NO. Stop being reasonable. Pick a side, and flip the frick out.A couple of big time throws, but lots of inaccurate passes. Too early to call one way or the other.
Shouldn't the QBs college performance play some small part in this decision?if I was the owner of the team with the #1 pick in the spring Arch would be the easy choice
Bernie Kosar. He had a tough first start as a redshirt freshman in 1983 at the Swamp in a 28-3 loss. He won his next 11 games for the U culminating in a 31-30 win over Nebraska as a big underdog in the Orange Bowl game. National Champs. First overall draft by the Browns in the "Supplemental Draft."NO. Stop being reasonable. Pick a side, and flip the frick out.A couple of big time throws, but lots of inaccurate passes. Too early to call one way or the other.
And Joe Burrow couldn't beat out Dwayne Haskins, Jalen Hurts couldn't beat out Tua Tagovailoa, Tom Brady couldn't beat out Drew Henson or Brian Griese, Drew Brees sat behind Billy Dicken and the list goes on and on. It doesn't matter.He didn't beat out Quinn Ewers who wasn't good.This guy is legit. Anyone who says otherwise just just hating the name and the pub he gets after having not done much. What he does in the pros is anyone's guess, but he's going to be a top 5 pick.
EDIT - He can have a bad game and have the above be true. I can acknowledge he made some dumb decisions and bad passes today. He also made some throws that were.
It could happen in spite of Jerry's faults. If a team with a real #1 QB has them go down early in the season with an ACL (it's happened enough) and finishes last or if a team with a real #1 simply has a terrible year and finishes last, I could see them fleecing the Cowboys for 3 1st rounders and possibly more to move up to 1. That would be a crazy haul, heck, knowing what Dallas has to offer it might be worth tanking as a middling NFL team with a great QB (Bengals? Chargers?)? If a team like Indy or NO or Miami finish last and Arch comes out, it's a wrap.Jerry Jones is playing 3D chess to land him, be ready.
Theres no way you watched Texas today and said there's a great qb.Looked like a great QB starting his first college game in a hostile environment against the best team in the country.
Some errant throws, but absolutely the real deal. I’m not a heavy college guy but if I was the owner of the team with the #1 pick in the spring Arch would be the easy choice.
I think probably the very last thing you said is the best. There was always just too much hype. I can garuntee you I would have not heard of him if his name wasnt Manning. There's plenty of top QB prospects who aren't nationally famous before they even play in college. There's also plenty of top QB prospects who end up not being very good either.I don't get it. Was he getting by on name? Was it nerves? I don't follow college football until late in the season, so I'm unaware if maybe in our haywire world where we're looking for stability if maybe we're looking in the wrong place based on name. Is that the case?
Also, he's young and this was his first game? Jeez. Let's not only give it time for him to develop into something potentially special but back off from anointing him as anything yet.
Shouldn't the QBs college performance play some small part in this decision?if I was the owner of the team with the #1 pick in the spring Arch would be the easy choice
This is the guy we should have listened to.Peyton's son Marshall also is worth taking a look at. He's only 10, but he's in the 95th percentile in height and already stands tall in the pocket when facing blitzes from 11 year olds.
That’s just way too reasonable of an approach for a FF forum.Shouldn't the QBs college performance play some small part in this decision?if I was the owner of the team with the #1 pick in the spring Arch would be the easy choice
This is the way.NO. Stop being reasonable. Pick a side, and flip the frick out.
When evaluating college players I pay particularly close attention when their team is evenly matched or outmatched. It’s easy to run up numbers on cupcakes, but when evenly matched or worse you get some good evidence on how skills may translate to the next level, even though NFL Ds are far superior to their college counterparts.
This was one of those opportunities for Manning and he laid an egg IMO. He had some bad college level misses on what were open throws, and NFL windows are a lot tighter than what he saw yesterday. His mechanics are questionable when he’s feeling pressure and he looked a bit panicked more often than not.
This was a chance to put his team on his back and lift them up, like the guys who transfer well do, and he failed. Not sure how anyone watching yesterday saw any kind of good performance. He’s got a lot of work to do and his name is only going to get his foot in the door at the next level. After that he’s going to have to prove it while likely being under extreme scrutiny - maybe even more than Taylor Swift at a Chiefs game.
He actually looks pretty decent lolThis is the guy we should have listened to.Peyton's son Marshall also is worth taking a look at. He's only 10, but he's in the 95th percentile in height and already stands tall in the pocket when facing blitzes from 11 year olds.
Maybe next year.Looked awful. Waited 3 years for this? Heisman my ***
He comes from a family of generational wealth, non-factor imo.I wonder how much being the highest-paid college player will factor into his development. We have seen plenty of guys get a good contract and slack off. He makes a lot for someone his age. Does he still have the drive to improve?
One single game. Let’s check back just prior to the 2027 NFL draft.He ain’t it
It's one game guys.He ain’t it
was one of the first in here to negatively criticize his performance, but one game in a tough environment isn't enough to throw dirt on his graveHe ain’t it
Chase Daniel
ARCH MANNING in the 1st Qtr….think he will be okay
6/9, 101 YDS, 2 TDS