This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Oakland's Run D seems to be okay. I've learned over the last few week's that Maurile's projections are done ahead of time. Probably didn't factor in last week's performance. I don't pay attention to the early week projections any more after Maurile had Luck in them for 2 weeks in a row after he was ruled out for awhile.
I had a bye and had just acquired Lacy but I can imagine it was very frustrating for many to see Lacy well but Starks still getting high value snaps/touches throughout the game. If Lacy doesnt get the 4th quarter TD then its a different tune in this thread. And you're right that Dallas not sustaining anything on offense led to lots of plays and opportunities for both GB backs.
Of course. It's a question of whether Lacy is able to make the best of the carries. This does worry me.
I owned both til last week and trades Lacy for Rawls..obviously didn't turn out well but trusted Miller over Lacy is what I am trying to say
he had 11 carries and only averaged 2 yards per. At some point you can't keep killing drives by feeding the guy. He didn't have it today.
Lacy has always seemed like the type of back that needs 20-25 carries per game. He needs to get into a rhythm and mixing him and Starks (and Kuhn) up just hurts his production. Not just fantasy, I think it hurts the Packers offense to do that, when he is rumbling the offense just works so much better. It makes sense to bring in Starks for 3rd downs, stuff like that, but Lacy needs a feature back role to do well.
I can't do it, not in the super bowl. Not saying it can't happen but I would be very surprised if he has anywhere close to 80 and two td's.
I wouldn't be surprised if he had 20+ pts or if he had 2 points. It does seem that the Pack have been in this pattern of embracing the run and doing well on offense, and abondoning the run and performing badly. You'd think this week they would be focused on getting the ground game going, but it's too much of a risk for me in week 16.
This. I'll add that I'm looking to buy this offseason.
True, he's kind of been on this pattern of a crappy game then a good game. He was crap last week so he probably will blow up this week. So wish I could start him but I just can't bring myself....
Was lucky? enough to sell Lacy after his two good games last month in a dynasty for Bell.
I'm liking him just fine. Three years in the league, three titles for me. Always comes up big this time of year. Thanks PHAT Eddie.
