly stupid post not silly...I was trying to be nice. No reason to even make a post like that which adds absolutely nothing to this thread other than to take a shot at Luck owners.
Peace board police have a nice day. :violin: :tumbleweed: :sadbanana: :hophead:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Raiderfan32904 said:
Against the Jags, Hasselbeck is a legit option. I just picked him up.
There is absolutely no reason to believe Hasselbeck is a legit option. He's 40 years old and going to play behind an OL that can't handle a blitz and has a below average run game. He's going to get blasted if he plays.
He's going to playing and "We're going to win!"

 
Luck and Rodgers both fell hard to the 3rd in my redraft... If I could do it over, I'd prob grab Rodgers there instead.

I would never in rounds 1 or 2, but by the 3rd to go with what was supposed to be a sure thing and never worry about QB felt like a no brainer.

 
Reason #34 to never take a QB in round 1, remember this moment folks for next year.
Well it wasn't wrong to fade the late round 1 RBs.
Historically it's a bad idea to take a QB in round 1, the value usually isn't worth it compared to what you get later (Brady,Dalton,Palmer), can we start an agreement on that?
Of course. I resisted the QB craze in 2012 after the statistical anomaly the year before when the top 5 guys crushed everyone else. One sharp guy in my league who plays poker for a living took Stafford like 8th overall that year - I couldn't believe it.

Thought I would zag when everyone else wanted to zig this year so I deviated from the normal 'wait on qb'. Should've gone Gronk/WR or WR/WR I guess. But taking RB for sake of taking RB wouldn't have been any better.

 
Luck and Rodgers both fell hard to the 3rd in my redraft... If I could do it over, I'd prob grab Rodgers there instead.

I would never in rounds 1 or 2, but by the 3rd to go with what was supposed to be a sure thing and never worry about QB felt like a no brainer.
I hear you there my possibly bald brother, I would have grabbed him in round 3 in a second. I think rounds 3-5 is the perfect time to get a QB, all of my previous drafts that I've revisited showed a Brady or someone else that was there and made an awesome pick.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reason #34 to never take a QB in round 1, remember this moment folks for next year.
Tell that to the Rodgers owners?
How about the Tom Brady owner who is better off so far when did he go in your draft?
My point is it's not a universal falsehood to take an elite rated QB in the first round. It's arguably a much safer pick than a RB. Look at the dumpster fire that is 1st round RB's not named AP, Charles or Bell. I'd still take a Top 3 rated QB I believed in at the right point of the first round. Bad break for Luck owners, meeting/exceeding expectations for Rodgers owners.

 
Reason #34 to never take a QB in round 1, remember this moment folks for next year.
Well it wasn't wrong to fade the late round 1 RBs.
Historically it's a bad idea to take a QB in round 1, the value usually isn't worth it compared to what you get later (Brady,Dalton,Palmer), can we start an agreement on that?
Only if you'll agree that it's a bad idea to draft a RB in round 1 because the value usually isn't worth it compared to what you get later (Dion Lewis, Karlos Williams, Carlos Hyde, Chris Johnson, etc.)

 
Reason #34 to never take a QB in round 1, remember this moment folks for next year.
Tell that to the Rodgers owners?
How about the Tom Brady owner who is better off so far when did he go in your draft?
My point is it's not a universal falsehood to take an elite rated QB in the first round. It's arguably a much safer pick than a RB. Look at the dumpster fire that is 1st round RB's not named AP, Charles or Bell. I'd still take a Top 3 rated QB I believed in at the right point of the first round. Bad break for Luck owners, meeting/exceeding expectations for Rodgers owners.
More than a bad break, I'm debating Blake ####### Bortles versus Colin Kraepernick this week :hot:

FML... At least I'm 3-0 so I've got some wiggle room, but ####!!

 
What the hell happened to him?

Makes losing on Dalton by $3 this week sting even more. At least there's 2 okay options on the WW in Tannehill vs NYJ and Stafford @ SEA but of course they have about the worst matchups possible.

 
What the hell happened to him?

Makes losing on Dalton by $3 this week sting even more. At least there's 2 okay options on the WW in Tannehill vs NYJ and Stafford @ SEA but of course they have about the worst matchups possible.
This one is available to me too and not even a thought.

It is Bortles or Kraep well ahead of an awful looking Stafford going in to Sea.

 
Reason #34 to never take a QB in round 1, remember this moment folks for next year.
Tell that to the Rodgers owners?
How about the Tom Brady owner who is better off so far when did he go in your draft?
My point is it's not a universal falsehood to take an elite rated QB in the first round. It's arguably a much safer pick than a RB. Look at the dumpster fire that is 1st round RB's not named AP, Charles or Bell. I'd still take a Top 3 rated QB I believed in at the right point of the first round. Bad break for Luck owners, meeting/exceeding expectations for Rodgers owners.
Fair point, I would take Rodgers 1st above any other QB before the draft this year or now, lots of bad starts for the top guys at all positions.

Reason #34 to never take a QB in round 1, remember this moment folks for next year.
Well it wasn't wrong to fade the late round 1 RBs.
Historically it's a bad idea to take a QB in round 1, the value usually isn't worth it compared to what you get later (Brady,Dalton,Palmer), can we start an agreement on that?
Only if you'll agree that it's a bad idea to draft a RB in round 1 because the value usually isn't worth it compared to what you get later (Dion Lewis, Karlos Williams, Carlos Hyde, Chris Johnson, etc.)
OK Ill give you Dion out of those but you still have Leveon,Charles and AP, name me 3 QB's who would go in round 1 today.

 
Reason #34 to never take a QB in round 1, remember this moment folks for next year.
Does that apply to round 2? :unsure:

The QB in round 1 is always a crap shoot. I've gotten lucky when I did so...Brady in 2012 and Brees in 2013. But then again as pointed out it seems that now even RBs are not panning out so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I don't know if there was some psychic intuition involved but I went and grabbed Derek Carr from FA last Saturday because I wasn't too happy with Luck anyway and I had too many good WR so I could drop Torrey Smith. Hopefully Luck will snap out of it after he recovers.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Reason #34 to never take a QB in round 1, remember this moment folks for next year.
Well it wasn't wrong to fade the late round 1 RBs.
Historically it's a bad idea to take a QB in round 1, the value usually isn't worth it compared to what you get later (Brady,Dalton,Palmer), can we start an agreement on that?
Only if you'll agree that it's a bad idea to draft a RB in round 1 because the value usually isn't worth it compared to what you get later (Dion Lewis, Karlos Williams, Carlos Hyde, Chris Johnson, etc.)
Exactly. I posted the same thing in another thread or this one. There are tons of late picks and early busts at every position. I drafted Luck in one league (went QB late in my other two) in the 2nd and I looked back and yes there were a couple guys who I'd rather have but for the most part that late 1st through early 3rd was a bonanza of early busts, but like last night (Forsett) the season isn't over yet. I drafted really well for that Luck team so honestly I still like that pick. If he starts playing better, the team is loaded.
 
What the hell happened to him?

Makes losing on Dalton by $3 this week sting even more. At least there's 2 okay options on the WW in Tannehill vs NYJ and Stafford @ SEA but of course they have about the worst matchups possible.
This one is available to me too and not even a thought.

It is Bortles or Kraep well ahead of an awful looking Stafford going in to Sea.
Yeah Im not doing Stafford with that matchup and how he's looked this year. Avoiding Kaep as well. I think for me itll be either Tanne or Alex Smith @ CIN

 
Reason #34 to never take a QB in round 1, remember this moment folks for next year.
Tell that to the Rodgers owners?
How about the Tom Brady owner who is better off so far when did he go in your draft?
My point is it's not a universal falsehood to take an elite rated QB in the first round. It's arguably a much safer pick than a RB. Look at the dumpster fire that is 1st round RB's not named AP, Charles or Bell. I'd still take a Top 3 rated QB I believed in at the right point of the first round. Bad break for Luck owners, meeting/exceeding expectations for Rodgers owners.
Fair point, I would take Rodgers 1st above any other QB before the draft this year or now, lots of bad starts for the top guys at all positions.

Reason #34 to never take a QB in round 1, remember this moment folks for next year.
Well it wasn't wrong to fade the late round 1 RBs.
Historically it's a bad idea to take a QB in round 1, the value usually isn't worth it compared to what you get later (Brady,Dalton,Palmer), can we start an agreement on that?
Only if you'll agree that it's a bad idea to draft a RB in round 1 because the value usually isn't worth it compared to what you get later (Dion Lewis, Karlos Williams, Carlos Hyde, Chris Johnson, etc.)
OK Ill give you Dion out of those but you still have Leveon,Charles and AP, name me 3 QB's who would go in round 1 today.
Based on production? Rodgers, Brady and Dalton. Bottom line is it's easy for you to come in now and say "I told you so" like some kind of hero, but if Luck was at the level he was last year he'd absolutely be worth a first round pick at the point in the draft guys like CJ Anderson, DeMarco Murray or Marshawn Lynch were going.

Was Dez Bryant a bad first round pick.

I took Luck in Round 2, despite usually waiting on a QB, based on my VBD values. Obviously it hasn't worked out but to act like it was wrong is just silly. The first two rounds have been littered with "bad" picks so far - and all those RBs I listed are outperforming guys that went in Rounds 1-3, so if you want to dismiss them to make your point I don't know what to say.

 
Reason #34 to never take a QB in round 1, remember this moment folks for next year.
Plus first round picks like Jeremy Hill, Dez and Marshawn are either injured or aren't performing well. Silly post.
All signs point to bb7278 selected Stephen Gostkowski in round 1 because he is solid.
The folks that deal in absolutes are the ones who continue to lose. I'm still fine with my pick of Luck. Hopefully he plays, but I think he'll be putting up plenty of points this year. I'm hoping the shoulder is fine, but I couldn't predict that any more than Dez. I'll live with it.
 
Reason #34 to never take a QB in round 1, remember this moment folks for next year.
Plus first round picks like Jeremy Hill, Dez and Marshawn are either injured or aren't performing well. Silly post.
All signs point to bb7278 selected Stephen Gostkowski in round 1 because he is solid.
The folks that deal in absolutes are the ones who continue to lose. I'm still fine with my pick of Luck. Hopefully he plays, but I think he'll be putting up plenty of points this year. I'm hoping the shoulder is fine, but I couldn't predict that any more than Dez. I'll live with it.
I am not. That offensive line is terrible, it doesn't matter who is throwing passes behind a line that bad.

 
Dr. Octopus said:
bb7278 said:
OK Ill give you Dion out of those but you still have Leveon,Charles and AP, name me 3 QB's who would go in round 1 today.
Do you think that anyone that took Luck passed on Bell, Charles of Peterson to do so?
I saw it happen, Luck before Charles in one league.

Bottom line is you guys can have fun and do whatever you like but I will NEVER take a QB in round 1 no matter what and I've definitely won a lot in 15 years and there's at least a few people that agree with me not that I care.

I was just trying to help because I think it's a fair strategy that's worked for me but to each their own, I think a lot of people checking this thread are Luck owners so I understand your frustration.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dr. Octopus said:
bb7278 said:
OK Ill give you Dion out of those but you still have Leveon,Charles and AP, name me 3 QB's who would go in round 1 today.
Do you think that anyone that took Luck passed on Bell, Charles of Peterson to do so?
I saw it happen, Luck before Charles in one league.

Bottom line is you guys can have fun and do whatever you like but I will NEVER take a QB in round 1 no matter what and I've definitely won a lot in 15 years and there's at least a few people that agree with me not that I care.

I was just trying to help because I think it's a fair strategy that's worked for me but to each their own, I think a lot of people checking this thread are Luck owners so I understand your frustration.
Maybe you can draft up some cheat sheets for us next year. Thanks.

 
Dr. Octopus said:
bb7278 said:
OK Ill give you Dion out of those but you still have Leveon,Charles and AP, name me 3 QB's who would go in round 1 today.
Do you think that anyone that took Luck passed on Bell, Charles of Peterson to do so?
I saw it happen, Luck before Charles in one league.

Bottom line is you guys can have fun and do whatever you like but I will NEVER take a QB in round 1 no matter what and I've definitely won a lot in 15 years and there's at least a few people that agree with me not that I care.

I was just trying to help because I think it's a fair strategy that's worked for me but to each their own, I think a lot of people checking this thread are Luck owners so I understand your frustration.
Maybe you can draft up some cheat sheets for us next year. Thanks.
It doesn't take a genius to figure out you don't take QBs in the first two rounds in 12-teamers, regardless of scoring format.

 
Chuck Pagano says he's questionable for Sunday

Pair that with next week's Texan game against that awful O-line and then playing the Pats after that? Oof

 
Dr. Octopus said:
bb7278 said:
OK Ill give you Dion out of those but you still have Leveon,Charles and AP, name me 3 QB's who would go in round 1 today.
Do you think that anyone that took Luck passed on Bell, Charles of Peterson to do so?
I saw it happen, Luck before Charles in one league.

Bottom line is you guys can have fun and do whatever you like but I will NEVER take a QB in round 1 no matter what and I've definitely won a lot in 15 years and there's at least a few people that agree with me not that I care.

I was just trying to help because I think it's a fair strategy that's worked for me but to each their own, I think a lot of people checking this thread are Luck owners so I understand your frustration.
Maybe you can draft up some cheat sheets for us next year. Thanks.
I sincerely promise you Doc Oc I will PM you my final 2016 cheatsheet no later than 8/26/16 for your use/amusement :thumbup:

Back to NOT derailing ths thread...

How does Grigson still have a job, I would put Luck getting the snot kicked out of him/his injury squarely on Grigson for not fixing the o-line that kinda sucked last year too.

https://www.facebook.com/FireRyanGrigson

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dr. Octopus said:
bb7278 said:
OK Ill give you Dion out of those but you still have Leveon,Charles and AP, name me 3 QB's who would go in round 1 today.
Do you think that anyone that took Luck passed on Bell, Charles of Peterson to do so?
I saw it happen, Luck before Charles in one league.

Bottom line is you guys can have fun and do whatever you like but I will NEVER take a QB in round 1 no matter what and I've definitely won a lot in 15 years and there's at least a few people that agree with me not that I care.

I was just trying to help because I think it's a fair strategy that's worked for me but to each their own, I think a lot of people checking this thread are Luck owners so I understand your frustration.
Maybe you can draft up some cheat sheets for us next year. Thanks.
It doesn't take a genius to figure out you don't take QBs in the first two rounds in 12-teamers, regardless of scoring format.
Draft dominator disagrees with you in certain scoring formats. Besides like I mentioned before a lot of us affected by Luck's injuries have him in a dynasty league. I'm not sure why this turned into a discussion about not drafting a QB in the 1st round.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top