Raider Nation
Devil's Advocate
Em, please remove "not" from the title. Thanks.
				
			Dynasty league, I'm 0-3 and weak at RB. Put A. Jeffery on the trading block yesterday and got this offer: Lacey and TY HIlton, for Jeffery and 2015 1st round pick. I countered with Lacey and Michael Floyd, and got denied. Not sure what I expected for Jeffery, but just don't feel like I'm getting enough with Lacey/Hilton?Care to post the best offer?Getting peppered with trade offers this week.
I was verbally offered Rashad Jennings yesterday, but the offer has been withdrawn.
fair deal.TonyRockyHorror said:Dynasty league, I'm 0-3 and weak at RB. Put A. Jeffery on the trading block yesterday and got this offer: Lacey and TY HIlton, for Jeffery and 2015 1st round pick. I countered with Lacey and Michael Floyd, and got denied. Not sure what I expected for Jeffery, but just don't feel like I'm getting enough with Lacey/Hilton?Air Stich said:Care to post the best offer?Getting peppered with trade offers this week.
I was verbally offered Rashad Jennings yesterday, but the offer has been withdrawn.
I'd trade Alshon for Lacy but not the first for TY Hilton. Luck spreads the ball and there's 6 pass catchers in that offense. Guys like Hilton, VJax, Desean are lineup killers because 2/3rds of the time they score nothing. And when they go off, half the time you don't even need the extra points because you would have won anyway. I prefer consistent players, though.fair deal.TonyRockyHorror said:Dynasty league, I'm 0-3 and weak at RB. Put A. Jeffery on the trading block yesterday and got this offer: Lacey and TY HIlton, for Jeffery and 2015 1st round pick. I countered with Lacey and Michael Floyd, and got denied. Not sure what I expected for Jeffery, but just don't feel like I'm getting enough with Lacey/Hilton?Air Stich said:Care to post the best offer?Getting peppered with trade offers this week.
I was verbally offered Rashad Jennings yesterday, but the offer has been withdrawn.
If you really believe in Lacey and need a RB....you make that deal. Your trading Alshon for Lacey and your 1st rounder for TY Hilton. That is how you must look at it.
Hey Thanks Guys!I'd trade Alshon for Lacy but not the first for TY Hilton. Luck spreads the ball and there's 6 pass catchers in that offense. Guys like Hilton, VJax, Desean are lineup killers because 2/3rds of the time they score nothing. And when they go off, half the time you don't even need the extra points because you would have won anyway. I prefer consistent players, though.fair deal.TonyRockyHorror said:Dynasty league, I'm 0-3 and weak at RB. Put A. Jeffery on the trading block yesterday and got this offer: Lacey and TY HIlton, for Jeffery and 2015 1st round pick. I countered with Lacey and Michael Floyd, and got denied. Not sure what I expected for Jeffery, but just don't feel like I'm getting enough with Lacey/Hilton?Air Stich said:Care to post the best offer?Getting peppered with trade offers this week.
I was verbally offered Rashad Jennings yesterday, but the offer has been withdrawn.
If you really believe in Lacey and need a RB....you make that deal. Your trading Alshon for Lacey and your 1st rounder for TY Hilton. That is how you must look at it.
I'm considering giving Jeffery, so I would definitely do Garcon....But it depends on your other WR strength, and I'm also in a Dynasty so having a young primary RB is a plus.Would anybody sell Garcon high to buy Lacy low? I'm desperate at RB2, I'm starting McCluster for chrissakes
Well, it's because that's how they did it last year, and it worked then.I can tell you 100% why Starks has looked better....they're only running out of the Shotgun formation with draw runs. Starks has much more burst and will look better on draws out of the Shotgun. I just don't understand how you have a power back like Lacy and you are running this ridiculous offense.Ha
Has he? Honestly don't know as I've only been able to watch the Seattle week 1 game. In the replays I have seen Lacy is met in the backfield often, not much for him to do IMO. Starks has done a little more with a little less.Good point but explain why Starks looks better when he was in with this defences?Here is everything you need to know about the demise of Eddie Lacy.
Total Defense rankings in 2014 (per NFL.com):
1. Detroit Lions
2. New York Jets
8. Seattle Seahawks (despite playing against Manning, Rodgers, and Phillip Rivers-3 top playoff offenses from a year ago).
Week 1: Lacy had 12 carries for 34 yards vs Starks' 7 for 37.
Starks didn't get a touch week 2
Week 3: Lacy had 11 carries for 36 yards vs Starks' 8 for 38.
Its not like Starks is blowing him away?
Lacy has also caught 6 passes to Starks' 2
Oh, get off it. He played three of the top 5 run defenses in the league the first three games. What happened when McCoy played against ONE top 5 run defense? 3 points, that's what. I'm still on the Lacy train and think he finishes well in the top 10, if not top 5.I think Im going to offer Sproles for Lacy, non-ppr, but I almost feel like Im giving away too much.
Oh, get off it. He played three of the top 5 run defenses in the league the first three games. What happened when McCoy played against ONE top 5 run defense? 3 points, that's what. I'm still on the Lacy train and think he finishes well in the top 10, if not top 5.I think Im going to offer Sproles for Lacy, non-ppr, but I almost feel like Im giving away too much.
 
 This is the real concern. He doesn't have to get 100 and a TD, but his value drops entirely if he looks bad or gets dinged.Now, that being said, if he doesn't put up 100 yards and a TD this week you can forward all posts to suicide watch.
You got Lacy off the clearance rack.I Traded romo for lacy. 12 team ppr dynasty.
It's getting trade rapey in here.Just bought him for Mike Wallace.
I don't want to throw the R word around, but...
so you play with guppies?It's getting trade rapey in here.Just bought him for Mike Wallace.
I don't want to throw the R word around, but...
After I declined sanders/d.Brown the owner sold for Ridley/garcon standard
Well its a big money league with long time friends and that guy always makes horrible trades.so you play with guppies?It's getting trade rapey in here.After I declined sanders/d.Brown the owner sold for Ridley/garcon standardJust bought him for Mike Wallace.
I don't want to throw the R word around, but...
After watching film of the Week 3 loss at Detroit, Eddie Lacy said he needs to work on keeping his pads low.
Lacy is looking for answers as to why he's struggled so bad through three games. But the underlying stats are good, as his yards after contact per attempt and missed tackle rate are both up from last season. He's just been blown up in the backfield too often by three really elite run defenses. It's reasonable to think Lacy will break out against a Bears defense that ranks 26th in the NFL right now.
Source: Green Bay Press-Gazette
Sep 25 - 11:54 AM
I agree, doesn't look like the same guy as last year.Slow and fat. Sell low
the hold was why he scored though. He's looked pretty terribleBounced out for a nice TD run....called back by a flag..would've made 2 today
ok, I doubt anybody is checking this thread for kool-aid larry's draft breakdown, but I'll work off ffcalc for some thumbnail opinion.Kool-aid Larry....
Where do you have Lacy ranked and what are your projections for him?
first of all, I mostly look in these threads for opinion from others, but I did have a bit of an opinion of my own going in this time, as I had spent a fair amount of effort looking at green bay a couple years ago for some similar thread about starks, grant, or wtfever it was --- the conclusion I came up with is green bay is constantly throwing in the endzone, and even when they don't you get vultured by rodgers and kuhn, so the gb rb didn't really appeal to me, and I have yet to see much, if anything, contrary to that.
not only wasn't lacy's production boosted by rodgers, as people like to insist based on their imaginations, it might have actually been hurt by all these great surrounding players on this historic offense crowding out his td opps.
I'd prefer to look at it drive by drive, but I'm not doing that again.
The Packers throw the ball first and goal more than anyone I have ever seen. Very frustrating as a Lacy owner. I don't see many touchdowns this year for Lacy. Not getting enough touches for many yards either.
They complain about the run game not being what it should be, then proceed to execute a 3:1 pass/run ratio game plan. Why act surprised at the run game being poor when you have very little intention of establishing the run anyway?
1st and 3 from the 3 yard line, let's run the clock down a bit right? Nahhh, let's throw again! Lacy doesn't help himself but man this is some amazing game plan they have. Hey, it's working today though right
 
 He has danced some...but relatively few carries in a blow out with the Bears secondary being that bad...coupled with being hit at or near the line a lot.the hold was why he scored though. He's looked pretty terribleBounced out for a nice TD run....called back by a flag..would've made 2 today
I think facing Green Bay is why these three defenses look so good.Rotoworld:
After watching film of the Week 3 loss at Detroit, Eddie Lacy said he needs to work on keeping his pads low.
Lacy is looking for answers as to why he's struggled so bad through three games. But the underlying stats are good, as his yards after contact per attempt and missed tackle rate are both up from last season. He's just been blown up in the backfield too often by three really elite run defenses. It's reasonable to think Lacy will break out against a Bears defense that ranks 26th in the NFL right now.
Source: Green Bay Press-Gazette
Sep 25 - 11:54 AM
now the 4 best run defenses are behind himNow that the three best run defenses are behind him, let's see what he can do.
This sums it up quite well.A week ago--every Lacy supporter was blaming his ineptitude on Rodgers being off--as well as a tough schedule. Well today his QB was on fire--his team was moving the ball--and he was going against a very weak run defense---and in this dream scenario--he gets 48 yrds and a td?
 
 I think his dancing is still a symptom of poor blocking. If a back is approaching the LOS at what we might call a trot, he's patiently watching for the hole to appear but he's still going to get the linemen's backsides eventually. So if he does so and no hole really opens up he's got to choose between running up their backs, or he has to try and bounce it outside (which he isn't really built to do), or he dances a bit to buy some time hoping a crease eventually opens up that he can exploit.He has danced some...but relatively few carries in a blow out with the Bears secondary being that bad...coupled with being hit at or near the line a lot.the hold was why he scored though. He's looked pretty terribleBounced out for a nice TD run....called back by a flag..would've made 2 today
The run blocking was poor today.
He wasn't great...no doubt. Several times he just danced when running straight ahead would have given him a few more yards. But we are talking about maybe adding 20 more yards total.
But when Rodgers sees Conte on Cobb...they will throw it that way every time and be out of any though of running the ball.
