What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Anyone not like Eddie Lacy? (1 Viewer)

This just sounds like a really big waste of money.  3 million guaranteed plus you now have to stay on the guy and make sure he drops 20 pounds?  Good luck with that.
Lacy can be effective if he's stays healthy. Problem is his running style and his life style are not conducive to him staying healthy.

 
Lacy can be effective if he's stays healthy. Problem is his running style and his life style are not conducive to him staying healthy.
I agree if healthy.  But 3 million guaranteed before he loses a pound?  At 267lbs his market would be almost nil.  I think they could have made it more incentive laden.  Im not sure how motivated he will be to earn that extra 2 mil knowing he'll get another contract from another sucker in a year.  

 
On this team, he will have every chance in the world to rush for 12+ TDs, even if they are mainly short yardage goal line.  TDs are the great equalizer in ff for a rb so although he may not be svelte and rush for 1650/14, he will have very good value in ff considering on any given week he will be a legitimate threat for 1-2 short yardage TDs plus some game-killing yardage.  

 
On this team, he will have every chance in the world to rush for 12+ TDs, even if they are mainly short yardage goal line.  TDs are the great equalizer in ff for a rb so although he may not be svelte and rush for 1650/14, he will have very good value in ff considering on any given week he will be a legitimate threat for 1-2 short yardage TDs plus some game-killing yardage.  
Every week he's in uniform. How many weeks will that be?

 
Every week he's in uniform. How many weeks will that be?
That's true for any player and, as rbs go, lacy has been pretty durable.  I think if we are assuming it is a given he is going to miss games, we are probably over reacting to last year. The first three years of his career, he played in 15,16, and 15 games.  How many rbs in this league miss only two games in three years?  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
On this team, he will have every chance in the world to rush for 12+ TDs, even if they are mainly short yardage goal line.  TDs are the great equalizer in ff for a rb so although he may not be svelte and rush for 1650/14, he will have very good value in ff considering on any given week he will be a legitimate threat for 1-2 short yardage TDs plus some game-killing yardage.  
Seems extremely optimistic IMO.

 
That's true for any player and, as rbs go, lacy has been pretty durable.  I think if we are assuming it is a given he is going to miss games, we are probably over reacting to last year. The first three years of his career, he played in 15,16, and 15 games.  How many rbs in this league miss only two games in three years?  
He played in 15 games in 2015. You weren't happy if you drafted him though. He was pretty average and ineffective and he was struggling with his weight by most accounts. I just see a downward trend on this guy and weight seems to be a part of it. If he's in shape, I agree with all your points.

 
Seems extremely optimistic IMO.
I guess that is depending on perspective but I wouldn't say extremely in any case because marshawn Lynch pretty much put up that many TDs every year he was in Seattle while battling injuries. I think Seattle and their qb and skill players pose more stress on teams now than they did then in terms of options in the red zone.  I'm not saying I think lacy becomes a guy that wows us with 125+ and is a juggernaut but I can easily see 50 yards a game just based on situation and I think the seahawks seem to be one of those teams that find themselves in short yardage goal line situations quite a bit.  Just my thoughts 

 
I guess that is depending on perspective but I wouldn't say extremely in any case because marshawn Lynch pretty much put up that many TDs every year he was in Seattle while battling injuries. I think Seattle and their qb and skill players pose more stress on teams now than they did then in terms of options in the red zone.  I'm not saying I think lacy becomes a guy that wows us with 125+ and is a juggernaut but I can easily see 50 yards a game just based on situation and I think the seahawks seem to be one of those teams that find themselves in short yardage goal line situations quite a bit.  Just my thoughts 
Marshawn Lynch>>>>>>Eddie Lacy for starters, but I think you're way off-base about the current Seattle team. They only had 13 rushing TDs last year and 10 the year before, and that's team-wide. They have one of if not the worst offensive lines in the NFL.

 
On this team, he will have every chance in the world to rush for 12+ TDs, even if they are mainly short yardage goal line.  TDs are the great equalizer in ff for a rb so although he may not be svelte and rush for 1650/14, he will have very good value in ff considering on any given week he will be a legitimate threat for 1-2 short yardage TDs plus some game-killing yardage.  
Unless their line improves massively they are now a passing team. Also Rawls will get a piece of that pie.

 
267 Pounds? No bueno. Mt $$$ in on LACY being a bust and Rahls is the value play here. Grab Rahls on the cheap in all formats and sit on him. 

 
267 Pounds? No bueno. Mt $$$ in on LACY being a bust and Rahls is the value play here. Grab Rahls on the cheap in all formats and sit on him. 
Could be another Tampa Bay from last year. 3 decent backs but lots of different starters due to injury. Not calling Prosise injury prone but last year wasn't a great indicator of durability. Rauls injury history speaks for itself. Fatman is not on my target list either. The situation doesn't look very predictable or stable.

 
At 267 already are we certain they aren't asking him to just gain 27 more pounds to help with the O-line woes?
That would be done by May. Could have some creative OL reporting eligible formations

If he gets to training camp below 250 I'll be pretty surprised. If he keeps the weight off I'd be even more surprised. 

My prediction: He's out of football after this contract. I hope he has a good investment firm. 

 
He doesnt weigh 267, lol. If you believe that, I got a timeshare to sell you on. The photo of him getting off a plane is nowhere near what a guy who weighs 267 looks like.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, he lied. He is sharing a bitter dudes report of an "un-named" team. i have eyes >>> https://twitter.com/christomasson/status/841687173015429121

 
OK. I'll trust your eyes over an independent reporter with inside information on what the scale actually said. Fair enough
Obviously I have no idea, but admit that he looks pretty good in that picture. He's look a lot more sloppy if he was 267.

It would also be hard to believe that the Hawks would sign him for $5.5MM ($3MM guaranteed?) if he was pushing 270. They're a pretty well run organization. That would seem pretty irresponsible. 

 
Obviously I have no idea, but admit that he looks pretty good in that picture. He's look a lot more sloppy if he was 267.

It would also be hard to believe that the Hawks would sign him for $5.5MM ($3MM guaranteed?) if he was pushing 270. They're a pretty well run organization. That would seem pretty irresponsible. 
MIN GB and SEA offered similar contracts. He took Seattle to be in a run-first offense. Seattle's deal has weight incentives built into it. 

 
MIN GB and SEA offered similar contracts. He took Seattle to be in a run-first offense. Seattle's deal has weight incentives built into it. 
Minny isn't expected to be a run first offense? Seems like least competition for him in Minny. SEA has shifted away from Run first. What am I missing here? 

 
Minny isn't expected to be a run first offense? Seems like least competition for him in Minny. SEA has shifted away from Run first. What am I missing here? 
MIN OL was horrid for running the ball. Seattle went away from running the ball but historically they re run first. Wikson had his worst season ever being asked to carry the team. That team works better with Wilson managing the game and them running the ball. 

 
I have no doubt he is maybe 245ish in that pick based off height and size. He looks to have a belly still, but he always has. I have a coworker about his size in height but much bigger and he is sloppy. He weighs 280. If Lacy is 267, he hides it well. Muscle is more tight and fat is fluffy, but it weighs the same.

I broke down a dudes weight way too much bordering on creepy levels. gotta step away, lol.

 
MIN OL was horrid for running the ball. Seattle went away from running the ball but historically they re run first. Wikson had his worst season ever being asked to carry the team. That team works better with Wilson managing the game and them running the ball. 
Yeah no

 
Care to elaborate? Which part don't you agree with?

MIN had a bad OL and couldn't run the ball?

SEA is better when they run first?

Wilson had his worst statistical season as a pro while SEA didn't run the ball last year?

all of that can be backed up by facts, records and statistics 

 
Wilson had his worst statistical season as a pro while SEA didn't run the ball last year?
Pretty sure his passing numbers were pretty similar to other years but his rushing was way way down.   Unless you count all the running for his life he was doing behind the line because they couldn't block for poop.

 
Care to elaborate? Which part don't you agree with?

MIN had a bad OL and couldn't run the ball?

SEA is better when they run first?

Wilson had his worst statistical season as a pro while SEA didn't run the ball last year?

all of that can be backed up by facts, records and statistics 
Wilson was hurt for most of the season.  I think Seattle is trying to be more of a passing team. They were a running team when they had Beast mode and Wilson was less experienced. But whether they're a pass first or run first team neither will work with a crappy OL.

 
Lacy in that pic could be 267.  But it would be surprising.  The implication would be that he's got a lot of muscle and high muscle density (because muscle weighs more than fat).  In that pic he looks like 255 to me. That's not to say that he didn't lose the weight between visits.  If an athlete who has put on some pounds goes on a crash diet/doesn't stuff their face for 5 days, there's a chance they could drop 10 lbs.

He could do great in Seattle if they draft Oline in the first 2 rounds.

 
Pretty sure his passing numbers were pretty similar to other years but his rushing was way way down.   Unless you count all the running for his life he was doing behind the line because they couldn't block for poop.
Career low for passer rating
Career High for INT
Career high in passing yards/attempts.

I don't think that's a ringing endorsement for Wilson to get the workload of Aaron Rodgers

Sure comparing those numbers to the next one down isn't terrible however the biggest issue IMO is comparing him to 2015. He had an amazing season in 2015 and a huge let down in 16 compared to then, when they ran the ball an awful lot more (477 attempts in 2015 vs 283 in 2016)

 
Back to Eddie Lacy, lol

If the guy in this picture looks like he weighed in 267 this week, your opinion on things is of no value to anyone any more. :laughing emoticon:
https://twitter.com/Seahawks/status/842203593411244032

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That is the source, but the guy writing it forgot people still have eyes.
Also after the BeastMode line, prepare for some "FeastMode" remarks. :laughing emoticon:

 
That is the source, but the guy writing it forgot people still have eyes.
Also after the BeastMode line, prepare for some "FeastMode" remarks. :laughing emoticon:
He's always looked like a slim fat guy TBH. But regardless I think arguing over what we see vs what's reported is just worthless. We can agree to disagree on this 

 
Well, we dont want to use your eyes Brew. lol
And for that matter, did you even see a scale or you taking a hack jobs word for it?

 
Well, we dont want to use your eyes Brew. lol
And for that matter, did you even see a scale or you taking a hack jobs word for it?
hack job :lol: whatever fits your talking points. :rolleyes:  Again, I'm done debating subjective versus objective information. It's like comparing apples to corned beef. Keep telling yourself whatever you need to make you feel better about your team. I see this every day in my job. It's not worth my time to debate it. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ironic Brew, as you brought it back up with your remark, not me. This time, make sure you are actually done debating it. ;-)
Lacy is a fat man, no one disagrees, but 267? Naive to think that. Its so amazing people see that picture and say he is 267.
There are multiple pictures circulating, none look at 267. Google what a guy who is 5'11 and 270 looks like.
My guess is 250 ish right now. The numbers in the incentive line up.

Field Yates ‏ 33minutes ago
Eddie Lacy's weight incentives breakdown ($55k for each month achieved)
May: 255 lbs
June & August: 250 lbs
September-December: 245 lbs

I wanna add, what is up with talking positive about a player mean you own them or have an agenda? Are people that simple minded and short sighted? Do we have to constantly talk negative about players to feel cool and accepted?

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top