What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Are Aliens Visiting Us? (6 Viewers)

The closest solar systems to our are Alpha Centauri and Proxima Centauri. Both are ~25 trillion miles away. Next closest? ~38-40 trillion miles away.

That's a lot of gas...

unless they are traveling via mechanisms we haven't defined yet...like dimensions etc.

700 years ago, Europe didn't know North America existed.

We have a lot to learn.

150 ago these devices we are all typing on and communicating through would have felt like magic.

We went from flight of any kind being a dream to landing humans on the moon in under 65 yrs.

Point being, a civilization doesn’t need to be that far ahead of us in terms of years to be accomplishing things we can only dream of.
 
The closest solar systems to our are Alpha Centauri and Proxima Centauri. Both are ~25 trillion miles away. Next closest? ~38-40 trillion miles away.

That's a lot of gas...

unless they are traveling via mechanisms we haven't defined yet...like dimensions etc.

700 years ago, Europe didn't know North America existed.

We have a lot to learn.

150 ago these devices we are all typing on and communicating through would have felt like magic.

We went from flight of any kind being a dream to landing humans on the moon in under 65 yrs.

Point being, a civilization doesn’t need to be that far ahead of us in terms of years to be accomplishing things we can only dream of.

:penalty:
 
The closest solar systems to our are Alpha Centauri and Proxima Centauri. Both are ~25 trillion miles away. Next closest? ~38-40 trillion miles away.

That's a lot of gas...

unless they are traveling via mechanisms we haven't defined yet...like dimensions etc.

700 years ago, Europe didn't know North America existed.

We have a lot to learn.

150 ago these devices we are all typing on and communicating through would have felt like magic.

We went from flight of any kind being a dream to landing humans on the moon in under 65 yrs.

Point being, a civilization doesn’t need to be that far ahead of us in terms of years to be accomplishing things we can only dream of.

:penalty:
Don’t go there. Lol
 
I saw this today from Dan Farrah of Rogan
The Age of Disclosure director/producer Dan Farah tells Joe Rogan the U.S. conducted nuclear weapon tests with the specific intent to recover crashed UFOs.

Farah: “One of the realizations early on was that atomic weapon testing has a ripple effect that can down these things. So they started doing it.”

Rogan: “They did it on purpose?”

Farah: “Yeah. And so did Russia.”
 
I saw this today from Dan Farrah of Rogan
The Age of Disclosure director/producer Dan Farah tells Joe Rogan the U.S. conducted nuclear weapon tests with the specific intent to recover crashed UFOs.

Farah: “One of the realizations early on was that atomic weapon testing has a ripple effect that can down these things. So they started doing it.”

Rogan: “They did it on purpose?”

Farah: “Yeah. And so did Russia.”
Rogan. 😂😂😂.
 
I saw this today from Dan Farrah of Rogan
The Age of Disclosure director/producer Dan Farah tells Joe Rogan the U.S. conducted nuclear weapon tests with the specific intent to recover crashed UFOs.

Farah: “One of the realizations early on was that atomic weapon testing has a ripple effect that can down these things. So they started doing it.”

Rogan: “They did it on purpose?”

Farah: “Yeah. And so did Russia.”
Rogan. 😂😂😂.
Can't really say I'm a Rogan fan, but is that really a knock? He had Ken Burns on to talk about his Revolutionary War doc recently aswell. Just part of the media tour in 2025.

As a side note, $24.99!!??!! I don't think so :lol:
 
I saw this today from Dan Farrah of Rogan
The Age of Disclosure director/producer Dan Farah tells Joe Rogan the U.S. conducted nuclear weapon tests with the specific intent to recover crashed UFOs.

Farah: “One of the realizations early on was that atomic weapon testing has a ripple effect that can down these things. So they started doing it.”

Rogan: “They did it on purpose?”

Farah: “Yeah. And so did Russia.”
Rogan. 😂😂😂.
Can't really say I'm a Rogan fan, but is that really a knock? He had Ken Burns on to talk about his Revolutionary War doc recently aswell. Just part of the media tour in 2025.

As a side note, $24.99!!??!! I don't think so :lol:
I get that Rogan has a huge audience. But man he seems like a real tool. If I was Ken Burns type famous I doubt I would stoop to Rogan level media despite the eyes and ears he gets
 
Just finished watching. It’s impressive. For people who have been following this topic I’m not sure there is a ton new information, but to see all of these incredibly credentialed and credible people all in one place undeniably saying this is real is a wow moment. The language being used by everyone involved is not vague or couched, it’s definitive and direct.

I’m really not sure how anyone can watch it and doubt what is being told to the audience.

My wife, who is not into this type of stuff at all and classifies herself as a nonbeliever, was blown away.
 
Last edited:
I saw this today from Dan Farrah of Rogan
The Age of Disclosure director/producer Dan Farah tells Joe Rogan the U.S. conducted nuclear weapon tests with the specific intent to recover crashed UFOs.

Farah: “One of the realizations early on was that atomic weapon testing has a ripple effect that can down these things. So they started doing it.”

Rogan: “They did it on purpose?”

Farah: “Yeah. And so did Russia.”
Rogan. 😂😂😂.
Can't really say I'm a Rogan fan, but is that really a knock? He had Ken Burns on to talk about his Revolutionary War doc recently aswell. Just part of the media tour in 2025.

As a side note, $24.99!!??!! I don't think so :lol:
I get that Rogan has a huge audience. But man he seems like a real tool. If I was Ken Burns type famous I doubt I would stoop to Rogan level media despite the eyes and ears he gets
Yeah, I can understand that, but regardless of what people may think of Rogan good or bad, Ken Burns did use his platform to promote his work. I'm just saying that appearing on Rogan's podcast isn't reserved for conspiracies and the fringe (ofcourse there's plenty of that), but mainstream and highly regarded people also promote using his platform. Which is why I don't think it's automatically a knock on the guest. His platform is part of the media promotion now.
 
I saw this today from Dan Farrah of Rogan
The Age of Disclosure director/producer Dan Farah tells Joe Rogan the U.S. conducted nuclear weapon tests with the specific intent to recover crashed UFOs.

Farah: “One of the realizations early on was that atomic weapon testing has a ripple effect that can down these things. So they started doing it.”

Rogan: “They did it on purpose?”

Farah: “Yeah. And so did Russia.”
Rogan. 😂😂😂.
Can't really say I'm a Rogan fan, but is that really a knock? He had Ken Burns on to talk about his Revolutionary War doc recently aswell. Just part of the media tour in 2025.

As a side note, $24.99!!??!! I don't think so :lol:
I get that Rogan has a huge audience. But man he seems like a real tool. If I was Ken Burns type famous I doubt I would stoop to Rogan level media despite the eyes and ears he gets
Where else are you going to get 2-3 hours to have a conversation that you can direct in a direction you want and isn’t edited for time constraints?
 
I saw this today from Dan Farrah of Rogan
The Age of Disclosure director/producer Dan Farah tells Joe Rogan the U.S. conducted nuclear weapon tests with the specific intent to recover crashed UFOs.

Farah: “One of the realizations early on was that atomic weapon testing has a ripple effect that can down these things. So they started doing it.”

Rogan: “They did it on purpose?”

Farah: “Yeah. And so did Russia.”
Rogan. 😂😂😂.
Can't really say I'm a Rogan fan, but is that really a knock? He had Ken Burns on to talk about his Revolutionary War doc recently aswell. Just part of the media tour in 2025.

As a side note, $24.99!!??!! I don't think so :lol:
I get that Rogan has a huge audience. But man he seems like a real tool. If I was Ken Burns type famous I doubt I would stoop to Rogan level media despite the eyes and ears he gets
Where else are you going to get 2-3 hours to have a conversation that you can direct in a direction you want and isn’t edited for time constraints?
Yeah, but Rogan. 🙄
 
Watched the 4 minute Dan Farrah interview with Jake Tapper last night
I saw this today from Dan Farrah of Rogan
The Age of Disclosure director/producer Dan Farah tells Joe Rogan the U.S. conducted nuclear weapon tests with the specific intent to recover crashed UFOs.

Farah: “One of the realizations early on was that atomic weapon testing has a ripple effect that can down these things. So they started doing it.”

Rogan: “They did it on purpose?”

Farah: “Yeah. And so did Russia.”
Rogan. 😂😂😂.
Can't really say I'm a Rogan fan, but is that really a knock? He had Ken Burns on to talk about his Revolutionary War doc recently aswell. Just part of the media tour in 2025.

As a side note, $24.99!!??!! I don't think so :lol:
I get that Rogan has a huge audience. But man he seems like a real tool. If I was Ken Burns type famous I doubt I would stoop to Rogan level media despite the eyes and ears he gets
Where else are you going to get 2-3 hours to have a conversation that you can direct in a direction you want and isn’t edited for time constraints?
jake tapper gave him 4 minutes

Harrumph
 
I saw this today from Dan Farrah of Rogan
The Age of Disclosure director/producer Dan Farah tells Joe Rogan the U.S. conducted nuclear weapon tests with the specific intent to recover crashed UFOs.

Farah: “One of the realizations early on was that atomic weapon testing has a ripple effect that can down these things. So they started doing it.”

Rogan: “They did it on purpose?”

Farah: “Yeah. And so did Russia.”
Rogan. 😂😂😂.
Can't really say I'm a Rogan fan, but is that really a knock? He had Ken Burns on to talk about his Revolutionary War doc recently aswell. Just part of the media tour in 2025.

As a side note, $24.99!!??!! I don't think so :lol:
I get that Rogan has a huge audience. But man he seems like a real tool. If I was Ken Burns type famous I doubt I would stoop to Rogan level media despite the eyes and ears he gets
You think Joe Rogan is a tool?
You can choose to not listen or have any respect for him, you're right to do so but...
That guy has amazing guests on and let's them talk for hours with very few commercial interruptions when I'm streaming on YT at home

A tool to me is someone who is kind of a puppet and just spitting out whatever the network tells them to
I don't feel that Rogan models that. I wish you would describe him with a different derogatory term, I do respect your right to not enjoy his brand of entertainment
I feel like Rogan was kind of a trailblazer that others have tried to emulate or launch their own, Bill Maher and Club Random comes to mind

Cheers Bud
 
I would like to know if the aliens are visiting the Nuke sites as reported...
Why don't we have amazing footage in high resolution of something flying around there?
Certainly the nuke sites have the best security and cameras and god only knows what but they can't snap a photo or get a video of the spacecrafts?
 
I saw this today from Dan Farrah of Rogan
The Age of Disclosure director/producer Dan Farah tells Joe Rogan the U.S. conducted nuclear weapon tests with the specific intent to recover crashed UFOs.

Farah: “One of the realizations early on was that atomic weapon testing has a ripple effect that can down these things. So they started doing it.”

Rogan: “They did it on purpose?”

Farah: “Yeah. And so did Russia.”
Have you seen the documentary yet?

-When they start mentioning that there is unual UFO activity around the Nuke Sites...it sounds like a movie
We've awaken the aliens deep down in the oceans where they reside and they're not happy that humans have Nuclear Weapons...

I guess the countries that have them will agree at once to get rid of them, should be an easy fix
 
Watched the 4 minute Dan Farrah interview with Jake Tapper last night
I saw this today from Dan Farrah of Rogan
The Age of Disclosure director/producer Dan Farah tells Joe Rogan the U.S. conducted nuclear weapon tests with the specific intent to recover crashed UFOs.

Farah: “One of the realizations early on was that atomic weapon testing has a ripple effect that can down these things. So they started doing it.”

Rogan: “They did it on purpose?”

Farah: “Yeah. And so did Russia.”
Rogan. 😂😂😂.
Can't really say I'm a Rogan fan, but is that really a knock? He had Ken Burns on to talk about his Revolutionary War doc recently aswell. Just part of the media tour in 2025.

As a side note, $24.99!!??!! I don't think so :lol:
I get that Rogan has a huge audience. But man he seems like a real tool. If I was Ken Burns type famous I doubt I would stoop to Rogan level media despite the eyes and ears he gets
Where else are you going to get 2-3 hours to have a conversation that you can direct in a direction you want and isn’t edited for time constraints?
jake tapper gave him 4 minutes

Harrumph
Conversely, his Rogen interview was 2+ hrs and fantastic
 
I would like to know if the aliens are visiting the Nuke sites as reported...
Why don't we have amazing footage in high resolution of something flying around there?
Certainly the nuke sites have the best security and cameras and god only knows what but they can't snap a photo or get a video of the spacecrafts?
We do. They just haven’t been declassified to be able to be shown. Jay Stratton talks about that in this interview. He says they have undeniable clear video evidence. He just can’t release it.
 
I hate the way Joe Rogan admits that he knows nothing and just listens to people and ask questions.

He’s a monster
And the way he actually lets people with different viewpoints all the political spectrum come on his show. How dare he?
:shrug:
Sorry, I find the guy annoying and kinda dumb.
Sure, certainly you’re right. I’m not a fan of Tucker Carlson, but the guy has some fantastic guests from time to time.
 
I hate the way Joe Rogan admits that he knows nothing and just listens to people and ask questions.

He’s a monster
And the way he actually lets people with different viewpoints all the political spectrum come on his show. How dare he?
:shrug:
Sorry, I find the guy annoying and kinda dumb.
If it matters, I don't think his stand up comedy is particularly good, much better at his day job IMHO
Rogan listened to Art Bell in the over night as did some of us as well as overnight sports talk shows on other stations, bell was the guy who would bring on someone claiming to be abducted by aliens, that's where a lot of the UFO stuff was put out in the open for the public to digest, overnight radio shows

-Your entitled to not like the guy, no big deal
I just think most people would enjoy Rogan's show, i don't listen daily, it depends on the guest he is talking to

He interviewed Robert Rodriguez the film maker earlier this year and it's one of the more incredible interviews I've heard.
Rodriguez pulls back the curtain on how he makes scripts, films, it's kinda fascinating if you have the time
 
Link to the government conceding these phenomena are actual somethings "flying with purpose"? (As opposed to a UAP appearing to)

We were discussing how I used craft, that’s how I described what I meant not what the government said. I’m not sure what you mean or are implying with your part in the parentheses

Link to the government admitting that these phenomena can't be explained by conventional means? Mick explains what it could be or is most likely to be - when has the government said that it couldn't be explained that way? (Rather than simply saying they can't be sure)

I feel like this is a semantics game here, I don’t really understand where you’re going with it. If Mick claims something could be an airplane, and the government comes out and says after a bunch of analysis we can’t identify what it is. Don’t you think they thought about the possibility it was a plane, especially since they’ve eliminated 95% plus of the other things as such?* These people’s literal job is to determine exactly what’s on these videos and have access to the technology and source data yet Mick at home on his computer can determine what is where they can’t? And to be clear, they don’t couch their statements as “that’s most likely a plane but we can’t be sure so we classified it UAP”. They’ve ruled out the plane explanation, they just can’t come up with a good explanation for what it is.

* to be clear I’m not implying that they’re saying they don’t know then makes it an alien craft. But whatever it is, alien, China, Russia or Doc Browns flux capacitor, it’s absolutely worthy of further investigation to determine exactly what they are.

Or just "good" evidence. Heck, I'd take some "decent" evidence at this point before thinking it should be a bigger story
Again, this is just where we differ. But if you don’t think some of the most highly trained credible people in the world, and we’re not talking about one or two at this point but many (people we trust with 10’s of millions of dollars of aircraft and to make life or death decisions based on their observational skills and decision making in combat) witnessing crafts fly in ways that far and away defy any known craft and conventional technology then back that up with radar and LIDAR as not even “decent” evidence, well I’m not sure what meets your criteria for decent.
I don't think it's just semantics. I think you, like many people out there, are misrepresenting what the government has officially said and are filling in the gaps between what they said and what they didn't say with your own thoughts and assumptions.

There's a clear difference between saying that a video "appears to show something that is moving in a way we can't explain" and that it "definitively shows a craft (however you want to define that) moving in a way we can't explain." The first leaves open the possibility that what we see is not quite as it appears. The government says the first while people assume they mean the second and declare it as truth.

And of course I expect that they thought about whether these phenomena are caused by things like planes. You say they obviously ruled out that possibility because they didn't couch their statements by saying that it was still a possibility or probability, yet they also didn't couch their statements by saying that it's possible it's aliens, so did they rule out aliens, too? Not saying something definitively is something does not equal saying that it definitively is not something.
 
I strongly disagree that starting with the assumption that aliens are involved is equally as valid as starting with the assumption that there are other, more mundane explanations. My wife woke me up last night because she heard a big thump downstairs. I went down and looked around and didn't see anything before going back to bed. I could start with the assumption that it was a ghost, or that it was a small meteorite hitting my door, or I could start with the assumption that it had a more likely normal explanation. Turned out it was just the heavy door to a foldup cabinet that wasn't closed all the way and fell down on the desk part. I mean, I guess it could still be ghosts that pulled it down, but why go there when we have gravity?
IMO, the issue is how disinterested the public is when it comes to this topic, and that’s where the conditioning part comes in play. To use your analogy of the thump downstairs, your prior probability that it’s someone trying to harm your family isn’t gonna be very high. Indeed, it’s most likely your cat being silly. But, given that it could be something quite nefarious, you’re at least gonna get out of bed to check it out…
Of course it's worthy of investigation. As far as I'm concerned, where we're at is where I was in getting out of bed to check. Limited data to work with - a sound someone heard or thought they heard, poor lighting when I looked around, etc. My point was that I went back to bed without being able to explain the phenomenon but assuming it was something more mundane than ghosts, aliens, etc. And my assumption turned out to be valid, as most things do when the picture is more clear in the light of day.
 
I saw this today from Dan Farrah of Rogan
The Age of Disclosure director/producer Dan Farah tells Joe Rogan the U.S. conducted nuclear weapon tests with the specific intent to recover crashed UFOs.

Farah: “One of the realizations early on was that atomic weapon testing has a ripple effect that can down these things. So they started doing it.”

Rogan: “They did it on purpose?”

Farah: “Yeah. And so did Russia.”
Have you seen the documentary yet?

-When they start mentioning that there is unual UFO activity around the Nuke Sites...it sounds like a movie
We've awaken the aliens deep down in the oceans where they reside and they're not happy that humans have Nuclear Weapons...

I guess the countries that have them will agree at once to get rid of them, should be an easy fix
No Im waiting for normal streaming. Looks good and I feel like I know about 90% of what’s in it. Really think this is great for someone just looking at this issue. I jumped into it after the NYT 2017 article.
I listened to the Farrah interview on Rogan while doing some work around the house this morning. Good show , the nuke stuff is wild. They even got into Jimmy Carter talking about remote viewing. Crazy
 
Link to the government conceding these phenomena are actual somethings "flying with purpose"? (As opposed to a UAP appearing to)

We were discussing how I used craft, that’s how I described what I meant not what the government said. I’m not sure what you mean or are implying with your part in the parentheses

Link to the government admitting that these phenomena can't be explained by conventional means? Mick explains what it could be or is most likely to be - when has the government said that it couldn't be explained that way? (Rather than simply saying they can't be sure)

I feel like this is a semantics game here, I don’t really understand where you’re going with it. If Mick claims something could be an airplane, and the government comes out and says after a bunch of analysis we can’t identify what it is. Don’t you think they thought about the possibility it was a plane, especially since they’ve eliminated 95% plus of the other things as such?* These people’s literal job is to determine exactly what’s on these videos and have access to the technology and source data yet Mick at home on his computer can determine what is where they can’t? And to be clear, they don’t couch their statements as “that’s most likely a plane but we can’t be sure so we classified it UAP”. They’ve ruled out the plane explanation, they just can’t come up with a good explanation for what it is.

* to be clear I’m not implying that they’re saying they don’t know then makes it an alien craft. But whatever it is, alien, China, Russia or Doc Browns flux capacitor, it’s absolutely worthy of further investigation to determine exactly what they are.

Or just "good" evidence. Heck, I'd take some "decent" evidence at this point before thinking it should be a bigger story
Again, this is just where we differ. But if you don’t think some of the most highly trained credible people in the world, and we’re not talking about one or two at this point but many (people we trust with 10’s of millions of dollars of aircraft and to make life or death decisions based on their observational skills and decision making in combat) witnessing crafts fly in ways that far and away defy any known craft and conventional technology then back that up with radar and LIDAR as not even “decent” evidence, well I’m not sure what meets your criteria for decent.
I don't think it's just semantics. I think you, like many people out there, are misrepresenting what the government has officially said and are filling in the gaps between what they said and what they didn't say with your own thoughts and assumptions.

There's a clear difference between saying that a video "appears to show something that is moving in a way we can't explain" and that it "definitively shows a craft (however you want to define that) moving in a way we can't explain." The first leaves open the possibility that what we see is not quite as it appears. The government says the first while people assume they mean the second and declare it as truth.

And of course I expect that they thought about whether these phenomena are caused by things like planes. You say they obviously ruled out that possibility because they didn't couch their statements by saying that it was still a possibility or probability, yet they also didn't couch their statements by saying that it's possible it's aliens, so did they rule out aliens, too? Not saying something definitively is something does not equal saying that it definitively is not something.
I suggest you watch Age of Disclosure. The language used by all is incredibly clear.
 
I don't think his stand up comedy is particularly good,
This is probably clouding my judgement. I find his stand up routine to be just about the worst out there. So amazingly unfunny to me.
I don’t get his standup. Horrible, imo
This. His stand up is so bad it sours me on him overall. It's so unfunny it's hard to listen to him about anything, though with the right guest I'll occasionally tune in.

Rogan aside, curiosity is getting the better of me and I'll either sail the high seas or pony up the $20 bucks next week. From what i gather there's not really much I'll find new information, but having it all presented in a well done documentary with so many reputable accounts seems worth a watch.
 
I don't think his stand up comedy is particularly good,
This is probably clouding my judgement. I find his stand up routine to be just about the worst out there. So amazingly unfunny to me.
I don’t get his standup. Horrible, imo
This. His stand up is so bad it sours me on him overall. It's so unfunny it's hard to listen to him about anything, though with the right guest I'll occasionally tune in.

Rogan aside, curiosity is getting the better of me and I'll either sail the high seas or pony up the $20 bucks next week. From what i gather there's not really much I'll find new information, but having it all presented in a well done documentary with so many reputable accounts seems worth a watch.
This comment from Dan Farrah was interesting form his Rogan interview

"Reverse-engineered UAPs in space, capable of deep space travel."

"Some of the UAPs that have been seen by our astronauts during missions are NHI... and some are reverse-engineered craft."
 
I don't think his stand up comedy is particularly good,
This is probably clouding my judgement. I find his stand up routine to be just about the worst out there. So amazingly unfunny to me.
I don’t get his standup. Horrible, imo
This. His stand up is so bad it sours me on him overall. It's so unfunny it's hard to listen to him about anything, though with the right guest I'll occasionally tune in.

Rogan aside, curiosity is getting the better of me and I'll either sail the high seas or pony up the $20 bucks next week. From what i gather there's not really much I'll find new information, but having it all presented in a well done documentary with so many reputable accounts seems worth a watch.
This comment from Dan Farrah was interesting form his Rogan interview

"Reverse-engineered UAPs in space, capable of deep space travel."

"Some of the UAPs that have been seen by our astronauts during missions are NHI... and some are reverse-engineered craft."
That starts to muddy up the waters doesn't it? I think from my perspective there's enough smoke there must be atleast a little fire even if it's our own tech.

Regardless of the language the government/military uses to describe these encounters/sightings they're unexplained. Skepticism is understandable, but a hard look at what is being said by some pretty serious people deserves some attention. I'll have to check out his interview when i get a chance. The little bit I've seen is interesting to say the least.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top