What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Andy Reid and the Cardinals? (1 Viewer)

Just some interesting news, I have someone on the inner circle of the Eagles (on the staff) who actually says it's looking more like KC than Arizona at this point. Andy seems to be tied to Heckert as the GM and KC may be willing to bite on that. Should have some more info today.

 
PFT

At a time when a “source” (possibly, agent Bob LaMonte) is expressing “95 percent” certainty to Adam Schefter that Andy Reid will be the next coach of the Cardinals and Arizona P.R. guru Mark Dalton is saying there’s a 99-percent chance that the 95-percent assessment is 100-percent inaccurate, someone not named Andy Reid will be getting a second interview for the job.

Per a source with knowledge of the situation, Cardinals defensive coordinator Ray Horton will interview with Arizona brass for a second time on Wednesday, a day after his initial interview for the job.
According to Ian Rapoport and Albert Breer of NFL Network, Reid’s interview is scheduled for Thursday.

It’s the first known interview of Reid for one of the vacancies other than the one his firing in Philly created. And while there’s a chance he gets the job, there is significant skepticism in league circles regarding any and all reports that it’s a virtual done deal.

Likewise, there’s more than significant skepticism regarding the reports that former Browns G.M. Tom Heckert will join Reid in Arizona. The source for those reports could be their mutual agent, Bob LaMonte, who likely is trying to puff up as many of his guys as he can for as many of the jobs in which he can place them.
UPDATE 12:15 a.m. ET: It appears that the Cardinals are leaking that the interview will occur on Thursday to employees of NFL Network, and that LaMonte is leaking Wednesday to other reporters.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Slider said:
'JetMaxx said:
Reid will be great for Kolb but he has been poor in just about every facet of his HC/GM responsibilities going on about 5 years now.
2010 says hi.
What happened there? We lost in the first round of the playoffs after losing the 2nd seed to Joe freaking Webb.And 2010 just might be the worst Eagles draft of the last 15 years. Only 2011 can compete with it for the title.
:goodposting: Beat me to it.
 
Chiefs now look more likely than Cardinals to hire Andy Reid

Reid interviewed with the Chiefs on Wednesday and ended up delaying a scheduled meeting with the Cardinals in order to extend his meeting with the Chiefs. And ESPN’s Chris Mortensen said on Mike and Mike in the Morning that the events of the last 24 hours suggest that Reid is getting close to a deal in Kansas City.

“The Chiefs were trying to close a deal with Andy Reid,” Mortensen said. “At this point I’m going to be surprised if Andy Reid is not the Chiefs’ coach. Now, I’ve been surprised before, but there’s a lot of activity there. Some would say, ‘Why Kansas City over Arizona?’ One thing is, in Kansas City, Clark Hunt, the owner of the Chiefs, he’ll let Andy Reid build this thing the way he wants to build it. And if you know Andy, he wants to be able to basically pick the entire organization, set up his personnel. . . . The Chiefs are willing, and Clark Hunt is willing to do that.”

 
I am aware of Reid's offense. I am also aware of Charles' skill set. What am I missing that those 2 aren't a great match and that Charles can't produce at levels that Westbrook and McCoy haven't in the past?

Then again, I see the error of my ways. If Reid ends up in KC, all Charles owners should trade him for what they can get.

 
I am aware of Reid's offense. I am also aware of Charles' skill set. What am I missing that those 2 aren't a great match and that Charles can't produce at levels that Westbrook and McCoy haven't in the past? Then again, I see the error of my ways. If Reid ends up in KC, all Charles owners should trade him for what they can get.
I'm not saying he can't still be fantastic. But having a pass-first isn't necessarily a good thing for Charles.
 
Charles by year rsh, rec ave touch per game

2008-67, 27, 5.87

2009-190,40, 15.33

2010-230,45, 17.18

2011-inj

2012-284,36, 20.00

Shady under Reid

2009-155,40, 12.18

2010-207,78, 19

2011-273,48, 21.4

2012-200,54, 21.16

Sometimes perception does not match reality. PHI homer here. Reid got the ball to his main RB a LOT. He got too cute near the goal line for me but the notion that JC got more touches than Reid got Shady is nonsense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Charles value goes down, down, down.
Absolutely horrible posting.Say what you will about his game management, personnel decisions, the Castillo fiasco, etc, but Andy Reid is unquestionably a strong offensive coach -- MUCH better in that aspect than anyone the Chiefs have had in recent years. His primary RBs have pretty much ALWAYS been fantasy stud RB1s. Healthier offense + much more involvement in the passing game + less of a committee approach certainly isn't going to make Charles LESS valuable. Charles, having proven that he's back 100% and now in a VERY RB-friendly system, is likely headed for top-5 overall pick territory.
 
so pioli out then?
my question also.. I was a bit surprised he wasnt canned along with Romeo the other dayas for Charles value.. all depends on who's behind center and what wideouts KC can acquire/grow within the system. Was disappointed with Baldwin this year but wasnt sure if it was because of below avg. QB play or that he hasnt progressed. :unsure:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just some interesting news, I have someone on the inner circle of the Eagles (on the staff) who actually says it's looking more like KC than Arizona at this point. Andy seems to be tied to Heckert as the GM and KC may be willing to bite on that. Should have some more info today.
:thumbup:
 
Charles value goes down, down, down.
Absolutely horrible posting.Say what you will about his game management, personnel decisions, the Castillo fiasco, etc, but Andy Reid is unquestionably a strong offensive coach -- MUCH better in that aspect than anyone the Chiefs have had in recent years. His primary RBs have pretty much ALWAYS been fantasy stud RB1s. Healthier offense + much more involvement in the passing game + less of a committee approach certainly isn't going to make Charles LESS valuable. Charles, having proven that he's back 100% and now in a VERY RB-friendly system, is likely headed for top-5 overall pick territory.
I agree Reid is a major boon for Charles value. Put another way I'm big time bummed for Ryan Williams value he did not land in Arizona.I do think Reid is a much better offensive coach for fantasy purposes than anyone the Chiefs have had recently but taking fantasy out of the equation I'm not sure he's a better NFL OC than Haley. I thought Haley was solid. The talent was poor so the numbers were never going to be great but I thought he managed the talent very well. Part of that management involved keeping Charles touches in check which rubbed a lot of people wrong in fantasy football but in terms of the real NFL I thought he handled his touches close to perfect. A Haley offense may not produce the points of a Reid offense but it also won't usually get your QB hit so often or produce the turnovers.
 
As a Steelers' homer, IMO Haley really wasn't super impressive this year. Certainly not saying he's awful, but seems more like your run-of-the-mill solid NFL OC. I see Reid as an exceptional offensive mind -- if he were willing to settle for that role I think he'd be among the very best offensive coordinators in the NFL.

As a Charles owner and fan, I agree that his carries probably shouldn't be among the league leaders in the interest of keeping him healthy longer. I definitely think getting him more involved making plays in space in the passing game will really add to KC's offense (and Charles' overall stat-line).

 
Charles value goes down, down, down.
Absolutely horrible posting.Say what you will about his game management, personnel decisions, the Castillo fiasco, etc, but Andy Reid is unquestionably a strong offensive coach -- MUCH better in that aspect than anyone the Chiefs have had in recent years. His primary RBs have pretty much ALWAYS been fantasy stud RB1s. Healthier offense + much more involvement in the passing game + less of a committee approach certainly isn't going to make Charles LESS valuable. Charles, having proven that he's back 100% and now in a VERY RB-friendly system, is likely headed for top-5 overall pick territory.
I agree Reid is a major boon for Charles value. Put another way I'm big time bummed for Ryan Williams value he did not land in Arizona.I do think Reid is a much better offensive coach for fantasy purposes than anyone the Chiefs have had recently but taking fantasy out of the equation I'm not sure he's a better NFL OC than Haley. I thought Haley was solid. The talent was poor so the numbers were never going to be great but I thought he managed the talent very well. Part of that management involved keeping Charles touches in check which rubbed a lot of people wrong in fantasy football but in terms of the real NFL I thought he handled his touches close to perfect. A Haley offense may not produce the points of a Reid offense but it also won't usually get your QB hit so often or produce the turnovers.
Andy Reid's offenses prior to Vick were very low on turnovers....
 
'Deranged Hermit said:
'Bigboy10182000 said:
Cheifs fans...which QB do you like better out of Barkley or Smith?
:goodposting: If Reid goes to KC, I think it's a slam dunk he takes a QB. Probably will try to catch lightning in a bottle for a second time after his success with McNabb.
Any chance they make a run at Flynn since he's a product of the West Coast/Green Bay/Philly system?
 
'Bigboy10182000 said:
Cheifs fans...which QB do you like better out of Barkley or Smith?
As a Chiefs fan I would rather they went after Flynn or Alex Smith. But if I had to choose I'd go with Geno.
 
'Bigboy10182000 said:
Cheifs fans...which QB do you like better out of Barkley or Smith?
As a Chiefs fan I would rather they went after Flynn or Alex Smith. But if I had to choose I'd go with Geno.
Are Flynn or Alex Smith really different guys than Cassell? Cassell's 2010 is better than any season Smith has had, and Flynn couldn't beat out a late-round rookie despite getting a big contract. If you put Smith out there on a crappy KC team he's going to get eaten alive just like he did on a crappy Niner team for five years.
 
'Deranged Hermit said:
'Bigboy10182000 said:
Cheifs fans...which QB do you like better out of Barkley or Smith?
:goodposting: If Reid goes to KC, I think it's a slam dunk he takes a QB. Probably will try to catch lightning in a bottle for a second time after his success with McNabb.
He'll bring in McNabb as his Doug Peterson and they'll draft Geno #1 overall. Reid won't let Albert leave either IMO
 
'Bigboy10182000 said:
Cheifs fans...which QB do you like better out of Barkley or Smith?
As a Chiefs fan I would rather they went after Flynn or Alex Smith. But if I had to choose I'd go with Geno.
Are Flynn or Alex Smith really different guys than Cassell? Cassell's 2010 is better than any season Smith has had, and Flynn couldn't beat out a late-round rookie despite getting a big contract. If you put Smith out there on a crappy KC team he's going to get eaten alive just like he did on a crappy Niner team for five years.
That late round rookie who beat out Flynn has been pretty spectacular this season, and he also got his chance to shine thanks to a preseason injury Flynn suffered. Also I was thinking the price might be right for Flynn, because I can't imagine Seattle wanting to keep him around as a backup. Like you said, he's got a big contract.Alex Smith, yeah, I'd be less excited about him. But he has proven himself to be the anti-Cassel as far as turnovers are concerned. Still, I see your point here. Smith has proven that he isn't significantly better than Cassel, and we haven't seen enough of Flynn to really draw a conclusion. The same, however, could be said of Smith and Barkley. My point was basically that I don't think either of those guys are worth that #1 pick. Personally, I'd like to see us trade away that #1 pick to the highest buyer.Even though we have a need for a QB, If we do keep that #1 pick, I would want to use it on the best overall prospect. My understanding is there are some great defensive prospects out there. That might be the way to go.
 
My point was basically that I don't think either of those guys are worth that #1 pick. Personally, I'd like to see us trade away that #1 pick to the highest buyer.Even though we have a need for a QB, If we do keep that #1 pick, I would want to use it on the best overall prospect. My understanding is there are some great defensive prospects out there. That might be the way to go.
Problem is the draft class doesnt have that #1 player teams would deal up for or at least give up a lot to make it worth while. Guess its debatable but I wouldnt take Geno or Barkley in the top 10.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top